Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#135 - dishie
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
#132 - mjdjoy
Reply +2
(02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#215 to #132 - bigsaltyballs
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#158 to #132 - somenerd
Reply +2
(02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#159 to #158 - somenerd
Reply +6
(02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#160 to #159 - somenerd
Reply +3
(02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#161 to #160 - somenerd
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#162 to #161 - somenerd
Reply +2
(02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#163 to #162 - somenerd
Reply +4
(02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#164 to #163 - somenerd
Reply +2
(02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#173 to #164 - craigdavid
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
ive seen this gif so many times and i dont like it because of what it is, i like it because of the way her face is almost perfectly spherical at the end
#165 to #164 - somenerd
Reply +2
(02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#201 to #165 - nockae
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
His cup became non-existent.
#168 to #165 - tokawase
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
Thanks for showing me these, you beautiful man
#170 to #168 - somenerd
Reply +2
(02/02/2013) [-]
No problem. I just found this one too.
No problem. I just found this one too.
#218 to #170 - bigsaltyballs
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#130 - sammyjankiis
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
I feel healthier already :)
#125 - Switchphone
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
Is it possible to actually complete a surgery in this game or is the whole thing just a gag?
#190 to #125 - Zarke
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
Yeah, you can win. It's actually pretty loose with the winning conditions.

I managed to win with several bone fragments and a scalpel in his chest cavity. His heart was also upside down and his lungs were somewhere on the floor. Somewhere.
#131 to #125 - freakyorange
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
Regardless of what you lose, as long as the new heart gets in, you win.
#128 to #125 - EpicFace
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
If you manage to cut the heart out and put the new one in, the game ends and you get a grade.
#120 - DoggyBouncer
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
What is the name of this game?
#121 to #120 - killkornflakes
Reply +2
(02/02/2013) [-]
Surgeon simulator
#122 to #121 - DoggyBouncer
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
Thanks!
#118 - anon
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
Exactly this. My grandfather just got out of the hospital after 4 kidney surgeries, and the total cost was 41 dollars.

For a private room fee.

