Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#3 - sinkoran
Reply +127
(08/22/2013) [-]
fat bastards, lose some weight
#4 to #3 - grandtheftkoala **User deleted account**
Reply 0
(08/22/2013) [-]
I couldn't have said it better myself
#29 to #3 - insaneguy
Reply +5
(08/23/2013) [-]
kill one of them, feed the rest for a couple days
#105 to #29 - anon
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
hours*
#17 - skiskate
Reply +48
(08/23/2013) [-]
My god it is her
#52 to #17 - creepycreeper
Reply +3
(08/23/2013) [-]
yes we also saw the content
#43 - caelinnis
Reply +37
(08/23/2013) [-]
#48 to #43 - konradkurze
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
#170 to #48 - anon
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
whats is that?
#72 - mraye
Reply +28
(08/23/2013) [-]
I'm too thin to work... gimmie moneies.
#55 - kaboomz
Reply +25
(08/23/2013) [-]
This image has expired
> doesnt wanna work
> gets fat as ****
> gets payed

and theres people starving in the streets...
#121 to #55 - anon
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Welcome to the HUMAN RACE.
#76 - thehollowlord
Reply +18
(08/23/2013) [-]
Man the harpoons, it's time to thin the herd...
#83 - aesis
Reply +16
(08/23/2013) [-]
£22,000 in benefits?   
Not enough?   
If that's a yearly thing, **** them, they get that ontop of welfare for each member per week, which is ridiculous.
£22,000 in benefits?
Not enough?
If that's a yearly thing, **** them, they get that ontop of welfare for each member per week, which is ridiculous.

#127 - crazyolitis
Reply +14
(08/23/2013) [-]
Don't give any money   
they can't afford food   
they lose weight   
they are able to work   
???   
profit.
Don't give any money
they can't afford food
they lose weight
they are able to work
???
profit.
#152 to #127 - nylak
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
That's almost word for word what I was thinking.

The problem will just rectify itself! Magic!
#56 - klutzyspy
Reply -17
(08/23/2013) [-]
England ffs, we're trying to give USA **** about not using the metric system, so dont ******* count using a unit so stupid as "stone". A foot at least has a general size to it, a stone can be anything.
#109 to #56 - anon
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
It's funny because a foot is an imperial unit, the very measurement you seem to hate. Both metric and imperial systems are used in England and as a result I've never seen any confusion when it comes to measurements here.
#189 to #56 - themarineelite
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#75 to #56 - mrhazzy
Reply +9
(08/23/2013) [-]
A stone in the UK us a unit of measurement. it isn't stupid.
#78 to #75 - klutzyspy
Reply -6
(08/23/2013) [-]
yes and its an idiotic unit of measurement, that was the whole point of my comment. I wasnt unsure if it was a unit or not.
#79 to #78 - mrhazzy
Reply +2
(08/23/2013) [-]
I guess you are not from the UK?

I'll break it down for you, There's 14 pounds in 1 Stone.

#81 to #79 - klutzyspy
Reply -6
(08/23/2013) [-]
so a pound is a pebble then? a gravel? boulder?
#102 to #81 - thegamefaceman
Reply +2
(08/23/2013) [-]
A 'foot'. So a toe? A nail?

This is the argument you're currently using. Stop commenting because you sound like a damn fool.
#115 to #102 - klutzyspy
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
i agree that a foot is a idiotic way to measure too, and i agree on your point that using toe, nail etc would be just as stupid
#84 to #81 - mrhazzy
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Ok, now you are just being an idiot.

A stone is a stone, yes, BUT It has another meaning, as a unit of measurement, that has nothing to do with it's other meaning.

I don't literally weigh 10 Stones. because each of those stones have a different weight.

A pound is also a unit of measurement, it has no relation to pebbles or boulders, not even gravel.

in total, we have Stones, Pounds and Ounces. all units of measurement.
#106 to #84 - therealslim
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
bro dont argue with the idiot he's ******* with you. I feel bad I live in the same nation if he doesnt understand the concept of a measurement
#107 to #106 - mrhazzy
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
As soon as he said boulder...

