| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
#22616
-
samanthathepylon ONLINE (04/14/2013) [-]
"Supernatural - 01x08 - Bugs"
NOPE NOPE NOPE NOPE NOPE
NOPE NOPE NOPE NOPE NOPE
**samanthathepylon rolls a perception check, spotting wiredguy lurking in the shadows.**
Good, I guess.
They keep delaying her surgery though...
The doctor thinks it's just a pulled muscle.
>girl has had polycystic ovaries from young age
>sent into hospital multiple times in the past 6 months
>every time, doctors think it's appendicitis
>fucking cyst on her ovary, whoddaguessedit?
>comes in recently in so much pain she is throwing up
>scan (originally for appendicitis) shows a cyst has formed and burst
>doctor thinks the cyst hasn't drained completely
>wants to perform surgery to clean it all out
>needs to gain permission, or something, I don't know
>THE PAIN IS PROBABLY JUST A PULLED MUSCLE, NO SURGERY
And people think doctors are supposed to be clever.
They keep delaying her surgery though...
The doctor thinks it's just a pulled muscle.
>girl has had polycystic ovaries from young age
>sent into hospital multiple times in the past 6 months
>every time, doctors think it's appendicitis
>fucking cyst on her ovary, whoddaguessedit?
>comes in recently in so much pain she is throwing up
>scan (originally for appendicitis) shows a cyst has formed and burst
>doctor thinks the cyst hasn't drained completely
>wants to perform surgery to clean it all out
>needs to gain permission, or something, I don't know
>THE PAIN IS PROBABLY JUST A PULLED MUSCLE, NO SURGERY
And people think doctors are supposed to be clever.
They do pretty good considering, in fairness.
They probably have like, a dozen sick or even dying patients to deal with a day, and from the patient's point of view, they're the most important thing in the world at that moment, but to the doctor they're just another work assignment that needs to be dealt with efficiently.
And remember that only bad news gets reported. Every time a doctor makes a major fuck up, it'll make it into the papers or whatever, but the 999 times out of a thousand they don't, they're just sneered at and looked down upon by the taxpayers because they're only doing their job.
Our local hospital has been pretty shit in my sister's experience though...
They probably have like, a dozen sick or even dying patients to deal with a day, and from the patient's point of view, they're the most important thing in the world at that moment, but to the doctor they're just another work assignment that needs to be dealt with efficiently.
And remember that only bad news gets reported. Every time a doctor makes a major fuck up, it'll make it into the papers or whatever, but the 999 times out of a thousand they don't, they're just sneered at and looked down upon by the taxpayers because they're only doing their job.
Our local hospital has been pretty shit in my sister's experience though...
I know, right? T_T
They don't actually fucking deliver decent information. It's an entertainment based business, and it's all geared towards entertainment and propaganda.
Yeah, hopefully.
Apparently, the best thing for PCOS is to have a baby, which'd be pretty nice, get a little niece or nephew x3
So what're you up to?
They don't actually fucking deliver decent information. It's an entertainment based business, and it's all geared towards entertainment and propaganda.
Yeah, hopefully.
Apparently, the best thing for PCOS is to have a baby, which'd be pretty nice, get a little niece or nephew x3
So what're you up to?
Oh god I just fapped to a dropbox full of hardblush stuff.
What the fuck is this I don't even.
What the fuck is this I don't even.
#22554 to #22553
-
wiredguy ONLINE (04/10/2013) [-]
Well, I hate to be creepy...
But, you say you want to be gay, but just don't feel it, right?
Build up an association to gfur.
I find a lot of people do this when they first start exploring homosexuality.
They find Gfur, usually Hardblush, think it's kinda hot because of how girly it is, and sort of ease themselves into it.
Even I myself couldn't actually watch proper gay porn when I was younger. Just furry.
It's actually been done before as a psychological experiment, though somewhat more extremely.
They wired this gay guy up to a button which would shock the pleasure centre of his brain every time it was pressed, plonked him down in front of some straight porn and let him loose on the button.
