| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Show:   Top Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
Show All Replies
#22 - Compootor (01/30/2013) [-]
We don't get less intelligent every generation. It irritates me to no end when people are so ignorant. Every single fucking generation has been looked on as retarded by the older one because they bring in new customs and trends that seem silly or stupid to the older generation, who remains obliviously unable to accept that they were just as retarded as the new generation, just in a different way and for different reasons. The world is getting smarter with every generation, and being stupid was never really fatal except back when we had natural enemies.
User avatar #143 to #22 - daentraya (01/30/2013) [-]
Also, the newer generation are just for some reason younger than the older generation, and young people tend to be less wise than older people
User avatar #83 to #22 - EvilWolf ONLINE (01/30/2013) [-]
i;m in the current generation and i still think its stupid
#28 to #22 - N. Korean citizen (01/30/2013) [-]
so true. Social Darwinism has been discredited and a science for years and as a matter of fact stupid people often procreate more making them a more successful "species" as opposed to the more educated.

If the world was getting stupider as time went on there would be no new technology, stop and think.
User avatar #21 - lilfunny (01/30/2013) [-]
This logic
#18 - rawrbowwow (01/30/2013) [-]
Way ahead of ya.
User avatar #37 to #18 - lordlolland (01/30/2013) [-]
Was just about to mention it.

DAMN YOU FOR MAKING AN OBSCURE POP CULTURE REFERENCE I WAS ABOUT TO MAKE!!!!!!!!!!11111oneoneone
User avatar #274 to #37 - rawrbowwow (01/30/2013) [-]
I was going to post a picture of Mike Judge, but I didn't think anyone would get that.
User avatar #19 to #18 - evilanakie ONLINE (01/30/2013) [-]
dat movie
User avatar #17 - paulxdragon (01/30/2013) [-]
Wrong. We're getting smarter with each generation, but more ignorant. Oh the irony.
#14 - agrajag (01/30/2013) [-]
1) That's not how the meme works
2) No. That's not true. We get smarter each generation, because fuckin science keeps discovering new things. It's great. Stupid people have always existed, there's no reason to think that people are getting worse.
#16 to #14 - moonmanp (01/30/2013) [-]
"We get smarter each generation, because fuckin science keeps discovering new things."

lol wut.
User avatar #15 to #14 - hammerfell (01/30/2013) [-]
But it is true that more stupid people live longer because of modern medicine, and thus many of the stupider ones get to surivive until breeding age.
#284 to #15 - agrajag (01/30/2013) [-]
Sure. BUT, thanks to modern medicine, smart people also get to live longer, and survive even longer than 15.
#29 to #15 - N. Korean citizen (01/30/2013) [-]
breeding age being 14. stupid people have always lived long enough to resupply the earth.

Who do you think is more numerous on earth? stupid people or smart people?

