Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#126 - vigilum ONLINE (08/08/2013) [-]
Soviet Gollum is best Gollum.
#72 - bazda (08/08/2013) [-]
I'd still watch without visual effects. It just means that film makers would have to actually.....i don't know...MAKE FILMS?!

Just look at the original Star Wars. Minimal visual effects, still had people ******** their pants at the premiere.
#155 - grasman ONLINE (08/08/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I certainly would not watch these movies.
But there are great movies without special effects.
Have you ever seen "The man from earth"?
That's a great movie and it's basically shot in a single room.
#142 - Yojimbo (08/08/2013) [+] (1 reply)
"Yeah, no one watched any movies that came out before they had CGI!"
User avatar #140 - robertolee (08/08/2013) [-]
I watched the X men origins wolverine story without the finished visual effects, it was ******* hilarious.
User avatar #130 - Furubatsu (08/08/2013) [-]
I don't mind special effects
but I hate it when a movie relies too much on them that it ignores/drowns the story.
#124 - whatwhen (08/08/2013) [+] (3 replies)
**whatwhen rolled a random image posted in comment #462 at Pacific Rim in a nutshell ** i didnt watch that pi or whatever its called, but i always thought that was trained tiger
#123 - tieze (08/08/2013) [-]
there are also good movies which don't need that amount of special effects, just sayin
User avatar #120 - nuclearcomedy (08/08/2013) [-]
Look at the original trilogy of Star Wars, look at all those amazing special effects. Not a single bit digitally inputted, all well timed shots, with special effects that you had to be skilled in, not to mention real built sets.

It was pure genius, now it's just computer input, restraining the actors from being able to interact with their environment.
User avatar #104 - snoozes (08/08/2013) [-]
Avatar would be pretty god damn boring.
#93 - gardenmanly (08/08/2013) [+] (3 replies)
can anyone tell me what this one is from? I can't remember but I remember this visual. I think a guy shoots a bow and arrow, but I could be wrong..
User avatar #94 to #93 - tonyredgrave (08/08/2013) [-]
Immortals
#86 - mattoland (08/08/2013) [-]
the Davy Jones one just looks like someone walked in on a Rim Job
User avatar #79 - tombombadil (08/08/2013) [-]
This post makes a good point, but there's plenty to be said about filmmakers who go with a full physical set. It depends on the kind of movie you're looking to see.
User avatar #44 - kathuzada (08/08/2013) [-]
I wouldn't watch Avatar again even with special effects
User avatar #42 - wumbido (08/08/2013) [-]
Life of Pi Without VFX
User avatar #35 - jedawg (08/08/2013) [-]
Yeah, they're called plays
User avatar #4 - lothet (08/07/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Wathcing the first movie about Wolverine when it leaked without special effects adedd was fun. It didn't feed my hungry eyes, but I got insight on the pre-production phase and some behind the scenes stuff.
#3 - anonymous (08/07/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Anyone post a pic of an oribinal Start Wars behind the scene!

And yes I DO watch films without special effects! The people today just got lazy, cause it is possible to do good films without them!
User avatar #16 to #3 - qazsa (08/08/2013) [-]
"they just got lazy" you are implying as if all the special effects are piss easy to do.
#122 - anonymous (08/08/2013) [-]
they should release effects-free workprints as a separate release
they'd make more money for less work and I'd enjoy that so much more
#54 - TurtleOnItsBack (08/08/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Would watch 'Life of Pi' if there were no special effects and it was a real tiger.
 Friends (0)