...no rusting over here. Just trying to educate the poor sap.
#108 to #107 - therealslim
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
ah my mew friend that is a lost cause
#110 to #108 - mrhazzy
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Indeed so, I have moved on to other ventures, I stick around to see what dribble falls from his mouth.
#85 to #84 - klutzyspy
Reply -5
(08/23/2013) [-]
its still an idiotic thing to call a unit of measurement.
#90 to #85 - monkee
Reply +3
(08/23/2013) [-]
The imperial system has its origins in the mists of time. The ancient Egyptians certainly used a version to build the pyramids. It is based upon human quantities, ie. an inch is a "thumb", a foot is a foot. Another standard for an inch was three barleycorns. A yard is the distance between your outstretched hand and nose, etc. A cupful is the amount of water you can hold in your cupped hands. A hundredweight is the most a person can carry. A handy sized throwing stone weighs a pound.
A stone is usually 14 pounds Avoirdupois, as decreed by King Edward III in 1340 when Flemish Florentine measures were adopted to aid England's vital international wool trade. Since a pound is meant to be the size of the average sized throwing stone, it makes sense to class 14 of them as an independent 'stone' weight.
#93 to #90 - klutzyspy
Reply -2
(08/23/2013) [-]
so a stone is 14 smaller stones?

But yes its an outdated and primitive system.. as well as not being very precise.
#97 to #93 - monkee
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Outdated, yes. But it's much much easier to guess a length or volume using imperial than it is using metric. In Britain we are taught both and use them independently. There are also certain things which you cannot use the metric system to measure, including converting types of screw heads etc into metric measurements. My step-father works in a shipyard and there is no correct metric measure for a three-quarter inch screw head, a staple in his building materials. I use metric to understand temperature, volume and weight for small things (such as cooking). I use Imperial for my height, weight and during motoring (e.g PSI, pounds per square inch). The system works, not everything can be divided neatly by ten as the metric sytem does.
#98 to #97 - klutzyspy
Reply -1
(08/23/2013) [-]
3/4 inch 3,81 cm
PSI convertion is also quite possible www.ehow.com/how_7633127_convert-psi-metric.html
The only reason it seems hard is because it was chosen to use PSI in stead of pascal.
Do you not use "horsepower" in motoring? that's based of metric units.
#99 to #98 - monkee
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
I do not understand your repeated attacking and unwillingness to accept that both measurements have their uses.
You are being as stubborn as an american with imperial. I recognised both have their uses. Sure I could convert, but the point I made was that it is easier, rather than being pedantic.
Also, your measurement for 0.75 of an inch is wrong - check your math.
I will not feed the trolls any longer, because if you're too dense to grasp the concept of making life easy I have no hope of educating you further.
Good day.
#100 to #99 - klutzyspy
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
my point is that it only seems easier because its what you were taught. Counting everything in 10's makes it much easier that haveing 3 feet to a yard, 12 inches to a foot etc
#103 to #100 - anon
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Using that logic it's easier to count time using multiples of ten no? Instead of 24 hours in a day, lets divide it into 20 hours with centihours. Doesn't fit as neatly as you'd like? Maybe dividing by ten doesn't work all the time.
#114 to #103 - klutzyspy
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
im sure it would work, but we are using an old system. the current system is flawed, hence leapyears
#86 to #85 - mrhazzy
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
so what do you call it?
#87 to #86 - klutzyspy
Reply -3
(08/23/2013) [-]
Grams and meters.. you know, the metric system.. We dont walk around saying "i weigh 3 dog and im as tall as if you stacked 6 feet on top of each other"
#88 to #87 - mrhazzy
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
so your system is different... Big woop? to me, Grams seem to be a too small of a measurement for body weight, that's just going into detail.

I'm 10 Stone, 5 Pounds, not sure what that would be using your system. If you find our system stupid, then maybe you should understand it a bit more before you go bashing it. You need to login to view this link

I don't think your system is stupid, just because it has different names. Hell, yours could be more effective. But I don't care, we have our system. You have yours.
#89 to #88 - klutzyspy
Reply -3
(08/23/2013) [-]
that's where we have kilograms, just as you have 14 stone = 1 boulder. (i imagine)
#91 to #89 - mrhazzy
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
For starters there's no such thing as boulders as a unit of measurement. you clearly do not understand, and do not want to understand, I've given you a link so you can read up on different systems.