/Canada

#172 to #118 - anon
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
But....But Humans only have 2 kidneys O.O
#192 to #172 - Zarke
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
So operate on each one twice.
#116 - theflamingfire
Reply +15
(02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#114 - agooodname
Reply +15
(02/02/2013) [-]
#153 to #114 - stiffbeefyone
Reply +5
(02/02/2013) [-]
MS Paint skills off the charts!
#156 to #153 - agooodname
Reply -8
(02/02/2013) [-]
no... just no
no... just no
#169 to #156 - stiffbeefyone
Reply +4
(02/02/2013) [-]
If I remember correctly, Mitt Romney did say NOT to help out the 3 major US car brands and let them topple over. That alone would have put millions out of a job. Not only at headquarters, but new/used car dealerships, repair shops, and part stores. You cannot even comprehend the ripple effect that would cause. Obama stepped in, bailed them out, and they all paid back IN FULL plus the U.S. government owns a large share of GM now. Now they can push cleaner vehicles. If Romney was President at that time, he would have thrown the US into more problems than we ever had, close to the housing market crisis. That reason alone is the reason I'm glad he's not in office.
#177 to #169 - agooodname
Reply -6
(02/02/2013) [-]
if you have some time i suggest you watch this it will make it very clear who really saved the auto industry.
www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/60minutesapp/previous-segments/business
#178 to #177 - stiffbeefyone
Reply +3
(02/02/2013) [-]
You cannot even give the correct link? I bet you are the same ignorant American that also thinks that the $600 billion spent per year for the war when Bush was in office, WAS NOT deferred until Obama took office to make it seem as if Democrats pushed the U.S. debt to $15 trillion huh?
#179 to #178 - agooodname
Reply -6
(02/02/2013) [-]
no need to be rude, i see you liberals cannot hold a conversation without acting like children, typical
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kS-rYlLlFM
#180 to #179 - stiffbeefyone
Reply +3
(02/02/2013) [-]
I just saw that video prior to your post.  This is a video of AFTER the bailout.  This video does not have anything to do with Obama bailing out the auto industry.  This is of "Chrysler's turn around".
I just saw that video prior to your post. This is a video of AFTER the bailout. This video does not have anything to do with Obama bailing out the auto industry. This is of "Chrysler's turn around".
#186 to #180 - agooodname
Reply -4
(02/02/2013) [-]
if Fiat had not have taken over Chrysler they would have liquidated with or without the bailout Obama funded
#187 to #186 - stiffbeefyone
Reply +3
(02/02/2013) [-]
So you are telling me, that when the U.S. government gave Chrysler a ton of money to bail them out, that Chrysler is NOT going to hire someone to help them out?  I mean, that would have been the general idea right?  CMON! Think a little bit.  Don't believe 100% what the media puts in your head.  I know this first hand.  The local news NEVER reports exactly how things go down.  Same goes for national news.  You have to think outside the box.  Chrysler got money, and they hired/partnered up with someone to put together a plan to stay afloat.  They can't just get the money and say "well, we have money, we are fine."  Lol.  Now Fiat gets all the glory.  Please.  You sound like a 9-5 worker that only does and thinks what he's told.
So you are telling me, that when the U.S. government gave Chrysler a ton of money to bail them out, that Chrysler is NOT going to hire someone to help them out? I mean, that would have been the general idea right? CMON! Think a little bit. Don't believe 100% what the media puts in your head. I know this first hand. The local news NEVER reports exactly how things go down. Same goes for national news. You have to think outside the box. Chrysler got money, and they hired/partnered up with someone to put together a plan to stay afloat. They can't just get the money and say "well, we have money, we are fine." Lol. Now Fiat gets all the glory. Please. You sound like a 9-5 worker that only does and thinks what he's told.
#194 to #187 - agooodname
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
OK thank you for opening my eyes, i was blind but now i see. If only obama could run for a third term then we would have world piece
#202 to #194 - Chas
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
ITT: agoodname is a retard
ITT: agoodname is a retard
#200 to #194 - stiffbeefyone
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
Lol.  I didn't mean it like that.  I just hate the fact that people don't credit Obama for the great he has done for the country.  I can name 100 things he has done great for the United States. There is no way that you will get everyone to back every president, but still.    Truth be told, Romney would have not been a better president than Obama.  If there was a better Republican candidate, I would have voted for him.  God knows I would have.  But Romney had too many faults prior to his campaign for presidency.  Still love you fellow FJer.  :)
Lol. I didn't mean it like that. I just hate the fact that people don't credit Obama for the great he has done for the country. I can name 100 things he has done great for the United States. There is no way that you will get everyone to back every president, but still. Truth be told, Romney would have not been a better president than Obama. If there was a better Republican candidate, I would have voted for him. God knows I would have. But Romney had too many faults prior to his campaign for presidency. Still love you fellow FJer. :)
#207 to #200 - agooodname
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
