x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#164 - Jeff C (08/23/2013) [-]
I remember walking home late at night a few weeks ago, and you ever get the feeling that you're not alone? .. Well, I quickly turned around to find a .44 magnum on the ground, and it began to mug me with no human input.

Oh, wait, you mean to say PEOPLE kill people? Oh well now I just feel silly
User avatar #160 - perseeus (08/23/2013) [-]
I can't believe that there's actually a gofuckyourself.com
#132 - erpetrich ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]
I don't drink Starbucks, I tried it once, tasted like **** , never going again
User avatar #277 - maxismahname (08/23/2013) [-]
I thought it was Zach Galafanakis and I was expecting something funny at the end
User avatar #275 - foelkera (08/23/2013) [-]
Fun fact: Starbucks sometimes has promotions where you get a free coffee if you bring a gun to the store
User avatar #273 - flaminggodzilla (08/23/2013) [-]
>Diffferent opinion
> **** YOU! GO DIE ASSHOLE!
User avatar #258 - aahrg (08/23/2013) [-]
this whole hating starbucks because they allow guns is ridiculous.

everywhere guns are legal, the coffee shops allow them.

dunkin donuts allows guns.
tim hortons allows guns.
krispy kreme allows guns.

even if these retards did get starbucks to ban guns, all the gun owners would just go down the street to the next place
User avatar #220 - parttimezombie (08/23/2013) [-]
>first time open carrying
>get iced coffee at Starbucks
>barrista looks at gun, asks what i'm carrying
>respond, Beretta Px4 Storm full size 9mm
>barrista: right on, I'm a Sig Saur fan myself
User avatar #222 to #220 - drewbridge (08/23/2013) [-]
We have a Px4 in .45, they're nice.

9mm master race is better.
User avatar #245 to #222 - azumeow (08/23/2013) [-]
9mm master race.

Ummm...wut?
User avatar #278 to #220 - Onemanretardpack (08/23/2013) [-]
Carried my Steyr m9 into my local starbucks. Glockfags were jelly
User avatar #133 - thedutchs (08/23/2013) [-]
I think people should have the right to own guns provided there are many background checks, psychological evaluations and mandatory gun safety lessons.
User avatar #145 to #133 - themastermorris (08/23/2013) [-]
I agree, also to add to that, keep better track of who has a gun. Here in the US, we have the background checks and all but we kinda suck at keeping track of who is actually purchasing these firearms.
User avatar #147 to #133 - superunclesam (08/23/2013) [-]
As an enthusiast this seems reasonable. Just no stupid ******* mag limits
#122 - jackassalope (08/23/2013) [-]
More guns = Less crime. Its a pretty clear correlation once you start looking at actual data.
User avatar #118 - lesrin (08/23/2013) [-]
your right guns kill people, im sry i forgot that wars were fought with machine guns back in the 1400's my bad, carry on good sir
User avatar #108 - thewowpimp ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]
My brother acutally has the best arguemewnt I've heard in a long time for gun rights.

The only weapon in the history of man made for killing other humans

is the sword. Yep, only thing a sword can do is kill humans, so why have we not banned swords?
#109 to #108 - hansjob (08/23/2013) [-]
you can also parry with a sword. or use it as a cutting tool
User avatar #110 to #109 - thewowpimp ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]
you gonna use a longsword to chop some wood? And have it break?

No, the sword was made with the express purpose of fighting with human beings.

A gun can be used to hunt animals, not a sword.
User avatar #113 to #110 - thewowpimp ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]
You can't hunt with a sword is the point.

You have to imagine that a weapon's purpose is purely violent in this scenario.

Also the first guns could still have been used in theory, it just was financially practical.
#123 to #113 - elyiia (08/23/2013) [-]
If you're not hunting with a sword, you're just not doing it right.
If you're not hunting with a sword, you're just not doing it right.
#129 to #113 - hansjob (08/23/2013) [-]
sure, I'll give you that. But for the sake of arguing, I have another point. There are different types of so-called melee weapons and different types of firearms or guns. The different types have or had different uses. So you could use a gun for both hunting and murdering, but guns are usually made for either hunting or "protection". Same with melee weapons (spears, swords).
tl; dr, swords and guns are not comparable, gun is a vague term, you wouldn't use a cannon or an assault rifle to hunt, you wouldn't use a hunting spear to kill a man
User avatar #130 to #129 - thewowpimp ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]
well when people talk about gun rights, we often hope they refer to a glock and not a cannon.

And melee weapons are more than often swords if they are not knives.
#131 to #130 - hansjob (08/23/2013) [-]
clearly, but who uses a glock to hunt? besides, swords as weapons have been replaced with firearms specifically made to wound or kill.
User avatar #134 to #131 - thewowpimp ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]
but not only humans.

Swords can't be used sensibly to hunt, but guns can.
#135 to #134 - hansjob (08/23/2013) [-]
as i said, guns and swords aren't coparable categories. there are guns that are made to kill people, there are melee weapons that are made for hunting
User avatar #138 to #135 - thewowpimp ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]
what melee weapons can you hunt with?

