deviant data. .. almost read " we get rid of you for the benefit of society" almost lol'd
x
Click to expand

Comments(131):

[ 131 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #21 - lordalpha (05/08/2014) [+] (2 replies)
almost read " we get rid of you for the benefit of society" almost lol'd
User avatar #3 - lean ONLINE (05/07/2014) [-]
Unless you are a government climatologist, then you are paid to only graph the outliers for the study
User avatar #25 - klick ONLINE (05/08/2014) [+] (4 replies)
I don't understand....if she was honest, what's the issue???
#9 - gibroner (05/07/2014) [+] (11 replies)
jesus christ I'm 6'2"and the heaviest I've ever been in my life is 320 how the **** does someone even get that ******* fat
#60 - marioisbestpony (05/08/2014) [+] (10 replies)
*******		 americunts and their metric system
******* americunts and their metric system
#88 - atomicman (05/08/2014) [+] (7 replies)
'We'd get rid of an outlier for the benefit of the study' is a 			******		 argument.   
   
Getting rid of an outlier is bad in any form of actual stat tracking even if it were for him to make a point. Removing outliers is just like falsifying tests in your advantage.    
   
Patience is a virtue, just overdo the test with other subjects and keep doing it until you're either satisfied with the avarage result ór your theory is proven wrong.   
   
This is in no way relevant but I felt this post didn't contain enough intellect just yet
'We'd get rid of an outlier for the benefit of the study' is a ****** argument.

Getting rid of an outlier is bad in any form of actual stat tracking even if it were for him to make a point. Removing outliers is just like falsifying tests in your advantage.

Patience is a virtue, just overdo the test with other subjects and keep doing it until you're either satisfied with the avarage result ór your theory is proven wrong.

This is in no way relevant but I felt this post didn't contain enough intellect just yet
User avatar #81 - temporalguardian ONLINE (05/08/2014) [-]
So i google 5'1 and 330 lbs to see how that looks cause im not american, and all i get are pictures of boobs. Cant say i was disappointed /shrug
User avatar #57 - pandation (05/08/2014) [+] (9 replies)
6'1, 270 lbs. I'm a chubster, I'll admit. But I'll change I promise.

No really I will
Right after this slice of cake
No you're right... I've had enough cake
I'll start tomorrow
User avatar #4 - twistedwoodthing (05/07/2014) [-]
If you were looking at overall trends, yeah, it would make sense to ignore the outlier, although she's still a data point.
User avatar #86 - lotengo ONLINE (05/08/2014) [+] (1 reply)
1,77m and about 62kg
Skinny guy.
#82 - newerhinji (05/08/2014) [+] (1 reply)
Time to contribute to this circle jerk, 5'10 and 163 lbs (a tad too much fat, but mostly muscle)
#90 to #82 - brujeriasun (05/08/2014) [-]
That is just about the exact same weight and height as me.. but the majority of it is muscle, worked hard to burn off the fat, then all that glorious lifting.
User avatar #66 - jzwangpk (05/08/2014) [-]
She needs to check her fat privilege. Not everyone can get out of participating in studies. What a bitch.
User avatar #100 - garaichu (05/08/2014) [-]
183 cm
75 kg

Metric system masterrace.
#96 - snaigen (05/08/2014) [-]
186 cm (6'1''?)
98 kg (196 lbs?)
User avatar #56 - ninjaroo ONLINE (05/08/2014) [-]
I haven't measured my height or weight in nearly four years.
Nothing interesting here.
User avatar #55 - theugandanhero (05/08/2014) [-]
5'4" 140 lbs.
I'm also 19 God dammit.
#37 - kingderps (05/08/2014) [-]
6"3 170 (all muscle) Six pack, giant 20" dick are all stats that don't define me
User avatar #36 - bendingtimeisgood ONLINE (05/08/2014) [-]
Since this seems to be a thing, 5'9.5" right around 300, although I haven't weighed in a while. Yup, I'm definitely fat.
0
#14 - biomedic has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #13 - acask (05/07/2014) [+] (2 replies)
that graph hurts to look at it has no detail or reference points
and I am pretty sure hight should be y and weight should be x
#16 to #13 - Absolute Madman (05/08/2014) [-]
It's a nearly 45 degree line, it would look the same you ******* cunt
[ 131 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)