Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #9 - therealtjthemedic (06/14/2013) [-]
>having a rear site AND a scope
#13 to #9 - MrTurdTastic (06/14/2013) [-]
>Applying actual weapons logic to a Tactical Self Defence Stick
>Applying actual weapons logic to a Tactical Self Defence Stick
User avatar #14 to #13 - therealtjthemedic (06/14/2013) [-]
Technically, if that stick was painted black it would be considered an assault weapon by US govt
User avatar #16 to #15 - therealtjthemedic (06/14/2013) [-]
And now we wait for the vegetarians.
User avatar #40 to #16 - jurto (06/14/2013) [-]
I'm a vegetarian, yet I don't like cauliflower =/
User avatar #46 to #9 - aahrg (06/14/2013) [-]
let's not forget that it's a ******* stick
#42 to #9 - fbiagent (06/14/2013) [-]
Thats actually pretty common... its a folding rear site (aka backup iron sight). Usually its left down, but in the case of an emergency (like your scope not working) you can flip it up and use your irons
User avatar #55 to #9 - CallMeCrisco (06/14/2013) [-]
>having a rear sight and no front sight...
#8 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
USA should ban guns. Any dumb ass ************ who thinks guns are a good idea should be shot with their own weapon. After all, guns are for killing.
User avatar #22 to #8 - thehans (06/14/2013) [-]
you really dont know anything about guns do you?
my momma always told me, if you dont exactly know what you are talking about, then shut the **** up
User avatar #39 to #8 - captfuckhead (06/14/2013) [-]
> Ban guns to stop people killing people
> Kill people who don't hand over their weapons
2/10, try harder, troll.
User avatar #34 to #8 - durkadurka ONLINE (06/14/2013) [-]
I sincerely hope nothing bad happens to you, but if you're ever being robbed, raped, assaulted, etc, please think about your statement and reflect on how stupid it is.
#20 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
Self defence from what? You americans need to realise that the only danger you have is other americans with guns.
#23 to #20 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
Which is even more reason to get one
User avatar #35 to #20 - durkadurka ONLINE (06/14/2013) [-]
People with other weapons.

And I guess you expect those other people to give up their guns once you give up yours.
User avatar #38 to #20 - captfuckhead (06/14/2013) [-]
Ever been jumped, beat and robbed? I did, got a concussion from it, all for $11 and two packs of cigarettes. That's why I have them.
User avatar #73 to #20 - thisotherdude (06/14/2013) [-]
Oh that's cute, the anon thinks he's a person.
#24 to #20 - captnpl ONLINE (06/14/2013) [-]
and bears
#31 to #20 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
Come live in the mountains of Colorado for a while and get back to me on that.
#67 to #20 - cheated has deleted their comment [-]
#118 to #20 - anonymous (06/15/2013) [-]
Read the constitution douche. Guns allowed so people will be able to overthrow the government should it overstep its bounds.
#123 to #118 - WutzATroll (06/15/2013) [-]
what the **** are the people going to do to stop the government? Absolutely nothing.
#78 - wobbles (06/14/2013) [-]
can someone clarify this for me? I am not American... do they want to ban all guns or what?
User avatar #96 to #78 - chiefrunnyjeans (06/14/2013) [-]
no, just "scary looking" semi automatic rifles. the only ones who support banning them are ignorant sheep.
#117 to #96 - hazelnuttz (06/15/2013) [-]
Really? Sheep? No one I've ever heard from has made a clear and solid argument as to why average citizens should need to be able to buy automatic rifles and high capacity magazines. I get not banning all guns, that's obvious, but you don't NEED to have a weapon that is capable of killing lots of people really quickly. The less of those there are around the less lives will be lost en-mass. How can anyone argue that fact?

The only argument I've heard from gun advocats is that they want to have the same, if not, more powerful weapons then the bad guys have. Well. Considering the badguys are more often then not just average citizens like you gun advocates... the irony is perfectly clear.

And if you're worried about criminal gangs getting hold of now illegal automatic rifles and going on shooting sprees, well you can rest assured that there will still be FAR LESS shooting sprees then the alternative. And in any case you'll still have your concealed hand guns etc and be able to defend yourself if you're smart about it.

Advocating for the right to buy assault rifles won't save a crowd of people from getting mowed down at a fair, or in a mall, or anywhere really. But if the gun wasn't available to begin with, far less people would be killed.

If you don't agree feel free to say why
#135 to #117 - wobbles (06/15/2013) [-]
banning guns for regular people is just bad.

