Home  RSS Feeds 
Original Content  
Funny Pictures  Funny Videos 
Funny GIFs  YouTube Videos 
Text/Links  Channels 
User Rankings  
NSFW Content 
Funnyjunk Math
FunnyJunk, y u redefine math?!
 
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#33

Lambda (12/07/2011) [+] (6 replies)
No, no. See, you forgot to factor in the complex conjugates.
68+2
(68+bi)+(2+bi)
Now, divide by zero:
(68+bi+2+bi)/0
"but you can't do that", you say. NONSENSE!
You forgot that there was a silent "12i" in the denominator.
so we have
(68+bi+2+bi)/(0+12i)
Cancel the i's
(68+2+2b)/12
(70+2b)/12
So now we have
(5.83)2b
And of course, there's 2b, or not 2b? So we multiply by the inverse of 2b:
(5.83)(2b)*(1/2b)
and end up with
5.83.
That's how funnyjunk math works. 68+2=5.83
68+2
(68+bi)+(2+bi)
Now, divide by zero:
(68+bi+2+bi)/0
"but you can't do that", you say. NONSENSE!
You forgot that there was a silent "12i" in the denominator.
so we have
(68+bi+2+bi)/(0+12i)
Cancel the i's
(68+2+2b)/12
(70+2b)/12
So now we have
(5.83)2b
And of course, there's 2b, or not 2b? So we multiply by the inverse of 2b:
(5.83)(2b)*(1/2b)
and end up with
5.83.
That's how funnyjunk math works. 68+2=5.83
#14

kibi (12/07/2011) [+] (1 reply)
At least you didn't sit there actually typing out 68+2 and get mad when it didn't work.
#142

anonymous (12/07/2011) [+] (1 reply)
thanks to this post I know understand how to post. thank you op
#6

lemonlord (12/07/2011) [+] (4 replies)
how do you know it wasn't a Multiplication and not an Addition sum?
that could be a funny looking X
that could be a funny looking X
#219

nucularwar (12/07/2011) [+] (1 reply)
I always reload when I'm about to submit. works (almost) every time.
#88

joccobbin (12/07/2011) [+] (2 replies)
it took me so long to figure out what they wanted i always thought they wanted 68t2, or 68+2, i never thought to actually do the math
scold me please
scold me please