Then, they got him to have sex with this prostitute, and after a while, he was bi.
It's interesting just how malleable the whole thing it.
But, you say you want to be gay, but just don't feel it, right?
Build up an association to gfur.
I find a lot of people do this when they first start exploring homosexuality.
They find Gfur, usually Hardblush, think it's kinda hot because of how girly it is, and sort of ease themselves into it.
Even I myself couldn't actually watch proper gay porn when I was younger. Just furry.
It's actually been done before as a psychological experiment, though somewhat more extremely.
They wired this gay guy up to a button which would shock the pleasure centre of his brain every time it was pressed, plonked him down in front of some straight porn and let him loose on the button.
Then, they got him to have sex with this prostitute, and after a while, he was bi.
It's interesting just how malleable the whole thing it.
As far as I'm aware, everyone has the perfect capability to be bisexual.
I don't think it's so much that you need to learn to like men as an acquired taste or something, but that something is stopping you and you need to get past that. And the most surefire way of doing that is just to get used to the idea, to accept it as normal.
I dunno, that's just how I see it.
I don't think it's so much that you need to learn to like men as an acquired taste or something, but that something is stopping you and you need to get past that. And the most surefire way of doing that is just to get used to the idea, to accept it as normal.
I dunno, that's just how I see it.
#22562 to #22561
-
wiredguy ONLINE (04/10/2013) [-]
Two things I've learned recently:
1. If you go out, and talk to people, and do things, and be social: you will end up in a relationship. Regardless of how much you wish there were another way, there really isn't.
You won't get a boyfriend if you never meet new boys, will you?
2. "The love game" sucks and I hate it.
1. If you go out, and talk to people, and do things, and be social: you will end up in a relationship. Regardless of how much you wish there were another way, there really isn't.
You won't get a boyfriend if you never meet new boys, will you?
2. "The love game" sucks and I hate it.
I only have a vague knowledge of it.
Funny story, I mentioned the site to my mum once, and she gave me a weird look and I was like "What? You don't know craigslist?" and she was like "I know what craigslist is, how do you know!?"
Apparently she'd seen it referenced on TV and thought it was a place just for people to meet up for sex.
Funny story, I mentioned the site to my mum once, and she gave me a weird look and I was like "What? You don't know craigslist?" and she was like "I know what craigslist is, how do you know!?"
Apparently she'd seen it referenced on TV and thought it was a place just for people to meet up for sex.
you've been visited by the admin fairy of
NUCLEAR DESTRUCTION
<3 <3 <3
NUCLEAR DESTRUCTION
<3 <3 <3
You will never feel the horse cock.
Never.
Only dreams.
Also, these are for you.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpR9kvaD1mE
www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6rkXGikuNA
Never.
Only dreams.
Also, these are for you.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpR9kvaD1mE
www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6rkXGikuNA
www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLQX2XQfYQs
To have a shower.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWJFC98jPrQ
I've been interested in vice's documentaries though. :3
We'll chat later.
Do you have skype?
To have a shower.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWJFC98jPrQ
I've been interested in vice's documentaries though. :3
We'll chat later.
Do you have skype?
Hi! I'm Nirvana, as aforementioned. Sorry, it's getting really. . .
Inversely. . .
Here at the realm of the Inverse!
So, how're you! See, I know everything my little Angel does, but I don't know a thing about you! Can I get info from you, by means of a chat?
Inversely. . .
Here at the realm of the Inverse!
So, how're you! See, I know everything my little Angel does, but I don't know a thing about you! Can I get info from you, by means of a chat?
So, I found this...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=1w2dMekIJLw
It's 2 parts.
Thought you might want to watch it.
It's quite interesting, actually, if weird.
Still, the guy lives where I live (which I didn't know).
So apparently I live in a quite a socially prolific place according to him. ;p
Tell me what you think, if you can stomach him. ;3
www.youtube.com/watch?v=1w2dMekIJLw
It's 2 parts.
Thought you might want to watch it.
It's quite interesting, actually, if weird.
Still, the guy lives where I live (which I didn't know).
