Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#154 - anonymous (08/08/2013) [-]
wait a minuet the life of pi didnt have a real tiger? it looks so real! wait, THE LIFE OF PI DIDNT HAVE A REAL TIGER! why didnt they just get an animal trainer? why did it have to be CG!
User avatar #151 - mads (08/08/2013) [-]
I'd love to watch a film which was CG heavy without the CG. I think it would be interesting.
#145 - derpomancy (08/08/2013) [-]
Why yes, funnily enough.
Yes I would.
#141 - cinematicbrix (08/08/2013) [-]
******					 I didn't realize Bill Nighy played Davy Jones
****** I didn't realize Bill Nighy played Davy Jones
User avatar #138 - decieverofthegods **User deleted account** (08/08/2013) [-]
This is somewhat unfair if you think about it. If there wasn't any quality, computerised effects, then the actors/actresses wouldn't be covered in sensors and standing in front of green-screens and look stupid like that, they would have make up and costumes/outfits made by top professionals and would ultimately still look quite good, like they did in the past. So yeah, I'd probably still watch the movies without the 'top' effects.
User avatar #127 - piketchup (08/08/2013) [-]
yes, because it would be ******* hilarious
#125 - anonymous (08/08/2013) [-]
Seeing pictures like this ruins the magic for me. For example, when I saw The Hobbit, I was totally immersed in the fantasy. Now that I see the picture, I remember it's all fake. I want to believe!
User avatar #112 - tmbg (08/08/2013) [-]
back in my day movies actually had stuff that was actually there, and we LIKED IT
#111 - ishotthedeputy (08/08/2013) [-]
I was in the middle of this and just started thinking, "What the **** am I doing with my life." Long story short, I guess I'm here to stay. Is there a welcoming ceremony?
User avatar #91 - twofreegerbils (08/08/2013) [-]
They are commonly referred to as plays
User avatar #90 - muzzleloader (08/08/2013) [-]
Except it wouldn't look like that.
#73 - kanedam (08/08/2013) [-]
respect to the visual artists!

but at the same time: shame on them!
even though the computers have so much more ressources than 10 years ago the animations have gotten worse.
just look at the t-rex from jurassic park. damn, it looked like it was there! and it still does! than look at the new animations and you just clearly see they are animations... why did they degrade the animations in the past few years? i just dont understand... back when i watched jp i thought "damn... soon all movies will look 100% realistic and have a lot of **** going on!" but instead all these animations are clearly animations... it's really a shame!

and then again, take aliens from ridley scott. it was great even without computer animations... so who says you need them?
nowadays they are mostly used to compensate the lack of originality and plot... and the bad actors. (just watch any movie on mute and in most cases you wont be able to tell what emotion the actor is playing. they have become that bad at mimic) i think it has taken a turn for the worst even though there's so much more potential nowadays...
#46 - anonymous (08/08/2013) [-]
I'd watch anything with Scarlett Johansson in it.
#45 - randasaurousrex (08/08/2013) [+] (2 replies)
is david hassellhoff the guy who plays the squid guy in pirates of the carribbean?
User avatar #69 to #45 - seriouslyblack (08/08/2013) [-]
willem dafoe, obviously
User avatar #41 - lacypushupbra (08/08/2013) [-]
If The Hobbit was like that I still would watch it.
User avatar #39 - xgrandmoffx (08/08/2013) [-]
I would still watch films. The cinematographic works which I consume are valued by me for their stories, not their blasting.
User avatar #30 - Paranoid Sniper (08/08/2013) [-]
be cool to have the non-edited version in the special features or something
User avatar #29 - fuckthehabs (08/08/2013) [-]
I just gained much more respect for actors/actresses
#17 - scrumdillyicious (08/08/2013) [-]
As long as the story was good, then yeah. Not having visual effects would force the writers to come up with some damn good stories rather than just a movie filled with special effects
#10 - soulkiller (08/07/2013) [-]
Yes. Yes I would.
 Friends (0)