Upload
Login or register
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#525 - deletedmyaccount
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Well, that's the difference between a feminist and a bitch, not women's rights and feminists.
#506 - whiteguyindisguise
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
She's taking them to court, ironically she's probably have done more harm to feminism - making it less likely businesses to hire bitchy cunts. Oh and I was there for the raid, saved this when someone from /pol/ posted it...
#480 - inbardo
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
#449 - BarbraStreisand
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
User avatar #317 - sgc
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
wait hold on so the first one bitches about religion and the other is just a bitch...
someone help me make sense of this please
#321 to #317 - etofun
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
one is a good person who is doing something to stop the rather inhumane treatment of women in a country where their religion and government is the same thing. the other is a colossal bitch.
#408 to #321 - gemnesys
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
#576 to #408 - etofun
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
yes shes a colossal bitch, deal with it.
User avatar #360 to #321 - sgc
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
yeah but what exactly is she doing
#375 to #360 - etofun
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
witch one? the good person or colossal bitch?
#213 - thebritishguy
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
there was an atheist rally and the feminists had strict rules like
"all women must wear no plastic jewellery or short skirts as it is stereotypical"
who thinks of that idea "you aren't allowed to wear that because your a women! good job I'm fighting sexism" these people are B-A-N-...N-A-N-U-A..umm-A-N-A-ah for ***** sake they are BANANAS
#228 to #213 - evilpotato
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
"Banauas"

Anyone happen to have your pic, but not a thumbnail?
User avatar #241 to #228 - thebritishguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
I found it in the comment section / :
User avatar #272 to #241 - evilpotato
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Did you expand before saving? Because it seemed good before I expanded your comment, but it was the same size as the thumbnail, so I assumed you had saved thumbnail. It is a very good picture though, and I thank you for previously saving it and now posting it.
#201 - LocoJoe
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
And we're the oppressors.
User avatar #263 to #201 - vixenmacabre
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Read Shiny's comments...
Women did not make these laws or pass them. Less than %20 of Govt. is female so the majority of those decisions were made by men who think they know what is best for women.
User avatar #209 to #201 - Shiny
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
To be fair, most of these laws stem from the belief that women are weak and unable to care for themselves.
User avatar #217 to #209 - LocoJoe
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
I guess since they're so "free and independent" womyn who don't need no man I can take my child support back right? Nope, they'd bitch about how the "patriarchy" is trying to force them to be poor. **** them, vasectomy and no marriage are the best choices.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxNRtObt8no
User avatar #243 to #217 - Shiny
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Don't try to evade the point. The vast majority of maternity laws were written by typical conservative WASPs that believe men have to take care of women because they're stronger and more capable; it's sexist again both sexes. Only abortion is the exception here, and even that was an extremely controversial legal decision at the time of Roe v. Wade.

