Upload
Login or register
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#176 - broorb
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
My ex girlfriend was the type who became aroused by stimulating conversation - like, interesting theories and debate.
User avatar #199 to #176 - MysticTomatoe
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
> quantum physics
~OH GOD YESSS!
#229 to #176 - anon id: 3a8bf82c
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Is that why she is your ex?
User avatar #192 to #176 - ancano
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
wait, she'd get wet from a presidential debate?
I believe, that Americans need hope.
<GF> oh my godddddd yeeeeeeessss
#203 to #192 - broorb
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Hahaha nah. Like we'd have lonnngg conversations about psycho-philosophical theories and it'd really get her blood going, which in turn got her in the mood
User avatar #193 to #192 - organiclead
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Stimulating conversation, not boring conversations that have been had a million times before.
User avatar #194 to #193 - ancano
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
They are too, fun! It's great to see who is the least moronic and repetitive as well as aggressive in those debates. good lord! did you think I watched for the content?!
User avatar #195 to #194 - organiclead
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
But that's, like, anti-porn to someone who's stimulated by intelligent conversation!
User avatar #181 - anonymousefj
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
so that's what ******** is
User avatar #159 - sirbustyabals
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Sapiosexuality is an abomination, it says so in the bible for dummies.
#196 to #159 - imofcnotharveydent
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
obvious troll is obvious.
User avatar #185 to #159 - Anonomousthirteen
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Today, good sir, I say "No" to your proposition of a **** storm. Have a nice day, my unbelieving friend.
User avatar #240 to #185 - sirbustyabals
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
I actually am a believer, I just meant as a joke.
User avatar #246 to #240 - Anonomousthirteen
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/19/2013) [-]
Then I apologize for being altogether far too serious. Have a nice day, good sir.
User avatar #62 - iliekcereal
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
I'm not exactly aroused by it, but I enjoy talking to smart people more than anything. Idiocy hurts my brain. Intelligent people are sexy.
#189 - doyoulikeapizza
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
**doyoulikeapizza rolled a random image posted in comment #3386949 at My Little Pony fanfiction, backgrounds, songs, lyrics, and GIFs. **
#188 - avatarsarefornoobs
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
i think this is the 3rd time this has reached front page
thats not really what bothers me, what bothers me is that i just cant see WHY
#209 to #188 - funmanigro
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
>being surprised from reposts on frontpage
User avatar #219 to #188 - rawesome
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Every aspiring wizard on funnyjunk thinks this is refering to them, that's why.
User avatar #236 to #219 - avatarsarefornoobs
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
that actually makes total sense, i get it now. thanks
User avatar #180 - nightmarecorpse
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
I don't believe I'm sapiosexual, but If someone is an idiot, I can never find them attractive. No matter how good looking they may be.
User avatar #173 - organiclead
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Rule 32: Everything is a fetish. No exceptions.
#139 - latinotornado
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
This isn't even a real word. And for anyone who says, "oh I must be this, so called, Sapiosexual" really? so you would only find brain power attractive? So gender wouldn't matter. So you would have intimate sex with an obese, deformed, or scarred human purely on the fact that they're smart? yea, ok.
User avatar #141 to #139 - alyosha
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
That's like saying that someone who likes big boobs is only ever interested in boobs and would bang a huge obese deformed monstrosity as long as it had a good rack. Having a fetish doesn't mean you'd waive all other concerns in choosing a partner as long as it satisfied said fetish.
User avatar #142 to #141 - latinotornado
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
exactly my point good sir
User avatar #145 to #142 - alyosha
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
What? I'm disagreeing with you. Sapiosexual isn't an accepted word in Websters or Oxford, but your point as you explained it is "someone who finds intelligence attractive would AUTOMATICALLY rather have sex with Steven Hawking than a Playboy model." Which is false. I'm sure there are people like that who exist, but... hell, my girlfriend is pretty damn smart and I find that hot as ****, but I'd still rather have her than some theoretical physicist who (mentally) makes her look like a goldfish. Once again, fetishes aren't necessarily exclusive and overriding of all other concerns when choosing a mate. It's possible to be aroused by something and yet have other factors negate it.
User avatar #146 to #145 - latinotornado
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
you misunderstood this made up words meaning. It wasn't described as a fetish. It was described as a sexuality. NOT A FETISH. So you just went further into proving my point. As a fetish it makes sense which is why I agreed, and I thought you understood the content and my comment. It's a simple misunderstanding you took, no biggie.
User avatar #148 to #146 - alyosha
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Alright. Although the image actually calls it a "behavior." The content refers to it as "phenomena." My understanding was that that was implying it to be a fetish, yours was that of an entire sexuality. However, the image itself does not directly state either.

