Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#1076 - bazda ONLINE
Reply +5
(04/22/2013) [-]
Banning guns protects kids? How are those gun-free zones working for you?
#1084 to #1076 - anon
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
About as good as those demilitarized zones...
#990 - mkchillin
Reply +5
(04/22/2013) [-]
This girl has her finger on the trigger, no strap to sling the gun over her shoulder with, and may or may not have it on safety

OH WAIT, stupid me, it's the gunthat is the issue at hand, not the people and their actions in regards to them__
#1015 to #990 - krobeles
Reply -2
(04/22/2013) [-]
So we're gonna go with the "Guns dont kill people. People kill people." arguement?

Honestly, i can hardly see the logic behind this one. Sure, people kill people, but people without guns are much less likely to kill people as they dont have the means to instantly end somebody's life with the snap of a finger. It takes a much more insane and deranged mind to bash someones head in with a hammer/fists with gouge out his insides with a knife.
With a gun, it just takes the snap of a finger. An instant of bad judgement from an otherwise compleatly decent person, and bang. Dead guy.

Besides that, other than filling some childish need to feel like you have some tangible power, what purpose does having firearms available in such large quantities really serve?
If you'de like to go hunting you can still do that, if gun laws are tightened.
#1031 to #1015 - anon
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
Guns don't kill people. People with moustaches kill people.
#998 to #990 - moldypubes
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
Mag is also in. Finger can be on the trigger for learning purposes/posing if the mag is out, breach cleared and weapon on safe.
#1000 to #998 - anon
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no

THE GUN IS ALWAYS LOADED
#1312 to #1000 - moldypubes
Reply 0
(04/23/2013) [-]
No way there comes a point where the trainee needs to stop being an idiot and train by switching mags, positions and getting adjusted to the feel
#1005 to #1000 - douthit
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
I have to pull the trigger on my Glock to field strip it.
#1056 to #1005 - bazda ONLINE
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
So? Clear it, safe direction, there is nothing unsafe about that.
#1036 to #990 - tylosaurus
Reply +1
(04/22/2013) [-]
Imagine if the gun wasn't available.

Then you wouldn't have to worry about the people being the issue.
#1066 to #1036 - anon
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
"Lets just keep teaching them to be scared of it rather than informed." ******* pleb.
#1075 to #1066 - tylosaurus
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
What are you on about?

Can't hear you over the amount of safety and people with no guns here.
#1054 to #1036 - anon
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
too late for that... any regulation from this point could only make things worse
#1069 to #1054 - tylosaurus
Reply +1
(04/22/2013) [-]
That's what you get for wanting your "freedom" in form of deathly weapons.
#894 - anon
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
good thing you have to be 21 to buy an assault weapon..........
#923 to #894 - ivoryhammer
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
That doesn't stop kids from finding their parent's guns, taking it to school and killing other kids does it?
#944 to #923 - amsel
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
People breaking the law are -BREAKING THE LAW-. Please explain to me how banning assault rifles will stop someone from killing people. They're either going to buy the exact same gun illegally (which many of them currently do; IE the high-cap magazine in the aurora shooting) or find another way to kill people (which many of them currently do, IE the Boston marathon bombings). Banning weapons only affects the people who already follow the law, and they're not who you're worried about.
#946 to #944 - ivoryhammer
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
Why do you need an assault rifle? Why do you need anything more than a pistol for self defense and a hunting rifle for hunting.
#951 to #946 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
what if the criminal has body armor (it's actually pretty common)
people hunt with ar-15s all the time
#947 to #946 - amsel
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
The second amendment was put in to make sure that the people as a whole remain stronger than the government, thus avoiding the possibility of a dictatorship. It has nothing to do with hunting.
#948 to #947 - ivoryhammer
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
When was the Bill of Rights written?
#962 to #948 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
The founders never imagined tv which can sway people's political opinions to those who have the most money, nor the internet which can defame people rapidly. The first amendment still applies to those, right?
#953 to #948 - amsel
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
If you're gonna make an "assault rifles didn't exist in the 1800s" argument, it's rather irrelevant. The entire bill of rights goes after the same purpose of "the government should be limited in power and the people should be stronger."
#902 to #894 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +5
(04/22/2013) [-]
18 in most states for rifles/shotguns
21 for handguns

just sayin'
#832 - ARandomSpoon
Reply +5
(04/22/2013) [-]
That bitch has terrible trigger safety.
#857 to #832 - ShadeElement
Reply +1
(04/22/2013) [-]
You sir are a genius.
In one simple sentence you have both made me laugh, and pointed out that people who are opposed to firearms are utterly ignorant about them.

