x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#374 - anamenotaken (05/10/2013) [-]
Edison would say that wouldn't he, the bastard.
#395 to #374 - neoexdeath ONLINE (05/10/2013) [-]
Relative gets zapped by douchebag

Never forgets, never forgives.
#326 - martbeast (05/10/2013) [-]
mfw looking back on those statements
mfw looking back on those statements
User avatar #318 - therealtjthemedic (05/10/2013) [-]
Last one is right.
Computers DON'T weigh more than 1.5 tons, do they?
User avatar #310 - andrewjla (05/10/2013) [-]
There's no way I will fap tonight.
User avatar #19 - nockae (05/09/2013) [-]
Thomas Edison was a *********** anyway.
User avatar #360 to #19 - matttboyagain (05/10/2013) [-]
Yes he was.
User avatar #241 - sepheroth (05/10/2013) [-]
Well, to be fair, our computers don't weigh over 1.5 tons
User avatar #160 - skrynox (05/10/2013) [-]
Hipsters, duckfaces, and 13 year old faggots will be gone from social websites by 2015.

- Me


Let's hope this isn't a false prediction.
User avatar #165 to #160 - zorororonoa (05/10/2013) [-]
I havent seen a duckface in forever. Those are still around?
#379 to #160 - anon (05/10/2013) [-]
you just jinxed it
thanks
User avatar #274 - spindlecruiser (05/10/2013) [-]
The last one is true, PCs don't weigh more than 1.5 tons, so yeah.
User avatar #232 - Ottovan (05/10/2013) [-]
"Democracy will be dead by 1950"


Well... They're kinds right....
User avatar #211 - hatmanfirst (05/10/2013) [-]
I like how he has sources
#176 - urbemarmis (05/10/2013) [-]
some of these are just the competitors of certain products trying to down play the fact that they know itll be something big, hoping people will listen and agree, and not buy their competitors ****
#169 - pitpug (05/10/2013) [-]
Am I the only one that just loves how many ***** Thomas Edison does not give?

I mean look at him, hes all like, "Stop fooling around with alternating current..... you look stupid..."
User avatar #123 - savethedinosaurs (05/09/2013) [-]
Technically, the last one isn't wrong.
#33 - bananajoe (05/09/2013) [-]
all these quotes about cinema and the internet only being a fad makes me think about 3d tech, many people say it's useless and dumb and won't have a future, who knows, maybe this will be the next big thing
User avatar #153 to #33 - thewaronbeingcool (05/10/2013) [-]
Well 3D has failed twice before. They tried it in the 50's and it failed, and they tried it in the 80's and it failed again.

And to be honest, nowadays hardly anyone gives a **** about it any more. Chances are it'll fail again.
User avatar #37 to #33 - chucknorrisTHEGAME (05/09/2013) [-]
I really, really hope it's not.
#47 to #37 - horaquan (05/09/2013) [-]
I semi-agree with you. Some 3D just seems like a novelty, but I've seen a nature show in 3D, and I felt it actually gave it a better feel than regular 2D.
User avatar #91 to #47 - bknob ONLINE (05/09/2013) [-]
truth be told I think 3D will become big in its own unique way, but it wont replace 2D, similarly how TV became huge but didn't replace radio.

Unless of course 3D gets to such a point where its just way easier to make something 3D (without it actually being an issue for the majority of the public) then it might replace it.
User avatar #56 to #47 - efdinthea (05/09/2013) [-]
the advancements into light polarization are still fairly new and not yet full understood in terms of applying it to modern technologies. so it may be a very big possibility.
User avatar #105 - inevergetdubs (05/09/2013) [-]
Doctors said that women cant run marathons cause their uterus would fall out.
#96 - sirfistalot ONLINE (05/09/2013) [-]
Birds will never lift.














