Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#229 - hellproof
Reply +1
(04/19/2013) [-]
Yeah I searched for awhile and he never said this. He is actually a moderate feminist.
#189 - thezillis
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
This is so true. If you **** a guy because you're drunk, he didnt rape you. Don't belittle rape.
#194 to #189 - anon
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
Drunk people can't give consent. Don't have sex with someone that's drunk. If you do and you aren't also intoxicated you're a rapist. Plain and simple.
#203 to #194 - thezillis
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
It's a dick thing to do, but its not rape.
#212 to #203 - theexo
Reply +1
(04/19/2013) [-]
actually anon is right, if you take advantage of someone while they're drunk and you're sober then it is technically rape. especially if you were getting the girl drunk on purpose
#216 to #212 - anon
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
"technically rape"

More like undoubtedly rape in every sense of the word
#219 to #216 - theexo
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
i mean technically as in "how the law defines it"
#206 to #203 - anon
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
No it's literally rape. And you'd literally be a rapist. And should be arrested as one.
#207 to #206 - thezillis
Reply -1
(04/19/2013) [-]
It's not and shouldn't be a punishable crime.
#213 to #207 - anon
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
Nope. It's rape. Argue all you want, the law is at least decent enough to understand this simple concept even if you don't. And it won't ever change.
#198 to #194 - mjjrussell **User deleted account**
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
The problem with that is if you are drunk too you can still be charged with rape.
#208 to #198 - anon
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
Please do some research on how hard it is to convict rapists in the first place, much less in a situation like you described. Don't spread bad information please.
#214 to #208 - mjjrussell **User deleted account**
Reply -1
(04/19/2013) [-]
It isn't bad information if it can happen.
#221 to #214 - anon
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
The number is so low that it's hardly existent. I know the internet wants to believe oh so badly women are evil creatures that can send you to jail without trail with just one accusation but it isn't true at all. It's exactly the exact opposite. The number of rapists who will never get punished is astronomically high. But between the problem running rampant and the problem that is hardly existent, guess which one funnyjunk will choose?
#237 to #221 - mjjrussell **User deleted account**
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
I never said that woman were evil creatures. You are putting words into my mouth. All I said is that just because both parties are drunk doesn't mean that people are exempt from being charged with rape. It doesn't matter that the number is so low because it has happened in the past. You are just assuming the worst in people that have a slight contradiction to what you said. I think rape is horrible and that especially if someone has sex with someone who is drunk and they aren't that they should be charged. I was pretty much getting at that make sure you know who you are sleeping with and that they want the same thing.
#188 - kingosiris
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
I don't know why Ryan Glosing is in this picture, but it seems more legit with him in it.
#204 to #188 - SgtObvious
Reply +1
(04/19/2013) [-]
Ryan Glosing
#183 - tbagbandit
Reply +1
(04/19/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#200 to #183 - technoplasm **User deleted account**
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
#77 - fuzzlefeenix
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
but the car didn't attempt to make her drive it, whereas it's very possible a man could make a girl sleep with him... Also a man can still **** a woman if she's too drunk to move or resist, which can't happen with driving.
#91 to #77 - giggitygantz
Reply -1
(04/19/2013) [-]
what about if both parties are drunk is the man more accountable because he is a man?
#85 to #77 - Zarakima
Reply +1
(04/19/2013) [-]
Valid points both, however that's the difference between real rape and 'oh I regret my drunken actions, I was raped' rape, something. Of course those who commit real rape deserve punishment, but this whole thing of calling a drunken mistake 'rape' is just plain disrespectful to real rape victims as well as having massive repercussions on the life of an accused innocent, and it is women who use this 'false victimhood' not men. It is a terrible problem especially since you're pretty much taking either person's word for it, and it's more a situation of 'are they telling the truth or are they just a good actor', and the female 'victim' is often given the benefit of the doubt, despite the consequences for the accused being arguably equally impacting on their life as being raped.
#86 to #85 - Zarakima
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
disregard the 'something' at the end of the first sentence
#75 - avatarsarefornoobs
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
this is stupid, both parties are at fault...
why do i even bother? this post sucks, where's the funny?
#78 to #75 - lieutenantshitface **User deleted account**
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#185 to #78 - anon
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
He literally said "BOTH parties are at fault." Meaning the male AND the female.
#202 to #185 - lieutenantshitface **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#11 - backupclover
Reply +1
(04/18/2013) [-]
This is funny because I just finished watching the Notebook.
#231 - thegrimreaver
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
True, but thing is, the car isn't actively trying to get her to drive it.
"Hey baby, c'mon. Let's go for a ride. You're cool for it. You're totally not impaired. Who's gonna find out?"
#227 - anon
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
How can the comment debate be taken seriously when there are no women on the internet
#223 - darksideofthebeast
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
Same rules apply to guns.
#160 - ishotthedeputy
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
I agree with the statement but not the logic. When she turns on a car, the car turns on. There's no other option. When she turns on a man, he can think about the consequences of it. I'm not saying this to condone a girl's logic; any girl who does that deserves to be stoned on the cross, there could just be a better example is all I'm saying
#166 to #160 - derpherping
Reply -3
(04/19/2013) [-]
why is it his responsibility to look out for her or think of how it affects her?
It would be her own fault for getting ********* in a place where no one is there to babysit her stupid ass.If you get drunk and get ****** its no ones fault but your own.
#176 to #166 - anon
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
So, by your logic, if a girl goes to a trusted friends house, passes out in a bed where she believes she is safe, and some guy finds her and has sex with her, she was not raped? No one was in the room "babysitting her stupid ass," so it's all her responsibility?

If a girl (or guy) is unable to say "yes," it's rape.
#154 - mummyslittlebitch
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
Did he really say that? Must have references
#150 - anon
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
Regrettable sex? Cry rape!
#135 - anonymoose
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
To everyone in the comments, this post isn't about having sex with a drunk girl who's passed out.

It's about the fact that if 2 drunk people have sex and the girl wakes up the next day sober, she can claim it was rape.
#64 - weenieandthebutt
Reply -1
(04/19/2013) [-]
The guy is a sleazebag, not a rapist. There's a difference. When you're *********, you just tend to act upon your subconscious and do things that you secretly wanted to do without those morals getting in the way. If it's not forced or against her will, it's not rape; as simple as that. As a drunk, I've been banned from a town, I've madeout with munters and even one old woman (don't ask), I'd gotten myself into silly accidents where I'd broken my teeth but those were all my mistakes to live with. Problem with this god damn women is that they love to abuse the notion of feminism and falsely implement it as their sanctuary of innocence.
#67 to #64 - basilbrush
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
The guy could be pissed too. Is he still a sleazebag?
#68 to #67 - weenieandthebutt
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
in that case, no
#54 - anon
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
Just saiyan, a car lacks the ability to say "maybe not tonight".
#50 - anon
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
Uh, well, the difference is that an automobile isn't a ******* conscious human being taking advantage of a drunk female.
#49 - rodneyabc
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
Yeah, but if a car keeps sweeping up random drunk chicks then plowing them into walls, then goes online bitching about it's right to do so, you're well within your rights to say "shut the **** up car, you're ******* creepy."
#42 - mrmamric
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
I don't know about you, but I've never run over three people and drove into an elementary school with my cock.   
   
Well, I have, but that's beside the point.
I don't know about you, but I've never run over three people and drove into an elementary school with my cock.

Well, I have, but that's beside the point.
#43 to #42 - Xyhpon
Reply 0
(04/19/2013) [-]
#2 - teranin
Reply 0
(04/18/2013) [-]
indeed
indeed