Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#134 - pandamoncia
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
**pandamoncia rolled a random image posted in comment #84 at how i expect valentines day will go down ** I never saw this as a problem..
But now..
#131 - secondjess
Reply +22
(01/31/2013) [-]
So I work as a graphic designer. One of my past clients sent me a 250x200 bmp of their logo in a word document. That was the highest quality copy of their logo that they had.
So I work as a graphic designer. One of my past clients sent me a 250x200 bmp of their logo in a word document. That was the highest quality copy of their logo that they had.
#170 to #131 - comradewinter ONLINE
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
Why would you even use something with pixels for a logo, anyway? Those things should be vectors.
#212 to #170 - secondjess
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
YES. THANK YOU!
#156 to #131 - SognaVetr
Reply +3
(01/31/2013) [-]
As a web designer, i share your pain: 400x150 bmp logo in words made with wordart and clipart. MFW.

But at the end of the day i designed a new logo and got some nice extra cash for it.
#211 to #156 - secondjess
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Yea I ended up remaking this clients as well, though I kept it quite close to their original because they had it on business cards and signs and whatnot already.
#135 to #131 - ishalltroll
Reply +5
(01/31/2013) [-]
250x200.
A bitmap.
In a word document.
#132 to #131 - pyra
Reply +16
(01/31/2013) [-]
#129 - pyra
Reply +7
(01/31/2013) [-]
#123 - daddymcswagger
Reply -3
(01/31/2013) [-]
**** PNG and JPG, GIF rulezz.   
OC.
**** PNG and JPG, GIF rulezz.
OC.
#157 to #123 - anon
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
APNG
#148 to #123 - reican
Reply -2
(01/31/2013) [-]
**** EU, therefore **** you.
#127 to #123 - pyra
Reply +10
(01/31/2013) [-]
Gif is worse than jpg in quality
it has horrible compression
the only good thing about it is that it can display animation frames
#217 to #127 - daddymcswagger
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Get your facts straight.
#218 to #217 - pyra
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Prove me wrong
#219 to #218 - daddymcswagger
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
When did I ever say " GIF is superior quality. " ?
#220 to #219 - pyra
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
"**** PNG and JPG, GIF rulezz.
OC."

>"GIF rulezz"
#221 to #220 - daddymcswagger
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Can be smaller without compromising quality ( as much ) Can be animated.
#119 - bozhko
Reply +9
(01/31/2013) [-]
mfw jpeg
#110 - kaelanduck
Reply +10
(01/31/2013) [-]
Heck yeah JPEG
#153 to #110 - lolme
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
Someone better ******* call Ghostbusters.
#107 - snakefire
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
Can you even make jpegs transparent?
#111 to #107 - skords
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
No.
#112 to #111 - snakefire
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
Well we have our answer for best format then.
#113 to #112 - skords
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
There is no BEST format as such in my opinion. It really depends upon your content/design. However, PNG offers wide use as it is does not compress images like JPEG.
#118 to #113 - cousin
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
Actually, you can make PNG's tiny. As small, if not smaller than a JPG.
#121 to #118 - skords
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
If I am not wrong, won't we will loose some colors while doing so?
#133 to #121 - cousin
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
Yes, but most colours are not needed anyway. There usually isn't any difference between the two, just PNG's are smaller (when compressed).
#144 to #133 - skords
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
Some images (usually smaller) don't reflect any changes when we decrease the color palette but some large images do.
#163 to #144 - cousin
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
Say for photos, use JPG or TIFF.
Anything else really, PNG's are better.
#165 to #163 - skords
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
Exactly sir, exactly.
#115 to #113 - snakefire
Reply -1
(01/31/2013) [-]
What special thing does jpeg do?
#116 to #115 - skords
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
If you use a digital camera to take a high quality picture with lots of colors, you might need JPEG to store it or use it as it will compress the image and reduce the size of the file.
PNG is optimum for web purposes.
#101 - anon
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
I think I preffer RPG
#99 - kirkbot
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
it's funny because it's a png
#103 to #99 - camdonwin
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
haha I just checked. Honestly, it would have been funny either way. . .


or maybe even funnier if it was a .gif
#97 - jpg
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
Jpg is clearly master-race
#96 - bloodeyes
Reply +9
(01/31/2013) [-]
idk about you all but .gif is a toy from heaven
idk about you all but .gif is a toy from heaven
#93 - stillanonymous
Reply -5
(01/31/2013) [-]
there's no transparency in this picture, waste of space using png tbh.
#88 - injerseyforever
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#87 - comehonorfacetwice
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
.TIFF all the way, totally lossless. Files are huge though.
#104 to #87 - camdonwin
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
not everything is compatible, TIFF is a good working format, but not if you're trying to save space, time, or if you dont care about quality.
#83 - aharmlessquirel
Reply +10
(01/31/2013) [-]
I had to check what the image was saved as to make sure it was .png.

God I really wanted it to be .jpg. I really really did.
#105 to #83 - camdonwin
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
same
#102 to #83 - thalfak
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
Save img
Open Paint
Save as .jpg
#72 - twatmissile
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
Shut up, Peg
#68 - killjow
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
This is fine but any ****** that uses BMP deserves to be shot that **** is like internet explorer.
#67 - sixty
Reply +12
(01/31/2013) [-]
hooray for PNG
#171 to #67 - crazehtoast
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
I can't even save the image...
#172 to #171 - crazehtoast
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
Never mind, computer is being stupid.
#124 to #67 - racrox
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#108 to #67 - camdonwin
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
wait, I need to try this out.
#109 to #108 - camdonwin
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
whuuuttt
#73 to #67 - josephkirk
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
....EXPLAIN!!!!
#74 to #73 - sixty
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
It's the DMA
#77 to #74 - josephkirk
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
DMA? please elaborate on the subject
#78 to #77 - sixty
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
The Double Medium Apple
#80 to #78 - josephkirk
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
ummm k...google noped me
#81 to #80 - sixty
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
It's a secret image that doubles itself, that can only be done by few users
#98 to #81 - deliciousdee
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
Is that why there is two identical threads here?
Is that why there is two identical threads here?
#85 to #81 - josephkirk
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
mmhmmm i see...well good luck with that. i could ask how to do it but then i guess once you post how you do it. SPAM! spam everywhere
#65 - kuroda
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
Dont forget about transparency.
#64 - volenti
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
I'm glad we are finally talking about this.