So apparently I live in a quite a socially prolific place according to him. ;p
Tell me what you think, if you can stomach him. ;3
I'm not at all sure what you're saying here. Could you go over it again?
What I'm saying is that I hereby renounce all forms of solipsism, existentialism, or anything relying on the same basic principles.
"God doesn't exist."
"There's no absolute proof that he does or doesn't exist, plus some rubbish about deism, then reality and the multiverse, yada yada yada" *slap to the face*
No, shut up. I don't mean "God" as an abstract concept of a creator, I mean Jesus' father, or whatever literal way there is to pinpoint a deified lifeform from other major religions. And religion is most definitely fucking fictional, and the existence of any super being outside of organised religion is evidently not relevant to my life, nor worth my time, even if they were to exist.
I'm sorry, I meant to type "Why should I care?", which is a trick question, because I definitely shouldn't.
Without any form of organised hierarchy, I (Richard Anton Patrick Mullan, speaking in the first person about his own existence as a British teenager, no abstractions) would not at all be able to live the comfortable life I do today, regardless of how corrupt said governing hierarchy may or may not be; I'm happy with my computers and my education and my hardcore animal pornography, as opposed to sticks and stones and animal pelts.
So why complain? And that's still assuming that conspiracies can at all hold their ground.
The fact that some dude who's long dead may have pulled some strings in a war which I wasn't alive for x3
And what others that are inflicted? Inflicted with oppression, I assume you mean. And the only time I believe that is applicable is when it is blatantly obvious, *cough cough* North Korea *cough*. No conspiracies there, just downright, average despotism.
What I'm saying is that I hereby renounce all forms of solipsism, existentialism, or anything relying on the same basic principles.
"God doesn't exist."
"There's no absolute proof that he does or doesn't exist, plus some rubbish about deism, then reality and the multiverse, yada yada yada" *slap to the face*
No, shut up. I don't mean "God" as an abstract concept of a creator, I mean Jesus' father, or whatever literal way there is to pinpoint a deified lifeform from other major religions. And religion is most definitely fucking fictional, and the existence of any super being outside of organised religion is evidently not relevant to my life, nor worth my time, even if they were to exist.
I'm sorry, I meant to type "Why should I care?", which is a trick question, because I definitely shouldn't.
Without any form of organised hierarchy, I (Richard Anton Patrick Mullan, speaking in the first person about his own existence as a British teenager, no abstractions) would not at all be able to live the comfortable life I do today, regardless of how corrupt said governing hierarchy may or may not be; I'm happy with my computers and my education and my hardcore animal pornography, as opposed to sticks and stones and animal pelts.
So why complain? And that's still assuming that conspiracies can at all hold their ground.
The fact that some dude who's long dead may have pulled some strings in a war which I wasn't alive for x3
And what others that are inflicted? Inflicted with oppression, I assume you mean. And the only time I believe that is applicable is when it is blatantly obvious, *cough cough* North Korea *cough*. No conspiracies there, just downright, average despotism.
Literal reality describes the reality in which we exist in.
It is practical to accept reality, whether it be convenient or not, because we are dealing with what we can reasonably be expected to comprehend.
What I'm saying is that the universe doesn't care for the semantics of convenience--and that the principles discussed in essays, books, and journals do not lose any truth just because they are not 'easy' to convey on a common basis.
Maybe it would be best to make it clear? :P
Quite the difference, and I'm not sure that's warranted.
Are you saying you renounce all principles that deal with prudence on that basis that you'll chose one that best fits to the current climate in such a way that it allows for you to not be prosecuted? That you have no individual preference of morality at all, so long at it pertains to your aims?
Because that's quite a disturbing observation, if so...
You're, if you forgive me for saying, are using a lot of emotional language, and I'm finding it hard to determine what you mean. The language you're using is quite extremely. 'Definitely', for example, implies that you're making an absolute statement on what one ought to do...
Complaint does not mean full-on rejection...
But then that goes back onto the fact that it would depend upon a care for the future.
You should care, perhaps, if it pertains to it?