In the UK we have Stones and Pounds for body weight, and we use Kilograms, grams and ounces for food recipes and stuff like that.
#142 - kolpster
Reply +8
(08/23/2013) [-]
#41 - mymiddleleg
Reply +8
(08/23/2013) [-]
#12 - reaperriley
Reply +8
(08/23/2013) [-]
83 stones = 1162 lbs.... that's about 290 lbs per person. I mean, I'm 280 lbs and I look nothing like that. Damn people... just wow....
#16 to #12 - anon
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
yeh you will definitely look like them if you were wearing the same clothes unless you are an EXTREME tank which i ****** doubt post pics to prove me wrong faggot time stamps too 280b = 20 stone so yeh youre morbidly OBESE
#26 to #16 - reaperriley
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Your an anon, I don't care what you think. Post on a profile and I will post pics.
#186 to #26 - anon
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
sorry ive been coming to this site for nearly 5ish or so years and i have always refused to make an account seem utterly pointless to me.
#20 to #12 - dangerbearr
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Dude, I'm the same way. I weight about 285ish and I don't look that fat. I look bigger, no doubt, but not THAT big.
#27 to #20 - reaperriley
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Well yeah, same. I am 6'4" and I have a large frame. You know, wide shoulders and all that fun. Sure I have a little bit of extra weight but I don't look fat. Just big.
#21 to #12 - confidence
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Well it all depends if you are more muscle or fat considering fat weighs less than muscle so looking at those peoples average weight just think of yourself as more muscle
#23 to #12 - whiteblob
Reply +2
(08/23/2013) [-]
Or you think you don't look like that, it happens sometimes you have a different perspective of what you really look like.
#124 - joshofsouls
Reply +7
(08/23/2013) [-]


22,000 dollars. Not enough.
Ahaha.. Ahhahaha... AHAHAHAAH....AHAHAHAHAHA

**** YOU
I HOPE THEY TRIP OVER THEIR FAT ROLLS AND FALL IN A VAT OF DIET SHAKES.
#126 to #124 - protomanrulez
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
First time I read your comment I thought you said diet snakes. And I was confused.
#128 to #124 - tylosaurus
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
I don't think it says dollars?
#139 to #128 - joshofsouls
Reply +2
(08/23/2013) [-]


Okay, still, that's a ******* lot of money for them to bitch about.
I have to work with barely enough for food and bills, and these cunts are saying they're too fat to get their grubby mashed potato stained sausage fingers dirty?

***********
#140 to #139 - tylosaurus
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Yeah, it is a lot of money.
#138 to #124 - deathtoswag
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
#143 to #124 - fieldxofxinnocence
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
Think you're gonna be more pissed of when I tell you that's not 22 thousand dollars, it's 22 thousand pounds which is the equivalent of around 34 thousand dollars apparently.
#149 to #143 - joshofsouls
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
oh yeah, that was pointed out below, I looked up the conversion.
#113 - bugsbob
Reply -2
(08/23/2013) [-]
They're not fat; they're America-thin.
#176 to #113 - sashathefolx
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
Granted, yes quite a few people in America are fat ***** but not all of us are.

The average weight for a Man in the US is 88.3 kg (194.7 lb)
The average weight for a Woman in the US is 74.7 kg (164.7 lb)

Matter of fact the United States is no longer the worlds fattest country. We are now ranked as #2. Wanna know who's got us beat? Mexico.
#118 to #113 - largeheadphones
Reply +7
(08/23/2013) [-]
They're fat,people in america are not that averagely fat.
#37 - europe
Reply +6
(08/23/2013) [-]
They'll be skinny in no time without those benefits
#179 - anon
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
So that is how Phanact looks! Either that or this is not OC.
#181 to #179 - noii
Reply +3
(08/23/2013) [-]
>phanact
>OC
#182 to #181 - phanact [OP]
Reply +5
(08/23/2013) [-]
#174 - manirock
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#175 to #174 - elmosays
Reply +2
(08/23/2013) [-]
get with the program. mexico is #1 on fat people
shocking, i know
#177 to #175 - Churd
Reply +5
(08/23/2013) [-]
That is because the ones that can run, jump, and swim, came to America.
#74 - mrhazzy
Reply +5
(08/23/2013) [-]
They are all standing. Which means they all stood up and walked to get into place. Which means they can carry their own weight. The Walrus on the right struck a pose.

