Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#315 - haloforlife
Reply +2
(06/30/2013) [-]
I don't get it? What does she expect him to do, pull out a sword and go all charge of the light brigade on the enemy?
#317 to #315 - derangedberger
Reply -1
(06/30/2013) [-]
She wasn't talking about the picture.
#319 to #317 - haloforlife
Reply 0
(06/30/2013) [-]
Ohhhhhhhh my mistake, I only really looked at it for about 5 seconds, and I thought it was a picture.
#306 - wacemindu
Reply +2
(06/30/2013) [-]
You can still be strong and brave whilst being afraid... in fact to do something you are actually afraid of makes you braver in my book.
#316 to #306 - viscerys
Reply 0
(06/30/2013) [-]
In order to be brave, one must first be afraid.
#283 - iamwillygean
Reply +2
(06/30/2013) [-]
#194 - hokeymon
Reply +2
(06/30/2013) [-]
We can see here twitter page OP. You dun goof now.
#328 - jazzyietheferret
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
If you have no fear, then you can not be brave. The lack of fear only makes someone stupid.
#326 - CaptainWaffles
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
"Find the feminist" is almost as much fun as "Spot the Vegan."
#324 - anon
Reply 0
(06/30/2013) [-]
Women do not belong in the army... i'm sorry but it's true. They're just a hassle usually. They can not carry as much equipment as men because they are physically weaker, that's a fact and not just sexist ********, so who has to take on the extra gear? The men in the unit. If there was ever close quarter fighting the same rule applies about them being physically weaker, now someone else has to look after them. I would not trust a woman covering my back. Also the brotherhood of battle, it isn't sisterhood.
#422 to #324 - jzwangpk
Reply -1
(07/01/2013) [-]
Well, some of those are debatable. Women actually tend to do better at carrying heavy torso loads because their anatomies are, well, better suited to it because their bodies are built to carry babies for nine months. But I won't dispute what you said about close-quarters combat, because load-bearing strength does not equal combat strength at all. To be honest, though, it really depends on what roles you put them in. Not every single woman in the military is going to take up a role with a lot of equipment, so you don't have to worry about men having to carry a **** ton of extra gear. A woman with a rifle and standard gear can manage just as well as the man next to her. Additionally, they're an asset in the field - hostile civilians tend to trust women more than men (it's a psychological thing), and women tend to be more cool-headed and better at thinking in crisis situations.

I could go on (I wrote a whole paper on this for my AP Government class) but that's just my two cents
#330 to #324 - slenderwolf
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
There are a few exceptions. Have you ever seen the Israeli army? They have some of the most combat capable women in the world over there. Of course that is different than here where women have been pampered and treasured as delicate playthings for decades.
#358 to #330 - anon
Reply 0
(06/30/2013) [-]
But if a man and a woman went through the same training the man would come out superior in combat just because of his natural advantage of strength.
#337 to #330 - timmywankenobi
Reply 0
(06/30/2013) [-]
modern feminisim101: worthless Men need to treasure and provide for and protect women as a whole like they are porcilan dolls. Man must exalt woman hood at all times while also acknowledging that masculinity which built society is evil and wrong.
#279 - monsterderp
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
stupid cunts.
stupid cunts.
#272 - TheFixer
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
correct me if im wrong but when a man passes a kidney stone isnt that pain comparable to child birth depending on the stone size?
#274 to #272 - thechosentroll
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
Yes, mainly because the human brain releases natural painkillers during birth. It does jack **** when you pass a kidney stone.
#275 to #274 - TheFixer
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
yay endorphins
#253 - maguitox
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#185 - friendlyanon
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
To be brave you must first be afraid...
#184 - whycanticaps
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
Idk, I bet he is scared ********
#146 - kaiizel
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
She must not have had good role models or relations with decent men.
#141 - ramerez
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
That guy is brave and is most likely strong, but believe me he is ******* ******** himself as anyone who just had a bullet hit right next to his head would.
#137 - guylongname
Reply -1
(06/30/2013) [-]
I don't think OP understands that the wench was trying to say that true men aren't afraid to show what they truly feel, even if it does make them look vulnerable. Anyone else think everyone being just a bit too harsh on this woman, who probably didn't come up with quote herself?
#139 to #137 - tristmilt
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
Yeaaaa, but this is the internet. We can only take the exact literal meaning of what she said and not look into it further for the actual intent.
#106 - anon
Reply 0
(06/30/2013) [-]
the photographer should took the moment the bullet touch that babykiller' head.
#113 to #106 - cowandchicken
Reply 0
(06/30/2013) [-]
.......what.
#116 to #106 - lolollo
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
You're trying too hard.
#62 - brokenboulevard
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
#71 to #62 - kieranbaker
Reply 0
(06/30/2013) [-]
scroll down
#75 to #62 - brokenboulevard
Reply 0
(06/30/2013) [-]



Fiddle sticks.
#100 to #62 - kingoflulzfool
Reply 0
(06/30/2013) [-]
keep forgetting about that damn pocket...
#144 to #62 - yeorey
Reply 0
(06/30/2013) [-]
Comment #22
#66 to #62 - joeypie
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
Thank you good sir.
#39 - kooliojoe
Reply 0
(06/30/2013) [-]
That's a quote from the movie The Ugly Truth
#50 to #39 - teamrocketninja
Reply 0
(06/30/2013) [-]
Why do you know that?
#51 to #50 - Shramin
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
Perhaps he watched the movie?
#21 - phantomhawkfour **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#11 - reican
Reply +1
(06/30/2013) [-]
can't afford fear, ain't got any time for that.