Upload
Login or register
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#2 - anon id: 7cb64152
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/10/2013) [-]
h-hey guys I've got some constructive criticism regarding a website we've all enjoyed for years a-

IF YOU DONT LIKE IT YOU CAN LEAVE HURR HURRRRRRRRR BRB EATING **** AND JACKING OFF TO GAY PORN WITH HATS ON
User avatar #144 to #2 - thomasman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/11/2013) [-]
gay porn with hats on?

so basically TF2?
User avatar #113 to #2 - blokrokker
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/11/2013) [-]
"BRB EATING **** AND JACKING OFF TO GAY PORN WITH HATS ON"
So watching Twilight and playing TF2?
User avatar #65 to #2 - theshadowed
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(11/11/2013) [-]
#36 to #2 - mrswagly
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(11/11/2013) [-]
Alright seems like a good place to post this. Why doesn't admin implement a system to where it stops something from being posted twice in our new posts. I know the majority of the people on this site like old posts, so they like to see reposts every now and again. That's not a bad thing, but it doesn't need to be posted twice. We have an archive on this site of all the posts that been posted. Everyone who loves to see old posts they've seen before can go there to look at them. Why the **** do we even have an archive of posts on this site if we don't even use it? What about the new people you say? They can go to the archive too! I'm saying this because in the future you're gonna get tired of those reposts too and eventually leave the site, I know hundreds have already done so because of it. I enjoy this site, but with our front page almost always consisting of reposts, I get bored of it. If this gets positive votes I'll start posting it on other posts untill it get noticed.
User avatar #163 to #36 - therealtjthemedic
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/11/2013) [-]
That's pretty ******* stupid. We had that before and it was dumb as.
Nobody is going to go looking through archives for things to post, and eventually we just end up with ****** ragecomics on the front page.
User avatar #188 to #163 - mrswagly
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/12/2013) [-]
Then why do we have an archive?
User avatar #52 to #36 - TheExile
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/11/2013) [-]
We actually used to have that system, back in the day. However, a huge problem with it was you would try to upload a photo, and it would get blocked because someone else had uploaded it 6-7 months ago. It doesn't matter if it only got 3 thumbs and 2000 views, it would still be flagged for all time, basically. Then, people would do **** to get around it, like cutting off edges or filling in little black dots to throw off the image recognizer. It was easy to get around, and the quality of FJ was going downhill. It was going on for quite awhile, but a lot of people were happy when it was finally over.
User avatar #55 to #52 - mrswagly
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/11/2013) [-]
Then why don't we have him improve it by making it have to get to the front page first before it be blocked from reupload. Or a repost page similar to the newest uploads or front page. We gotta get him to at least try and experiment with it before everybody leaves and the site dies.
User avatar #59 to #55 - TheExile
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/11/2013) [-]
It would only cut those reposts down to about 60-70%. Not even by half. Then, all those ones that are still being madly posted are now also **** quality, like I said. Edges cut off, random black bars/dots through the post. **** like that.
#33 to #2 - anon id: 02c82b2a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/11/2013) [-]
What's wrong with gay porn? ******* homophobe
What's wrong with gay porn? ******* homophobe
#50 to #33 - retilica
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(11/11/2013) [-]
nothing's wrong with gay porn. on the other hand gay porn with hats on is an atrocity
User avatar #105 to #50 - kurbeh
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(11/11/2013) [-]
Don't you ever say something against Team Fortress 2 again!
#28 to #2 - mcsquishin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/11/2013) [-]
"Constructive"
#3 to #2 - tyraxio
Reply +22 123456789123345869
(11/10/2013) [-]
>implying the majority of the criticism is anywhat constructive
#177 to #3 - FuckTheWhat
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/11/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#73 to #3 - ventriloquist
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(11/11/2013) [-]
Hello!

I saw your post, and noticed you possibly had trouble finding a word for an adjective of ambiguity. Perhaps you can try "any" "somewhat" "anywhere near" or "a bit". Good day!
#192 to #73 - tyraxio
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/12/2013) [-]
I used "anywhat" in a correct sense.
User avatar #118 to #73 - mlpokeyuan
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(11/11/2013) [-]
We don't take to your kind here.
#4 to #3 - anon id: 7cb64152
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/10/2013) [-]
>greentexting

Even so, people have the right to criticize. This site costs a lot of money to run too, if everyone that was disheartened with the direction of the website "just left", the site would collapse. Airing grievances isn't a bad thing, but telling people to leave when they disagree with what's happening is just silly.
User avatar #89 to #4 - admiralen
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/11/2013) [-]
Them whining hurts the site more than them staying helps it, it just pisses people of and buzzkills causing people to get bored with the site.
#5 to #4 - tyraxio
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/10/2013) [-]
Of course, but it doesn't qualify as content.

Occasionally, someone comes with a good idea, but usually it's just whining over a minor change, and I'm here for the content and the community.