Aw, **** it. This is not a topic worth arguing over. I'm going to bed.
User avatar #151 to #148 - latinotornado
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
it...it even ******* says Sexuality. Sapiosexuality...that means its a sexuality. Just like Heterosexuality or homosexuality. What is Heterosexuality? The ATTRACTION to the opposite sex. What's Homosexuality? The ATTRACTION to the same sex. That's what a sexuality is. Robosexuality, the ATTRACTION to robots. All that ****. It even says sexuality in the name. Therefore, it's a sexuality.
User avatar #160 to #151 - alyosha
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Read it again. It says sapiosexual. And it's a nonexistent word! \

Jowiman, in the comment you define as "just being a smart-ass," is absolutely correct. I think you might be a bit of an idiot. You're dogmatically declaring the word as something it isn't (it DOES NOT say "sexualITY") and also reading a lot into the common meaning for its roots (which you've misread) where the definition is plainly given. Fake definition, sure, but it's a definition all the same.

But like I said. It's not worth debating over. You're not going to listen to me and I've got better things to do than argue how the English language works to someone who can't even be bothered to read the goddamn image properly.
User avatar #161 to #151 - izzygirl
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
What you're implying is that a sexuality assumes a person only cares about one specific factor in a mate, which is false. In every sexuality, there are multiple factors that a person looks for in a desired mate, but one factor is the most important. It could be gender that is most important; but in this word's case, it seems intelligence is the most important. That's not to say intelligence is the ONLY thing a person would look for in a mate, it's just that it is the most important factor.
#147 to #146 - jowiman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
the definition given in OP's pic was that you're attracted to or aroused by intelligence, not that it's a sexuality rather than a fetish. you can be atrracted to or aroused by multiple things...
User avatar #150 to #147 - latinotornado
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Exactly! It's the definition of a sexuality. It's even in the god damn name! how are you people not getting this!? Heterosexuality: being attracted to the opposite sex. Homosexuality: being attracted to the same sex. 'Sapiosexuality':being attracted to smarts. It's a sexuality. Jesus christ
#152 to #150 - jowiman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
just because it has "-sexual" in the word doesn't necessarily limit the meaning to someone who is ONLY attracted to intelligence. a) the english language is a huge prick face b) it's not even a word so **** logic
User avatar #153 to #152 - latinotornado
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
no no, it doesn't say sexual. It says sexuality. Therefore, in the ENGLISH language, it is a sexuality.
#154 to #153 - jowiman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
sorry, where did it say sexuality? i might be going blind, but i don't think so...

since there's a definition give, you can't really assume any more meaning from the word... if you made a word, you could call it flyingpuppysexual and define it as "v. listening to rock music while eating icecream" and i couldn't (or, shouldn't ) come along and imply that people who like to flyingpuppysexual would have intimate sex with an obese, deformed, or scarred human...
User avatar #156 to #154 - latinotornado
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Dude, you're just being a smart ass now. "wwweeeeelll just because it says sapiosexual doesn't mean its a sexuality" just...just stop. I'm done.
User avatar #172 to #156 - thedarkestrogue
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
I just read through this entire thread and there's so much stupid I think I might have an ******** right about now.
User avatar #243 to #172 - latinotornado
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2013) [-]
do you mean that as an insult to me?
User avatar #244 to #243 - thedarkestrogue
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2013) [-]
No. You were correct. They all made stupid illogical arguments.
User avatar #245 to #244 - latinotornado
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2013) [-]
THANK YOU SO MUCH. And I am being serious. I was surrounded by twats.
User avatar #247 to #245 - thedarkestrogue
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/19/2013) [-]
One guy tried to argue with me saying that because they were putting two new words into the oxford dictionary and because gay has two meanings that bisexual had some other meaning other than what the dictionary said.
It didn't make much sense.
#158 to #156 - jowiman
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
of course i'm being a smartass. doesn't make your assumption more valid.
User avatar #143 to #139 - Shitthatscrazy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Greek godess Athena would bless those whos minds have attracted her and charmed her with a child who was not born of flesh but of though. in essence ya it kinda can work like that, except probably not getting shagged by a godess or somethin
User avatar #164 to #139 - ilcecchino
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Attracted to. dosn't mean the only thing. and dosn't mean you would. Bi sexual. i could be hetero AND sapio
User avatar #166 to #164 - latinotornado
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
oh dear lord. It's still a sexuality. Bisexuality is the attraction to both men and women. Heterosexuality is the attraction to the opposite sex. Homosexuality is the attraction to the same sex. The definition of all sexuality has the word 'attracted' to. That's how the english language works. If it has blahblahsexual, that means there attracted to the blahblah. For example, robosexual. Means someone is attracted to robots. same word, ATTRACTED. Now, for example, we have the word HeteroSEXUAL. That doesn't mean "oh well he's ATTRACTED to women, but hey, he'll bang a dude every now and then" NO. Do you get what I mean? Because the dumb asses below obviously do not. And also, if you can't tell, my jimmies are rustled
User avatar #167 to #166 - ilcecchino
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
I'd bang a dude for money. hell alot of gay porn stars are hetero and married with children. it's great money. does that make me homo? no? am i attracted to them? no?

and bisexual means 2 sexualitys. nobody has to say what those two are. BI doens mean men and women it means bi. two. bicycle?. doesnt mean men and woman cycle.
it gets it's name from 2 wheels