Most sexism against men stems from sexism against women. Radical feminism have nothing to do with how American society has viewed the sexes.
#264 to #243 - LocoJoe
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Because men are. Through all of ******* history men have run everything. Men have built infrastructure, set up laws, fought wars, and ran things while all women(those who weren't slaves, servants, etc etc) had to do was stay at home and raise children. Society was working fine until some women thought that staying at home was too much and decided to try and become independent.
User avatar #274 to #264 - Shiny
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
So, you agree that men should be forced to pay to support children and ex-partners they don't want, since women need them so much?
User avatar #276 to #274 - LocoJoe
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Not anymore. Society changed. Feminist want equality yet I have not heard a single one talk about changing divorce laws that favor women.
User avatar #283 to #276 - Shiny
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
How can you possibly complain that feminists are biased against men while contending that women themselves are inferior? Are you even aware of this bizarre doublethink?
User avatar #287 to #283 - LocoJoe
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
I never said they were inferior. I said that in the past society men were the ones capable of running society. Things have changed and now everyone can get to the top of the food chain. Men are however stronger, that's just nature.
User avatar #295 to #287 - Shiny
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Well, raw physical strength is pretty meaningless from a sociological perspective. Radical feminism doesn't care about positive discrimination against women because they don't want to give up the unfair benefits that come with de jure inferiority.
#194 - tunasandwhich
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
**tunasandwhich rolled a random image posted in comment #1513242 at Friendly ** i hate feminists
User avatar #206 to #194 - gmarrox
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Relevant. Disgusting, but relevant.
#207 to #194 - garymuthafuknoak
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#229 to #194 - raigen
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
OH GOD... THE RELEVANCE
OH GOD... THE RELEVANCE
#249 to #194 - elgringogordo **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #265 to #194 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Then you don't understand what feminism is...
It's the belief that women should be equal to men i.e not have their genitals mutilated at a young age, not be forced to marry, have the option to abort (or not, in some countries, women are forced to abort) etc, etc.
#621 to #265 - tunasandwhich
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/08/2013) [-]
ya i still hate them
User avatar #622 to #621 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/09/2013) [-]
Ya you're still stupid
User avatar #337 to #265 - RandomAnonGuy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
At its most basic it's the promotion of female rights.
You could still be a feminist if you lived in a matriarchy.
In most 1st world countries we're well on our way down the path to equality - It's feminists who whine about the stupid stuff that makes everyone hate them.
To be clear, the radicals that think that men should be rounded up at ten years old, "milked" and rendered sterile before being put to work for the rest of their life are still feminists.
If you support the rights of both genders, there's dozens of ways to say that without associating yourself with those people.
User avatar #405 to #337 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
And I mean of course I support the rights of both genders (i.e all human beings) but feminism is still very much relevant in today's world.
User avatar #395 to #337 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
I have never even heard of that way of life wishing to be implemented!
I think some males, those who dislike feminism, are more likely to be educated on the wrong parts of it or what it has done to harm men.
You should be trying to find out what good feminism does for the world rather than trying to find points to use against it.
User avatar #448 to #395 - RandomAnonGuy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
I was merely clarifying why some people would hate feminism by explaining that your view is incomplete.
I acknowledge that feminism has done a lot for society as we know it. However I feel that the two sides of feminism - the "good" that focuses on both and the "bad" that's just entitled bitches being whiny, should be separated. I also feel that the "good" is more accurately represented by the terms humanist, human rights activist and/or egalitarian.
User avatar #456 to #448 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
I know well why people dislike feminism - it's because they are uneducated on it's true purpose.
I see that so many people on the internet have strong opinions on it yet they obviously have not bothered to research what it's true nature is.
People need to gain a common sense in determining a true feminist from a 'whiny' person. I would also like to add that 'whiny' is subjective and some legitimate cries for feminism are shunned due to a lack of knowledge and understanding.
User avatar #297 to #265 - timmywankenobi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
but many men do have their genitals mutilated as baby's it's called circumcision and the child gets no say in it.
User avatar #306 to #297 - vixenmacabre
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Circumcision is pointless however...
It is done with proper medical supervision and knowledge.
It is done in a clean place with the right tools.
You are looked after and made sure that you don't get an infection and DIE FROM IT.