but you should know all about that, pleb
User avatar #12 - brettd (01/30/2013) [-]
I'm so tired of hearing about how my generation are all semi-retarded and that if my parents had just beaten me a little more, I wouldn't have turned out so bad. People have been bitching about the newest generation and claiming their own's superiority since the dawn of man. I bet people in the 1800s used to be all "back in my day, if we had to go somewhere, we walked! Now every kid you see has his own horse. What happened to the good old days?" There really isn't one generation that's better than all the others. My grandparents generation may have been more hard-working than ours, but they were also racist, sexist, and overall intolerant. Every generation has its setbacks. This one happens to be the unusually large supply of idiots.
#137 to #12 - N. Korean citizen (01/30/2013) [-]
What the fuck is wrong with racism, sexism and overall intolerance?
User avatar #119 to #12 - vigorion (01/30/2013) [-]
Well if it's just about intelligence, there is a well known effect called the Flynn effect. It describes that even though psychology defines IQ as a stable trait calculated from the average of the target population, it is still rising steadily with every generation.
User avatar #258 to #119 - simfar (01/30/2013) [-]
technically it cant, as the IQ rating scale is determined by the masses average. so if its higher then last year, they knock the scale down a few notches
User avatar #276 to #258 - vigorion (01/30/2013) [-]
That's the beauty of it. Every time they change the norm scale, they have seen a generall increase in IQ making the new norm (100) higher than last years. So, yes, technically 100 is always average, but there is still an inflation in intelligence required to reach 100.
#118 to #12 - saladtongsofdeath (01/30/2013) [-]
i really dont care about how superior my generation is to yours... hell, im rooting for you guys cuz your generation is inheriting the earth (in a sense). im just sick and fucking tired seeing how much of whinny little bitches you guys are... its like if my generation asked your generation to toss around a football, your generation would be like "ugh... ok, maybe after i fix my chipped nail and detangle my hair and update my twitter account... and then you take a picture holding the ball and posting it on instagram saying that your "hanging wit ma boyz playin tackle football"
User avatar #121 to #118 - giblets (01/30/2013) [-]
You're judging a whole generation on a minority.
#126 to #121 - saladtongsofdeath (01/30/2013) [-]
quite the contrary, its actually the minority that doesnt act that way... the rest of your generations cries and moans when they get the iphone 4s instead of the 5.... i didnt get an N64 till four years after it came out... and that was my first console ever, i had to trade almost all my pokemon cards and pogs for it
User avatar #130 to #126 - giblets (01/30/2013) [-]
Actually, the majority doesn't moan, so you don't hear about them. (By your generation what age are you talking about?)
#141 to #130 - saladtongsofdeath (01/30/2013) [-]
so you're saying that this picture was based off of only a few people?... no, a stereotype exist because of what the majority does, not what the minority does... perfect example: "black people like watermelon" of course not all black people like watermelon, but the majority of them does and by your generation im talking about 00's kids
#152 to #141 - Jameshaich (01/30/2013) [-]
That picture is based off a minority... They just standout and are hated by the internet community.
I could go into the local university/college and find maybe 3 people who fit the description to the left.
User avatar #271 to #152 - giblets (01/30/2013) [-]
Man, you've got me excited, today I bought an Enter Shikari ticket.
#176 to #152 - N. Korean citizen (01/30/2013) [-]
You clearly haven't been to my college. Sigh.
#154 to #152 - saladtongsofdeath (01/30/2013) [-]
sooo using your logic, you are telling me that only a minority of black people like watermelons?
#157 to #154 - Jameshaich (01/30/2013) [-]
Are you...
Is he...
Humans like watermelon regardless of race. it's just a sterotype...
I'm scottish, and I know 3 gingers, i know nobody who wears kilts unless a very special occasion.
Most people I know hate haggis...
Sterotypes aren't based on a majority...
#158 to #157 - Jameshaich (01/30/2013) [-]
Sorry, i mean Humans dislike or like watermelon regardless of race.
Not everyone likes watermelon.
User avatar #151 to #141 - giblets (01/30/2013) [-]
Okay so the majority of French people wear berets, striped shirts and have garlic around their necks?
And what age are you?
#46 to #12 - N. Korean citizen (01/30/2013) [-]
I agree to some degree, but you must admit that the current generation is much different than the past ones.
True respect is hard to find these days, especially among children.
Gradually more and more has become acceptable that were previously not deemed so. Girls can walk around wearing skirts the size of underwear and a small cloth covering perhaps only from her breasts to the top of her bellybutton. These things have become acceptable and are now considered fairly normal.
Certain moral values have greatly changed in a fairly short time period, and not for the better if you'd ask me.
User avatar #30 to #12 - turboderp (01/30/2013) [-]
That's what I've allways thought aswell. THe thing is, you mostly hear of the "smart" and "sucessfull" persons from past generations.. So when you see your own and the next generations, all you hear/see is what you look for; dumness and retardedness.

I'd say our generation is one of the smartest. The world recods for youngest people who does this and this is beaten all the time (for different thins, such as chess, mathemathics, physics, sports etc. etc.) If you single out the smartest/most sucessfull people of our generation and the next, then you'll see it's not that bad at all.
User avatar #11 - AccWasLost (01/30/2013) [-]
People are getting smarter, and people are getting dumber.
Anyone who says to kill all the idiots has to realize that without the idiots, there are no geniuses.
User avatar #10 - chituat (01/30/2013) [-]
exponential growth, followed by exponential decline.
User avatar #9 - hanabro (01/30/2013) [-]
But... we're getting more intelligent every generation. We just have way, WAY more advanced social media then we used to, so it seems like people do stupid stuff more often, when in reality, people have always done stupid stuff.

