Anonymous comments allowed.
75 comments displayed.
#341 to #340
-
zaiopeperse (09/17/2015) [-] But are you the one with the ******* amazing voice though?
#343 to #342
-
zaiopeperse (09/17/2015) [-] It appears to be you, yes. I think we know eachother from skype dude
#345 to #344
-
zaiopeperse (09/17/2015) [-] You have a very soothing voice, you sound like the chillest person in the world.
#328
-
thejudgingmoose (09/04/2015) [-] Duel me, my friend. I shall meet you in the Dive to the Heart.
#330 to #329
-
thejudgingmoose (09/04/2015) [-] *Hefts Two Become One in his antlers.* Let us be fair, have a good fight.
#332 to #331
-
thejudgingmoose (09/04/2015) [-] It holds a very dear meaning to me. Even though there are better ones I have only used it since I got it. I do not care.
#289
-
sexyhimself (06/11/2015) [-] Yo, check who da colored text again!!!!!
Also, you have a colored text item in your FJ inventory majigger
Also, you have a colored text item in your FJ inventory majigger
![Hollow Grumpstion [Extended YTPMV]](https://img.youtube.com/vi/cTVCSOji1Og/default.jpg)
#274 to #273
-
pumkinz (05/20/2015) [-] Oh, you put the wrong link in the description then, or you didn't customize your url, either way www.youtube.com/user/Blizzard-Knight- comes up as an error
#252 to #251
-
beams (05/16/2015) [-] James S Allen and James W Ford, two communists, wrote The Negroes in a Soviet America in 1935 which repeated the rhetoric that came out of the Communist Internationale. In order to communize America, the negroes must be used to spark a mass movement. The negro communist movement alone would not succeed in the revolution, they would be only one part of a mass movement which would be mostly proletarian of all colors.
The theory offered was that there must be two revolutions at once. One would be a revolution organized in the south as part of a plot for the heavily populated areas in the southern states to secede and form an independent communist black nation. At the same time there'd be a campaign for equal rights throughout the entire United States.
The southern black nation idea was ludicrous. Yes, a majority of blacks live in the south and there is many majority black areas, but there is more whites in the south and each black majority area is often over a dozen miles form the next one. Also, many blacks were coexisting with whites just fine in the south. Yes, racial struggles existed but blacks almost universally wanted peaceful integration which they believed would happen naturally without government involvement.
The black nation idea took off in the black ghettos of the north. There, they felt they were surrounded by white nieghborhoods trapping them in the ghetto. Many blacks in these ghettos felt they were colonized by the whites and thus they bought the idea of a separate nation.
Though in the ghetto too, the idea of a separate nation was ridiculous to the ears of most blacks. It only persuaded a rather small percentage of blacks to take action, and most were under 25 anyway.
Malcolm X was a leading voice in the movement for a black nation. Black gangs in the street, organized by members of the Black Muslim movement, instigated the riots in Harlem, Manchester, Philadelphia, Jersey City and other cities in 1964. They all happened within days of each other. Then there was the riots in Watts in 1965, the worst rioting the country had seen since thousands were killed in the white supremacist/anarchist/progressive yes they were all the same but that is a WHOLE NOTHER STORY chaos of the early 1900s.
The theory offered was that there must be two revolutions at once. One would be a revolution organized in the south as part of a plot for the heavily populated areas in the southern states to secede and form an independent communist black nation. At the same time there'd be a campaign for equal rights throughout the entire United States.
The southern black nation idea was ludicrous. Yes, a majority of blacks live in the south and there is many majority black areas, but there is more whites in the south and each black majority area is often over a dozen miles form the next one. Also, many blacks were coexisting with whites just fine in the south. Yes, racial struggles existed but blacks almost universally wanted peaceful integration which they believed would happen naturally without government involvement.
The black nation idea took off in the black ghettos of the north. There, they felt they were surrounded by white nieghborhoods trapping them in the ghetto. Many blacks in these ghettos felt they were colonized by the whites and thus they bought the idea of a separate nation.
Though in the ghetto too, the idea of a separate nation was ridiculous to the ears of most blacks. It only persuaded a rather small percentage of blacks to take action, and most were under 25 anyway.
Malcolm X was a leading voice in the movement for a black nation. Black gangs in the street, organized by members of the Black Muslim movement, instigated the riots in Harlem, Manchester, Philadelphia, Jersey City and other cities in 1964. They all happened within days of each other. Then there was the riots in Watts in 1965, the worst rioting the country had seen since thousands were killed in the white supremacist/anarchist/progressive yes they were all the same but that is a WHOLE NOTHER STORY chaos of the early 1900s.
#255 to #253
-
beams (05/16/2015) [-] Martin Luther King was a radical, by any definition. His advocatism would had fallen on deaf ears for many of his ideals were rather extreme and unpopular. But there was also Malcom X and the violent black revolutionaries. MLK was a moderate compared to them.
The violents and the nonviolents had supported eachother. The non-violent people would not have the power to back up threats. The violent people would be viewed as criminals if there was no nonviolent characters giving people the image of the violent instigators as activists that lost faith in the nonviolent process.
Martin Luther King's Southern Christian Leadership Council had joined with the NAACP, SNCC and CORE to form the Council of Federated Organizations. COFO. This was a southern activism group that combined violent and nonviolents together.
The violents and the nonviolents had supported eachother. The non-violent people would not have the power to back up threats. The violent people would be viewed as criminals if there was no nonviolent characters giving people the image of the violent instigators as activists that lost faith in the nonviolent process.
Martin Luther King's Southern Christian Leadership Council had joined with the NAACP, SNCC and CORE to form the Council of Federated Organizations. COFO. This was a southern activism group that combined violent and nonviolents together.
