Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #150 - wilddittoappears (08/08/2013) [-]
well, at lest i would prefer a blowjob from the avatar lady who doesn't use her "make up"
#145 - derpomancy (08/08/2013) [-]
Why yes, funnily enough.
Yes I would.
#137 - harbydeath (08/08/2013) [+] (1 reply)
i remember when wolverine origins was leaked before the effects were put in. was highly downloaded if i remember
User avatar #127 - piketchup (08/08/2013) [-]
yes, because it would be ******* hilarious
#125 - anonymous (08/08/2013) [-]
Seeing pictures like this ruins the magic for me. For example, when I saw The Hobbit, I was totally immersed in the fantasy. Now that I see the picture, I remember it's all fake. I want to believe!
User avatar #121 - andrewjla (08/08/2013) [-]
and yet people still bitch and complain when they have to pay a few extra dollars for a 3D movie.
User avatar #116 - dracomancer (08/08/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I hate to be the bearer of bad news guys but the guys hired to do the special effects for life of pi went bankrupt because of the heavy stuff they had to do for that tiger and such. That ****** expensive.
User avatar #112 - tmbg (08/08/2013) [-]
back in my day movies actually had stuff that was actually there, and we LIKED IT
#108 - mymissiondaytwo (08/08/2013) [-]
Game of Thrones would still be watchable.
User avatar #91 - twofreegerbils ONLINE (08/08/2013) [-]
They are commonly referred to as plays
User avatar #80 - pepemex (08/08/2013) [-]
If a movie isn't good without visual effects then it wasn't good to begin with. Watch Dogville and you'll understand.
#73 - kanedam ONLINE (08/08/2013) [-]
respect to the visual artists!

but at the same time: shame on them!
even though the computers have so much more ressources than 10 years ago the animations have gotten worse.
just look at the t-rex from jurassic park. damn, it looked like it was there! and it still does! than look at the new animations and you just clearly see they are animations... why did they degrade the animations in the past few years? i just dont understand... back when i watched jp i thought "damn... soon all movies will look 100% realistic and have a lot of **** going on!" but instead all these animations are clearly animations... it's really a shame!

and then again, take aliens from ridley scott. it was great even without computer animations... so who says you need them?
nowadays they are mostly used to compensate the lack of originality and plot... and the bad actors. (just watch any movie on mute and in most cases you wont be able to tell what emotion the actor is playing. they have become that bad at mimic) i think it has taken a turn for the worst even though there's so much more potential nowadays...
User avatar #52 - xxELITExx (08/08/2013) [-]
everything would be comedy movies. except dramas, they would still be piles of feces.
#45 - randasaurousrex (08/08/2013) [+] (2 replies)
is david hassellhoff the guy who plays the squid guy in pirates of the carribbean?
User avatar #69 to #45 - seriouslyblack (08/08/2013) [-]
willem dafoe, obviously
User avatar #41 - lacypushupbra ONLINE (08/08/2013) [-]
If The Hobbit was like that I still would watch it.
#36 - anonymous (08/08/2013) [-]
yeah it's called musicals
User avatar #30 - Paranoid Sniper (08/08/2013) [-]
be cool to have the non-edited version in the special features or something
User avatar #22 - ivoryhammer (08/08/2013) [-]
I didn't care for Avatar or Avengers, even with special effects.
#17 - scrumdillyicious (08/08/2013) [-]
As long as the story was good, then yeah. Not having visual effects would force the writers to come up with some damn good stories rather than just a movie filled with special effects
#10 - soulkiller (08/07/2013) [-]
Yes. Yes I would.
 Friends (0)