Upload
Login or register
Back to the content '(Untitled)' Leave a comment Refresh Comments (242)
[ 242 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
#186 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
I thought the US invaded syria because they were using chemical weapons, and that is not allowed in the Geneva Convention.


I don't know much about politics, correct me if I'm wrong.
#238 to #186 - sageofbattleon
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Geneva convention and several (several being a double digit number here) treaties that compel prettymuch every developed nation to act if a country uses chemical weapons.

Another point is that we aren't "punishing" them like some people are saying, we are removing their ability to make another strike of this type.
#185 - anon
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
But war is how we can distract the citizens from out own problems
#164 - cmcdftw
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
You know its funny because war actually helps nation's substantially, such as how ww2 basically pulled us out of the depression
#152 - urbancohort
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Says the greatest country in the world.
#142 - demandsgayversion
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
If you wanna go over to the civilians who are melting from chemical weapons and tell them "Sorry, we can't help you because our job market is bad", then you go ahead.
#175 to #142 - anon
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Then how about you go ahead and explain to the parents of the servicemen who will inevitably die that we just had to go interfere in another countries business based on loose evidence.
#187 to #175 - demandsgayversion
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
We have hundreds of videos of never gas killing civilians, reports from many hospitals of people suffering from nerve gas, and the leader dude confirmed that he was using nerve gas. Also, I think the parents of soldiers would understand their child's death more than the parents of young children.
#204 to #187 - Kanoah
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
You realize we're not physically invading, right? Tell me which U.S soldiers would die from an invasion that doesnt happen
#229 to #204 - demandsgayversion
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Tell that to the other guy. I was countering his ****** argument part to strengthen my own argument. I showed that his argument was wrong and that even the part of it that was untrue and made up was still wrong.
#236 to #229 - Kanoah
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
No, I know, I just replied to the wrong comment, sorry 'bout that.
#239 to #236 - demandsgayversion
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
derp
#215 to #204 - anon
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
We'll have ships in the water and planes in the sky, if we strike Assad he isn't just going to not use his military, there WILL be some deaths.
#189 to #187 - anon
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
We know nerve gas was used but there is 0 evidence Assad used them, in fact UN reports say the device used to launch the gas was primitive, that's not something a professional army is going to use.
#195 to #189 - demandsgayversion
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Obama JUST had an address. Did you not watch it?
#181 to #175 - anon
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Loose evidence??
#106 - avatarsarefornoobs
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
first, its not an invasion   
second, this **** is getting old, it gets brought up almost every ******* day   
third, wheres the funny?
first, its not an invasion
second, this **** is getting old, it gets brought up almost every ******* day
third, wheres the funny?
#97 - tiredofthis
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Here here...
#89 - roflsaucer
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Except, you know, we're probably not going in to Syria the way things are going.
#78 - thebestpieever ONLINE
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Yeah... protip: when ************* BRITAIN rejects war. WE that wanted to go to war for a ************* PIG then it is perhaps not a very smart war.
#75 - Zydratejunkie
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
mu If we MT MIME
sonnet: Imu was our -
THAT? BE GREAT.


It... lightbulb is a poet, tears of awe and inspiration leak from my eyes.
#56 - steil
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
#27 - restfullwicked
Reply 0
(09/10/2013) [-]
the US Invades other countries to distract people from doing that. Britain did the same thing. im fairly sure thats how we ended up with an empire. "so yeah, can we do something about all this slavery and **** now?" "we COULD do that, but we just found out that India has some even BIGGER diamonds"
#219 - urfunnyman
Reply -1
(09/11/2013) [-]
dat lightbulb
dat lightbulb
#94 - frogie
Reply -1
(09/11/2013) [-]
But war is a source of income and jobs, which makes going to war efficient. Don't get me wrong, I don't want the states to go to war and drain more of Canada's money..but still.
#81 - swagswagyolo
Reply -1
(09/11/2013) [-]
But the russians are helping us!
#4 - whothefkisanon
Reply -2
(09/10/2013) [-]
That's the point.
Let's make trouble outside our country to forget the trouble we already have here. It's an old thing politicans have been doing for millenia.
#25 - fyaq
-4
has deleted their comment [-]
#7 - enkmaster
Reply -4
(09/10/2013) [-]
Considering a large part of the American economy depends on attacking someone every once in a while that isnt really an option.