Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #7 - wretchedlarva (02/10/2014) [-]
This can't be legal. Someone please prove me wrong.
User avatar #84 to #7 - timelordjam (02/11/2014) [-]
I am starbucks brother and laws cousin. is very real
User avatar #30 to #7 - rollmeanddie (02/10/2014) [-]
I am Manuela's fourth leg and I can confirm this is legal.
User avatar #31 to #30 - wretchedlarva (02/10/2014) [-]
I wish I could give you 100 thumbs up.
#33 to #31 - rollmeanddie (02/10/2014) [-]
I wish we could be together, but alas, I am but a lowly manwhore.
User avatar #34 to #33 - wretchedlarva (02/10/2014) [-]
please add my on skype i want to love you. message me <3
User avatar #38 to #34 - rollmeanddie (02/10/2014) [-]
I fear I am in the middle of moving and have only my phone, but I shall return for thee!
User avatar #39 to #38 - wretchedlarva (02/10/2014) [-]
please do, i love you 5ever lets get married pls
User avatar #42 to #39 - rollmeanddie (02/10/2014) [-]
I must finish my quest, my sweet, but I swear that once I have slain the dragon of Bonecap Mountain, we'll be wed that day's morrow, and the beast's head will hang above our mantle!
User avatar #8 to #7 - lordgeneral (02/10/2014) [-]
lawschool student here. it's legal.
#95 to #8 - pkrbarmovie (02/11/2014) [-]
How could someone discredit that argument? I wonder how come a "lawschool" student can not know what "prove" means...
#82 to #8 - Womens Study Major (02/11/2014) [-]
NO IT ISN'T THAT IS ******** NO COURT WOULD CONCLUDE THAT THEY ARE ACTUALLY USING THE LOGO AS A PARODY AND EVEN IF THEY WERE YOU CAN'T USE PARODIES LIKE THAT. YOU CAN'T JUST SAY IT'S A PARODY AND HAVE A JUDGE OR JURY BELIEVE YOU. THIS IS ******** STOP THUMBING IT UP YOU IDIOTS.
User avatar #71 to #8 - iamundecided ONLINE (02/11/2014) [-]
How can you be in law school AND be on fj at the same time?
Lawyered
-Aspiring law student.
#64 to #8 - Womens Study Major (02/11/2014) [-]
Another law student: actually, this specific case probably isn't. this document is pretty damning. It clearly shows that their actual intent isn't a parody. while parody use in general is legal, you have to meet certain standards of proof and this clearly cuts against it. if anyone is actually interested there's a case about vanna white and a parody robot likeness of her. You need to login to view this link
0
#25 to #8 - robotekk has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #50 to #25 - kuchikirukia (02/10/2014) [-]
As someone who comes from anywhere on the internet, I can confirm I'm a moron.
User avatar #9 to #8 - wretchedlarva (02/10/2014) [-]
What about when Apple sued all those people for "copying"? What about Flappy Bird and Nintendo? How is this different? I know it's "parody" but it sounds like an excuse.
#112 to #9 - dangaddy (02/11/2014) [-]
flappy bird thing is wrong, you ******* retard
User avatar #10 to #9 - lordgeneral (02/10/2014) [-]
the apple suit wasn't presented as parody, and flappy bird is owned by nintendo. any further questions?
User avatar #12 to #10 - wretchedlarva (02/10/2014) [-]
Pretty sure Flappy Bird was sued because of the Mario pipes.
#62 to #13 - Womens Study Major (02/11/2014) [-]
They didnt own nor buy it, they just didn't care - but the creator got affraid that if he had too much success he would be facing them later in life
User avatar #11 to #10 - wretchedlarva (02/10/2014) [-]
Flappy Bird is owned by Nintendo? wut
User avatar #23 to #11 - tubaplayah ONLINE (02/10/2014) [-]
Actually the the creator of Flappy bird deleted it. He was based in Korea With no affiliation to any major Gaming corporation.
 Friends (0)