Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#210 - spacemasterfive (09/11/2013) [-]
but... weapons of mass destruction...
#193 - qwertywtf (09/11/2013) [-]
We obviously aren't invading Syria because of "chemical warfare".
We just want their Dethcones.
User avatar #186 - Zaxplab ONLINE (09/11/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I thought the US invaded syria because they were using chemical weapons, and that is not allowed in the Geneva Convention.


I don't know much about politics, correct me if I'm wrong.
User avatar #152 - urbancohort (09/11/2013) [-]
Says the greatest country in the world.
User avatar #142 - demandsgayversion (09/11/2013) [+] (10 replies)
If you wanna go over to the civilians who are melting from chemical weapons and tell them "Sorry, we can't help you because our job market is bad", then you go ahead.
#139 - anonymous (09/11/2013) [-]
There are three types of people who hate america:
1. People who have never lived anywhere other than america.
2. People who have never lived in america.
3. Edgy faggots.
#106 - avatarsarefornoobs ONLINE (09/11/2013) [-]
first, its not an invasion   
second, this 						****					 is getting old, it gets brought up almost every 						*******					 day   
third, wheres the funny?
first, its not an invasion
second, this **** is getting old, it gets brought up almost every ******* day
third, wheres the funny?
#80 - skullnigga (09/11/2013) [+] (1 reply)
but then if we didnt get involved we'd get **** for not getting involved
User avatar #78 - thebestpieever (09/11/2013) [-]
Yeah... protip: when ************* BRITAIN rejects war. WE that wanted to go to war for a ************* PIG then it is perhaps not a very smart war.
#35 - anonymous (09/10/2013) [-]
I'm a pretty easygoing guy but it really bothers me that this says "invade".
We wouldn't be invading it, we'd just be ******* it up with some explosions n' **** from the sky
'merica
#27 - restfullwicked (09/10/2013) [-]
the US Invades other countries to distract people from doing that. Britain did the same thing. im fairly sure thats how we ended up with an empire. "so yeah, can we do something about all this slavery and **** now?" "we COULD do that, but we just found out that India has some even BIGGER diamonds"
#26 - anonymous (09/10/2013) [+] (2 replies)
It's not an invasion, it's strikes.
With missiles.

There might be ground troops, but without congress they can't stay there for more than 60 days.
#219 - urfunnyman (09/11/2013) [-]
dat lightbulb
dat lightbulb
User avatar #94 - frogie ONLINE (09/11/2013) [-]
But war is a source of income and jobs, which makes going to war efficient. Don't get me wrong, I don't want the states to go to war and drain more of Canada's money..but still.
#81 - swagswagyolo (09/11/2013) [-]
But the russians are helping us!
User avatar #4 - whothefkisanon (09/10/2013) [-]
That's the point.
Let's make trouble outside our country to forget the trouble we already have here. It's an old thing politicans have been doing for millenia.
-4
#25 - fyaq has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #7 - enkmaster (09/10/2013) [-]
Considering a large part of the American economy depends on attacking someone every once in a while that isnt really an option.
 Friends (0)