Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#227 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [+] (15 replies)
So you put the gun down and deal with it with that bedside lamp or a rolling pin.
"Holy **** , you mean you can resolve problems WITHOUT A GUN?"
User avatar #251 to #227 - tyuru (01/30/2013) [-]
God made man, Colt made them equal
#205 - afireinsidebrad (01/30/2013) [+] (6 replies)
At the risk of starting my own ********* of doom, am I the only one who is for the banning of high powered assault weapons but against semi-automatics being banned? Where the hell do you live where you need an AK-47 with a bayonet attachment and drum clip to defend your house? HIgh power, do ban, but semi-auto, dont

this has been my opinion, feel free to assault me

<-image not relevant
User avatar #83 - Snookbone (01/30/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Seeing as there's another ********* down there, I shall weigh in with my non-committal, balanced view.

Stricter gun laws will help to reduce the very number of domestic shootings (both deliberate and accidental) and murders by firearms.

Stricter gun laws will not stop insane people doing insane things.

Basically, it can be a good or a bad thing, so... yeah.
#46 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [+] (17 replies)
being somebody who owns no automatic or semi automatic weapons(colt army 1867 revolver and replica colt 1867 navy revolver and colt 1880 and a 1894 remmington double barrel I am in favor of the assault weapon ban, I personally see no need to own guns that can go semi auto or full auto, logical rational responses only please
User avatar #67 to #61 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (01/30/2013) [-]
That's the most stupid and idiotic comparison you can make.

A car is used to get from Point A to Point B. A gun is used to kill stuff.
A car becomes a threat only and ONLY when misused (stupid driving, loss of control, etc). How the **** do you misuse a gun (inb4 "you can point it at yourself by mistake", that's not a misuse, that's a contribution to society)?!?

HOW THE **** do you compare them?!?
#259 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [+] (6 replies)
The real question is if America will ever become a truly civilised country inb4 red thumbs
User avatar #263 to #259 - paintbucket (01/30/2013) [-]
because we have all of these violent riots going on.

oh wait no, that's in europe.
#176 - jonnyourmaster (01/30/2013) [+] (2 replies)
just for reference, the day they make my semi-auto guns illegal there will b nothing stopping me from making them all full-auto.
#126 - jdonaldson has deleted their comment [+] (13 replies)
#130 to #126 - gergen (01/30/2013) [-]
Bitch please. Do you even Deadite?
User avatar #82 - Marker (01/30/2013) [+] (14 replies)
People are so obsessed with the second amendment talking about guns. "Arms" doesn't necessarily mean firearms. If you can't own a gun, get a pair of katanas.
User avatar #89 to #82 - thatguywhohasbacon ONLINE (01/30/2013) [-]
Arms within the second amendment refers to the weapons that the government uses for it's military so if the government manages to turn it's military on it's people then the people have a chance to fight back.
User avatar #181 - sirham (01/30/2013) [+] (11 replies)
Even though I'm against guns, they shouldn't ban them. There are so many guns already, that if they banned them, murderers would still be able to get them easily. It would just be a waste of money and police. In Denmark, weed is illegal. But it's easy as hell to get.
User avatar #234 to #197 - paintbucket (01/30/2013) [-]
a murderer isn't a murderer until he murders
felons don't have a right to a gun.
User avatar #113 - responsibletim (01/30/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Can't own a gun? Get a crossbow.
User avatar #5 - ttritt (01/30/2013) [-]
meanwhile, in New York.
#298 - bitchplzzz (01/30/2013) [-]
#294 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [+] (27 replies)
It's funny how retards will never understand that CONTROL doesn't mean BAN.
#289 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [+] (1 reply)
American logic:
One kid chokes on a Kinder egg: We have to ban all Kinder eggs!!
One guy shoots 24 kids with a gun: We need even more guns!!
#196 - cuberkid (01/30/2013) [+] (2 replies)
i like the fact the ban is the "assault rifle ban" you cant get an assault rifle( to the most of my knowledge) in the states BECAUSE the definition of "assault rifle" is one that has full automatic capabilities and just because a semi auto rifle looks like a full auto M4 when in fact its a semi auto AR15 doesn't make the semi auto rifle an "assault rifle" per say, it is just "a rifle"
#125 - jdonaldson has deleted their comment [-]
#107 - tiddycats has deleted their comment [+] (2 replies)
#118 to #107 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [-]
The liberals are seizing our liberty. The liberty our forefathers has fought will be gone.

If we banned guns, bad people still can manage to get it from black market. We, a good people, left nothing but melee weapon against the explosive one. Our life is threatened.
(Source : theweek. com/article/index/237900/what-gun-control-can-and-cant-do/ )

Sandy hook tragedy also a hoax. It is not caused by a mentally ill person, but rather a trained, probably soldier. It is said that Israel was responsible to this tragedy to teach american a lesson regarding the Middle East issue in United Nations assembly.
(Source : presstv. ir/detail/2012/12/18/278706/israeli-squads-tied-to-newtown-carnage/ )

I have put the source to support my arguments. So your move liberals!
#70 - anonymous (01/30/2013) [+] (14 replies)
Gun control =/= Banning guns.

Gun bans? Retarded.
Doing nothing? Retarded.
Soley blaming mental health (which IS an issue, but not the only one)? Retarded.
Soley blaming lax laws? Also retarded.

It'ss a combination of these things that need to be considered when coming up with a 'solution'. And I think too many people are picking 'sides' instead of trying to make anything better.
#1 - anonymous (01/29/2013) [-]
That's when you pistol-whip the ****** .
#252 - willindor has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)