Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #213 - lorkhan (09/06/2013) [-]
Just because someone is famous doesn't make me care about their love-life or anything about them. Why is this such a big deal?
User avatar #206 - mrhazzy (09/06/2013) [-]
he's clearly got a good head on his shoulders now...

he clearly didn't when he started dating her...
#205 - dafunkad (09/06/2013) [-]
people care so much
people care so much
#220 to #205 - taurusguy (09/06/2013) [-]
I guess you cant say this when it is still a "hot" subject, got hated on like **** on FJ when i said i didnt care when it was the next day from the VMA or so.
#209 to #205 - herbolifee (09/06/2013) [-]
^ This exactly. Seriously, who the **** cares.
#183 - Gigsta (09/06/2013) [-]
MFW Miley Cyrus is mentioned
MFW Miley Cyrus is mentioned
#230 to #183 - fullmetaloptimist (09/06/2013) [-]
Miley Cyrus
#182 - brawlmaster (09/06/2013) [-]
boyfriends face when
boyfriends face when
User avatar #164 - demandsgayversion (09/06/2013) [-]
Maybe it was a joke. Just hear me out. So she was booked for this dude to dance around in her underwear on the VMAs for this guy - a pretty ****** up proposition. So instead of saying no and leaving it to some other whore to jiggle around on stage, she decides to sabotage the performance. She does whatever the **** that is with her hair, dresses in nasty yet comfortably supportive underwear, and proceeds to make a fool of herself. But for some reason the opportunity to reveal that it was a joke never came out.

Unlikely, but an alternative. Her being on any amount of drugs, I still wouldn't think the PR people or security would let her go out there like that unless it was a joke.
User avatar #254 to #164 - jockothecrock (09/06/2013) [-]
explain the brittney's comeback fiasco then
User avatar #282 to #254 - demandsgayversion (09/06/2013) [-]
Idk what that is. I was simply giving an alternate explanation of this situation, I don't believe it or think it's more likely than she's just a druggy whore. But come on, NOBODY could find that underwear sexy. That's the one thing everyone overlooks. If it was some lacy thong and pasties, maybe this could be taken as seriously as everyone has been, but between her old person underwear, weird hair, stupid tongue face, and the fact that she's rubbing her ass on a referee, I really can't take this situation seriously at all.
User avatar #285 to #282 - jockothecrock (09/06/2013) [-]
have you seen what was Britney spears's comeback perfomance on the vma's? here is a link
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGtxxNrHHnE

she was so ashamed of this performance, she called herself a fat pig on stag, but she did bounce back. however, compare this to the miley cyrus thing. the thing is, these perfomances are run by tv executives, and the only thing they want is ratings and money. it doesn't matter if miley cyrus was doing drugs or not, there was nothing to prove that she did or didn't unless she announces the news to the public but she did went up onstage in a state that was unfit for a performer to be, whether emotionally, mentally, or physically. however, she did went up onstage because, you know, "the show must go on!" she must be in that period in her life where she believes that acting out is the way people will change they view her from adorable teen princess to adult "ratchet" queen.
#162 - internetknight (09/06/2013) [-]
Yall mother ******* need to go watch, God Bless America
#155 - fairyprincess (09/06/2013) [-]
She's a feral
#214 to #155 - jumytime (09/06/2013) [-]
*******					 ferals, man
******* ferals, man
User avatar #236 to #214 - teranin ONLINE (09/06/2013) [-]
South Park Sacrifice Song
User avatar #287 to #236 - jumytime (09/07/2013) [-]
Wat
#145 - jaraandrew (09/06/2013) [-]
What I think is a reasonable argument against that night - Here's why her "performance" was gross to me: It wasn't that she was a Disney channel sweetheart, it wasn't that she's trying to make a statement, it's not that I think she's some whore for being sexual on stage - that performance was disgusting to me because it was just plain awful! I recently watched her on Youtube singing old country songs in a modest dress and just a guitar and her voice and it was great. She could just stand there and I'd listen to her sing old school country ballads. She actually earned some respect. But this? This was awful. Tasteless, tacky, messy, and sexual yet not at all sexy. It's a shame she feels she needs to resort to that to make a statement. It would have been more amazing and worthy of respect had she just sung a beautiful song. IDK. Just my opinion.
User avatar #168 to #145 - stevenrm **User deleted account** (09/06/2013) [-]
i just looked up these videos you were talking about, she is a good singer
User avatar #157 to #145 - konradkurze (09/06/2013) [-]
it wasnt a statement, it was her blackmailed by the system to do that **** and distract people from usa wanting more war

