cool story parent. . BREE: HEB: YALI KNOW HEW BABIES GET ALL QUIET AND GALM WHEN THEY SEE A MOBILE so APPARENTLY THEY DO THIS BECAUSE THE MOBILE RESEMBLES BEDS  cool story parent BREE: HEB: YALI KNOW HEW BABIES GET ALL QUIET AND GALM WHEN THEY SEE A MOBILE so APPARENTLY DO THIS BECAUSE THE RESEMBLES BEDS
Upload
Login or register

cool story parent

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
BREE:
HEB:
YALI KNOW HEW BABIES GET ALL QUIET AND GALM WHEN THEY SEE
A MOBILE
so APPARENTLY THEY DO THIS BECAUSE THE MOBILE RESEMBLES
BEDS OF FRET FLYING THAT , LY
CARRY THEM OFF
IT' S A / PRECEDENT SO THAT IF THE BABY STATE
STILL THE BIRD ' T NOTICE AND EAT IT
BABIES DON' T LIKE AMBLES
THEY' RE F UMFANG
lam mum than a bit disturbed by how hard J laughed at this.
ILOVETHIS
...
+804
Views: 38778 Submitted: 12/31/2013
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (130)
[ 130 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #3 - suikerpapa
Reply +158 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Ffs..

They're not actually terrified, it's just an instinctive feature. Like a reflex
User avatar #9 to #3 - faggotishshit
Reply -10 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Weirdly enough, I still remember the times when I was a baby, but just faintly. I always saw those things as very calming, hanging overhead.
User avatar #57 to #9 - crazypat
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
You do know most of the cells in your brain are replaced after 9 years right. I mean you can have 1-3 memories of early childhood until about 16 but not small ones like that.
User avatar #77 to #57 - metalmind
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Well, that's where you're dead wrong.
I'm 18, and I remember almost everything from the age of 2 onwards, and a few from even earlier.
I mean I remember everything, from the kind of milk we used to buy, over the kinds of meals I ate, stories I got read, how a lot of days went, to my first day of kindergarden.
I have memories from when I when I had learned to walk, and when I used to ride on the extra seat on my mothers bicycle, when I was about 2.
So don't tell me that ********, that you only have memories from age 3 onwards.
It's just not true.
#88 to #77 - crazypat
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Yeah. No.
#95 to #88 - metalmind
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
It was created 20 seconds before you used it to thumb yourself up, then deleted it.
#89 to #88 - crazypat
+1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #94 to #88 - metalmind
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Yeah, very mature, creating a user account to thumb yourself up:
www.funnyjunk.com/user/flailtits
That user account was created, thumbed up your posts, and deleted himself right afterwards.
Flagging you.
#93 to #88 - anon id: de35e1b3
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Yeah, actually true.
Just because not everybody has a very limited memory, doesn't mean some people don't.
User avatar #59 to #57 - faggotishshit
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Actually, I only have 2 memories of my childhood, that one, and one in which I was waiting for my parents in the hospital.
#68 to #57 - anon id: 78471a09
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
I have a few memories of when I was 3 (I'm 21) and they weren't exactly life changing. Also Hyperthymesia.
User avatar #69 to #68 - crazypat
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Don't have to be life changing it just has to be important enough to be imprinted.
User avatar #70 to #69 - zonryu
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
i still have a memory frome when i had just turned 3 and got some MEGABLOX for mah B-day
User avatar #72 to #70 - crazypat
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
I have a memory of breaking my mothers china.
#60 to #57 - anon id: 77ddfc04
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Replaced? I thought that once neurons die, they remain that way and no new ones are ever formed because all the ones you have are developed before birth? The only thing that changes among them through the years are the connections between them.
#133 to #3 - allinallout **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
so is ******** your pants out of fear
#134 to #3 - twentyten
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
instinct does not mean reflex. They're different. Heck, people aren't even sure we have instinct, at least in this day and age.
#8 - harbingerwolf
Reply +110 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
I honestly have no idea how humans managed to survive with how noisy their offspring is.
I honestly have no idea how humans managed to survive with how noisy their offspring is.
#32 to #8 - nthmetal
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
The males can have teeth bigger than their bodies.
They can also eject those teeth at tremendous speeds using an appendage we call their arms.
One my not be enough to take out one predator, but they often travel in packs.

spears
User avatar #138 to #32 - instalation
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
that was beautiful
#16 to #8 - felixjarl
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
A human baby will only be noisy if it knows there are other humans around, when you leave a baby it becomes noicy beacause it dont want to be leaved and be ungarded.   
   