If you don't believe me, ask an elderly person for help with your math. They probably didn't even know that letters could be a part of math.
#20 to #9 - lemtyl (01/30/2013) [-]
At least from my experience rich people don't have many kids. And, rich people are usually smart. Whereas the poorer people I know have ~2-4 kids and aren't as intelligent.
As for asking an old person about algebra who would remember highschool math that you don't use daily after 50 years?
IMO: average IQ will drop gradually, but we will have a few geniuses still.
#8 - doggstar ONLINE (01/30/2013) [-]
well not so much stupidity but general weaknesses like lactose intolerance and allergies that would have been bred out because, well you know, the ones with them would have died before spreading their genes.. the stupidity comes from lack of education and discipline, children need to be put into line. i was punished corporally as a child if i didn't do my chores, acted out or if i didn't do my homework and i've turned out to be a decent hard working contributor of society, if anything it's the laws that we have now days banning parents from hitting their kids if they do something wrong that are the main problem with children being idiotic fools with their swag and yolo shit. if i were to have been like that i'd have had my head slapped and told to button down and do my school work by my step dad, my mother would have had me cleaning all the dishes in the cuboards and cleaning the house by scrubbing the floor, walls and roof or polishing all the shoes and then cutting the edge of the lawn with a pair of scissors or doing push ups, sit ups and running on the treadmill till i almost passed out before sitting me down and making me do my homework and then some.. she used to be a drill sergeant in the air force and knew how to get shit done, she even did room inspections and had us up at the crack of dawn to do what we were supposed to do.. and this was from the age of six
#13 to #8 - N. Korean citizen (01/30/2013) [-]
If anything our modern society is an even greater danger to people with serious allergies. As for lactose intolerance it's more of a mild inconvenience for most people and I highly doubt it would have been bred out as well. I agree with the rest of your comment. Raising the next generation is the responsibility of previous ones.
#7 - N. Korean citizen (01/30/2013) [-]
Odd how the average iq in the population is increasing then
#5 - N. Korean citizen (01/30/2013) [-]
Its called dysgenics if anyone's interested. Sadly it also applies to all physical flaws as well; poor eyesight, weak frame, asthma.
User avatar #3 - sidathon (01/29/2013) [-]
Essentially, we are fucking up natural selection.
#231 to #3 - N. Korean citizen (01/30/2013) [-]
We are a species intelligent enough to invent medicine, natural selection is our bitch.
User avatar #212 to #3 - dreamthrow (01/30/2013) [-]
One more reason why I don't agree with evolution
User avatar #213 to #212 - sidathon (01/30/2013) [-]
How does that relate to this? Besides it being thought up from the same guy.
#101 to #3 - rmoran (01/30/2013) [-]
No way, the second one is so much better.
#87 to #3 - majoen (01/30/2013) [-]
You know, there was a German with the same idea about 80 years ago
User avatar #140 to #87 - daentraya (01/30/2013) [-]
That's not 'natural' selection. It's human selection. We could in theory evolve humans like we did bananas and dogs. All the factors of natural selection have been overwritten by human selection which allows even handicapped people who'd never have survived some hundred years back. We evolve our technology instead, to do all the work for us
User avatar #6 to #3 - joekooldash (01/30/2013) [-]
nah, its just not working fast enough, maybe someone could help it along?
User avatar #2 - shitattack (01/29/2013) [-]
Having read some of those labels, I think it's a great thing that it's a special occurrence in the U. S. of fukken A.

In my country, those idiots don't get past early childhood. And this country is rich.
User avatar #4 to #2 - arziben ONLINE (01/30/2013) [-]
*koff* rednecks *koff*
#1 - N. Korean citizen (01/29/2013) [-]
Sounds a bit like the plot of "Idiocracy". A bit. Just the part about stupid people surviving to reproducing and blow the ratio of smart-to-stupid, not so much the WHY.
 Friends (0)