Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
-15
#14 - killkornflakes has deleted their comment [-]
#15 to #14 - teranin ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
Why would you want to kill korn flakes?
#132 to #15 - anonymous (07/29/2013) [-]
blood for the blood god
User avatar #16 to #15 - killkornflakes (07/29/2013) [-]
I really don't know but i really need a picture of it happening.
#141 - anonymous (07/29/2013) [-]
Dont deny child's rights for your ass's pleasure. Marriage was meant to defend the rights of children to have both a father and mother, who represents their identity, lineage, and history, about the future equality of children who are motherless or fatherless compared to those who are raised by their father and mother. Today this right of the child can be bought on the market place by homo people.
1 Mama + 1 Papa = True Parents. Lessons from the French.
1. "The rights of children trump the right to children. As a society we should not be encouraging this. It’s not biologically natural.” Jean-Marc, a homosexual French mayor.
2. “In France, marriage is not designed to protect the love between two people. Marriage is specifically designed to provide children with families. The most serious study done so far demonstrates quite clearly that a child has trouble being raised by gay parents.” said Xavier Bongibault, an atheist homosexual.
#143 to #141 - teranin ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
Every orphan and every child raised by a single parent says " **** you, ******* "
#162 to #143 - McGaha (07/29/2013) [-]
I was raised by a single parent, my dad just wasn't there. But I still wanted a dad; thought about what it would be like to play sports with him, and fish with him and such. Orphans crave a father figure as well. So why say **** you anon? If you were raised by a single parent you know as well as anyone that yeah we may have turned out fine but you know you wanted to have a father figure there. so I'll take the red thumbs and agree with Anon on this one
#165 to #162 - teranin ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
Here's the problem with that. There are vast amounts of orphans out there in the world, children up for adoption, and children from single parent homes. As such, it cannot be used as a reason to exclude one type of loving parentage from having the ability to raise children. Children deserve a home, and parents who will love them, and that is far more important than the genders of those parents.
#168 to #165 - McGaha (07/29/2013) [-]
I understand what you are saying and to be quiet honest that is why I am on the fence about a lot of issues dealing with child parent relations. I do agree every child deserves a loving home, but at what psychological cost? I mean regardless of whether or not you are for or against same sex marriage you're entire life outlook would change had you been raised by same sex parents. I just feel like that is a strange living environment for a young malleable mind
#169 to #168 - teranin ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
All of the studies done have shown that real damage is done to children's psyche in orphanages, and abusive families, and that in homes with parents that aren't abusive, regardless of their gender or how many there are, children almost universally come out more well adjusted and less traumatized.  Let the gay people raise the orphans, they aren't going to turn them gay (that 						****					 doesn't work like that) and it will improve those children's lives in the long run, as far as the science that isn't funded by the heritage foundation is concerned.
All of the studies done have shown that real damage is done to children's psyche in orphanages, and abusive families, and that in homes with parents that aren't abusive, regardless of their gender or how many there are, children almost universally come out more well adjusted and less traumatized. Let the gay people raise the orphans, they aren't going to turn them gay (that **** doesn't work like that) and it will improve those children's lives in the long run, as far as the science that isn't funded by the heritage foundation is concerned.
#175 to #169 - McGaha (07/29/2013) [-]
Alright then you've won me over in that aspect, but even then how do you explain those who have gone through the experience and feel lesser for it for example that quote above by Jean-Dominique Bunel. He truly felt as if he had an absence in his life, an absence any child without a father could understand but one that was unwillingly filled with another female figure rather than the male figure he natural sought for as a child.
(Also out of related images so here is some Richard Hammond)
#178 to #175 - teranin ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
He is expressing his opinions based on personal experience, anecdotal evidence is 100% subjective, so just as there are likely children who felt robbed that they had a male and female parent when they hate men or some other individualized bias, there will of course be some instances of people with similar opinions directed at homosexual parentage.  They may have had issue with it, but had their experiences been those of an orphan or a child with only one parent their opinions might have been colored differently.  Furthermore, the way he states it implies that a lot of bad opinions were stated about his father in that household, and that his father was still alive and COULD have been reached but his mother prevented him from taking that action.  Really, it sounds like he had 						****					 parents, and it's not because they were both women.
He is expressing his opinions based on personal experience, anecdotal evidence is 100% subjective, so just as there are likely children who felt robbed that they had a male and female parent when they hate men or some other individualized bias, there will of course be some instances of people with similar opinions directed at homosexual parentage. They may have had issue with it, but had their experiences been those of an orphan or a child with only one parent their opinions might have been colored differently. Furthermore, the way he states it implies that a lot of bad opinions were stated about his father in that household, and that his father was still alive and COULD have been reached but his mother prevented him from taking that action. Really, it sounds like he had **** parents, and it's not because they were both women.
#185 to #178 - McGaha (07/29/2013) [-]
Agreed. Although it would still seem to me the lack of a father is damaging to a child's emotional and mental state. I would have to do more research before I could be sure of my belief on this; but what you have said does make sense my main point at first was simply that every child should have an opportunity for a mother and father but in the end having a loving family is more important regardless of gender. Plus I'm just happy to have actually had a decent discussion on here without it turning into a "You're wrong, I'm right kinda thing." here take this Sherlock image for use in future discusions
#187 to #185 - teranin ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
Thanks for that, here, have this Fry and Laurie reaction picture for similar reasons.
User avatar #157 to #141 - articulate (07/29/2013) [-]
My father left when I was a month old and yes, I do feel like I needed a father figure, but I would rather have only a mother than no parents at all.
#152 to #141 - anonymous (07/29/2013) [-]
3. "I was raised by two women, suffered from the lack of a father, a daily presence, a character and a properly masculine example, some counterweight to the relationship of my mother to her lover. I was aware of it at a very early age. I lived that absence of a father, experienced it, as an amputation. As soon as I learned that the government was going to officialize marriage between two people of the same sex, I was thrown into disarray. It would be institutionalizing a situation that had scarred me considerably. In that there is an injustice that I can in no way allow. I would've jumped into the fray and would have brought a complaint before the French state and before the European Court of Human Rights, for the violation of my right to a mom and a dad." Jean-Dominique Bunel, a specialist in humanitarian law.
#310 to #141 - caelinnis (07/29/2013) [-]
I was raised by my grandmother, not my mother or father.

