Upload
Login or register
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #24 - gammajk
Reply +79 123456789123345869
(02/10/2014) [-]
Gee, thanks for completely abusing fair use.
#124 to #24 - aerosol
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/11/2014) [-]
Despite how little concern I have over the financial welfare of Starbucks, I kind if have to agree. I don't think they will suffer any loss as a result, but that doesn't make it any less of a bold, dick move.
Despite how little concern I have over the financial welfare of Starbucks, I kind if have to agree. I don't think they will suffer any loss as a result, but that doesn't make it any less of a bold, dick move.
#87 to #24 - yuukoku
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(02/11/2014) [-]
At least they're not abusing the welfare system. I know that's completely unrelated, but they're at least being productive in abusing a system.
#116 to #87 - anon id: 0c1aae8a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/11/2014) [-]
Kinda, but they are technically tricking the less savvy of their customers into thinking they are using a starbucks.

That said, as long as the coffee is as good or better the only people they're hurting is starbucks (barely) but still.