sad she had to be the sacrificial lamb
User avatar #196 to #157 - thebrownydestroyer **User deleted account** (09/06/2013) [-]
That's a pretty far out guess you have there
User avatar #199 to #196 - konradkurze (09/06/2013) [-]
well why else would an american sweetheart turn into a tramp overnight, unless whe was either blackmailed or bribed to do it

User avatar #222 to #199 - elyiia (09/06/2013) [-]
Over night? The VMAs have just been the latest low point on the ever descending spiral that is Miley Cyrus post Disney.
User avatar #224 to #222 - konradkurze (09/06/2013) [-]
idk i havent given a **** to pay attention to her to see how she fell
all i knew was she was supposed to be a good girl hannah montana
User avatar #201 to #199 - thebrownydestroyer **User deleted account** (09/06/2013) [-]
I'm just saying it's a bit out there to assume she did it to distract people from an upcoming war
User avatar #204 to #201 - konradkurze (09/06/2013) [-]
well usa has played the terror threat card too much, the boston bombing was just far too convenient and obvious....so they had to turn to something outrageous in a different way to distract peoples attention

since they cant blow up more americans without digging themselves deeper, they picked using a much-loved celebrity who till now had a clean record of being a little darling to the american people and turning her into a skank knowing that would hit america right in the apple pie heart
User avatar #207 to #204 - thebrownydestroyer **User deleted account** (09/06/2013) [-]
I guess there is a slight possibility
#143 - sofunnyso (09/06/2013) [-]
She's terrible, but that doesn't justify being terrible towards her. He has the right to dump her but isn't dumping by text a little bit too much? especially since they're freakin engaged!
User avatar #144 to #143 - thirdjess ONLINE (09/06/2013) [-]
Nah, they'd had an on and off relationship for a looong time. Because of her behaviour.
#152 to #144 - sofunnyso (09/06/2013) [-]
Oh, I didn't know that. I'm not much into celebrity news and stuff.
User avatar #153 to #152 - thirdjess ONLINE (09/06/2013) [-]
Me neither, really. I wouldn't know this tidbit at all if it weren't for my Mum reading all those gossip mags!
#142 - schmitty (09/06/2013) [-]
Sweet, so she's back on the market.
#179 to #142 - anonymous (09/06/2013) [-]
go ahead you can have her chicken ass
User avatar #159 to #142 - konradkurze (09/06/2013) [-]
you'd have less social issues if you dated amy winehouse's dead body than dating a sell-out slut
#149 to #142 - fizzor (09/06/2013) [-]
...   
You'd bang that?
...
You'd bang that?
#225 to #149 - squeejee ONLINE (09/06/2013) [-]
maybe if backed up a year or 2.
#216 to #149 - anonymoose (09/06/2013) [-]
Don't pretend you wouldn't. One unflattering photo of her ass and Funnyjunk pretend she's ugly as **** . She's still hot.
#212 to #149 - anonymous (09/06/2013) [-]
half of funnyjunk would bang anything willing. Hell I'd **** her.
#156 to #149 - angelusprimus (09/06/2013) [-]
Well yes.
And let me tell you, if i was five years younger, twice as handsome, much much richer and very famous she would totally be into me!
User avatar #191 to #156 - cubanwhiteman (09/06/2013) [-]
Well if I were three years older, way more handsome than I need to be, actually had enough money to afford an appartment, moved out of my parents basement, had the courage to talk to a woman, actually start working out, became famous (not by singing, I cant sing.)and if I were the queen of England...
I'd still think you're a faggot.
#253 to #191 - angelusprimus (09/06/2013) [-]
I love when baby losers try to insult me online, its absolutely adorable!
Do another! Do another!
User avatar #284 to #253 - cubanwhiteman (09/06/2013) [-]
First off, baby losers? really?
Second off, it's called sarcasm. I wasn't insulting you with that comment, ******** . There's the insult.