#256 to #255
-
beams (05/16/2015) [-] 
The point of COFO was to be viewed as a government for just the blacks. It was meant to be a rival government. They formed the Freedom Democratic Party as a rival to the Democratic Party. They did "voter drives" and "voter educations" and organized "Freedom votes." All part of the "Freedom Riders." Freedom votes were votes among blacks for various rival parties that were in existence back in that time. Freedom votes were cast in "freedom elections" which were organized by COFO, not by any state nor local government. So the votes cast didnt elect any actual person to an actual government position. Dont say the votes didn't matter: they were meant to establish the image of a rival government.
The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) was, violent. One of their members to serve as president of the organization was Stokely Charmichael, who had given speeches inciting crowds of blacks to riot throughout most of the sixties like in video linked above. He later would become a lower ranking member of SNCC who worked as a representative to the media. He had gone to Nortth Vietnam's capitol and interviewed many of the government officials there in a light showing North Vietnam to be a progressive nation.
#257 to #256
-
beams (05/16/2015) [-] SNCC was so violent they had to change their name in 1969 to Student National Coordinating Committee.
Robert F Williams was a local coordinator of the NAACP in North Carolina. He fled to Cuba and published the Crusader and did a radio show that broadcasted into America. He advocated violence as pic related suggests. Rosa Parks spoke at his funeral and said he was as much a hero as Dr King
We always hear about the march on washington. We always hear about MLK's assassination. But we never quite hear about that five year in between period. A lot happened.
Here is how the nonviolent theory works. First, the disadvantaged peoples will protest nonviolently for a change. The change doesnt come. As the downtrodden continue to suffer in poverty and under oppression, they eventually cannot take it any longer and rise up in violent rebellion. MLK expressed the rhetoric that the riots of 1964, Watts, and the much larger riots of 1967 were the results of nonviolence not working and he supported the violence in his statements coming just short of outright admitting he supported them.
MLK had been in activist organizations since 1947, 8 years before the Montgomery Bus Boycott. Much of that 8 year period is off the record. We know he was a member of the Southern Negro Youth Council. This was the youth arm of the National Negro Council. Dozens of dissidents had testified before congress that this was a communist organization. The National Negro COngress had filed a document titled "We Charge Genocide" which asked for the United Nations to interfere in the American politics (which would had meant the UN controlling much of our government) on behalf of the blacks in America.
If you want ONE good reason why appealing to the United Nations is bad, I challenge you to look up the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Look at Article 8. Where does it say rights come from? Look at Article 29 Section 3. This one section alone makes the document bad.
MLK gave a speech called "Beyond Vietnam" where he said America was "on the wrong side of a global revolution" and asked for a world where all countries had their governments linked together more closely. Or, a one-world government if you will.
He also wanted an Economic Bill of Rights which would guarantee every American a right to a job. Today, there are two million people employed by the Federal Government making the Federal Government the largest employer in the country. Had MLK had his way, the government would have to create positions for, and pay, for five times as many workers.
Obligation of all people to work/jobs for all people chosen and paid for by the government. This is one of the ten planks of communism in the communist manifesto. Marx wrote that communism could not succeed in any country until all ten were fulfilled.
Robert F Williams was a local coordinator of the NAACP in North Carolina. He fled to Cuba and published the Crusader and did a radio show that broadcasted into America. He advocated violence as pic related suggests. Rosa Parks spoke at his funeral and said he was as much a hero as Dr King
We always hear about the march on washington. We always hear about MLK's assassination. But we never quite hear about that five year in between period. A lot happened.
Here is how the nonviolent theory works. First, the disadvantaged peoples will protest nonviolently for a change. The change doesnt come. As the downtrodden continue to suffer in poverty and under oppression, they eventually cannot take it any longer and rise up in violent rebellion. MLK expressed the rhetoric that the riots of 1964, Watts, and the much larger riots of 1967 were the results of nonviolence not working and he supported the violence in his statements coming just short of outright admitting he supported them.
MLK had been in activist organizations since 1947, 8 years before the Montgomery Bus Boycott. Much of that 8 year period is off the record. We know he was a member of the Southern Negro Youth Council. This was the youth arm of the National Negro Council. Dozens of dissidents had testified before congress that this was a communist organization. The National Negro COngress had filed a document titled "We Charge Genocide" which asked for the United Nations to interfere in the American politics (which would had meant the UN controlling much of our government) on behalf of the blacks in America.
If you want ONE good reason why appealing to the United Nations is bad, I challenge you to look up the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Look at Article 8. Where does it say rights come from? Look at Article 29 Section 3. This one section alone makes the document bad.
MLK gave a speech called "Beyond Vietnam" where he said America was "on the wrong side of a global revolution" and asked for a world where all countries had their governments linked together more closely. Or, a one-world government if you will.
He also wanted an Economic Bill of Rights which would guarantee every American a right to a job. Today, there are two million people employed by the Federal Government making the Federal Government the largest employer in the country. Had MLK had his way, the government would have to create positions for, and pay, for five times as many workers.
Obligation of all people to work/jobs for all people chosen and paid for by the government. This is one of the ten planks of communism in the communist manifesto. Marx wrote that communism could not succeed in any country until all ten were fulfilled.
#258 to #257
-
beams (05/16/2015) [-] Why are civil rights bad? They arent. What has been done in the name of civil rights is bad. Notice how many black anons you see posting on the internet about how they hate that some blacks act as if they speak for the whole race. Same thing in the sixties. Guy in pic is Ben Bella. Not really the type of man a so-called pacifist would associate with.