   
But if you go far enough away then it will be silent in order to not get atention.
A human baby will only be noisy if it knows there are other humans around, when you leave a baby it becomes noicy beacause it dont want to be leaved and be ungarded.


But if you go far enough away then it will be silent in order to not get atention.
User avatar #61 to #16 - pickstar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Okay, sure, babies can stay quiet if on their own, but I think what he was trying to say is like human carrying noisy baby, predator hears, baby gets them both killed. Not babies getting themselves killed, babies getting everyone in the pack killed cus they couldn't shut up when predators were near
User avatar #114 to #61 - strangesir
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
If the baby won't shut the **** up, and you REALLY need it to shut the **** up, I'm sure someone'd try to cover it's mouth or something.
User avatar #115 to #114 - pickstar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
Not that effective when you got a ******* animal on your tale. It still makes mumbles and **** and or it'll **** itself and like the tiger or whatever will still hear or smell it. I would throw the baby and run.
User avatar #117 to #115 - strangesir
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
I guess. Shouldn't even be in that situation with a baby anyhow. What kind of place would you really need to take your baby away from home to, other than maybe like water to clean it or something?
User avatar #119 to #117 - pickstar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
***** HUMANS HAVE BEEN AROUND AND HAVE HAD OFFSPRING for an exceptionally long amount of time. He's talking about when people had to realistically face those situations, how did they live?
User avatar #120 to #119 - strangesir
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
NO **** *****. I know he was talking about past times and shiet. Even if it was ********* stoneage or something, I'm sure they'd have somewhere to stay and all.
User avatar #122 to #120 - pickstar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
Okay sure but predator near camp. Baby goes WAWAWAWAWA. Predator in camp. People dead.
User avatar #123 to #122 - strangesir
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
Implying nobody'd have some kind of weapon, or they wouldn't be the slightest bit strong/badass?
#128 to #123 - anon id: 754473ad
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
It's that humans are weak mentality. We aren't the strongest, but people are bigger (and by extension stronger) than most wild animals. Regardless of how many or how strong the predators are, only the most desperate would attack more than one or two people at a time. The only predators that could likely manage that would be extremely large animals (eg: bears) or numerous ones (eg: lions). If the people were armed, it would be suicidal to attack a group of them.
User avatar #124 to #123 - pickstar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
*****. TIGER. YOU THINK THEIR PUSSY STICKS CAN DO **** TO THAT BEAST? EVEN IF THEY STOP IT THE TIGER'LL MANGLE THEIR BALLSACKS AND **** ON THEIR EVERYTHING. P.S. Read the book the tiger. P.P.S. Hyena packs, bears, other people, wolf packs, hunters out and babies cry, etc etc etc etc ET CETERA
User avatar #125 to #124 - strangesir
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
:|

Well ****.
User avatar #137 to #125 - pickstar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
That tiger in the book The Tiger. Like. True story. 15 dudes in russia (RUSSIA!) with guns were like murdered to death? By one tiger. While it was being hunted. "It’s December 1997, and a man-eating tiger is on the prowl outside a remote village in Russia’s Far East. The tiger isn’t just killing people, it’s annihilating them, and a team of men and their dogs must hunt it on foot through the forest in the brutal cold. As the trackers sift through the gruesome remains of the victims, they discover that these attacks aren’t random: the tiger is apparently engaged in a vendetta. Injured, starving, and extremely dangerous, the tiger must be found before it strikes again."



