Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#134 - pandamoncia (01/31/2013) [-]
**pandamoncia rolled a random image posted in comment #84 at how i expect valentines day will go down ** I never saw this as a problem..
But now..
#131 - secondjess (01/31/2013) [-]
So I work as a graphic designer. One of my past clients sent me a 250x200 bmp of their logo in a word document. That was the highest quality copy of their logo that they had.
So I work as a graphic designer. One of my past clients sent me a 250x200 bmp of their logo in a word document. That was the highest quality copy of their logo that they had.
#170 to #131 - comradewinter ONLINE (01/31/2013) [-]
Why would you even use something with pixels for a logo, anyway? Those things should be vectors.
User avatar #212 to #170 - secondjess (02/01/2013) [-]
YES. THANK YOU!
#156 to #131 - SognaVetr ONLINE (01/31/2013) [-]
As a web designer, i share your pain: 400x150 bmp logo in words made with wordart and clipart. MFW.

But at the end of the day i designed a new logo and got some nice extra cash for it.
User avatar #211 to #156 - secondjess (02/01/2013) [-]
Yea I ended up remaking this clients as well, though I kept it quite close to their original because they had it on business cards and signs and whatnot already.
#135 to #131 - ishalltroll (01/31/2013) [-]
250x200.
A bitmap.
In a word document.
#123 - daddymcswagger (01/31/2013) [-]
****					 PNG and JPG, GIF rulezz.   
OC.
**** PNG and JPG, GIF rulezz.
OC.
#157 to #123 - anonymous (01/31/2013) [-]
APNG
User avatar #148 to #123 - reican (01/31/2013) [-]
**** EU, therefore **** you.
#127 to #123 - pyra (01/31/2013) [-]
Gif is worse than jpg in quality
it has horrible compression
the only good thing about it is that it can display animation frames
User avatar #217 to #127 - daddymcswagger (02/01/2013) [-]
Get your facts straight.
#218 to #217 - pyra (02/01/2013) [-]
Prove me wrong
User avatar #219 to #218 - daddymcswagger (02/01/2013) [-]
When did I ever say " GIF is superior quality. " ?
#220 to #219 - pyra (02/01/2013) [-]
" **** PNG and JPG, GIF rulezz.
OC."

>"GIF rulezz"
User avatar #221 to #220 - daddymcswagger (02/01/2013) [-]
Can be smaller without compromising quality ( as much ) Can be animated.
#119 - bozhko (01/31/2013) [-]
mfw jpeg
#110 - kaelanduck (01/31/2013) [-]
Heck yeah JPEG
User avatar #153 to #110 - lolme (01/31/2013) [-]
Someone better ******* call Ghostbusters.
User avatar #107 - snakefire (01/31/2013) [-]
Can you even make jpegs transparent?
#111 to #107 - skords (01/31/2013) [-]
No.
User avatar #112 to #111 - snakefire (01/31/2013) [-]
Well we have our answer for best format then.
#113 to #112 - skords (01/31/2013) [-]
There is no BEST format as such in my opinion. It really depends upon your content/design. However, PNG offers wide use as it is does not compress images like JPEG.
User avatar #118 to #113 - cousin ONLINE (01/31/2013) [-]
Actually, you can make PNG's tiny. As small, if not smaller than a JPG.
#121 to #118 - skords (01/31/2013) [-]
If I am not wrong, won't we will loose some colors while doing so?
User avatar #133 to #121 - cousin ONLINE (01/31/2013) [-]
Yes, but most colours are not needed anyway. There usually isn't any difference between the two, just PNG's are smaller (when compressed).
#144 to #133 - skords (01/31/2013) [-]
Some images (usually smaller) don't reflect any changes when we decrease the color palette but some large images do.
User avatar #163 to #144 - cousin ONLINE (01/31/2013) [-]
Say for photos, use JPG or TIFF.
Anything else really, PNG's are better.
#165 to #163 - skords (01/31/2013) [-]
Exactly sir, exactly.
User avatar #115 to #113 - snakefire (01/31/2013) [-]
What special thing does jpeg do?
#116 to #115 - skords (01/31/2013) [-]
If you use a digital camera to take a high quality picture with lots of colors, you might need JPEG to store it or use it as it will compress the image and reduce the size of the file.
PNG is optimum for web purposes.
#101 - anonymous (01/31/2013) [-]
I think I preffer RPG
User avatar #99 - kirkbot ONLINE (01/31/2013) [-]
it's funny because it's a png
User avatar #103 to #99 - camdonwin (01/31/2013) [-]
haha I just checked. Honestly, it would have been funny either way. . .


or maybe even funnier if it was a .gif
User avatar #97 - jpg (01/31/2013) [-]
Jpg is clearly master-race
#96 - bloodeyes (01/31/2013) [-]
idk about you all but .gif is a toy from heaven
idk about you all but .gif is a toy from heaven
User avatar #93 - stillanonymous (01/31/2013) [-]
there's no transparency in this picture, waste of space using png tbh.
-1
#88 - injerseyforever has deleted their comment [-]
#87 - comehonorfacetwice (01/31/2013) [-]
.TIFF all the way, totally lossless. Files are huge though.
User avatar #104 to #87 - camdonwin (01/31/2013) [-]
not everything is compatible, TIFF is a good working format, but not if you're trying to save space, time, or if you dont care about quality.
#83 - aharmlessquirel (01/31/2013) [-]
I had to check what the image was saved as to make sure it was .png.

God I really wanted it to be .jpg. I really really did.
User avatar #105 to #83 - camdonwin (01/31/2013) [-]
same
User avatar #102 to #83 - thalfak (01/31/2013) [-]
Save img
Open Paint
Save as .jpg
User avatar #72 - twatmissile (01/31/2013) [-]
Shut up, Peg
#68 - killjow (01/31/2013) [-]
This is fine but any ****** that uses BMP deserves to be shot that **** is like internet explorer.
#67 - sixty (01/31/2013) [-]
hooray for PNG
User avatar #171 to #67 - crazehtoast (01/31/2013) [-]
I can't even save the image...
User avatar #172 to #171 - crazehtoast (01/31/2013) [-]
Never mind, computer is being stupid.
#124 to #67 - racrox (01/31/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #108 to #67 - camdonwin (01/31/2013) [-]
wait, I need to try this out.
User avatar #109 to #108 - camdonwin (01/31/2013) [-]
whuuuttt
#73 to #67 - josephkirk (01/31/2013) [-]
....EXPLAIN!!!!
User avatar #74 to #73 - sixty (01/31/2013) [-]
It's the DMA
User avatar #77 to #74 - josephkirk (01/31/2013) [-]
DMA? please elaborate on the subject
User avatar #78 to #77 - sixty (01/31/2013) [-]
The Double Medium Apple
User avatar #80 to #78 - josephkirk (01/31/2013) [-]
ummm k...google noped me
User avatar #81 to #80 - sixty (01/31/2013) [-]
It's a secret image that doubles itself, that can only be done by few users
#98 to #81 - deliciousdee ONLINE (01/31/2013) [-]
Is that why there is two identical threads here?
Is that why there is two identical threads here?
User avatar #85 to #81 - josephkirk (01/31/2013) [-]
mmhmmm i see...well good luck with that. i could ask how to do it but then i guess once you post how you do it. SPAM! spam everywhere
#65 - kuroda (01/31/2013) [-]
Dont forget about transparency.
#64 - volenti (01/31/2013) [-]
I'm glad we are finally talking about this.
 Friends (0)