Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #105 - sasquatchjc (09/11/2013) [+] (6 replies)
While I agree, I believe many people don't really understand exactly WHY we butt our noses into other country's business; money. When we go to war with another country, factories constantly produce weapons which skyrocket the economy a **** ton. While some might argue more than others on the morality of this like "but are american lives worth it?", it's just the cold truth that war is actually really good for our economy.
#101 - lulzdealer ONLINE (09/11/2013) [+] (3 replies)
This image has expired
I agree wholeheartedly, the only thing that worries me is that it makes us look weak as **** ; not taking action when we said, when we VOWED we would.
User avatar #103 to #101 - crazycommando (09/11/2013) [-]
or we could top running overt actions (invading countries and **** ), straighten out our country, while still running covert strikes on specific targets, still take action while keeping a low profile and ruling out our own problems

just a thought
User avatar #68 - xkronusx (09/11/2013) [-]
ahem America FUCK YEAH!
User avatar #51 - uzbekistan (09/10/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Imagine if your country was using chemical weapons on YOU. Would you want someone to help or not?
User avatar #11 - kyojinn (09/10/2013) [-]
Because spending money rebuilding the country we've just destroyed, makes much more sense than abstaining from conflict. And using the money that was saved on things that could better our own country... like education, funding of the sciences, a proper healthcare reform etc...
inb4 'peace loving faggot' I served in the Armed forces, and deployed into a combat zone, our wars are done, lets fix our own **** yeah?
User avatar #186 - Zaxplab ONLINE (09/11/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I thought the US invaded syria because they were using chemical weapons, and that is not allowed in the Geneva Convention.

I don't know much about politics, correct me if I'm wrong.
#185 - anonymous (09/11/2013) [-]
But war is how we can distract the citizens from out own problems
User avatar #183 - srskate (09/11/2013) [-]
So what you're saying is, you want the army to straighten out America.
#172 - speritblood (09/11/2013) [-]
WW2 had proven that once we stop invading countries our economy will collapse
User avatar #164 - cmcdftw (09/11/2013) [-]
You know its funny because war actually helps nation's substantially, such as how ww2 basically pulled us out of the depression
User avatar #152 - urbancohort (09/11/2013) [-]
Says the greatest country in the world.
#80 - skullnigga (09/11/2013) [+] (1 reply)
but then if we didnt get involved we'd get **** for not getting involved
User avatar #78 - thebestpieever (09/11/2013) [-]
Yeah... protip: when ************* BRITAIN rejects war. WE that wanted to go to war for a ************* PIG then it is perhaps not a very smart war.
User avatar #75 - Zydratejunkie (09/11/2013) [-]
mu If we MT MIME
sonnet: Imu was our -

It... lightbulb is a poet, tears of awe and inspiration leak from my eyes.
#71 - anonymous (09/11/2013) [+] (1 reply)
...... **** you op

Hippie bitch
You would let children die of chemical war fare you are **** !
#70 - anonymous (09/11/2013) [-]
to be fair, jumping into world war 2 did fix the economy. maybe they're trying for a repeat?
#67 - xkronusx has deleted their comment [-]
#52 - craftyatom (09/11/2013) [-]
Credit for the original goes to: xkcd.com/1232/
#35 - anonymous (09/10/2013) [-]
I'm a pretty easygoing guy but it really bothers me that this says "invade".
We wouldn't be invading it, we'd just be ******* it up with some explosions n' **** from the sky
 Friends (0)