These assholes can ******* work.
#39 - anon
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
******* ****, I hate fat people who act like this!
I'm a girl who is around 5 foot 3 and I weigh at least 220 pounds. But I have something special, it's called logical thinking:
~I don't dress like a slut, that's disgusting
~I do go to the gym, but just to work on weight lifting (over coming an arm injury, I have to get the lifting abilities back, long story) and to run a bit (so I can run for more than 3 seconds without getting winded as ****)
~I don't get upset that dating is hard for me, it's not their fault, it's mine, I get it
~I don't think I'm incapable of working, I know that I can, being fat only limits me for being a super model or an athlete, really... I can handle work
~I don't think I'm special, or that I have a disease

Please just know that yes, while a decent amount of fat people are like these assholes in the picture, but not ALL of us are. Some of us have common sense.
#47 to #39 - popeflatus
Reply -5
(08/23/2013) [-]
But not enough common sense to put down the ******* fork?
#54 to #47 - angelusprimus
Reply +5
(08/23/2013) [-]
Did you know that your type of personality is in psychology books?
People who attack strangers for no other reason but that strangers are a part of a group that has been deemed acceptable targets. Its done by desire to elevate yourself by putting someone down and seek attention and approval by your peers.
It commonly comes with low self esteem, lack of personal success and is often accompanied by sexual dysfunction.

I'm really sorry bro.
#58 to #54 - klutzyspy
Reply -2
(08/23/2013) [-]
and you pretty much just did the same to him
#111 to #58 - anon
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
No, he attacked him with reason. This is a classic scenario, e.g. you have to moan at a bunch of moaners to make them stop moaning, which makes you a moaner like them. Though someone has to do it, the fact is the person telling people to stop moaning is right and the moaners are wrong.
#60 to #58 - angelusprimus
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
No, he attacked her for no reason. She wasn't rude, she wasn't arguing, she wasn't doing anything.
He didn't attack her because of something she has DONE, he attacked her because of something she IS. Because attacking fat people is ok right now, and he expected people to support him and think he is funny.
I went after him because of what he has done. Because I don't like bullies and because behavior like that IS caused by low self esteem and lack of personal success.
He should stop it and work on his own self image, because low self image and bullying habits will give him a really ****** prospects in life.
#61 to #60 - klutzyspy
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#63 to #60 - klutzyspy
Reply -4
(08/23/2013) [-]
he just asked that with all her understanding of the problem, she hasnt considered not eating so much.
#66 to #63 - angelusprimus
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
If his sentance was phrased like this "Maybe you should eat less and stop being overweight" I'd agree.
But he went after her deliberately being rude and hurtful. That is not same thing and you know it as well as i do.
#57 to #54 - cleverguy
Reply -2
(08/23/2013) [-]
you just did the same exact thing, so.....
#62 to #57 - angelusprimus
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
You will note that I didn't go against acceptable target.
I went against acceptable target, fully aware I will get ******** of red thumbs, because there is a lot of people who think being rude to fat people for no reason is a good thing, and they cure their own insecurities that way too.
#64 to #62 - cleverguy
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
"I didn't go against acceptable target."
"I went against acceptable target"

k....
#65 to #64 - angelusprimus
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Typo, i ment unacceptable.
#67 to #65 - cleverguy
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
how is he an unacceptable target?

you said it yourself, you saw him as someone with self esteem, personal success, and sexual issues.