I salute you.
#1308 to #857 - ARandomSpoon
Reply 0
(04/23/2013) [-]
I'm glad brother :D I'm here to make you laugh :D
#748 - PhuckingPhreak
Reply +5
(04/22/2013) [-]
i like how her fingers on the trigger and the magazine is in and the breach isnt open, and i bet $100 shes pointing that rifle at a camera man, this is what happends when you know some idiot made this add
#615 - holywarstpd
Reply +5
(04/22/2013) [-]
Where did "MomsDemandAction.org" get an AR-15?

Oh and just a quick tidbit for the uninformed *********, the AR in AR-15 DOES NOT STAND FOR ASSAULT RIFLE.
#617 to #615 - anon
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
Armalite lel
#623 to #617 - holywarstpd
Reply +2
(04/22/2013) [-]
See? Even an angry black man knows that.
#509 - mrmuffins
Reply +5
(04/22/2013) [-]
Finger off the trigger until ready to shoot!

#351 - zukowashere
Reply +5
(04/21/2013) [-]
A Kinder egg will never save my life, a gun would.
#357 to #351 - defeats
Reply -7
(04/21/2013) [-]
Having a gun is more likely to get you killed than save your life.
#363 to #357 - bitchitroll
Reply +2
(04/21/2013) [-]
attempting to use an illegal firearm to harm another person is more likely to get you killed*


you had a few misspellings
#379 to #357 - defeats
Reply -1
(04/21/2013) [-]
#270 - lightninghedgehog
Reply +5
(04/21/2013) [-]
dat trigger discipline.....
#261 - krasnogvardiech
Reply +5
(04/21/2013) [-]
Bad stance
No trigger discipline
Rifle's stock is too big for a child to comfortably use
Most likely a paintball or BB gun

4/10. Would not take to firing range.
#215 - YoursTruley
Reply +4
(04/21/2013) [-]
M4....not...not legal in the first place....i dont know what they are trying to get at....all assault rifles have been banned...i dont......wtf?

also...people can kill with bombs too...as we have seen...problem isn't guns...it's people

dontdotdot
#246 to #215 - catsareforcancer
Reply -1
(04/21/2013) [-]
"M4"

...

Son, that there is an AR15. Albeit, one of the fully-automatic variety. I also heard that the gun legislations never passed so please point me to the source where assault rifles have been banned.
#281 to #246 - YoursTruley
Reply +2
(04/21/2013) [-]
i do think that is still an m-4 judging by her size and how big it is compared to her, m4s, as you know are smaller, and not banned i guess but:

It has been unlawful since 1934 (The National Firearms Act) for civilians to own machine guns without special permission from the U.S. Treasury Department. Machine guns are subject to a $200 tax every time their ownership changes from one federally registered owner to another, and each new weapon is subject to a manufacturing tax when it is made, and it must be registered with the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms and Explosives (ATF) in its National Firearms Registry.

To become a registered owner, a complete FBI background investigation is conducted, checking for any criminal history or tendencies toward violence, and an application must be submitted to the ATF including two sets of fingerprints, a recent photo, a sworn affidavit that transfer of the NFA firearm is of "reasonable necessity," and that sale to and possession of the weapon by the applicant "would be consistent with public safety." The application form also requires the signature of a chief law enforcement officer with jurisdiction in the applicant's residence.

Since the Firearms Owners' Protection Act of May 19, 1986, ownership of newly manufactured machine guns has been prohibited to civilians. Machine guns which were manufactured prior to the Act's passage are regulated under the National Firearms Act, but those manufactured after the ban cannot ordinarily be sold to or owned by civilians.


and seeing how an assult rifle is defined b being able to be full-auto, the above applies. (yes the 19994 ban did expire but the other did not)
#313 to #281 - catsareforcancer
Reply +1
(04/21/2013) [-]
One could also argue semantics, though, what is the legal definition of a "machine gun" and "assault rifle." I did hear from somewhere that the term assault rifle was simply some arbitrary term used by people looking to ban the same type of weapons the average american can buy today.