yeah we i do get carried away in internet debates haha. ill admit Obama not all bad but i still think Mit was the better choice. lets just agree to disagree.
#210 to #207 - stiffbeefyone
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
:)
:)
#112 - JHDog
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
What i'm seeing in the comments is that you're all afraid of free health care because it'll reduce the quality of care. That sounds really stupid, if you're injured or sick and go to the hospital and aren't injured or sick anymore that should be good enough. You also make it sound like doctors don't give a **** about helping people anymore (granted there are a minority of doctors that do) like if they're not getting paid they won't treat you. People seemed to forget doctors made a Hippocratic oath. of course they probably won't have the time to see you for the full 10 minutes they normally do go to see you but if you're still alive the next day, then you shouldn't complain about the quality of care.
#126 to #112 - areyouawakeyet
Reply +6
(02/02/2013) [-]
amerifag reporting,    
the 'quality of healthcare' excuse is just an excuse. conservative people here tend to think that any government intervention is socialist, and if its socialist, it must be communist and evil.   
they fail to see that by having universal healthcare, you stop the spread of disease because now there is no reason not to go to the doctor. overall health of the nation increases, as does productivity, which, in turn, can lead to a boon for business.   
the only people against it are those who don't want to pay taxes on their massive wallets.   
tl;dr - why the **** are we the only developed nation without universal healthcare?
amerifag reporting,
the 'quality of healthcare' excuse is just an excuse. conservative people here tend to think that any government intervention is socialist, and if its socialist, it must be communist and evil.
they fail to see that by having universal healthcare, you stop the spread of disease because now there is no reason not to go to the doctor. overall health of the nation increases, as does productivity, which, in turn, can lead to a boon for business.
the only people against it are those who don't want to pay taxes on their massive wallets.
tl;dr - why the **** are we the only developed nation without universal healthcare?
#139 to #126 - JHDog
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
I completely agree, this is ridiculous
#124 to #112 - ilikepatatas
Reply -1
(02/02/2013) [-]
yeh, im gonna get very happy when i get a disease and then it becomes chronic :D
#127 to #124 - JHDog
Reply -1
(02/02/2013) [-]
tell me, what's your definition of chronic?
#138 to #127 - ilikepatatas
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
when you get a wrong diagnosis and use the wrong drugs there is a chance that the bacteria that causes your disease fortifies and becomes immune or resistant to some drugs making the disease to last for weeks or months
example: you have conjuntivitys and use the wrong drugs,the bacteria that causes it fortifies, making the actual drug that you need to cure your eye/s less efective to that bacteria
in lamest terms NORMAL GERM+DRUG= 1-2 weeks SUPER SAIYAN GERM + DRUG = 2-3 months
so basically when we use wrong drugs or even the correct drug in a wrong time it has the same effect in a germ than in a saiyajing when you beat him (BUT NOT KILL)
-sorry if my english was bad
#148 to #138 - JHDog
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
That's actually wrong, drug resistant bacteria (most commonly known as MRSA aka the super bug) become drug resistant through evolution (evolution occurs faster in bacteria because they reproduce a lot quicker) and that is not caused by using the "wrong drug". It is caused by neglecting your dosage of the antibiotics that prescribed by you. So yes if you prescribed the wrong drug, you probably would get sick because it just doesn't work, but it wouldn't fortify the drug. If a doctor were to prescribe you the wrong drug, they know they are liable for your safety. So they will do what they must to help regardless of profit incentive.
#181 to #148 - ilikepatatas
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
No , actually all bacteria can evolve against a type of drug if we give em enough time to do it, thats the reason of why some drugs must be consumed "every 4 hours/3 hours/ 2 hours/ETC"
#214 to #181 - JHDog
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
you just reworded what i said
#196 to #181 - Zarke
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
That's almost exactly what he just said.
#151 to #148 - JHDog
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
*fortify the bacteria
sorry didn't proof read this
#150 to #148 - JHDog
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
prescribed to you*
#141 to #138 - ilikepatatas
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
saiyajin*
#109 - JHDog
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#106 - divviyday
Reply +20
(02/02/2013) [-]
lol, Cr1TiKaL.
lol, Cr1TiKaL.
#223 to #106 - anon
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
That is the best game in the history of the world.
#176 to #106 - eminempackerfan
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
He is so damn funny haha
#123 to #106 - minishadow
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
Whats this from?
#157 to #137 - minishadow
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
Thanks
#104 - anon
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
Pretty much everyone I've talked to (granted, I don't talk much politics) that hates Obama care actually has no ******* idea what it does. For example, if you would compare it in any way to Canadian health care, you're an idiot.