from all angles, you're still a dick
#68 to #67 - angelusprimus
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Acceptable and unacceptable targets, in psychology, has nothing to do with what you are, aka your behviour, its about being part of a group society has deemed an ok target.
For example, back in the nineties smokers were deemed acceptable targets and they were being extremely rude to, even though they were just smoking quietly outisde in fresh air, and people didn't just accept that, they condoned it.
Now its fat people. They are free to be attacked, the acceptable targets.
While bullies will be protected from responciblity for what they are doing to fat people, defended by people who think similar to them, and that makes them unacceptable targets.
#70 to #68 - cleverguy
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
you viewed him as psychologically below you and targeted him for insecurity. doesn't seem to different to me.

and now it seems like you're trying to call me a bully for calling you out on it.

just to clarify something, the comment was pretty rude, but unhealthy shouldn't be condoned, so not being accepting of the lifestyle of overweight people isn't necessarily a bad thing. same goes for smokers
#71 to #70 - angelusprimus
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
1: I acted on his bullying, not on his personality or group membership. I called him out on his ********. That's it.
2: I am implying that there is a reason you came to his defense in less then 5 minutes from me posting. If you had more noble motives, I'm glad to see internet is not filled with exclusively with dickheads.
3: I absolutely agree. But shaming those people, being rude to them and hurting them is contra productive. Most young people who are fat are fat because they have emotional problems they are hiding by overeating, since overeating produces dopamine.
Shaming and hurting them just makes them eat more, so people who are bullying them are not helping, they are making problem bigger.
#73 to #71 - cleverguy
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
1. "It commonly comes with low self esteem, lack of personal success and is often accompanied by sexual dysfunction."
these are not nice things to say to people. you spout crap about bullying, bu you're pretty much doing the same thing, no matter how much semantics you use to try and say you're not.
2. i was just scrolling through and saw the comment. i had a one-sentence reply. i wasn't rushing to anyones defense, i just put in my two cents. i didn't say he was right, i said you were being a dick.
3. okie dokie then
#77 to #73 - angelusprimus
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
1: yes. Rude thing to say to be sure. But true it really is like that, and when people are aware that their behavior comes from a bad cause, they might, just might, change it.
I'll give you that I should have left the sexual disfunction out. That was me putting in an uncessary jab.
2: That's cool.
#80 to #77 - popeflatus
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
My vagina works just fine
#82 to #80 - angelusprimus
Reply -1
(08/23/2013) [-]
Good for you.
You are still crude, cruel bully.
I hope you do something about it.
#101 to #77 - cleverguy
Reply -2
(08/23/2013) [-]
"But shaming those people, being rude to them and hurting them is contra productive."
"Rude thing to say to be sure. But true it really is like that, and when people are aware that their behavior comes from a bad cause, they might, just might, change it."

practice what you preach
#136 to #101 - angelusprimus
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Do we have different medicines for different diseases or does everyone just get a general medicine?
Shaming people who are hurting themselves by trying to deal with emotional problems through self harm, overeating etc. is counter productive.
On the other hand bullying comes from desire to seek approval through cruelty and setting yourself over someone.
Pulling them down, BECAUSE OF THEIR ACTIONS is pretty much only way to make them stop. Because it gives them exactly opposite of what they were trying to achieve.
And do you understand the difference between going against someone over what they are and going against someone over what they DO.
When somoene is cruel, mean and hurtful for no reason, they should be called out upon it. They are not victims, they are bullies. There is a difference.
#188 to #136 - cleverguy
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
"It commonly comes with low self esteem, lack of personal success and is often accompanied by sexual dysfunction."
"They are not victims"

k
#104 to #39 - martialnorris
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
you just caused a lot of rage
you just caused a lot of rage
#163 to #39 - lookathecomment
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
#148 to #39 - tittentei
Reply +2
(08/23/2013) [-]
What pisses me off is the "I'm fat, it's impossible for me to lose weight" and "it's not my fault that I'm fat" mindsets. It's nice to see you're not like that anon.
#38 - Silver Quantum
Reply +4
(08/23/2013) [-]
wonder how far back the guy who took the picture had to go in order for everyone to fit in the frame