Upload
Login or register
Back to the content 'Title' Leave a comment Refresh Comments (258)
[ 258 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
#212 - xtrmbragnrytz
Reply 0
(04/28/2013) [-]
Because you can't improve on something that's already at it's best
#146 - guanyu
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#139 - anon
Reply 0
(04/28/2013) [-]
Because they got it right the first time.
#83 - hentailovers
Reply -2
(04/27/2013) [-]
because there arnt any bugs to fix in the consoles.

consoles-1
PCs-1

its a tied. i give up
#84 to #83 - hentailovers
Reply 0
(04/27/2013) [-]
pcs not consoles
#86 to #83 - tacobadger
Reply 0
(04/27/2013) [-]
jesus **** your name is hentai lovers. Christ, dude. Keep that **** under wraps.
#93 to #83 - fawkwayne
Reply 0
(04/27/2013) [-]
You accidentallied the **** out of that sentence...
#68 - kenwordo
Reply 0
(04/27/2013) [-]
im tired of this pc vs console fanboy ****
#46 - taythekiller
Reply -3
(04/27/2013) [-]
If it ain't broke don't fix it?
#81 to #46 - anon
Reply 0
(04/27/2013) [-]
if it ain't broke, why not improve it?
#1 - sparkyoneonetwo
Reply -6
(04/27/2013) [-]
well just going with windows we are on like Pc version 22 or something like that
#13 to #1 - EddFitzpatrick
Reply -1
(04/27/2013) [-]
9th ersion of windows is windows 8...
#20 to #13 - sparkyoneonetwo
Reply -1
(04/27/2013) [-]
Windows 3.1 (August 1992; version number: 3.10.040)
Windows 3.0 (22 May 1990; version number: 3.00.73)
Windows 2.11 (13 March 1989)
Windows 2.10 (27 May 1988)
Windows 2.03 (9 December 1987)
Windows 1.04 (April 1987)
Windows 1.03 (August 1986)
Windows 1.02 (May 1986)
Windows 1.01 (20 November 1985)

That is 9 versions right there
#21 to #20 - EddFitzpatrick
Reply 0
(04/27/2013) [-]
oh ****, my apologies.
#23 to #21 - sparkyoneonetwo
Reply -1
(04/27/2013) [-]
and before windows 95 (what most people seem to think was the first) there was Windows NT 3.51
Windows NT 3.5
Windows 3.2
Windows for Workgroups 3.11
Windows NT 3.1


then

95
98
ME
2000
Xp
VIsta
7
and 8
#37 to #23 - EddFitzpatrick
Reply 0
(04/27/2013) [-]
i only counted 3.1 onwards
#119 - natethehunter **User deleted account**
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#53 - alphadolan
Reply -1
(04/27/2013) [-]
Because if something is perfect why change it?
Because if something is perfect why change it?
#33 - thepepsican
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#7 - zynax
Reply -1
(04/27/2013) [-]
They have been superior from the start?
#4 - breaken
Reply -1
(04/27/2013) [-]
Can't beat that logic, better throw it out the win
#155 - sloot
Reply -2
(04/28/2013) [-]
The only reason I have a cpu that can handle games is for when I want to play a non multiplayer game so I can torrent it and play it...
#147 - guanyu
Reply -2
(04/28/2013) [-]
PC 3 has......................................... no games
#127 - mcatheistnuggets
Reply -2
(04/28/2013) [-]
Feeding the trolls. Because it's the ultimate game system, and thus does not need a replacement.
#22 - bitchplzzz
Reply -2
(04/27/2013) [-]
w-wait, what was that anon closing the thread for? hes not even replying to OP and he's the only poster there
#9 - jtistillam
Reply -2
(04/27/2013) [-]
Because there improvements are unnecessary
#99 - ragnarfag
Reply -3
(04/28/2013) [-]
But the development of the computer has never stopped...
#48 - zhao
Reply -5
(04/27/2013) [-]
bow to us you filthy console peasant!
bow to us you filthy console peasant!
#49 to #48 - stgfilitov
Reply -5
(04/27/2013) [-]
#40 - Loppytaffy
-6
has deleted their comment [-]