So many girls die from forced genital mutilation.
User avatar #309 to #306 - timmywankenobi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
I agree with what you say about forced mutilation of girls but are you saying that because most circumcisions (100% of which are forced and is far more wide spread then female mutilation) are done in a sterile manner that it is okay ?
User avatar #319 to #309 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Circumcision does have some benefits such as reduced risk of contracting HIV. It is done with good intentions under sterile conditions.
Female genital mutilation is done with the intent to show girls they are immoral and need to have their ability to feel pleasure removed. It is done through an ignorant belief that girls need to have their genitals 'cleansed' so their virginity is more pure. It also inhibits extra marital sex. Basically they are mutilated so that they can be sexually CONtrollED.
If a woman in these countries has not had the procedure, they are shunned, beaten and considered unclean whores.
User avatar #322 to #319 - timmywankenobi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
male circumcision neither increases or decreases the risks of and stds to a even noticeable percentage so less then 1% and it reduces the sensitivity of that area since many nerves are in the foreskin ans third it is a unnecessary and painful trauma to force on a child and is just as wrong as female genital mutilation and In my opinion both should be stopped.
User avatar #387 to #322 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Has your life been affected to the point where you can't even have sex without feeling extreme pain and suffering by a circumcision?
Either way, both should be stopped, but the situation of girls in third world countries is still ridiculous and cruel on a level males will never have to experience.
User avatar #584 to #387 - timmywankenobi
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
fair enough.
#203 to #194 - wholesomeburn
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
#245 to #194 - Kellanved
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#147 - Cleavland Steamer
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
User avatar #178 to #147 - emptysuperman
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
I wanna butt **** her while calling her a faggot.
User avatar #85 - skeetonamber
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Feminist:
A person who advocates equal rights for women.


Stop labeling sexist women as feminists, it puts a bad image on real feminists.
User avatar #92 to #85 - ninjastarthrow
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Stereotypes exist for a reason.
User avatar #344 to #85 - RandomAnonGuy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Feminist:
A person who advocates womens rights.

While the distinction isn't huge it's an important one - Under this perfectly legitimate definition you can be a feminist in a matriarchy.
The word will always imply that the person is solely concerned with women and women only. If you're interested in both genders, simply call yourself a human rights activist. A humanist. An egalitarian.
User avatar #148 to #85 - sonicg
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
I like the term 'Feminazi', it's much more accurate.
User avatar #88 to #85 - calawesome
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
You name is Skeet on Amber....
User avatar #89 to #88 - skeetonamber
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
hey, she consented... it's all good...
User avatar #90 to #89 - calawesome
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
You're Awesome.
User avatar #91 to #85 - captainfuckitall
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
True, unfortunately the majority of femenists are much like the one on the right. As a result, the definition should be changed

An 'Equal Rights Activist' is the word you're looking for
#126 to #91 - anon id: 5d0436c1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
*Western Feminists
#112 to #85 - broorb
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
You're not going to get very far in this ******** of a community. You're quite right, of course, but this place is a self-perpetuating cesspit of baseless hate, and they wouldn't have it any other way.
You're not going to get very far in this ******** of a community. You're quite right, of course, but this place is a self-perpetuating cesspit of baseless hate, and they wouldn't have it any other way.
User avatar #72 - albinozino
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/04/2013) [-]
She lost her job aswell after this information came out, if it makes anyone feel better.
User avatar #45 - smittywrbmnjnsn
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/04/2013) [-]
I'd love to bang the one on the right.




Let's see her try to assign a sexual connotation to that.
User avatar #552 - firstresponder
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
the woman on the left is a feminist. The woman on the right is a cunt. Why is this so hard.
#452 - thechosentroll
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
This image has expired
So, the "you're not a cunt if you're wearing a suit" rule applies just as well to women? Neat.
User avatar #459 to #452 - ruderoody
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
No the difference is that the chick in the suit is actually trying to change an abusive system that degrades women and keeps them from education and certain other rights she is facing a legitimate issue and human rights offense in ca civilized, professional, and educated way the bitch on the right wants people to think she is some grand martyr for the cause of women she isn't looking to fix social justice issues she just wants to find reasons to hate any and all men. The one on the left is a by all means a revolutionary and a hero, the one on the left is a bigot and whose just mad that no one wants to give her ass the D
User avatar #481 to #459 - megatrollinator
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Plus, Adria Richards actually declared herself a "Hero" because of her actions.

Would a Hero cost a guy his livelihood over a pair of jokes?