It is practical to accept reality, whether it be convenient or not, because we are dealing with what we can reasonably be expected to comprehend.
What I'm saying is that the universe doesn't care for the semantics of convenience--and that the principles discussed in essays, books, and journals do not lose any truth just because they are not 'easy' to convey on a common basis.
Maybe it would be best to make it clear? :P
Quite the difference, and I'm not sure that's warranted.
Are you saying you renounce all principles that deal with prudence on that basis that you'll chose one that best fits to the current climate in such a way that it allows for you to not be prosecuted? That you have no individual preference of morality at all, so long at it pertains to your aims?
Because that's quite a disturbing observation, if so...
You're, if you forgive me for saying, are using a lot of emotional language, and I'm finding it hard to determine what you mean. The language you're using is quite extremely. 'Definitely', for example, implies that you're making an absolute statement on what one ought to do...
Complaint does not mean full-on rejection...
But then that goes back onto the fact that it would depend upon a care for the future.
You should care, perhaps, if it pertains to it?
There's a name for people who don't "accept reality". Schizophrenics.
Okay. Here's my point.
Say that we take solipsism, the idea that possibly, nothing except my own mind exists.
Why should I give a fuck?
It makes no difference to me one way or the other. And if I were somehow able to prove it as true, I'd just either spiral into depression, or somehow break the illusion and lose everything which could ever make me happy.
And it pisses me off when people bring up such wishy-washy philosophies into debates which actually relate to people's lives.
Because they make no difference, and would be regardless, uncontrollable.
Like with Christianity.
"Such and such in the Bible doesn't make sense"
"Oh yeah, but you can't ever fully disprove God, so I'm gonna choose to believe in him"
"But I'm talking specifically about relevant information and beliefs-"
"LOLNOPE, I HAVE AN OUT CARD, AND I'M GOING TO PRETEND I'VE WON THE ARGUMENT WITH IT"
It's pigeon chess. Nothing else.
There's this moment in BBC's Sherlock, where Holmes refuses to be educated on how the solar system works, because it isn't relevant to his interests and his life. Do you know it?
That's what I'm talking about. If things aren't relevant or at all applicable, why the hell should people waste thought on it, or be allowed to pretend to be clever and flash the fancy, sparkly words in relevant, intellectual discussion?
Okay. Here's my point.
Say that we take solipsism, the idea that possibly, nothing except my own mind exists.
Why should I give a fuck?
It makes no difference to me one way or the other. And if I were somehow able to prove it as true, I'd just either spiral into depression, or somehow break the illusion and lose everything which could ever make me happy.
And it pisses me off when people bring up such wishy-washy philosophies into debates which actually relate to people's lives.
Because they make no difference, and would be regardless, uncontrollable.
Like with Christianity.
"Such and such in the Bible doesn't make sense"
"Oh yeah, but you can't ever fully disprove God, so I'm gonna choose to believe in him"
"But I'm talking specifically about relevant information and beliefs-"
"LOLNOPE, I HAVE AN OUT CARD, AND I'M GOING TO PRETEND I'VE WON THE ARGUMENT WITH IT"
It's pigeon chess. Nothing else.
There's this moment in BBC's Sherlock, where Holmes refuses to be educated on how the solar system works, because it isn't relevant to his interests and his life. Do you know it?
That's what I'm talking about. If things aren't relevant or at all applicable, why the hell should people waste thought on it, or be allowed to pretend to be clever and flash the fancy, sparkly words in relevant, intellectual discussion?
Okay. I know...
Not sure what that added. :P
Their point would be that it relates to everyone, and that our futility and preference is irrelevant to it being the case.
You don't have to care.
It's an exercise to humouring a concept that is in itself an exercise of logic.
Like with some idiots.*
But I understand the frustration.
No. But I understand.
Because knowledge thrills some people? Because they want to?
Why should they not?
That holds the same weight as "Why should they?"
But yes, irrelevant information to debates are disregarded as fallacious attempts to mislead subject by those who can recognize them.
You'll see that happening on a controlled panel.
