Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #76 - xbits (05/04/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Avatar is still a **** movie.
#78 to #76 - anonexplains (05/04/2013) [-]
Your opinion is wrong, like alot of things in your life.
User avatar #69 - Ottovan ONLINE (05/04/2013) [+] (3 replies)
**** , it was all just CGI...

They didn't even have to ******* film actors. Coulda made the whole thing CGI.

I'll take my red thumbs now.

CGI destroys the spirit of movies, it's just a cheap and quick shortcut.
User avatar #79 to #69 - dabombmanater ONLINE (05/04/2013) [-]
I cant thumb you either way. Cause you just said it was all CGI which the point of this post was to prove it wasn't (and its not like they'd actually be able to send the the actors to another planet to get a real background). But on the other hand I agree with you CGI destroys the spirit of movies, it's just that this movie is an exception.
User avatar #61 - HerroMsLady (05/04/2013) [-]
I bet you're fun at parties.
User avatar #54 - grandmabetty ONLINE (05/04/2013) [-]
it's still a film that was overhyped because of the crappy 3D gimmick that surrounded it... 3D is just a waste of money at the end of the day
User avatar #38 - wisedrifter (05/04/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Does James Cameron even have the ability to make a bad movie?
#41 to #38 - hairibar (05/04/2013) [-]
Star Wars II: Attack Of The Clones
#17 - lordraine (05/04/2013) [-]
Anybody can make a normal complete waste of time and money. It takes real, legitimate talent to make it down to Avatar's level, though.
User avatar #19 - chocolatepuppy (05/04/2013) [-]
doesnt matter, stills was a ****** movie
 Friends (0)