Btw, if anyone wants to know what the jokes were, it was something to do with "Forking things in a sexual way" & "Big Dongles"
#428 - anon id: f060cc07
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
All of you that are hating on feminists, it's no different than hating on Christians because of the Westboro Baptist Church. These bitches that you're referring to are not feminists, they're assholes.
#436 to #428 - whymewhy
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
you're partially right.. in my opinion that adria bitch isn't a feminist she is a feminazi they are in my opinion the radical version of a feminist.. just like not all muslims are terrorists just the radicals.
User avatar #461 to #436 - ruderoody
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Im with ^ guy It's not the women working to actually change something that's unfair or wrong that we dislike it's the ones who decide to make it there mission to despise men and claim it's to help women we hate seriously bitches be cray
#419 - sweetellie
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
You're only using one bad example. And she's a Radical feminist which is only one sector of feminism, and the only one where somebody would behave in such a way. You shouldn't degrade the whole of feminism just because of one stupid woman.
You're only using one bad example. And she's a Radical feminist which is only one sector of feminism, and the only one where somebody would behave in such a way. You shouldn't degrade the whole of feminism just because of one stupid woman.
User avatar #458 to #419 - weenieandthebutt
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
I'm all up for the Islamic feminist movement but everything about western feminism pisses me off. They had your equal rights amendment signed back in the 1920s so why are they still bitching about it?
User avatar #275 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
When people say they hate feminism, I just assume they don't know anything about it.

Women's rights are HUMAN rights.

Feminism is needed in third world countries where young girls have their genitals forcefully mutilated to stop them from feeling anything during sex and therefore becoming 'sexual deviants'.
Islamic culture forces young girls to marry at the age of 10 (sometimes younger) and they are forced to have sexual relations with men 30 years their elder.
If a man commits adultery in certain countries (usually it's through rape), the women is blamed (for being raped) and then stoned to death or set on fire.
How can you possibly disagree with wanting to stop this?
This is the kind of inhumane, anti-female practice feminism wishes to fight.

We wouldn't mind the right to abortion either because a child is a huge impact on someone's life.

I mean there is so much more to it... If you hate feminism, I just assume you're uneducated on it.
User avatar #332 to #275 - reginleif
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
One of the main problems with feminism is that it seeks to incorporate other people's oppression as their own. When's the last time an American or European woman had to deal with FGM? They bring out the worst behaviors to try to justify the need for their creed, but the thing is..... being a white woman is probably the best thing you can hope to be right now.
User avatar #285 to #275 - icedmantwo
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
people hate women who take non issues like private sexual jokes and make large rants about it
whereas people who advocate for basic human rights for women in places where they are actually oppressed are celebrated
User avatar #289 to #285 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Then why is everyone saying feminism is ****?
Because they don't understand what it really means right? Adria whoever the **** is just some random douchebag. Her actions have nothing to do with feminism.
User avatar #307 to #289 - enorus
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Because many people on the Internet connect the word feminism with the idiot "feminists" who hate men because those are the ones who are given attention on sites such as Funnyjunk. No sane person is against what feminism is to you.
User avatar #315 to #307 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
They are not feminists. They are uneducated on it and those who connect their actions with feminism are too. Connecting and perpetuating those ideas leads to the intolerance of real feminism.
And there are MANY people against what I believe feminism is. Hence why it is still happening in the world.
User avatar #294 to #289 - icedmantwo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
and most people would accept that if it werent for her, and people like her, calling themselves feminists and hijacking the equal rights movement
most >rational< people who actually want true equality, rather than the sort of "equality" that people like adria want would do better to call themselves either equal right's activists or egalitarians because of it
User avatar #300 to #294 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
I call myself a feminist because I support equal rights for women around the world.
The movement happened before people like Adria tried to use it as an excuse to be a dick. I don't think it's right that we should have to change the name of our movement which is over 300 years old for the sake of those that are totally uneducated on it.
User avatar #305 to #300 - icedmantwo
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
1st and 2nd wave feminism im all for its really only the 3rd wave feminism that i find issues with
1st and 2nd were voting rights and equal pay respectively while 3rd is the whole thing that this adria lady subscribes to, and trust me when i say there are women out there who say if a man does something you dont like you should just call rape
that is why i dislike modern feminism and would consider myself an egalitarian rather than a feminist even though i would like to do things to help women in places that need it
User avatar #313 to #305 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Modern feminism encompasses all that I said in my first comment.
Your comment on women crying rape feels so ignorant to me... Rape exists. Just because a person feeling sexually violated doesn't fall into your definition on what 'legitimate rape' should be, does not mean that it doesn't exist.
projectunbreakable.tumblr.com/
User avatar #326 to #313 - icedmantwo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
yes i know rape exists
i have problems with people crying rape when things dont go their way or when they drink and have sex then wake up and realize they suddenly dont like who they are next too
i even saw a story about a girl who was told by another girl to call rape on the guy that just broke up with her for cheating
that is what im talking about