However, you won't see that on an average basis. As you know.
Also, was that last paragraph a punt at myself? ;p
Not sure what that added. :P
Their point would be that it relates to everyone, and that our futility and preference is irrelevant to it being the case.
You don't have to care.
It's an exercise to humouring a concept that is in itself an exercise of logic.
Like with some idiots.*
But I understand the frustration.
No. But I understand.
Because knowledge thrills some people? Because they want to?
Why should they not?
That holds the same weight as "Why should they?"
But yes, irrelevant information to debates are disregarded as fallacious attempts to mislead subject by those who can recognize them.
You'll see that happening on a controlled panel.
However, you won't see that on an average basis. As you know.
Also, was that last paragraph a punt at myself? ;p
No. No.
You used the word "relates". That's not good.
Because it isn't relevant.
No. Most people*
Or at least every single person I've ever spoken to about anything in which they might be used as tools. Not claiming for that to be everyone.
Yeah. That's all fine. Seriously, that's great.
But it's not fucking relevant.
And people treat it as if it is.
When it isn't
That's what I'm saying. And that's what conspiracy theories are.
No, not irrelevant to the debate.
Totally, irrevocably irrelevant to everything practical
Partly, also partly to myself, to Hector, to Joe, to Peter, and to anyone else I can think of.
Joe especially, now that I think about it.
I must stop backing down to Joe's points just because I like them, they're irrelevant and actually mostly inaccurate...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuIMmwJbnco
For reference.
You used the word "relates". That's not good.
Because it isn't relevant.
No. Most people*
Or at least every single person I've ever spoken to about anything in which they might be used as tools. Not claiming for that to be everyone.
Yeah. That's all fine. Seriously, that's great.
But it's not fucking relevant.
And people treat it as if it is.
When it isn't
That's what I'm saying. And that's what conspiracy theories are.
No, not irrelevant to the debate.
Totally, irrevocably irrelevant to everything practical
Partly, also partly to myself, to Hector, to Joe, to Peter, and to anyone else I can think of.
Joe especially, now that I think about it.
I must stop backing down to Joe's points just because I like them, they're irrelevant and actually mostly inaccurate...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuIMmwJbnco
For reference.
They're the same if you're talking on whether they can have an impact on something/one.
How is understanding that we're forged in the heart of starts relevant to our existence other than as an observation?
Because, simerly, they consider that an observation of logic.
Semantics on worth.
Relevant/relates--often interchangeable in the proverbial soup of subjectivity. I admire them all for what they are: differences.
Subjective.
"99% of things are subjective"--wired
"Practical"
Something steeped in, once again, subjectivity.
Because it's all cool.
Really, I'm just chilled about it.
Let them--their wafflings are as meaningful as mine.
Also, am I boring you?
Just wondering.
How is understanding that we're forged in the heart of starts relevant to our existence other than as an observation?
Because, simerly, they consider that an observation of logic.
Semantics on worth.
Relevant/relates--often interchangeable in the proverbial soup of subjectivity. I admire them all for what they are: differences.
Subjective.
"99% of things are subjective"--wired
"Practical"
Something steeped in, once again, subjectivity.
Because it's all cool.
Really, I'm just chilled about it.
Let them--their wafflings are as meaningful as mine.
Also, am I boring you?
Just wondering.
I don't see the connection between my point and what you just said there.
That's concrete, relevant, physical, practical information.
I have no fucking clue what you're arguing for or against.
But yeah, everything relative and practical is also subjective.
You're just spouting quotes and information; again, I don't see the relevancy to my point. Though if anything, they agree with it.
... Have I at all accurately conveyed what I was talking about?
I don't think I have, I'm sorry.
Also, I'm extremely tired and going to bed.
That's concrete, relevant, physical, practical information.
I have no fucking clue what you're arguing for or against.
But yeah, everything relative and practical is also subjective.
You're just spouting quotes and information; again, I don't see the relevancy to my point. Though if anything, they agree with it.
... Have I at all accurately conveyed what I was talking about?
