Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #602 - holywarstpd (04/22/2013) [-]
Because its pretty ******* difficult to choke on an AR-15.
User avatar #607 to #602 - therealtjthemedic (04/22/2013) [-]
It's also difficult to choke on a kinder surprise, if you aren't retarded.
#644 - brisineo ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
Here's a little thing to think about...   
   
ALL "mass shootings" (where the assailant was carrying a firearm of some sort, with a total of 4+ civilian casualties as a result) since 1950 were in labeled Gun Free Zones.  (Meaning that it is illegal for a civilian to carry a firearm into that zone, licensed or not)   
   
There have been several more attempts at mass shootings that fail to be recorded in the statistics that gun control advocates use, because they tried shooting up a place where their targets could shoot back.   
   
Also, I'd just want you to take note, the last time we tried to ban something that was a pretty large part of society, (ie the Prohibition amendment) the black market boomed and everyone was buying it illegally to the point where we had to stop because it only made things worse.  America, unfortunately, is in the unique position in being a black market central hub, where banning something as a whole (even something small such as high capacity magazines) is entirely ineffective, and the only true way proven to counter this is literally putting it at gunpoint of people who buy guns to defend themselves.
Here's a little thing to think about...

ALL "mass shootings" (where the assailant was carrying a firearm of some sort, with a total of 4+ civilian casualties as a result) since 1950 were in labeled Gun Free Zones. (Meaning that it is illegal for a civilian to carry a firearm into that zone, licensed or not)

There have been several more attempts at mass shootings that fail to be recorded in the statistics that gun control advocates use, because they tried shooting up a place where their targets could shoot back.

Also, I'd just want you to take note, the last time we tried to ban something that was a pretty large part of society, (ie the Prohibition amendment) the black market boomed and everyone was buying it illegally to the point where we had to stop because it only made things worse. America, unfortunately, is in the unique position in being a black market central hub, where banning something as a whole (even something small such as high capacity magazines) is entirely ineffective, and the only true way proven to counter this is literally putting it at gunpoint of people who buy guns to defend themselves.
#654 to #644 - superblargh (04/22/2013) [-]
I didn't even read the comment; your gif was just awesome.
I didn't even read the comment; your gif was just awesome.
User avatar #657 to #644 - secretdestroyers ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
Every law gets broken at at some point so, by your own logic, why bother having laws at all?

Law enforcement exists for a reason....not all cops screw people over.
#686 to #657 - brisineo ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
I'd rather have armed citizens to prevent an attack than to rely on police to stop the shooter after he's killed several people.

But I'm not saying all laws are hindrances. Law maintains order and productivity in society, and of course, a criminal disrupts that because laws are irrelevant to them. We stopped the prohibition act because we couldn't know where the alcohol was going and who was making/owning it, and that was a severe risk.

All I'm trying to say is that it shouldn't be outrageously difficult for a legal citizen to obtain a higher capacity weapon when outlaws can get them with ease or simply steal it from a legal citizen. It provides a distinct disadvantage, and more casualties would be the result. (Refer to post #649)
User avatar #696 to #657 - ponyfcker (04/22/2013) [-]
>not all cops screw people over