and i pretty much agree with everything you said in your first comment my issue is with the self entitled, easily offended morons who have hijacked feminism for themselves that they might create a society in which men are slaves to women
User avatar #393 to #326 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
It's impossible for women to create a society that way. If you would realise the way the world is today you would see that you have nothing to fear in that regard. Men very much run the world like has been for centuries and centuries.
Feminism wishes to create equality. We don't want to be viewed as 'bitches' and therefore less likely to be employed because we have strong opinions and are capable leaders. Men who are good at leading a team are seen as strong people while women who are good at leading a team are seen as bossy bitches. There is a study to back this up, I mentioned it a few days ago, not sure if it's worth mentioning.
User avatar #574 to #393 - icedmantwo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Once more I repeat myself; I'm all for equality however modern feminism in first world countries is largely been hijacked by "bitches" looking to create a society like that which is why i would call myself an egalitarian
and i also saw an article written by a women who started a women only company and ended up bankrupt because they spent more time fighting each other than actually working which resulted in nothing getting done
User avatar #597 to #574 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
Actually it hasn't. You just spend your time looking at things on funnyjunk and other sites that make you think feminism as been overtaken by... silly girls. The girls you see representing feminism are young and uneducated and their actions have been twisted i.e by OP when he makes the content. If you spent more time trying to find feminist minds that actually try and do good for the movement and for women in the world, you would see that you have only been looking at one facet of a complex thing.
I believe I'm one of those feminists that isn't a complete idiot, just saying. I'm just not afraid of red thumbs enough to not speak up about it on here.

