Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#58 - anonymous (07/12/2013) [-]
this is right in the terms of explosion but the overall long term fallout would kill everyone
#57 - darkparadox (07/06/2013) [-]
He's not talking about taking out the population. He's replying to someone who said that the US had enough to take out the entire land mass. He merely pointed out that the US arsenal would only be able to destroy about 5% of China's landmass
User avatar #53 - purpleday (07/06/2013) [-]
What a dumb **** . You don't need to bomb all of China to take down 90% of the population. You just gotta hit the coastline with your payload, counting the radiation and big ******* booms, I'd be willing to bet that you can take out 90% of the pop.
0
#39 - casadue has deleted their comment [-]
#20 - dehymenator (07/05/2013) [+] (4 replies)
This guy totally ignores the concussive blast radius (high pressure wave) and the spread of large ammounds of radioactive debris that will do significantly more damage over time than the blast its self over a much wider area.
This guy totally ignores the concussive blast radius (high pressure wave) and the spread of large ammounds of radioactive debris that will do significantly more damage over time than the blast its self over a much wider area.
#30 to #20 - bluejolt (07/05/2013) [-]
What is sauce on that gif? It looks....interesting.
#15 - lfunnymanl (07/05/2013) [-]
**lfunnymanl rolled a random image posted in comment #2653171 at Friendly ** ******* /a/ man
#37 - kanatana (07/05/2013) [-]
**kanatana rolled a random image posted in comment #2765006 at Friendly ** Wow. Just wow.
 Friends (0)