In a nutshell, what it does is require you to have health insurance. PRIVATIZED health insurance. Same stuff you've always been using. If you don't have it, you have a pay a tax (which is cheaper than actual insurance anyway). If you're so poor you can't afford that tax, you don't have to pay it (and you're probably on Medicaid anyway).

The reasoning for this is two-fold. First, all those people without insurance... who do you think is paying for them when they get in an accident, anyway? A hospital can't just tell you to **** off and die (literally) and tax-payers end up eating the bills they can't pay. Second, it allows the removal of the "previous condition" exclusion, where if you had asthma as a kid, you could be totally screwed out of insurance. Thing is, nobody would buy insurance until they got hurt if you weren't required to, and insurance wouldn't work.

Obama care also does a few other things like say preventative healthcare must be free. A colonoscopy is unpleasant enough without having to pay for it to. But if the patient not having to pay $25 means catching cancer, it's good business for the insurance anyway. Chemo is hella expensive.

The final controversial thing it does is say birth control should be free. This is because a company could say they don't believe in it, but that choice unfairly affects all of their employees (who might disagree). "Find a different employer then," is a retarded argument and you know it. They could say, "You have to cover it," but then scumbag companies would just say that they "cover" a whopping $0.01 on it. So it's all or nothing.
#96 - redclover ONLINE
Reply +27
(02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#94 - AreyouSerious
Reply +3
(02/02/2013) [-]
Robbaz, The king of Sweden!
#93 - urcool
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
Thats Robbaz!
Thats Robbaz!
#91 - Soilwork
Reply +33
(02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#248 to #91 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
I'm hungry now
#81 - anon
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
OMG PEWDIEPIE DID THIS
#77 - russianbro
+3
has deleted their comment [-]
#75 - gibroner
Reply +12
(02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#74 - lmOldGreg
Reply -19
(02/02/2013) [-]
Americans are ******* stupid... crying because they can't have high powered assault rifles with enough ammo to take out a pride of lions and moaning when a free health service becomes available. Wtf... Talk about self destructive tendencies.
#88 to #74 - anon
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
ummmmm. they are not trying to take high powered assault weapons. they are trying to take all weapons. and the weapons they are referring to as "assault weapons" the most popular one displayed is a remington .223 semi auto hunting rifle. It just LOOKS like an assault weapon. and the healthcare is not free, it is a forced 6,000 dollar a year plan, 11,000 dollars if you smoke. Get your **** straight before you jump on the "Let's bash America" wagon.
#79 to #74 - facetiousrunner ONLINE
Reply +3
(02/02/2013) [-]
step one   
https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=tn1Y6DVLwcY (you know how to fix that link pal)   
step two   
the problem with this "free healthcare" is that as something becomes free the standard of care will go down. So arguably one of the best healthcare systems in the world will go down the ******* due to even longer waits and downgraded care. Don't even get me started on what it will do to the cost of health care for everyone else.
step one
https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=tn1Y6DVLwcY (you know how to fix that link pal)
step two
the problem with this "free healthcare" is that as something becomes free the standard of care will go down. So arguably one of the best healthcare systems in the world will go down the ******* due to even longer waits and downgraded care. Don't even get me started on what it will do to the cost of health care for everyone else.
#105 to #79 - fosforgasxiii
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
>one of the best healthcare systems in the world
The US was ranked 37th a few years ago, even Cuba and Costa Rica had better healthcare.
#198 to #105 - facetiousrunner ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
someone loved to watch Micheal Moore videos huh? Also 9 in ten people enjoy a gang bang. Don't trust every stat you read. Here is the argument, does the best doctor have the best survival rate? Technically no. The most highly trained doctors take on the sickest patients who have an insanely high death rate.
http://www.who. int/healthinfo/paper30.pdf
also don't trust wikipedia.
Continuing www.politifact.com /truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jul/05/john-boehner/john-boehner-says-us-health-c are-system-best-world/
scroll past the talk of politics it does some great number crunching
#242 to #198 - fosforgasxiii
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
I've never ever watched anything from Micheal Moore. My stat came from the World Health Organisation.
What the **** is up with Americans who think they're nr. 1 in everything.
#249 to #242 - facetiousrunner ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
i never said we were number one. Based on the average waiting times for surgery and level of care provided. One can make a claim we are up there in the pecking order of things. We aren't number one in many things. Our poverty rate is way to high. Our murder rate is crazy. % of people in jail is to high.
#85 to #79 - blarglestheclown
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
and taxing paying citizens will be funding people who get free phones and health coverage while sitting at home unemployed...people who refuse to get a job.
This is why people who are not in America wont understand.
#87 to #85 - facetiousrunner ONLINE
Reply +4
(02/02/2013) [-]
the average person on welfare has cable and ac. You do not need that **** to live. Now I'm not saying there are people who do truly need the help, but they are now outnumbered by those who are system abusers.
#99 to #87 - blarglestheclown
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
Ill agree with that. I have freinds who are balancing on that line. It jsut sucks that the people who need it are the ones who will avoid using it and the lazy **** are the ones going to the hospital every time they sneeze too hard.