So before you were saying you were worried women were going to rule men.... Now you're citing articles that say women are not capable of ruling themselves.... What are you even trying to do?
User avatar #600 to #597 - icedmantwo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
im merely pointing out that there is a large, or at least extremely vocal, portion of so called "feminists" demanding that "womyn" be put in charge of everything while decrying everything a male does as "privilege"
i have also mentioned on at least 2 (possibly more but im too lazy to count) occasions that im all for the feminist work being done in 2nd and 3rd world countries where women dont get the rights they should (voting, equal pay, ability to get a job etc)
User avatar #601 to #600 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
It's just vocal. None of the feminist I know or any feminists blogs/pages I see even use the word 'womyn' or anyone saying all males actions are privilege. We discuss laws on contraception, victim blaming in society, equal pay**, fair representation in Government** and media etc. etc.
Feminism doesn't wish for women to be in charge of everything... It's only recently that women have started being hired into massive corporations like Fortune 500 and represented in Govt. Even so, it's less than 10% for both. This means that through most of history, only men have had a say in the development of society. History is seen through a man's eyes. That's only HALF of the possible history that we could be aware of today. A women's voice has always been scrubbed out of the history books because SHE WAS A WOMAN. In all areas, even art. Often times a woman would have to put her husbands name on a painting she did because critics and the art world believed woman's art was worthless. A lot of these artworks became famous and you believe was done by a man? It was done by a woman who was never allowed to take credit for it because it would have been considered worthless. That's the kinda **** we find unfair okay. We just want to be INCLUDED in the major decisions that occur in our societies. Because men and women think differently! You wouldn't want a world entirely run by women would you? Well it's almost been entirely run by men for CENTURIES now. Why? Because we weren't ALLOWED to have a say. There has never been a female president. It wasn't ALLOWED. There has never been a female pope. It's not ALLOWED. Women have not even been allowed to come CLOSE to these positions of power (it's slooowly changing albeit, but my point stands I hope).
Like I was saying before, if you look for something you will find it! You've been looking for all the things that make feminism look idiotic so that's what you've seen.
#602 to #601 - icedmantwo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
there are massive changes and still some minor changes to be left in modern 1st world society and massive changes to be made in 2nd and 3rd world society
this doesnt change that there are people out there attempting to hijack the movement
User avatar #603 to #602 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
No-one's trying to hijack anything. That woman has suffered because of the world she lives in and who are you to say otherwise? People do stupid things when they're hurt. She's trying to be strong even though she feels very wronged by the world. I'll admit I used to have strong dislike towards males because of the way they've run the world and what they've done to women through history and what they're doing today. See those skinny girls on the billboards that make us all insecure about our bodies? That was a man's idea. He doesn't care how he's affected girls and women in the world, all he cares about is money. He wants us to be envious of this impossible standard so that we will buy his product. Simple as that. The truth ******* hurts. And sexuality is hard for us too. She doesn't want him to experience sexual pleasure? Okay that's totally wrong but it stems from her own sexual shame and jealousy that men are served sexually in this world while we women are put on a platter for them. It sucks for us to see that so we get hurt, angry at the world and say stupid things and have stupid beliefs. It's not easy being a woman. You may hate to hear that but you can't disagree because you'll never know what it's like. You can't even try to know what it's like.

I still struggle with my body and sexuality because of the way men in charge of advertising and corporations have chosen to portray us and I always will. Women always will and it sucks that we have these insecurities and jealousy imposed on us just because a man wants to make money. Behind that ridiculous rant you posted is a lot of trauma that you can't even fathom. She is angry, but eventually her anger will steep into knowledge, like mine did.

She is not hijacking the movement, she is just upset and is making an attempt to get back at the world that wronged her by threatening to do the things she says there. Of course, that is a VERY VERY VERY EXTREME example!!! You wont find another like her around.
#604 to #603 - icedmantwo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
i really dont see how you cant justify anyone saying somebody should be disadvantaged as much as possible simply because of their gender
User avatar #613 to #604 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
Here's a link for you... Of sexism where it matters... A video of important woman being trivialised and insulted for their appearance.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-IrhRSwF9U
#605 to #604 - icedmantwo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
apparently im not the only one with this view
#615 to #605 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
How I view feminism.
User avatar #614 to #605 - icedmantwo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
Im attempting to point out to you the parts of feminism that are cancerous and should be dissociated from however you keep thinking im saying that all feminism is bad
feminism still has a massive place in the world particularly in 2nd and 3rd world countries where women dont have equal rights
my issue is with the people that i keep posting references too
User avatar #616 to #614 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
Well gee I don't know why you are bringing this to me. Why do I care about the issue you have with a few people? Regardless of the fact they're feminist or not. I've proven to you again and again that is not my way of thinking. I acknowledge they exist but it's no reason to end feminism. There are stupid people everywhere. There are stupid gays. There are stupid buddhists. There are stupid video gamers. There are stupid models. But I forgive them. Why don't you just get over yourself and stop hating on people for being stupid? It's a waste of your energy to hate people just like this conversation is a waste of my time.
User avatar #617 to #616 - icedmantwo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
i never once said end feminism i said there is a group - fringe or not - that seeks to pervert feminism from what it originally was (equality) to what they want it to be (superiority) and that there should be some way of forming a distinction between somebody the two groups as, while im all for equality, i dont want to be associated with somebody who loudly proclaims feminism to be something to put women in charge of men
#606 to #605 - icedmantwo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
i mean its not like there are people intentionally taking offense to innocent comments are there?
User avatar #612 to #606 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
People take offence to all things.
You find gay rights activists getting huffy about using the word 'gay' in the context of 'that's so gay, it's really lame'.
Does that mean we should stop fighting for the rights of gays? Because a few people take offence to a non-colloquial use of the word gay?
#607 to #606 - icedmantwo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
i mean its not like there are women who intentionally hurt men as much as they can or anything
User avatar #610 to #607 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
Sorry but TLDR... Personal relationships do not have any weight in the feminist agenda anyway. It goes two ways... Men do horrible things to women in love too!
User avatar #608 to #607 - icedmantwo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
or how about this first post here
www.ign.com/boards/threads/you-rage-you-lose-castration-day.452782556/
the person that originally made that post couldnt really be serious could she?
User avatar #611 to #608 - vixenmacabre
0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
...Like I told you so many posts ago...
You are just looking for things that make feminism look bad.
User avatar #609 to #608 - icedmantwo
0 123456789123345869
(04/06/2013) [-]
and a link to the original blog You need to login to view this link
User avatar #325 to #313 - memescomefromb
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
I thought I would butt in here.
I had a friend who decided to hook up with this guy. Totally consensual at the time, and was at her place. Anyways a day later she was texting me and was talking about how she started to regret it, and said "Now that I think about it, I don't think I would sleep with him again. I think that makes it rape?"

