x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1190 - doctorlea (04/22/2013) [-]
because a 5 year old can walk into a gun store a buy a gun...
#664 - killyojoy (04/22/2013) [-]
Didn't the kinder egg just become legal in America again?? Also I'm pretty sure we don't sell children assault rifles so I think we are fine on that matter.
Didn't the kinder egg just become legal in America again?? Also I'm pretty sure we don't sell children assault rifles so I think we are fine on that matter.
User avatar #420 - Laddie (04/22/2013) [-]
I don't know where you live, but I've never seen a child try to eat an assault rifle.


But in all seriousness, this is a pretty ****** argument.
User avatar #410 - mdmclean **User deleted account** (04/22/2013) [-]
I don't want to get involved in the gun debate
but i think we can all agree on he fact that if you follow a kinder egg whole and choke to death thats just natural selection
User avatar #36 - fantomen (04/21/2013) [-]
One is an M4 carbine.
It's more or less banned for civilian use and the few ones that are available to civilians cost 20grand.

The other is a plastic egg that was banned because of frivolous lawsuits something America is more infamous for than gun violence.
User avatar #26 - carguybig (04/21/2013) [-]
No guys... this ad creator is correct. Kinder Surprise shouldn't be banned! That was wrong of our government to do! :D
#1141 - ookichinchindesu (04/22/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Yes because children can buy an M16
#1144 to #1141 - sittingwhale (04/22/2013) [-]
Yes because that's not an M16. It's an M4 carbine. Just sayin'..
#1064 - teFlyingNinja ONLINE (04/22/2013) [+] (3 replies)
I believe in the right to have bear arms. No?
User avatar #1044 - zraven (04/22/2013) [+] (17 replies)
Because it's not an assault weapon, it's a semi-automatic rifle, usually used in target tournaments, and, sometimes, hunting.
User avatar #936 - amsel (04/22/2013) [-]
Banning assault rifles gives the government more power over the people. The second amendment has nothing to do with hunting; it was put in there to ensure that at any given point in time, the majority population would have stronger firepower than the government. With new legislation allowing the federal government to use drones in law enforcement, and the ridiculous arsenal of automatic weaponry and explosives owned by the military, it's silly to ban something like assault rifles. I really don't understand how "let's ban more things and intentionally give up a piece of our freedom" is ever a respectable argument in politics.
#681 - trigondarkthree (04/22/2013) [+] (17 replies)
This is simple: One is given to and used by children. One is only used by radically pro gun adults.
#687 to #681 - fordun (04/22/2013) [-]
Or ya know. Law abiding citizens with friends and families they want to protect.
User avatar #563 - foliap (04/22/2013) [+] (3 replies)
ok...ok. Honestly, I think both arguments are flawed regarding gun laws. But if you own a gun for self defense, why are there those with more than one? why would you need an assault riffle and so on, why not just an ordinary hand gun? Isn't that the point where the commodity of owning a gun becomes less self protection and more for leisure.

I'm don't really side with either end, as there isn't really any fix to the crime issues in america, but I don't agree with the argument "the gun didn't kill the person" statement. You're providing a killer with a killing machine, the use of a gun is quick and fast and requires much less pre-meditation to do than physically attack someone with a knife. I dunno, There are pro's an cons to either end, but it's really those two things that piss me off about the pro gun side.
#551 - gernab (04/22/2013) [+] (6 replies)
In 2010 358 deaths from rifles and on average 2,500 deaths from choking. Heue hehehe ueuhehueheuuheeeu heueuheehu.
In 2010 358 deaths from rifles and on average 2,500 deaths from choking. Heue hehehe ueuhehueheuuheeeu heueuheehu.
#495 - danielscqro (04/22/2013) [+] (4 replies)
We need to ban Democrats from owning guns, and not good average americans
User avatar #503 to #495 - capslockrage (04/22/2013) [-]
Guys look, a graph on the internet!
must be 100% true!
#355 - verby ONLINE (04/21/2013) [+] (13 replies)
I don't see the problem with background checks, and low capacity magazines. **** , even make assault weapon owners take a class on how to use it. In reality, it takes less than half a second to reload for a trained shooter. Which is what many NRA member claim to be.
Seems like all three are a reasonable compromise to me. Law abiding citizens lose no rights, psychopaths have a harder time doing evil things
#359 to #355 - bitchitroll (04/21/2013) [-]
the only people who own legal assault rifles have a class 3 firearms license and a federal tax stamp saying they can have it. everyone else has a semi automatic rifle
User avatar #333 - dawgfan (04/21/2013) [+] (6 replies)
Who the **** would give a little kid an AR-15?
User avatar #289 - Soilwork ONLINE (04/21/2013) [-]
Breaking Bad should change from meth to kinder eggs
#85 - waffies (04/21/2013) [-]
I wonder how the little girl felt when they handed her that. I mean im sure it's either a prop or unloaded, but still   
   
"Just stand here and look homicidal!"
I wonder how the little girl felt when they handed her that. I mean im sure it's either a prop or unloaded, but still

"Just stand here and look homicidal!"
User avatar #76 - habasparkz (04/21/2013) [-]
Nice trigger control bitch.
#30 - leshiggydonatello (04/21/2013) [-]
>that ******* trigger discipline
 Friends (0)