If a criminal wants to kill someone, do you think that a gun law would stop him? Most of the worst shootings happen at gun-free zones, where are people just couldn't protect themselves with a gun.

And by the way if someone like REALLY wants to kill someone, a small revolver or a knife can be more dangerous because they are stealthy.
User avatar #133 to #117 - chiefrunnyjeans (06/15/2013) [-]
In the UK there was an increase in gun crimes after they banned them.
1. 30 rounds is standard capacity
2. You obviously don't know enough about guns to be having this debate
3. They are semi automatic rifles, not assault rifles. Do you get all your information from msnbc or cnn? I ask because it's all wrong.
4. Open carrying of semi automatic rifles would make shooting sprees all but extinct. If you saw law abiding citizens with guns around you would you commit a violent crime? I think not. However if they weren't it would be so much easier to murder people because they can't fight back can they?
5. Semi automatic rifles and standard capacity magazines are what keeps places like detroit safe. I should know because I live right by there. Store owners use AR-15's to shoot and kill would-be robbers.
6. Second amendment makes any argument you come up with invalid. Welcome to America. Respect all rights to the fullest extent or gtfo
#134 to #133 - chiefrunnyjeans has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #80 to #78 - pebar (06/14/2013) [-]
Some people do, and they're trying...
But thankfully they will not succeed. They couldn't even get background checks for private sales through the democrat controlled senate.
*evil laugh*
User avatar #88 to #78 - thelastamerican (06/14/2013) [-]
It really depends. Some Americans want to ban all guns. Some want to ban only certain guns that are/have been used in warfare. Some want to ban only certain accessories that can be used with guns. Some want every citizen to be allowed to choose. Some want it mandated that every citizen be required to own a gun. Some want it mandated that every citizen is conscripted into the military for a certain amount of time when they come of age.

What it comes down to is that some people want to be left alone to take care of themselves, and some people want to take care of everyone else.
#77 - njjsoccerkid has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #79 to #77 - pebar (06/14/2013) [-]
the name isn't the same
User avatar #86 to #77 - exarzero (06/14/2013) [-]
Asshole going around making his name really close to others and doing this. Not his content.
User avatar #85 - brenton (06/14/2013) [-]
<sarcasm>That magazine holds too many rounds. Still illegal.</sarcasm>
#83 - xxhunterxx ONLINE (06/14/2013) [-]
User avatar #27 - hypex (06/14/2013) [-]
meanwhiile on /k/....
#95 - bbbaka (06/14/2013) [-]
ib4 goverment confiscates it   
GIF somewhat relevant
ib4 goverment confiscates it

GIF somewhat relevant
User avatar #94 - chiefrunnyjeans (06/14/2013) [-]
oh no. it has a scary foregrip and magazine. hurr durr we should ban this guys
#61 - tmdarby (06/14/2013) [-]
Here come the internet fights.
Here come the internet fights.
#130 - snakefire (06/15/2013) [-]
Nobody's taken' mai snipah
Nobody's taken' mai snipah
User avatar #132 - ethkot (06/15/2013) [-]
Come on! Now we have to ban sticks because when you do that to it, it looks like a gun!
#125 - anonymous (06/15/2013) [-]
I thought self-defense became illegal too.
User avatar #66 - Tazdingo (06/14/2013) [-]
Too bad the magazine is too big for it to be legal.
#76 to #66 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
Only in fascist states like California and a couple others.
#101 to #76 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
>implying fascism is bad
User avatar #121 to #101 - skinless (06/15/2013) [-]
it is
#109 to #101 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
>implying it's not
#120 - anonymous (06/15/2013) [-]
of the course the anti-sanity idiot makes a bunch of spelling errors
User avatar #100 - mymiddleleg (06/14/2013) [-]
End result of Britains Armed Forces budget cuts
#108 to #100 - lolfire (06/14/2013) [-]
Haha, you lot in the mainland aren't allowed guns.
User avatar #98 - mattucheese **User deleted account** (06/14/2013) [-]
In theory since it doesn't have a stock it could be considered a "pistol". The law is stupid on pistols and says you can not have forward vertical grip on it. Thus making it a federal crime to have that grippod on it...
#93 - doctormisha (06/14/2013) [-]
This is..the only relevant thing I have
#62 - Thenewguygunther (06/14/2013) [-]
User avatar #71 to #62 - vedgetable (06/14/2013) [-]
isnt no-scope just a regular shot..
 Friends (0)