And whatever study Xavier read, is wrong. Try reading an unbiased study, children raised by gay parents are perfectly normal. Most of them are straight, too.
#235 to #141 - anonymous (07/29/2013) [-]
ALL ABOARD THE WRONG TRAIN TOOT TOOT

Part 1: [url deleted]

Part 2: [url deleted]

Go **** yourself.

Sincerely,
-Ex military cop, bisexual.
#92 - freshlikeuhhhhhh (07/29/2013) [-]
anyone else really sick of seeing this phanact on your advertisements yet?
User avatar #115 to #92 - demacianhooker (07/29/2013) [-]
Get adblock.
User avatar #118 to #92 - Rageguyftw (07/29/2013) [-]
Get adblock
User avatar #93 to #92 - freshlikeuhhhhhh (07/29/2013) [-]
fagggggot***
User avatar #142 to #92 - mondprinzessin (07/29/2013) [-]
no, just no
#73 - anonymous (07/29/2013) [-]
Badass and jedi. Is it possible to use those two words together in a sentence?
User avatar #80 to #73 - noobtankz (07/29/2013) [-]
Is it possible not to?
User avatar #84 to #73 - holycrapimacupcake (07/29/2013) [-]
Mace Widu, Plo Koon, Yoda, Kit Fisto.
User avatar #96 to #84 - ivoryhammer (07/29/2013) [-]
Revan
User avatar #110 to #96 - huntergriff ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
cade skywalker's pretty badass...
User avatar #260 to #110 - holycrapimacupcake (07/29/2013) [-]
Jacen Solo.
User avatar #317 to #260 - huntergriff ONLINE (07/30/2013) [-]
Jacen's cool up until he becomes a sith...basically went anakin on everyone...
User avatar #319 to #317 - holycrapimacupcake (07/30/2013) [-]
I liked him even then, mainly because he;s not a whiny bitch, no, Jecen Solo does what Jacen Solo wants.
#271 - lolfire (07/29/2013) [-]
Why do you guys stand the Westborough Baptist church.....

If they were allowed into our country we'd have kicked seven shades of ***** out of them.
#273 to #271 - teranin ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
because we may not agree with what they say, but we'll defend to the death their right to say it.
User avatar #274 to #273 - lolfire (07/29/2013) [-]
There's a massive difference between free speech and hate speech.
User avatar #278 to #274 - teranin ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
In the USA, people are free to hate on each other. Speech is only limited when it comes to slander and libel, no lying to connontate illegal or character-destroying acts for people or companies. Aside from that, speech is free regardless of what it is
User avatar #284 to #278 - lolfire (07/29/2013) [-]
In American law Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress waives your right to free speech.

