Min comment interval:
Remaining character count: 8192
Remaining character count: 8192
Spoiler Image
Shortcuts: "C" opens comments. "R" refreshes comments.
Record voice message?
Scroll to your comment?
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#237

THEEGAME
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/07/2013) [] what they dont tell you is that pi may have these correct answers, but they will be covered in a infinite number of mistakes or lies. think of endless copies of romeo and juliet, but only one will be exactly as shakespear wrote it.
#231

anon id: 143bbb9f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2013) [] Same thing with many other values, such as root of 2,3,5,6,7,8... (basically any number that cannot be rooted)
#229

anon id: 1ab697f8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2013) [] Yeah except it will also contain retarded and meaningless **** because of its randomness
Also this so called 'property' is true for ANY imaginary number. Others like Eulers number and **** like 2^(0.5) will also have this socalled "property".
Also this so called 'property' is true for ANY imaginary number. Others like Eulers number and **** like 2^(0.5) will also have this socalled "property".
#226

mechanichore
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2013) [] This is the same for an infinite number of irrational numbersPi just happens to be an easily understood example.
#83

pineapplepeople
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2013) [] This means there is a point where pi begins to show every decimal of e in order, and there is a point in e where every digit of pi is shown in order.
#82

benegative
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2013) [] So? A monkey with a typewriter will eventually write hamlet. These discussions of infinity are dubious at best.
#73

anon id: a040937d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2013) [] This **** again?
No. Implying that a nonrepeating sucession of numbers contains every posible combination of numbers is the same as implying that there is only one kind of infinite.
This is falacious. We've alredy been through this, morons.
Only someone with very little mathematical knowledge can make these kind of assumptions, and even go around showing his own ignorance.
No. Implying that a nonrepeating sucession of numbers contains every posible combination of numbers is the same as implying that there is only one kind of infinite.
This is falacious. We've alredy been through this, morons.
Only someone with very little mathematical knowledge can make these kind of assumptions, and even go around showing his own ignorance.
#63

jwalton
Reply 2 123456789123345869
(04/03/2013) [] Wouldn't this be false? Infinite does not mean every, for example, there are an infinite amount of numbers in between 2 and 3 (2.4, 2.1125, 2.9999 etc.), yet none of them are 4. See what I mean?
#27

kadenmckrunk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/02/2013) [] Wouldnt this work with most rational numbers?
#28 to #27

sirbunsalot
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2013) [] No. It would work with no rational numbers
#50 to #27

tigersstripes
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/03/2013) [] any infinite nonrepeating decimal.