Home  RSS Feeds 
Original Content  
Funny Pictures  Funny Videos 
Funny GIFs  YouTube Videos 
Text/Links  Channels 
User Rankings  
NSFW Content 
What a Tesseract (4D Cube) Looks Like
mindfuck.
Tags: Mind Fuck
 
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#26

bearhandsahhh (11/21/2012) [+] (4 replies)
A 4 dimensional object rendered in 3 dimensions being viewed in 2 dimensions.
#190

scorcho (11/21/2012) [+] (1 reply)
that's just the 2D representation of the 3D shadow of a 4D object.
#181

whiplasher (11/21/2012) [+] (3 replies)
That's in no way 4D. That is only 3D. If it was 4D we wouldn't be able to see it.
Learn your shit.
Learn your shit.
#186 to #181

peteobear (11/21/2012) []
It's a 2D representation(because it's flat on your screen) of what a 4D cube would look like from a 3D inhabitant's perspective.
Just as a sphere passing through a plane would like like a circle that expands and contracts yet would also be viewed as a line that expands and contracts to 'inhabitants' of this 2D flatland.
This GIF shows the tesseract passing through itself because in those sections where it must reorient, it is not passing through itself, just passing by itself in a fourth dimension, but we cannot see that fourth dimension, so this is how the 4D cube would apear in our 3D world(theoretically).
TL;DR  it's still 4D, just what 4D looks like in a 3D world.
Just as a sphere passing through a plane would like like a circle that expands and contracts yet would also be viewed as a line that expands and contracts to 'inhabitants' of this 2D flatland.
This GIF shows the tesseract passing through itself because in those sections where it must reorient, it is not passing through itself, just passing by itself in a fourth dimension, but we cannot see that fourth dimension, so this is how the 4D cube would apear in our 3D world(theoretically).
TL;DR  it's still 4D, just what 4D looks like in a 3D world.
#133

bryceface (11/21/2012) []
Viewing a four dimensional object in two dimensions in a three dimensional world.
#246

mastermike (11/21/2012) []
a 3D representation of a 4D object on a 2D screen. Fuck this, I'm switching to an art major!
#213

WiggsMaGee (11/21/2012) [+] (1 reply)
That's not a 4D shape, its impossible for us to see anything that's in 4D, that's just what we think a 4D shape, converted into 3D looks like
#45

daggydaggy (11/21/2012) [+] (2 replies)
I'll explain
It's like drawing a 3D cube on a paper, now you watch a 3D cube in 2D.
That is a 4D cube, and since we live in a 3D world, we can only watch the 4D cube from a 3D perspective.
It's like drawing a 3D cube on a paper, now you watch a 3D cube in 2D.
That is a 4D cube, and since we live in a 3D world, we can only watch the 4D cube from a 3D perspective.
#50

AltiarCow (11/21/2012) [+] (6 replies)
Explanation:
This is a 3 dimensional representation of a 4 dimensional cube (tesseract). This is a 3 dimensional representation because we cannot comprehend 4 dimensional objects because we comprehend the universe in a 3 dimensional reality. The 4th dimension is generally considered time. with time being the 4th dimension, and this being a four dimensional object, the object seems as though it's moving because we can only see any instant of the fourth dimension  time. if we perceived a four dimensional world, than we would be able to see all 3 dimensional objects, and inside them, and the nature of the objects through time all at the same instant.
The interesting thing here is that it isn't actually moving. We actually live in a universe of many dimensions (11 observable, at least last I read). Aforementioned, we cannot perceive four dimensional objects, so to represent them on a 3 dimensional plane, it must be moving to show its existence on a linear timeline.
TL;DR: it isn't actually moving. it only looks like it is because it is 4 dimensional (the 4th dimension is time) and we can only see 3 dimensions
This is a 3 dimensional representation of a 4 dimensional cube (tesseract). This is a 3 dimensional representation because we cannot comprehend 4 dimensional objects because we comprehend the universe in a 3 dimensional reality. The 4th dimension is generally considered time. with time being the 4th dimension, and this being a four dimensional object, the object seems as though it's moving because we can only see any instant of the fourth dimension  time. if we perceived a four dimensional world, than we would be able to see all 3 dimensional objects, and inside them, and the nature of the objects through time all at the same instant.
The interesting thing here is that it isn't actually moving. We actually live in a universe of many dimensions (11 observable, at least last I read). Aforementioned, we cannot perceive four dimensional objects, so to represent them on a 3 dimensional plane, it must be moving to show its existence on a linear timeline.
TL;DR: it isn't actually moving. it only looks like it is because it is 4 dimensional (the 4th dimension is time) and we can only see 3 dimensions
#54 to #50

thecomkiller (11/21/2012) []
actually, a tessaract is in 4 spacial dimensions, what that animation is is what it's shadow would look like if it were rotating. you can see the concept by making a wireframe cube and rotating it and looking at the shadow it creates. the cube makes a 2 dimensional shadow of several squares going into and out of eachother and connected at the corners, a tessaract makes a 3 dimensional shadow of several cubes going into and out of eachother.
so really, this .gif is a 2dimensional representation of a 3dimensional shadow of a 4dimensional object slowly rotating.
so really, this .gif is a 2dimensional representation of a 3dimensional shadow of a 4dimensional object slowly rotating.
#228

muffinspecial (11/21/2012) [+] (1 reply)
I am tired of seeing this on the front page. As a 3d modeler, I know how to do this, it is just a cube going inside out over and over. I spend a half hour making a .Gif to show you what it is on simpler terms
#104

caelinnis (11/21/2012) [+] (7 replies)
did some research.
this isn't four dimensional, it's an object with 4 dimensions represented in a three dimensional universe.
this isn't four dimensional, it's an object with 4 dimensions represented in a three dimensional universe.
#211

rplix (11/21/2012) [+] (3 replies)
I like how everyone is copying the same comment to look smart.
Oh! By the way, that's just the 2D representation of the 3D shadow of a 4D object.
Oh! By the way, that's just the 2D representation of the 3D shadow of a 4D object.