Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
+4
#292 - awalkingdisaster **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#270 - dishie (01/30/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Guns are the final solution to every problem.
#288 to #270 - renzard (01/30/2013) [-]
And what do you know of final solutions?
#227 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/30/2013) [+] (15 replies)
So you put the gun down and deal with it with that bedside lamp or a rolling pin.
"Holy **** , you mean you can resolve problems WITHOUT A GUN?"
#149 - dickticklerluv (01/30/2013) [+] (8 replies)
However, you can legally shoot someone if they trespass on your property.
However, you can legally shoot someone if they trespass on your property.
#95 - merrymarvelite (01/30/2013) [+] (9 replies)
Is anybody really trying to take away handguns from people who own them legally, though?

I thought it was larger assault rifles your government was going after. You know, the ones that nobody has any real reason to own unless you're in an actual war zone.
#205 - afireinsidebrad ONLINE (01/30/2013) [+] (6 replies)
At the risk of starting my own ********* of doom, am I the only one who is for the banning of high powered assault weapons but against semi-automatics being banned? Where the hell do you live where you need an AK-47 with a bayonet attachment and drum clip to defend your house? HIgh power, do ban, but semi-auto, dont

this has been my opinion, feel free to assault me

<-image not relevant
-3
#107 - tiddycats has deleted their comment [+] (2 replies)
#122 to #118 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/30/2013) [-]
Those who wrote the sources you're so proud to present are as stupid as you.
User avatar #83 - Snookbone (01/30/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Seeing as there's another ********* down there, I shall weigh in with my non-committal, balanced view.

Stricter gun laws will help to reduce the very number of domestic shootings (both deliberate and accidental) and murders by firearms.

Stricter gun laws will not stop insane people doing insane things.

Basically, it can be a good or a bad thing, so... yeah.
#294 - blobbo (01/30/2013) [+] (27 replies)
It's funny how retards will never understand that CONTROL doesn't mean BAN.
#313 to #310 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/30/2013) [-]
A violent situation, like those mass shootings that happen every other month or a break in.
And what happens if you can't run away? Crawl in the corner and beg for your life or just let people die, real nice.
And again, in a high intensity situation like a break in you're not gonna be shooting dead on, and even if you do hit him it doesn't guarantee he just stops.
And you've obviously never hunted boar, where packs of 7+ can charge at you on a dime.
#289 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/30/2013) [+] (1 reply)
American logic:
One kid chokes on a Kinder egg: We have to ban all Kinder eggs!!
One guy shoots 24 kids with a gun: We need even more guns!!
#259 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/30/2013) [+] (6 replies)
The real question is if America will ever become a truly civilised country inb4 red thumbs
User avatar #263 to #259 - paintbucket (01/30/2013) [-]
because we have all of these violent riots going on.

oh wait no, that's in europe.
#176 - jonnyourmaster ONLINE (01/30/2013) [+] (2 replies)
just for reference, the day they make my semi-auto guns illegal there will b nothing stopping me from making them all full-auto.
User avatar #82 - Marker (01/30/2013) [+] (14 replies)
People are so obsessed with the second amendment talking about guns. "Arms" doesn't necessarily mean firearms. If you can't own a gun, get a pair of katanas.
User avatar #89 to #82 - thatguywhohasbacon (01/30/2013) [-]
Arms within the second amendment refers to the weapons that the government uses for it's military so if the government manages to turn it's military on it's people then the people have a chance to fight back.
User avatar #181 - sirham (01/30/2013) [+] (11 replies)
Even though I'm against guns, they shouldn't ban them. There are so many guns already, that if they banned them, murderers would still be able to get them easily. It would just be a waste of money and police. In Denmark, weed is illegal. But it's easy as hell to get.
User avatar #234 to #197 - paintbucket (01/30/2013) [-]
a murderer isn't a murderer until he murders
felons don't have a right to a gun.
User avatar #113 - responsibletim (01/30/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Can't own a gun? Get a crossbow.
User avatar #5 - ttritt (01/30/2013) [-]
meanwhile, in New York.
#298 - bitchplzzz (01/30/2013) [-]
hahaaa...
#196 - cuberkid (01/30/2013) [+] (2 replies)
i like the fact the ban is the "assault rifle ban" you cant get an assault rifle( to the most of my knowledge) in the states BECAUSE the definition of "assault rifle" is one that has full automatic capabilities and just because a semi auto rifle looks like a full auto M4 when in fact its a semi auto AR15 doesn't make the semi auto rifle an "assault rifle" per say, it is just "a rifle"
0
#125 - jdonaldson has deleted their comment [-]
-1
#252 - willindor has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)