Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#356 - anon (03/08/2013) [-]
why do people even question **** like this just go with the flow and things will turn out like **** just like science things will turn out like **** and religion no matter what everything you do will be **** lets think about that?
#355 - brokenhalf (03/07/2013) [-]
consider the following. what if the deitiy some call god/allah/etc. made the world like a game of sims and is just seeing what we do by ourselves. but every once in a while he intervenes?is that not a decent theory? and maybe he made us curious creatures so that we would use science to discover more about us and the universe we live in?
0
#326 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #301 - cryingchicken (03/04/2013) [-]
>make up random, easy to argue against quote that you think a religious person might have said that one time.
>argue against quote.
>???
>profit
0
#290 - sphinxe has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #276 - Ruspanic (03/04/2013) [-]
One is designed to be beautiful and the other is designed to be functional. Comparing them doesn't make sense.
#258 - xxxgnipsxxx (03/04/2013) [-]
I mean architecturally wise, it's true. The greatest structures man has built until recent times have been related to worship/religious roles, or at least assumed to be so by archeologists. But anyways, point is this post is kind of dumb.
#199 - theholum (03/04/2013) [-]
Science was used to build both structures... The difference is that the religious structure is built for religion, and the satelite is built for science.   
Science comes from the latin word for knowledge, thus, science is used to build both   
   
Now, please stop trying to piss of each other, yes, that goes for religious people as well, you're no better    
   
Sorry for generalizing, this criticism is only directed towards the ones who deserve it
Science was used to build both structures... The difference is that the religious structure is built for religion, and the satelite is built for science.
Science comes from the latin word for knowledge, thus, science is used to build both

Now, please stop trying to piss of each other, yes, that goes for religious people as well, you're no better

Sorry for generalizing, this criticism is only directed towards the ones who deserve it
User avatar #129 - anonymousefj (03/04/2013) [-]
comparing old structures to new structures
yeah
User avatar #124 - twi (03/04/2013) [-]
I'd rather have the huge ******* cathedral
bitches love cathedrals
#119 - herecomesjohnny ONLINE (03/04/2013) [+] (3 replies)
location location location.
location location location.
User avatar #85 - VincentKing ONLINE (03/04/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Its like people don't believe science and religion can work together :/
#51 - llamadude (03/04/2013) [-]
What defines a structure to be great? Aesthetics are subjective to the viewer. Functionality is subjective to the user and how the user utilizes or wants to utilize the structure. The religious people here will argue that the churches and stuff built are better while the atheist will believe that ISS and other science based structures are better. The greatness in a structure depends on the individual viewer so the only thing there is to argue is that the above statement is false.

Also, people make buildings, not religion or science.
User avatar #48 - duudegladiator (03/04/2013) [-]
Tubes. Thats all the ISS is. Why not make something as cool as the base in Star Trek? Because there is still the problem of priorities of funding.

If the Star Trek starbase were created, i would be training for NASA as soon as possible.
#19 - jeengak (03/04/2013) [-]
gotta appreciate the art work and detail put into the structures... however its the architect and the designers who built it with tax money... religion doesn't have anything to do with beautiful architect
#15 - anon (03/04/2013) [-]
The building in the picture on the top will still be standing long after the space station tumbles back towards Earth.

So tired of this pedestrian religion bashing. Just as annoying as Christians shoving their beliefs down your throat. Thumbed down.
#3 - anon (03/04/2013) [-]
Both have their own appeal.
#272 - anon (03/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
*sigh* Think back 200/300 years ago when religion was the more 'Believable' theory on life and what not, the guys took effort to make these buildings the greatest to impress their god(s) so in which case they were not made to go into space thus they didnt have much technology
4/10
#197 - pao (03/04/2013) [-]
yep, because religion, and religion alone, builds cathedrals. The other day I built my buddy a house by praying ten hail marys.
 Friends (0)