Besides, the idea is that swords have a far greater percentage of use as a murder weapon than guns.
#140 to #138 - hansjob (08/23/2013) [-]
people hunted with spears, both throwing spears and otherwise.
if you compare swords and battle rifles, you'll see that both are made for murdering. It's not fair to compare a military weapon (sword) with the whole category of guns which include both hunting firearms and military firearms.

coming back to the original point of your brother, who has or uses a sword anyway these days. also, i'm pretty sure that most places do have restictions on sword owning
#111 to #110 - hansjob (08/23/2013) [-]
I'm not saying you should use a sword to cut wood (I was thinking meat). But if I only had a sword and a gun, I would use the sword as a multi-purpose tool. Also, the first guns were definitely made for fighting humans, not hunting animals.
User avatar #124 to #111 - thewowpimp ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]
Sorry my comp must have lagged out and I replied to myself, see above for my response.
User avatar #116 to #108 - trevcars (08/23/2013) [-]
Swords are also made so you can look really cool.
#117 to #116 - thewowpimp ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]
that's not really a purpose, but yes they do.
User avatar #95 - Schwarzenegger (08/23/2013) [-]
Sounds like he attended a community college.
User avatar #65 - becefalus (08/23/2013) [-]
"A sword never kills anybody; it is a tool in the killer's hand." - Seneca
In this case it would be guns.
#24 - kevincfc (08/22/2013) [-]
If guns kill people, spoons make people fat.
#155 - acksl (08/23/2013) [-]
Guns don't kill People, people kill people
Guns don't kill People, people kill people
#156 to #155 - acksl (08/23/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #172 to #156 - beerterror (08/23/2013) [-]
Wait who let the ogres outta swamps?
User avatar #187 to #156 - aasherknight (08/23/2013) [-]
No, they will just use a knife instead (or some other weapon)
#205 to #187 - lyphowut (08/23/2013) [-]
all those mass stabings
User avatar #152 to #150 - largeheadphones (08/23/2013) [-]
I don't think you can use rockets on your own property. someone would notice that...
User avatar #154 to #152 - therealtjthemedic (08/23/2013) [-]
IM SORRY, I THOUGHT THIS WAS AMERICA
User avatar #157 to #154 - largeheadphones (08/23/2013) [-]
NOT ANYMORE! ******* DEMOCRATS! PLACING RULES ON EVERYTHING!
#196 - theonemica (08/23/2013) [-]
I'm not really pro-gun or anti-gun, I just think it should be harder to get one. But, you have to realize that guns are made for one purpose and one purpose only - to hurt/kill someone/something. There is no other use for them. I mean at least knives can carve wood and stuff.
User avatar #253 to #196 - esmebuffay (08/23/2013) [-]
You can carve wood with a gun, it's just really inefficient.
#326 to #253 - theonemica (08/24/2013) [-]
LOL that was really funny xD
User avatar #125 - elyiia (08/23/2013) [-]
I don't particularly care about this argument, however I do want to put one thought to everyone. Not having a gun in the house has been proven to signifigantly reduce the likelyhood of someone commiting suicide.
User avatar #178 to #125 - lazorman (08/23/2013) [-]
A person who wants to commit suicide WILL commit suicide.
No suicidal person ever has said "boy I think im gonna off myself today. wait, i dont have a gun! OH WELL I guess I'll go to work instead!"
User avatar #181 to #178 - elyiia (08/23/2013) [-]
You're wrong, someone who has time in between the moment of sucidial thoughts and the actual moment of suicide is signifigantly less likely to actually follow through. It's been scientifically proven that, in general, the longer in between the decision and the action the less likely they are to go through with it.

With a gunshot it's almost immediately after the decision, you have no time to process it. Trying to hang yourself for example, requires a strong enough rope and a location to hang it which takes far longer.

It's also incredibly unlikely to survive a sucide by gun, whereas someone who regrets their decision to OD for example can go to the hospitol for a high chance of survival.
User avatar #18 - GodofTV (08/22/2013) [-]
MOTHER ****** HAS A DIFFERENT OPINION THEN THAT OF THE AVERAGE FUNNYJUNKER GOD DAMN ASSHOLE NEEDS TO GET A PEICE OF OUR MIND.
User avatar #19 to #18 - xturboxx (08/22/2013) [-]
You are literally too stupid to insult.
User avatar #21 to #18 - nefariouspickle (08/22/2013) [-]
Are you not being sarcastic?
User avatar #41 to #18 - hanabro (08/23/2013) [-]
COMPANY HAS A DIFFERENT OPINION THEN THAT OF MINE GOD DAMN ASSHOLES NEED TO GET A PIECE OF MY MIND.
#48 to #41 - lesterthered (08/23/2013) [-]
ahaha nicely put
User avatar #107 to #48 - loganhusted (08/23/2013) [-]
COMPANY DOESN'T AGREE WITH MY OPINION OR THE OPINION THAT I OPPOSE. THEY MUST BE AGAINST ME.
User avatar #22 to #18 - dashgamer (08/22/2013) [-]
It's called being wrong, not having a different opinion.
#25 to #22 - commit (08/22/2013) [-]
"I'm not angry, I'm just RIGHT." -Egoraptor
sorry, I had
 Friends (0)