Hetero. and homo. 2

Hetero and robo. 2

just because it's most COMMONLY used to identify someone who is hetero and homo dosn't mean that's ALL that it can

gay means happy. yet people most commonly take it's Homosexual meaning
User avatar #175 to #170 - ilcecchino
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
www.google.com/#hl=en&safe=off&sclient=psy-ab&q=definition+of+gay&oq=definition+of+gay&gs_l=serp.3..0l3j0i10.6746.15024.0.15311.24.18.3.3.3.0.80.1052.18.18.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.6.psy-ab.SpYyHmyRPUE&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&fp=b216c9d9fd13dd85&biw=1920&bih=955


www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/24/lol-omg-oxford-english-dictionary_n_840229.html


http://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2011/03/29/oxforddictionaryaddslol bffotherslang


Congrats. Words changed and become or get removed as "words" based on COMMON opinion.

Again. Bisexual is COMMONLY referred to as man and woman. so obviously if LOL and OMG are being added to the dictionary as words. and "gay" has it's definition changed to homosexual rather than Happy. Bisexual under common knoledge will be refered to as Man and women. but if you look at the root of the word bisexual it means BI as in 2 and Sexual as in sexuality. Two sexualitys

Are you REEEEEEALY that dense?
User avatar #239 to #175 - thedarkestrogue
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Nw you're arguing against something that was besides the point.
You changed topic and I'm the dense one?
User avatar #241 to #239 - ilcecchino
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Changing the subject?

"Attracted to. dosn't mean the only thing. and dosn't mean you would. Bi sexual. i could be hetero AND sapio"

that was my point. my last statement is proving that bisexuality can mean a variety of different things stating alternate sources for contrast and comparisons. and that the root of words means something other than what the comman man actually think it means.

i'm done with your ignorance
User avatar #242 to #241 - thedarkestrogue
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
You did everything except say that. All you did was say that they put lol omg in the oxford dictionary and say that gay has multiple meanings.
And I'm the ignorant one?
#165 to #139 - viewtifulbro
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
So people are using a word that's not real... That's the way words are created.     
Thank God you weren't living in the 15th century cause you would be sending Shakespeare more hatemail than EA over SimCity..
So people are using a word that's not real... That's the way words are created.
Thank God you weren't living in the 15th century cause you would be sending Shakespeare more hatemail than EA over SimCity..


User avatar #171 to #139 - willdabeast
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
So pansexuality and asexuality are totally not words right?
Asexuals enjoy romance and don't care about sex(erotic relations) , gender, etc.
Pansexuals are kind of like bisexuals but more of "Hey! We're pretty common and may or may not be defined by the basic gender roles in both mind and/or body"
#136 - yrhcz
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
I get really turned on by girls that are smart. Seriously, I have a fetish for hot chicks doing high level mathematics.
User avatar #104 - bargainboner
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
does this mean instead of a porn website, saposexuals fap to wikipedia?
User avatar #16 - taintedangel
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(03/17/2013) [-]
You've never seen this before because most people tend to be dumb.
#51 to #16 - anon id: 62213408
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
well look at this little elitist right here
#81 to #51 - taintedangel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Log in and say that like a man, Meg.
Log in and say that like a man, Meg.
User avatar #9 - mechanichore
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(03/17/2013) [-]
I'm pretty sure that's just not being shallow.
User avatar #6 - simplelife
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(03/17/2013) [-]
Isn't this what Nikola Tesla was? He didn't care much for physical beauty but when he met a woman who was intelligent, he fancied her quite a bit.
#109 - nebuchadnezzaurus
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
THERE. IS. NO. SUCH. WORD.
Look it up in ANY authoritative dictionary - Merriam-Webster, Oxford Online Dictionary, anything.
Besides, the idea is completely dumb. Instant proof: that nerdy girl from The Big Bang Theory.
#102 - xsap
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
&quot;I'm Being Extremely Clever and there is no one up here being imprssed turned on&quot;    
   
- The Doctor
"I'm Being Extremely Clever and there is no one up here being imprssed turned on"

- The Doctor
User avatar #64 - theaceofthespade
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
I literally have this - I have literally fallen for girls because of their proficiency in applying mathematics, or their ability to write. Likewise, stupidity is a total turn off.
User avatar #80 to #64 - greenwithenvy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
did it hurt?
User avatar #86 to #80 - theaceofthespade
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Have you ever fallen with an erection?
#107 to #64 - nebuchadnezzaurus
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
Aww... you're so sweet
User avatar #130 to #107 - theaceofthespade
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
She could be a total idiot...
#41 - OrionPax
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
... this explains a lot of things...
... this explains a lot of things...
#31 - zombehhh
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(03/17/2013) [-]
i'm pretty sure this is just a different form of shallow.
i'm pretty sure this is just a different form of shallow.
User avatar #42 to #31 - abotu
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
......
it's shallow to be attracted to something?
User avatar #78 to #42 - zombehhh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/18/2013) [-]
apparently if it's good looks, yes.
#8 - justtocomment
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(03/17/2013) [-]
Except that's ********.