but then again Im speaking as a generalists again.
#189 to #99 - facetiousrunner ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
no you are right. When i was working in the summer, im a student in the year, I qualified for food stamps on my full time job. But as long as you don't get worthless **** like hbo and super high speed internet you can live off of minimum wage.
#209 to #189 - blarglestheclown
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
exactly I do the same I work summers as well
#216 to #209 - facetiousrunner ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
working forty hours a week on minimum wage i manage to eat and live in a place while paying off debt from the school year. It's possible. I'm a freak in that sense though an outlier. But the system needs to be reformed and more closely monitored to stop the abuse of it.
#219 to #216 - blarglestheclown
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
yeah hard part is people will never give the gov the right to come in our houses and check because by that point its gone too far and govt is going to become to powerful if we give them more tools.

God damn, Ron Paul I wish you had won...
#231 to #219 - facetiousrunner ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
He had my vote =p. I believe and honestly if you are taking money from someone else need it be aid or something along those lines. You have waived your right to have that "privacy" per say. My "big idea" is allow welfare to be privatized. There is someone out there willing to do it, especially if you offer tax breaks for it. If a private person is helping those people they will make sure they truly need it and will work their hardest to get them off welfare. Since it is money out of their pocket.
#237 to #231 - blarglestheclown
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
honestly not a bad idea , but the corporations in charge of it would in turn need to be closely monitored so they wouldn't monopolize on the situation. However that is a great idea privatization would be a great check and balance system for welfare
#239 to #237 - facetiousrunner ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Tenth amendment. Welfare therefore is technically unconstitutional. Just like education, another thing the federal government ***** up, needs to get put to the states and people. Btw sir you are a true gentlemen. I usually get ass pounded because I have right wing views.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Tenth amendment. Welfare therefore is technically unconstitutional. Just like education, another thing the federal government ***** up, needs to get put to the states and people. Btw sir you are a true gentlemen. I usually get ass pounded because I have right wing views.
#244 to #239 - blarglestheclown
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
Im neutral to be honest, I just go with what logically will work I could give two ***** bout party affiliation or view points :D lol
and I would shoot you some of the Dr. back but my new rig still needs a bigger hard drive for my picture collections lol
#246 to #244 - facetiousrunner ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
its all good. i say right wing views because on economic views i lean hard that way. But on most other things, besides abortion, i swing to a more middle ground
#251 to #246 - blarglestheclown
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
A SWINGER o_o lol jk
Yeah thats very similar to mine I am very liberal with human rights, but at the same time Im not going to Africa to have my soldiers die fighting for their equal rights in their country
#252 to #251 - facetiousrunner ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
I dunno fix our own problems before the worlds is my view.
#253 to #252 - blarglestheclown
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
#256 to #253 - facetiousrunner ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
I take it that I just said something amazing?
I take it that I just said something amazing?
#257 to #256 - blarglestheclown
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
ALUCARD is the exclamation point on you statement
#258 to #257 - facetiousrunner ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
its because im.........
its because im.........