Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#304 - mattass
Reply 0
(11/09/2013) [-]
its weird cuz the ghosts one looks worse then mw2
#238 - RonsteR
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
Call of duty is definitely a repetitive game, but the fast pace shooting in those games is sorta what a lot of people apparently like, i myself buy a cod game every year simply because my friends all enjoy it and it gives me something to do
#237 - arnoldnorris
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
I heard Ghosts is actually pretty good. Can someone confirm this?
#249 to #237 - RonsteR
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
I finished the campaign, imo it wasnt the best campaigns in the series but it did have some pretty epic mission and scenarios but the ending however lead me going wtf *might be spoiler so read at own risk* the ending basically confirmed a sequel with the way it ended but to me it seemed to be done poorly *again, this is my opinion*
The online is also pretty decent with the create a soldier feature and all the perks you can have, but there isnt much game modes as compared to the others *my favorite was demolition and they removed it so i find multiplayer not as exciting in this one, but i digress, the multiplayer is still fun to play with the 2 other game modes cranked and blitsed which is very fast paced,

and as for extinction, that **** is enjoyable as ****, can not stop playing, and i think it could possibly be the best thing they added in this game,

but yeah these are my opinions, look up gameplays of the vid and try it out if it interests you
#202 - KingJuan
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
I really like Call of Duty games. (obviously millions of people do but its not popular to admit)
The campaign for ghosts really made me sad- it was only 4 hours long.

thank god Riley was so enjoyable
#209 to #202 - zenkon
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
There is nothing wrong if you like call of duty, most of the gamers at some point liked the game, it just get boring when they start to making them one by year. and nothing really change from one to another. I still like the campaing I think they are pretty awesome and I haven't played another shoter/war game that has that kind camping.
#248 to #202 - koolkidkonnor
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
WHAT! the campaign for COD games was the best part after the MP go repetitive. now its only 4 hrs long?!
#179 - dracolegacy
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
if it aint broke dont fix it.
#176 - anon
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
ccccccccccccock
#172 - crazymaniscrazy
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
Im crazy.
#145 - anon
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
I haven't opened it yet but i got it today, is it good or should i take it back
#155 to #145 - reinbowxdash
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
take it back
#119 - tisjunkisdamnfunny
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
ryse looks so ******* good
#150 to #119 - bayleef
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
Omfg it ******* does
#294 to #150 - tisjunkisdamnfunny
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
go pc!!!!!!
#118 - Bad Man
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
The last COD I played for campaign was Modern Warfare 2. I only played the newer ones for Team Deathmatch and Gun Game. Now that Ghosts doesn't have the latter, I'm just going to get BF4 on Black Friday.
#101 - redrex
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
now, were they being lazy, or is there some point to using the same cutscene?
#99 - anon
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
just like pokemon, but you'd all suck nintendos dick for that.
#97 - princesssakura
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
Not sure if lazy, or trying to make a point
#95 - iamalexrawr
Reply -1
(11/08/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#113 to #95 - soupkittenagain
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
Good to know.
#60 - quietearp
Reply 0
(11/07/2013) [-]
Incidentally (most likely not) quoting a much better game.
#38 - ichies
Reply 0
(11/07/2013) [-]
Just a day ago posted a thorough comment about this on another website -.-.

tl;dr both BF and CoD games are garbage made in less than a year, unlike real good games which take 2-4x (if not more) times that. And that's the reason behind a whole ******* ton of assets being reused. Half of these games aren't even worthy of being an add-ons, just some models, textures and maps. Some people even believed this **** right here was supposed to be a wink to the MW2 gamers. I just hope I'm as rich as those people to throw my money away like that, otherwise it would be blatantly stupid, oh wait...
#45 to #38 - anon
Reply 0
(11/07/2013) [-]
Technically, CoD switches off between Treyarch and Infinity Ward, so no, it takes more than a year.

Though how it does and how they can still be such crap when everything is just reused I do not know.
#65 to #38 - Elemental
Reply 0
(11/07/2013) [-]
BF3 was release at the beginning of 2011. Feb 3rd to be exact. BF 4 just dropped.
BF4 development took 2.5 years.

By your own standard, BF development time qualifies it to be able to be a good game.

Also development time depends on the size of the developer. Dice is nothing to sneeze at.
#78 to #65 - ichies
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
Well BF4 seems kinda ok, I am actually gonna try it myself with my friend (we did some MW2 co-op before for the heck of it). Before that the only games from those series I've played were 2142 and the original CoD. Couple things to note, development time means ****, it took BF4 devs 2 years (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlefield_3) to make a map by the name of shanghai, which is almost whole made of concrete. I mean, did you see that abomination? Most of it is just plainly GRAY, with a tree here and there, some occasional ads, white rubbish on the roads and a cloud of dust everywhere to hide it. Sure the aerial view is nice, but that's it.

I'm a true Indie fan, I know my **** around those and I've seen what a handful, or just one person can achieve in a time frame of 2-4 years, without tens of years of assets and experience, in making of the same **** over and over again, with just little changes. There is no excuse for those big developers.
#80 to #78 - Elemental
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
Shanghai has some secrets that make it a lot more interesting. Most maps have scripted events that get triggered throughout the match. The map Flood, literally floods as you play and the vehicule options change as it goes. the longer the match goes the higher the water level.
#82 to #80 - ichies
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
Wow scripting, also in case you didn't know, most of the people don't even like those. When the skyscraper falls, it just becomes a pile of rubbish which is way less interesting. Only heard about the Flood one so I won't comment on that. My point is, everyone laughs at the 'omg graphics!', but when you actually look at it from a closer perspective, there is not that much to see at all, so what is there really? 2 scripted maps (btw that's nothing innovative), cool aerial view and an ironicly poor graphical fidelty.. I'm not mentioning anything else because that's mostly taken over from the previous titles. Well...
#87 to #82 - Elemental
Reply 0
(11/08/2013) [-]
The scripting is a lot less dumb sounding when you watch a dam explode in front of you while you assault the objective. It's definitely a pretty game.

As for the skyscraper falling, it is less visually interesting but it can turn the tide of the match. If one team was holding the skyscraper when it fell, they all die most of the time and the other team moves in before the dust settles. The rubble may be less pretty but it is way more dynamic to fight in, and a whole lot harder to hold than 6 elevators.
#28 - slapchoppin
Reply 0
(11/07/2013) [-]
doesn't all of america get ****** up by south america?

thats pretty creative by FPS standards
#27 - mrjweezy
Reply 0
(11/07/2013) [-]
I just told my roomates that ghost is going to be just like mw2.
Now i have proof
#19 - mutzaki
Reply 0
(11/07/2013) [-]
That's not true. I think I'm seeing more bloom in the newer one.
#17 - Xplode
Reply 0
(11/07/2013) [-]
Call of booty
Retorting for doody