They shouldn't be protected under the First Amendment if they are protesting funerals.
#287 to #284 - teranin ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
actually, no, it doesn't. There is no law on a federal level expressing such a context. Only when it can damage someone financially is it illegal, that's why hate groups even exist here in the states, and why the government hasn't arrested half of tumblr for endorsing and plotting genocide against males. As it turns out, it's covered by free speech.
User avatar #292 to #287 - lolfire (07/29/2013) [-]
Ahh it seems the Snyder v Phelps (2011) guarantee's that hate speech is protected.

Pretty sad that the justice system could fail so horribly.
#296 to #292 - teranin ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
depends on your definition of failure.  I for one support the idea of free speech being near absolute, because the way people take what people say is far too subjective to effectively enforce anti-hate, more than likely you would end up arresting a lot of people who were actually saying pretty insightful things, just because some mamby-pamby couldn't take a little criticism.
depends on your definition of failure. I for one support the idea of free speech being near absolute, because the way people take what people say is far too subjective to effectively enforce anti-hate, more than likely you would end up arresting a lot of people who were actually saying pretty insightful things, just because some mamby-pamby couldn't take a little criticism.
User avatar #86 - schnizel (07/29/2013) [-]
Remove Sith!
User avatar #61 - shittingmangos (07/29/2013) [-]
that's pretty cool, I can't stand westboro. I don't even call them a church, they are just a hate group. I believe in God and all but man they are just extremely ignorant. Main idea of all religion is pretty much everybody love everybody, at least that's my opinion.
User avatar #81 - lorddarkskull (07/29/2013) [-]
I preach the divine word of MissingNo., Blesser of One-Hundredfold.
0
#238 - PopcornOps **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#166 - asheskirata (07/29/2013) [-]
**asheskirata rolled a random image posted in comment #3039511 at Friendly **

that man is one of my heroes.
#201 - settantaventi (07/29/2013) [-]
This image has expired
**settantaventi rolled a random image posted in comment #5301772 at Furries ** jedi
#213 to #201 - darkjustifier (07/29/2013) [-]
I have lost my ability to even.
#289 - cunty (07/29/2013) [-]
for ages i coundt work out how the text related to the pictures; as i read the sign as "love all curves" and i thought she was a fat rights activist
#173 - anonymous (07/29/2013) [-]
I didn't know Jabba the Hutt was a Jedi...this is mindblowing.
User avatar #85 - LoveAmorAi ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
I go to UCF. The UCF Jedi is ******* awesome. It will be a shame when he graduates.
#207 - adamsizzler (07/29/2013) [-]
What`?
#27 - anonymous (07/29/2013) [-]
Sign says, "Love cures all"
content says "preaching messages of hate and intolerance"
seriously guys. seriously.
Look at it like this
(VERY FEW) Christians go out with signs against gay marriage not in hate, but in fear. If you truly believed that a person was going to burn forever because he or she is gay, you'd want to do something to try and prevent that.
Unfortunately too many Christians go out against gay marriage to yell and judge and hate. D: but don't let them become the picture for every christian.
too bad i'm an anon and my opinions don't count.
User avatar #133 to #27 - teranin ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
Just so you know, those are additional counter-protestors. The person taking this picture ended up taking it at an angle that showed the other counter protesters and not the WBC guys
#280 to #133 - anonymous (07/29/2013) [-]
wbc are not christians. they're assholes who put on a bad name for jesus. seriously, jesus specifically ******* says, "love everyone as you love yourself" not "love only certain people based on their social life/ decisions. go ahead be a dick ass wipe hole.
#283 to #280 - teranin ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
uh, did I say anything to that effect?
User avatar #83 to #27 - thebrownydestroyer **User deleted account** (07/29/2013) [-]
They aren't the hate preachers, im pretty sure they're with the jedi guy
#74 to #27 - anonymous (07/29/2013) [-]
You're opinion wouldn't count anyways. this is FJ. Your options: Bandwagon / Banned
User avatar #51 to #27 - demandsgayversion (07/29/2013) [-]
Just a guess, they're probly saying love cures diseases and not to use medicine. If Jedi was there, they were probly saying something ignorant.
#279 to #51 - anonymous (07/29/2013) [-]
sir, you just generalized them simply because a man in a jedi outfit was there.
wbc are a bunch of dicks, they aren't in the least bit christian.
#306 - dodgeorramit (07/29/2013) [-]
I've never seen this guy once on campus...but damn he's cool.
I've never seen this guy once on campus...but damn he's cool.
#270 - arkbound (07/29/2013) [-]
Seems like they have changed. I don't remember them protesting with half naked women, saying love is the answer. I'm not against this change.
 Friends (0)