When I hear of a "machine gun" I think of a crew-served weapon. To make this clear, I'm in no way against you, just trying to get that part out of the way before it comes up.
#337 to #313 - YoursTruley
Reply +2
(04/21/2013) [-]
no i understand, but the legal definition from the encyclopedia of Britannica is in short
"An assault rifle is a selective fire (selective between automatic, semi-automatic, and burst fire) rifle that uses an intermediate cartridge and a detachable magazine."

the thing is, is people dont understand the differences between assault rifles and rifles that are modified to look as such.

banning them will do nothing because they are basically already super hard to get.
it is honestly like no lawmaker or lawyers have done their homework.

#416 to #281 - dildzmiester
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
Not quite sure but ya it does look more like a carbine than a rifle, could be an M4
#230 to #215 - savirleo ONLINE
Reply +5
(04/21/2013) [-]
Didn't you hear? A sniper rifle killed some people with the help of a white van and a human
#232 to #230 - YoursTruley
Reply 0
(04/21/2013) [-]
ha!
#239 to #232 - savirleo ONLINE
Reply +5
(04/21/2013) [-]
Trust me, I'm a journalist
#842 - matthewfuckingmain
Reply +4
(04/22/2013) [-]
>Implying that there are gangs of children walking around with semi-automatic rifles.
#852 to #842 - bigbeaufort
Reply +2
(04/22/2013) [-]
I'd be ******* terrifed
#810 - iTzKitteh
Reply +4
(04/22/2013) [-]
I wasn't aware that children could buy guns.
#813 to #810 - vivapinatapro ONLINE
Reply +3
(04/22/2013) [-]
Only white kids can afford them, obviously.
#827 to #813 - iTzKitteh
Reply +4
(04/22/2013) [-]
****, even buy them without proper training, which I'm assuming happened because she's sitting there with her finger on the trigger.

That's...BASIC firearm handling.

The ad should be against ****** parents/parenting. Or against gun stores that sell children AR-15s. But, according to people like the ones that made this ******** ad, they assume ALL gunstores would sell to kids.
#831 to #813 - iTzKitteh
Reply +3
(04/22/2013) [-]
Plus, that's a ******* .22.

The **** can you do with a .22?
#783 - slimscheibe
Reply +4
(04/22/2013) [-]
**** THIS POST YOU DEMOCRATIC ANTI PUSSY FAGGOT
#480 - wernstrom
Reply +4
(04/22/2013) [-]
**wernstrom rolled a random comment #4135824 posted by trollins at My Little Pony fanfiction, backgrounds, songs, lyrics, and GIFs. ** :
 < relevant
**wernstrom rolled a random comment #4135824 posted by trollins at My Little Pony fanfiction, backgrounds, songs, lyrics, and GIFs. ** :
< relevant
#479 - ritzrules
Reply +4
(04/22/2013) [-]
it's a bad idea to ban either one.

kindersurprise is delicious and wonderful, AR-15's make excellent home defense weapons.

and teaching kids how to handle firearms SAFELY is a very practical skill and teaches them a lot about responsibility outside of the realm of guns, too.

sillies...
#492 to #479 - omfgitsstsix
Reply +2
(04/22/2013) [-]
*Fixed

AR-15 is delicious and wonderful, KinderSurprises make excellent home defense weapons.
#504 to #492 - ritzrules
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
****. why am i giggling.
#442 - hypnotoad stare
Reply +4
(04/22/2013) [-]
I didn't know that guns killed people. Because they don't, people kill people. Background checks, I agree with, banning assault weapons? No, and comparing chocolate to a gun totally is the most similar thing ever!
#411 - esquaredsixteen
Reply +4
(04/22/2013) [-]
I mean, I feel a lot safer knowing Chinese kids are banned from the U.S.
#438 to #411 - electro
Reply 0
(04/22/2013) [-]
HAH
#237 - akatsukipain
Reply +4
(04/21/2013) [-]
shes gonna need that when zombies come......
#127 - bendingtimesucks **User deleted account**
+4
has deleted their comment [-]