Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#209 - wanicochil (08/26/2013) [+] (9 replies)
Heath Ledger isn't the best actor they could get for joker

He would of made for an excellent Riddler, but joker was meh

People just love him to bits because he died

Just like everyone hated Amy Winehouse, then praised her like a goddess when she died
User avatar #205 - jewsburninindaoven (08/26/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Why not Matt Damon? He is a far better actor and has played the action hero before well unlike Affleck who sucked as Daredevil. He also looks more the part in terms of body. Affleck is skinny while Damon is broad-shouldered and big. I'd much rather have Damon than Affleck but I'd still always prefer Bale.
#200 - felex (08/26/2013) [-]
I miss him.
User avatar #198 - olmesy (08/26/2013) [-]
With everyone complaining about how Affleck is going to make a bad batman because he looks nothing like him, has anyone noticed how he has a very similar jawline to Christian Bale?

You know, the only part of batman you can properly see with the mask on
0
#187 - itachijebest has deleted their comment [-]
#186 - anonymous (08/26/2013) [+] (1 reply)
The problems with this movie start with Zack Snyder as the director, not casting Ben Affleck as the Batman.

all we should hope for is that Ben Affleck can teach Snyder how to shoot a ******* movie on top of not sucking as Batman
#185 - rockmanfan (08/26/2013) [+] (1 reply)
since we're comparing every batman film in existance, i didnt like the 89 burton batman film. the joker had no motive, no plan, and really just came off as silly and non threatening. and while i love jack nicohlson, i felt he was just being jack, and didnt really have a character to act out.
since we're comparing every batman film in existance, i didnt like the 89 burton batman film. the joker had no motive, no plan, and really just came off as silly and non threatening. and while i love jack nicohlson, i felt he was just being jack, and didnt really have a character to act out.
User avatar #184 - thewaronbeingcool (08/26/2013) [-]
I'm just pissed off because I heard they were looking for someone to play an older Batman.

Got my hopes up thinking it'd be a film based on the Dark Knight Returns or something.
User avatar #182 - Onemanretardpack (08/26/2013) [-]
I like the older joker better. I can't remember his name for the life of me, but I just grew up on the older batman movies. Plus, Heath was written a VERY good part in the movie. Being a good actor can only go so far if you have a **** character
#179 - anonymous (08/26/2013) [-]
Its not considered.... IT IS THE BEST.

The old hurp durp laughing gas, now Imma laugh for no reason joker is kinda meh....

Heath Ledger and John DiMaggio best jokers ever.
#160 - DutchBlood (08/26/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #143 - tehlulzbringer (08/26/2013) [+] (3 replies)
the funny thing is, had he not died after filming that film, he would have never won an oscar for that half arsed performance
User avatar #194 to #143 - iloveburzum (08/26/2013) [-]
Even if dying got him that oscar, its pushing it a bit to say half assed performance.

Its maybe not the joker you'd expect, but he clearly pushes it to the limit. There is no laziness there, not from him.

Which part was half arsed?
#95 - anonymous (08/26/2013) [-]
HE WASNT THAT ******* GREAT WHAT THE **** !
User avatar #90 - ihatecarltonbanks (08/26/2013) [-]
live action of the character? why so narrow about it. it was in my opinion one of the best acting performances of all time.
User avatar #87 - jcjohnson (08/26/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Doesnt mean ****** Ben Asslick would make a good batman.
User avatar #45 - dubious (08/26/2013) [-]
ADAM.....WEST.....
#27 - anonymous (08/26/2013) [-]
Heath was a one of a kind and is gone now. Benny simply isn't capable of pulling this one off.
#21 - ieatsnatch (08/26/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Batman is a comic novel that many people have and will continue to make interpretations of, and i dont see the problem with that. Why do some people get so offended when someone else decided to make a new movie about it, its not like there can only be one good version. " **** YOU CHRISTOPHER NOLAN, TIM BURTON AND JACK NICHOLSON WERE GOOD ENOUGH WHY RUIN IT!?"
They did a great job with that movie, and so did christopher nolan, they are both very different from each other as well so why compare them? Cant they just admit both jack nicholson and heath ledger made fantastic jokers?
#13 - chudboy (08/26/2013) [-]
I'm guessing this post is pointed to the latest news of Ben Affleck being cast as the new Batman. To be honest, I'm not entirely enraged by it. Of course there are other actors I would consider. But look at Ben Affleck now, he might of been in comedy movies etc and doesn't seem like a good pick, but look at Argo. Won awards for his Directing etc. He seems to be taking it more seriously, and maybe bored of that comedy role. He was a ****** Daredevil, but I didn't expect too much from that film anyway. You can't blame him for that movie alone, blame the writting, and the directing too.

Now if you think of the reputation the Batman films have now, and good writers and director coming to the film, I can imagine Affleck actually being good in this film.

Now this post points out a great argument. People didn't think Ledger was a great choice, because of his previous films etc. And many think you should pick an actor with the right experience, and has a good reputation. But look at what he did for the Role. I'm sure Ben Affleck will do the same (though maybe not the same effect as Heath Ledger did, or Bale for that matter).

User avatar #175 - ZeGerman (08/26/2013) [-]
Sooo, after this movie, Affleck will die?
 Friends (0)