I don't think I have, I'm sorry.
Also, I'm extremely tired and going to bed.
Precisely that.
What you think compared to another.
Like I said, semantics of worth.
And why is it practical?
Because we can't change it. Why is that practical?
Relevant, and related--yes. But practical?
(Assuming we're drawn away from the video.)
Basically that what you think has no more intrinsic importance than what someone else thinks.
Who's "they"?
No. Not really.
I've just been making 'devil's advocate' responses to what you've said, and what you've said drifted away from the video on an earlier rant.
I very rarely ever represent an agenda.
What you think compared to another.
Like I said, semantics of worth.
And why is it practical?
Because we can't change it. Why is that practical?
Relevant, and related--yes. But practical?
(Assuming we're drawn away from the video.)
Basically that what you think has no more intrinsic importance than what someone else thinks.
Who's "they"?
No. Not really.
I've just been making 'devil's advocate' responses to what you've said, and what you've said drifted away from the video on an earlier rant.
I very rarely ever represent an agenda.
You should have taken picks. <3
The guy presents some unique positions.
I find it endearing, to an extent--his intentions are (as he considers himself someone saving the human race) pleasant in some regards.
Not sure if I agree with the moon being hollowed out, or a reptilian race of parasites. But hey, it's plausible--if extraordinarily unlikely.
Although something I like to think about, when I consider such things to be silly, is to think about how unlikely the truth actually is. After all, there are so many other reasons for things happening, and yet the single truth that happens--still happens regardless.
We do live in a universe wherein everything is extraordinarily unlikely, but not necessarily impossible...
Anyway, the guy does raise some observations that have credit--mainly on economics. It's been the case that the Rothschild's have had major influences in major events: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_Mayer_Rothschild
^^That guy in particular played both sides of the Napoleonic wars.
Still, you're not intending to sneak down to the IOW for a ritual, are you? ;P
The guy presents some unique positions.
I find it endearing, to an extent--his intentions are (as he considers himself someone saving the human race) pleasant in some regards.
Not sure if I agree with the moon being hollowed out, or a reptilian race of parasites. But hey, it's plausible--if extraordinarily unlikely.
Although something I like to think about, when I consider such things to be silly, is to think about how unlikely the truth actually is. After all, there are so many other reasons for things happening, and yet the single truth that happens--still happens regardless.
We do live in a universe wherein everything is extraordinarily unlikely, but not necessarily impossible...
Anyway, the guy does raise some observations that have credit--mainly on economics. It's been the case that the Rothschild's have had major influences in major events: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_Mayer_Rothschild
^^That guy in particular played both sides of the Napoleonic wars.
Still, you're not intending to sneak down to the IOW for a ritual, are you? ;P
I guess that's true.
But... No.
Just no :I
The technicality of it not being literally impossible is not relevant.
Unless you're writing an essay, only deal with practical reality. That's something I've decided.
Well, perhaps.
But why do I care? Answer me that.
Shush you x3
But... No.
Just no :I
The technicality of it not being literally impossible is not relevant.
Unless you're writing an essay, only deal with practical reality. That's something I've decided.
Well, perhaps.
But why do I care? Answer me that.
Shush you x3
Literal reality is relevant. We live 'literal' reality every day; hence it is 'practical' to accept reality.
Although I do agree with what I think you mean, which is that it's easier to not advocate such things that seem so far fetched.
Like many things, I sit on the fence for logic.
Do you? I don't care if you don't. I would care if you care if others care, though. Commit to the apathy if so. :3
Perhaps you should care for the others that are inflicted instead, if not for yourself?
But then you didn't really phrase that very well.
'Care about what?' I ask. :3
Although I do agree with what I think you mean, which is that it's easier to not advocate such things that seem so far fetched.
Like many things, I sit on the fence for logic.
Do you? I don't care if you don't. I would care if you care if others care, though. Commit to the apathy if so. :3
Perhaps you should care for the others that are inflicted instead, if not for yourself?
But then you didn't really phrase that very well.
'Care about what?' I ask. :3