User avatar #151 to #149 - schmitty (09/06/2013) [-]
Yes, yes I would. Because despite what everyone is currently saying about her being a whore and all that **** , all she really did was dance like a moron at the VMAs. She didn't go out and blow 20 dudes in a row. Besides, when she's not acting like a ******* weirdo I think she's kind of hot.
#189 to #151 - generalwatergate (09/06/2013) [-]
not yet.
#154 to #151 - fizzor (09/06/2013) [-]
Yeah, okay, whatever floats your boat. I've never found her attractive so yeah.
#165 to #154 - grandogger (09/06/2013) [-]
I think she's pretty, as in nice face features and physically nice to look at. But then she dresses like a freak and makes an ass of herself and now I wouldn't want to be in the same room as her. So yeah there's a difference between pretty and attractive
#137 - anonymous (09/06/2013) [-]
like she won't find somebody else in 5 minutes.
User avatar #136 - daboomee (09/06/2013) [-]
You know, WW3 is just about to break out...there's a MASSIVE amount of nuclear waste spilling in to the ocean from Japan...The human race probably wont survive the next 50 years...oh we're just gonna keep talking about Miley Cyrus twerking? Oh okay then.
#188 to #136 - anonymous (09/06/2013) [-]
50 years? LAWL get real.
User avatar #160 to #136 - konradkurze (09/06/2013) [-]
that was the whole point
she was blackmailed into doing that **** so mainstream public dont give a **** about the real world
#146 to #136 - anonymous (09/06/2013) [-]
You seem to underestimate the survivability of human beings.
You'd have just an easy time killing off all of humanity in 50 years as you would ants.
User avatar #139 to #136 - sexyhimself (09/06/2013) [-]
so the wordl will be like fallout?
except we will all be dead when the cool **** happens
#135 - xXRockerXx (09/06/2013) [-]
I think you confuse this site with facebook... Nobody gives a **** about miley. The moment she takes her clothes off though let us know.
#130 - rainytrain (09/06/2013) [-]
People should look at themselves in the mirror instead of using celebrities as scapegoats for their own problems.
User avatar #161 to #127 - konradkurze (09/06/2013) [-]
will smith proved hes still a black man wanting to tap a slutty white woman
User avatar #138 to #127 - darnhaz (09/06/2013) [-]
Can someone edit it to her dad dissapointed?
#166 to #138 - RobotSox **User deleted account** (09/06/2013) [-]
#125 - gwynn ONLINE (09/06/2013) [-]
#118 - lamarsmithgot (09/06/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Wow, I really couldn't possibly give less of a **** .
User avatar #112 - spankyy (09/06/2013) [-]
Is this true though? I know there a lot of gossip magazines that spread false rumors. Did he actually break things off with her for that?

Also, he's still a douche for doing it via text, regardless of how embarrassing her performance was.
User avatar #131 to #112 - fuzzyballs (09/06/2013) [-]
why do you even care?
User avatar #133 to #131 - spankyy (09/06/2013) [-]
Ehh, I don't really, but since it was brought up I was curious. Unless you mean me saying he's a douche for doing it through text. That's just me commenting that he's a douche.
#105 - asillytractor (09/06/2013) [-]
Did someone already point out the fact; who ******* cares? If she was just some random chick, no one would care, but because she's "famous" and does this **** on TV people talk about it ad nauseam. Once again I reiterate who the **** cares?
User avatar #134 to #105 - spankyy (09/06/2013) [-]
In response to him saying I care, it's kind of just curiosity since it was mentioned. I would not care at all normally (unless I knew her and actually cared about her in a personal sense). I however read this and was informed regardless, so i'm curious whether it's true or not.
User avatar #132 to #105 - fuzzyballs (09/06/2013) [-]
spankyy cares
 Friends (0)