I agree with you partially.
he's not a tool for spending that amount of money on headphones [it can defnitely be worth it if you get the right ones] but for buying headphones that are a fshion statement, rather than functional. really expensive and good headphones don't look that different from cheap ones, so they're safe to wear in public. beats, on the other hand, are like jewelry. flaunt your jewelry, and it will get stolen. simple as that.

if there beats then no, bad sound quality, beats are terrible.

they dont have bad sound quality

they do for what they cost. i.e i can pay half the price for the same quality.

theyre not that expensive where i am. The sound quality is actually pretty good. its just everyone jumping on the bandwagon hate for beats. they look good and they play audio pretty well

how much are they where you are?

£90

rightttt, my razer headset was £60, has much better sound quality then beats.

i dont have a razor headset so i cant say if thats true or not and i cant take the word of someone who bandwagon

well, ive used beats, and trust me, my razer has better sound quality. Im not really on the bandwagon, i more have justified reasons for hating beats, example, the only people i know who own them are douches (not implying your a douche, this is my personal experience in my school)

there like the exact stereotypical douche.

No, they do have good sound quality.
They're just a bit more expensive than headphones with the same quality

also they make you look like a total douche.

I think the normal ones are okay looking.
But some guy in my college has superman beats, it's basically bright yellow, blue and red.
Ugliest fucking set i've seen.

they look ok, its just, there often worn as a fashion item, which is just dumb.

Ahh, i see where you're coming from now.

Pleasurable to listen to: Yes
Good (assuming that by good you mean accurate): No