So yes there are girls out there who will regret it later, and turn regret into "rape."


User avatar #391 to #325 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Well I'm not talking about those girls at all. I think there are times when a guy doesn't realise his attention is unwanted and the girl feels pressure. It's not rape, but it's still not fun.
Also, even in cases of legitimate rape, the offenders are often not convicted because what the girl was wearing or the fact she had been drinking makes it 'her fault'.
Besides, I'm talking about young girls under the age of 12 in third world countries who are forced to marry much older men and have sex with them.
User avatar #397 to #391 - memescomefromb
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Yes I agree with feminism for girls where it's needed. I think when everyone is talking about hating feminism, they mean the '3rd wave' As you and icedmantwo were talking about. I disagree with that one as well.

But yes, totally agree with you on helping the 3rd world women, and girls.
User avatar #401 to #397 - vixenmacabre
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Well I didn't want to tread into '3rd wave feminism' matters because I know it's dangerous territory for funnyjunk. I believe there are many reasonable things 3rd wave feminism asks for, such as proper conviction for actual sex offenders and not victim blaming.
User avatar #410 to #401 - memescomefromb
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
That is true. There are both bad guys, AND bad girls though.
It becomes very hard to convict people when the whole case is based off "He said, she said". To help convict legitimate rapes, girls should always remember go to the police first. No washing up, no changing clothes, no waiting a few days. It helps collect evidence and can put dangerous guys away. (That is what us girls were taught in high school)

But like I also said, there are some girls who pull the regret card, or cheat and get caught and claim rape. They make it hard on us to find actual criminals, and can hurt innocent peoples lives as well..

Anywho I'm hitting the hay. Noight
#240 - sefercil
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
a better term would be feminazi
a better term would be feminazi
#219 - triggathepirate
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
MFW feminist posts
User avatar #255 to #219 - lostdagame
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Then why did you comment?
#258 to #255 - triggathepirate
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#127 - silverlance
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
Reminds me of when I bought something on Amazon
The seller shipped it late
I gave him terrible feedback
Ignored his plea for me to remove it
Turns out the guy was a small trader with a young family to support
User avatar #174 to #127 - roflsaucer
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/05/2013) [-]
I don't get why people post terrible reviews because of such minor things like that. It's a slight inconvenience, at most. It's no reason to try and deter business from someone. I would only post a review if there was a problem with the product itself. The nature of shipping is that it is kinda iffy, post and delivery can be hectic. It might not even be the seller's fault that it took longer to ship, it might be whoever they used to ship it.