You're true on some occasions. My friend was caught smoking weed, this is in Idaho so the cops are strict about that, and the cop give him a lecture on drug abuse and how it can ruin your life, then he asked for a joint and dropped him off at his house telling him to stay in school and get his work done, then have time for weed.
User avatar #273 - Conquistador (04/21/2013) [-]
Banning guns would be a retarded thing to do. Criminals would just get them via black market.
#792 - queefhaterz (04/22/2013) [-]
Whenever the term "assault weapon" is used to define guns
User avatar #988 to #792 - douthit (04/22/2013) [-]
True dat. Assault is an action, not a weapon.
#1190 - doctorlea (04/22/2013) [-]
because a 5 year old can walk into a gun store a buy a gun...
#1047 - youtookpoop (04/22/2013) [-]
Why? because crooks can get there hands on a gun regardless if there banned or not. if they ban firearms the crime rate will surely rise. but if criminals know that that person or that house might have someone with a gun, then the crime rate goes down. with that said 						****					 people who make ads like this.   
*gif related
Why? because crooks can get there hands on a gun regardless if there banned or not. if they ban firearms the crime rate will surely rise. but if criminals know that that person or that house might have someone with a gun, then the crime rate goes down. with that said **** people who make ads like this.
*gif related
User avatar #1105 to #1047 - certifiedidiot ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
So basicly you shouldn't have ANY laws about anything at all because criminals are going to ignore them anyway?
User avatar #1209 to #1105 - youtookpoop (04/22/2013) [-]
I'm not saying that, i'm saying that if we ban guns, then the crime rate will increase dramatically and we can't protect ourselfs.
User avatar #1218 to #1209 - certifiedidiot ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
What kind of crappy neightbourhoods do you guys freaking live in, but just what crimes would increase so much?
User avatar #1310 to #1218 - youtookpoop (04/23/2013) [-]
think of it as this. regardless criminals can get their hands on pretty much anything illegal. so if you ban guns then no one can defend themselves and the criminals can do what ever they please
#779 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
ppl who want guns banned are just dramatic douche bags BANNING GUNS WILL DO NOTHING GUNS ARENT THE ONLY THING THAT KILL PPL YOU STUPID ***** here in america you can always get a gun and ppl die GET USE TO IT k what ever bye...faggots
#766 - caplocker (04/22/2013) [-]
I too am worried about my kids swallowing my assault rifle. These too are the exact same.


Oh, libefags, I'm being sarcastic if you haven't caught on.
User avatar #743 - omarjordan (04/22/2013) [-]
Man, I hate some of the laws in America. We used to have wonderballs, which after the law banning toys in candy went into effect switched to tart candies, and even those got banned because some ******** kid choked on those too.
#739 - joelalmonte (04/22/2013) [-]
Honestly, whenever one of these things that say guess which one of  these blah, blah, blah Everyone automatically guesses the one that is supposed to be suprising, or unexpected but its not because that sort of "shocking" answer stuff has  been done so many times. it wouldve been more suprising if the gun was the right answer.
Honestly, whenever one of these things that say guess which one of these blah, blah, blah Everyone automatically guesses the one that is supposed to be suprising, or unexpected but its not because that sort of "shocking" answer stuff has been done so many times. it wouldve been more suprising if the gun was the right answer.
#733 - bluelight (04/22/2013) [-]
well we have Kinder here and there Great
User avatar #667 - LeifEricson (04/22/2013) [-]
WHY WONT IT LET ME POST PICTURES!!!!
User avatar #679 to #667 - merkdox (04/22/2013) [-]
because you are new and you need enough thumbs to do it, here have one
User avatar #699 to #667 - PhuckingPhreak (04/22/2013) [-]
i got you bro
User avatar #752 to #699 - LeifEricson (04/22/2013) [-]
i thumbed both of yall thank you for the thumbs!
#664 - killyojoy (04/22/2013) [-]
Didn't the kinder egg just become legal in America again?? Also I'm pretty sure we don't sell children assault rifles so I think we are fine on that matter.
Didn't the kinder egg just become legal in America again?? Also I'm pretty sure we don't sell children assault rifles so I think we are fine on that matter.
#650 - juicyjuice (04/22/2013) [-]
>Hey honey can you go to the neighbors and sell them your girl scout cookies?
>Yeah sure
>*Leaves and returns shortly*
>Wtf is that?
>They gave me an assualt rifle for 10 boxes of thin mints
>The neighbors are the Russian Mafia
kids these days
thin mints are delicious
Pic somewhat related
User avatar #618 - jalthelas (04/22/2013) [-]
Drugs are illegal, yet they're all still on the streets.

If guns are banned in the US, people will just turn to gun smuggling.
User avatar #597 - toxicplague (04/22/2013) [-]
has a kinder egg ever saved anyone's life?
#513 - danielscqro (04/22/2013) [-]
another graph? ok!
User avatar #526 to #513 - thisisspartah (04/22/2013) [-]
you also need to account for population growth
User avatar #528 to #526 - danielscqro (04/22/2013) [-]
it is homicide rate you dumbass, or how many people per 100,000 get killed
User avatar #532 to #528 - thisisspartah (04/22/2013) [-]
you didn't really specify that
User avatar #525 to #513 - kyoutu (04/22/2013) [-]
Just because a problem has been around a long time doesn't make it any less of a problem...
#490 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
because criminals will follow the law when it comes to obtaining weapons
 Friends (0)