Bill Nye 2005
#386 - damrod (05/10/2013) [-]
Charles Darwing.
#388 to #386 - eltorodiablo (05/10/2013) [-]
it could have been worse
User avatar #316 - justbrandonreally (05/10/2013) [-]
I think they're all right, because in 2,000-10,000 or so years we are going to grow so much as humans that we probably destroy this tiny planet with pollution, war, genocide, or something else radical and crazy.... , and either have to go to a new planet, or cease to exist.
User avatar #327 to #316 - niralius (05/10/2013) [-]
!0,000 years we will surely as **** become the dominant galactic race, I would know I'm fomr the year 25,000
User avatar #330 to #327 - iamkagji (05/10/2013) [-]
People in the future still say **** ?
User avatar #331 to #330 - niralius (05/10/2013) [-]
why the **** not?
User avatar #332 to #331 - iamkagji (05/10/2013) [-]
I dunno. I figured something new would have come along by then.
User avatar #334 to #332 - niralius (05/10/2013) [-]
we're in that "retro" period, where thinks from back then are the bees knee's
User avatar #337 to #334 - iamkagji (05/10/2013) [-]
I see. Hey, did they ever get Robert Downey Junior back for Iron Man 4, and does Leonardo DiCaprio get his Oscar?
User avatar #338 to #337 - niralius (05/10/2013) [-]
Nicolas Cage is the next Iron Man and DiCaprio gets a Nobel prize for effort
User avatar #339 to #338 - iamkagji (05/10/2013) [-]
I see. Thank you for the information, future-man. Godspeed.
#138 - sebsebsebh (05/09/2013) [-]
Great post, spelling was a bit iffy though... Haven't heard of Charles Darwing before.
#151 to #149 - sebsebsebh (05/10/2013) [-]
EGGSELLENT
#84 - twomd (05/09/2013) [-]
Charles Darwin also said to that his theory would be wrong, and should be discounted if people don't find fossils for the transitional phase in evolution, after the tools, that have the capacity to do so, are invented. Yet, people still subscribe to it because ignorance is bliss, and the idea of discrediting a God is too appealing for immoral men. You can red thumb/ban me, but you can never abolish facts.
#109 to #84 - Capnhowdy (05/09/2013) [-]
While that statement is essentially correct, its the exact reason people subscribe to it. We DID find those fossils and many other forms of evidence Darwin never imagined such as DNA, mitochondrial or otherwise, radio dating, and epigenetics.
#90 to #88 - anon (05/09/2013) [-]
+++twomd here+++ religion is a set of beliefs. It's faith on the unseen. Most people have faith to some degree. Some have faith in a God, some, in chance. Some believe that everything just kinda happened. Or that we will all reach nirvana. But having faith in a god, or lack thereof, is religion. Unless you are postmodern, and agnostic, this post is self contradictory. The analogy in itself was weak, as it can be applied to most debatable topics, and it is also told from the view of an omnipotent being. It's as if whoever wrote this knew the context of the universe (that is no one).
User avatar #93 to #92 - agentpurplek (05/09/2013) [-]
>I know it's not the largest but its up there.
#94 to #93 - anon (05/09/2013) [-]
(still twomd) The largest what? And yes, a lot of corrupt people died, I'd like to say it's a shame but...
User avatar #107 to #94 - agentpurplek (05/09/2013) [-]
It's not the largest genocide in history but it is a large genocide of 2 million people and then nothing but inbreeding between a family. It takes at least 15 men and 15 women to keep the gene pool diverse enough to make us not all deformed. Some how this one guy got only two of each animal, again, not enough for breading.
#413 to #107 - anon (05/14/2013) [-]
not only did both of those pictures not address the points and arguments that i made, but you can breed with two animals, and id imagine arc would be rather crowded with fifteen animals of every species. any more random irrelevant biased pictures?
User avatar #414 to #413 - agentpurplek (05/14/2013) [-]
aha You can breed with two animals once and then what? Know you have a baby that can't bread with its parents because the gene pool is not diverse enough. Next to that how did a boat smaller than the titanic house all these animals.

This story is a myth just like the bible
User avatar #415 to #414 - agentpurplek (05/14/2013) [-]
Now* not Know
 Friends (0)