THAT ******* TIGER COULD TAKE A VILLAGE OF PUNY MEN WITH STICKS. AND EAT THEM ALL. At the same time. Siberian tiger distribution isn't even that far from the Beringia ice bridge, where if theorists are correct, all those ancient folks crossed and ****, meaning how did they manage to cross without getting their guts strewn across all of ancient russia.
User avatar #139 to #137 - strangesir
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
15 RUSSIANS with GUNS? Alright, I need more then that. Did their guns jam? Run out of bullets? Were they split up into small groups? Because there is no ******* way I can believe 15 MEN from RUSSIA with ******* GUNS couldn't kill ONE TIGER.
User avatar #140 to #139 - pickstar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
Split. But. GUNS. RUSSIANS.
#30 to #16 - anon id: e3070fc4
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
There is a spell checker built into the comment window. Leaved? Ungarded? Atention?
Just stop. Go read a book.
User avatar #34 to #30 - felixjarl
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Problem is that my spell check is in norwegian.
User avatar #1 - moforsho
Reply +53 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Geez, why does everyone on tumblr have to shout?...
User avatar #4 to #1 - thechosentroll
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
I keep asking that, too.
#13 to #1 - slysixtyfourwii
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
SO THAT YOU COULD HEAR THEM BETTER! I honestly don't know though
User avatar #20 to #13 - imofcnotharveydent
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
I don't know, does it really get louder even if I try to make my "reading" voice scream, it's still the same volume
User avatar #24 to #1 - Tirex
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
To silence the voices. They are alwaYS THERE WHISPERING IN THE BACK OF THEIR HEADS.
#67 to #1 - abcdxyz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#71 to #1 - partisan
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
BECAUSE THEY'RE ******* TERRIFIED!
User avatar #7 to #1 - harbingerwolf
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Why does everyone on FJ have to bitch.
User avatar #11 to #7 - moforsho
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Why can't everyone called harbingerwolf take a joke
User avatar #12 to #11 - harbingerwolf
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
I didnt know it was intended as a joke, the fact is on every single tumbr post on FJ a lot of the comments are people bitching about how tumblr posts.
#65 to #7 - tastycrisps
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Exactly
User avatar #15 to #7 - threadcreator
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Why don't you go to tumblr and stay there?
#5 - ohhh
+46 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#22 to #5 - Sunset
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#116 to #5 - hoddon
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/01/2014) [-]
Jesus just doesn't believe in. Evolution
User avatar #25 - mrepicllort
Reply +39 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
********. Babies can't even make out objects across the room until they're 8 months old, let alone 15,000 feet. That's how high a typical bald eagle will fly. If the baby was scared, it would start to cry for it's mother. Mothers are usually not far from their babies at any given point.

TL;DR: Mobiles don't terrify a baby.
User avatar #82 to #25 - lolme
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
Reflexes are not taught. How does a 2 month old baby know to hold it's breath when you put it's head under water? How does a baby deer know to lay down and be quiet when his mother leaves to get food? How does a bird know how to use it's "built in compass"? Who learned you to put your hand infront of your face when you fell? It's all reflexes, they're there from the start.
#44 to #25 - kingpongthedon
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
********. 15,000 ft is close to 3 miles in altitude. Raptors can approach 10,000 ft but it's highly unusual for them to do so. Typically, they don't go past 1000 ft unless they're migrating. Once they've spotted potential prey, they typically circle at several hundred feet. With a six-foot wingspan, they are readily visible at this altitude. Eagles can carry prey of over 20 lbs, much more than most babies weigh and have been known to take small dogs and cats and yes, babies too, even if humans are present. They also rely on motion to find prey. Furthermore, the baby doesn't need to distinguish the object as a raptor. As long as it can see the circular motion, the baby could react to the stimulus. Terrified probably isn't the right word, but the baby does instinctively react in a manner consistent with what would encourage it's survival.

TLDR: It's plausible at worst. ******** is a gross overstatement.
#80 - docvolto
Reply +19 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
fun faCT: BABIES ARNT EVEN REALLY SCARED OF MOBILES! THE DIRECTOR JUST TURNED ON THE CAMERA AND THE BABY JUST PRETENDED TO BE SCARED
NOW THATS ACTING
#6 - secretmouse
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
#76 - wwkybobo
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
I dont believe it. Probably just some more Tumblr ********.
#73 - kobegriffeysanders
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
A baby's instinct when it's scared or upset is not to remain calm. It's to cry out for its mother.
A baby's instinct when it's scared or upset is not to remain calm. It's to cry out for its mother.
User avatar #10 - zantheo
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(12/31/2013) [-]
I'M CRYING