Upload
Login or register
Back to the content 'guns' Leave a comment Refresh Comments (318)
[ 318 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #315 - bcsaint [OP]
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
top 15 XD
#298 - bitchplzzz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
hahaaa...
#294 - blobbo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
It's funny how retards will never understand that CONTROL doesn't mean BAN.
#297 to #294 - anon id: 2cbfdda7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Assault weapons BAN.
#299 to #297 - blobbo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Damn, I tought that in the one in the image was a gun, i must be blind...
#300 to #299 - anon id: 2cbfdda7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
And if it has more than 7 rounds it would be banned.
#302 to #300 - blobbo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
That's horrible!! I won't be able to kill more than 7 people at a time, then I'll have to reload to kill again...
#303 to #302 - anon id: 2cbfdda7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Implying 1 round equals one kill.
Implying people solely use guns for killing people.
Implying you'd be able to reload quickly under a high stress situation.
#306 to #303 - blobbo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Oh, and I never implied none of the 3 thing that you said...
#308 to #306 - anon id: 2cbfdda7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
That's horrible!! I won't be able to kill more than 7 people at a time.-Implication 1.
then I'll have to reload to kill again.- Implication 2 and 3.
#312 to #308 - blobbo
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
1. I said you can't kill more that 7 people with 7 bullets, not that you'll surely do it.
2. Already answered that below (only hunting is a socially useful activity for guns, and you don't need more that 7 bullets at a time).
3. Already answered that below (a person who is not sufficently trained should not be able to buy a gun).
#314 to #312 - anon id: 2cbfdda7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
It's like you didn't even read it.
1 shot doesn't mean they stop or go down.
Replied to that below.
Depends on what you mean by trained.
#305 to #303 - blobbo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Implying that you absolutely want to kill, to scare is not enough.
Implying that guns can do something ELSE than kill (yeah, i know, hunting and sport... something actually useful and that isn't done only by hunters?).
Implying that: 1) you can't buy more than one gun to have more bullets.
2) a person who can't reload (who is not sufficently trained) should be able to buy a gun.
#307 to #305 - anon id: 2cbfdda7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Implying you MIGHT scare the assailant off.
Implying you'd be able to switch between guns quickly enough.
1.And I'm talking about reloading quickly during some violent incident, which even law enforcement officers have trouble with.
2.Hunting is extremely useful, no reason to omit that for some arbitrary reason
#310 to #307 - blobbo
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
I'm sure the average person will not ever be involved in a Rambo like situation, tell me what you imagine when you say "some violent incident". If you are not a police officer the best thing to do is run away from who shots, so there's no need to stop and pretend you're in the Far West.
If some burglar breaks into your house i'm sure that you won't need more than 7 shots to scare, hurt or kill them, it's not like they come in groups of hundreds, you're not a movie hero...
I never said that hunting isn't useful, but i'm quite sure they don't need more than 7 bullets in a round to hunt ===> No problem
#313 to #310 - anon id: 2cbfdda7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
A violent situation, like those mass shootings that happen every other month or a break in.
And what happens if you can't run away? Crawl in the corner and beg for your life or just let people die, real nice.
And again, in a high intensity situation like a break in you're not gonna be shooting dead on, and even if you do hit him it doesn't guarantee he just stops.
And you've obviously never hunted boar, where packs of 7+ can charge at you on a dime.
#317 to #313 - blobbo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Wow, great arguments! So in all those mass shootings the problem was not that the mad person could fire how much he wanted WITHOUT having to reload, the issue here is be that in the remote case that you had a gun and couldn't run away you would have ONLY 7 bullets to take him down... That's truly twisted :|
I never said that you should crawl in the corner and beg because funcking CONTROL doesn't mean ******* BAN!!! So you can still have your gun for protection.
Do you think that a burglar would risk his life or that he would run away if you started shooting at him? He is a burglar, not a top elite russian assassin engaged to kill you.
I didn't knew you were a hunter!! And what do boars do when you shoot at them 7 times? Please send a pic of your preys!!
#318 to #317 - anon id: 2cbfdda7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Columbine happened during the last assault weapons ban, guess what? He just brought a ******** of 10 round magazines.
People have shrugged of shotgun slugs before, people aren't just going to stop because you shoot them.
Again the assault weapons BAN, I should be able to choose what firearm I think is best to defend myself and others, not choose from some arbitrary list people in gated communities gave me.
He's not going to just turn his back while you fire at him, he's going to fight back.
And SEVEN OR MORE boars, it takes more than 1 shot to down one of their younglings. Their instincts are to charge when threatened, not to run away.
#320 to #318 - blobbo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
That's instructing!! But think about it: in the few last mass shootings there was no one who standed there trying to kill the madman even if there was no restriction on the number of bullets one could fire in a round from his self-defense fireweapon, so your reasoning doesn't really work...
I want to buy a bunch of granades and a bazooka for my self defence, but my government won't let me buy them... They're so evil!!!
If he CAN run away he'll surely do it, he's not going to think "considering i'm in a field thant my enemy knows very well, i still have some possibility to kill him before he kills me so i'll try to do it!"
So hunters what usually use? shotguns or AK-47?? Damn...
#322 to #320 - anon id: 2cbfdda7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
And these mass shooting were where? Gun free zones, laws don't matter to criminals.
#321 to #320 - anon id: 2cbfdda7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
1. The mall shooter only killed himself after a citizen with a firearm took aim at him.
2. Not talking about any of those things, merely rifles and that are no different than hunting rifles being banned purely based on ergonomics and standard capacity handguns.
3. The criminal will probably be high off his **** as is the case in nearly 75% of home invasions, meaning he's not thinking straight.
4. The AR-15 is the third most popular hunting platform.
#324 to #321 - blobbo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
1. You can take aim at him even if you "only" have 7 bullets.
2. Your words are "I should be able to choose what firearm I think is best to defend myself and others", so if I think that a granade launcher is the best choise i should be able to own it!
3. If he's high then very probably he'll be the one to be killed (imagine his aim and speed, they will be terrible...), having 7 or more bullets per round won't change very much.
4. I'm sure all hunters can survive using "only" a shotgun or a hunting rifle.
#325 to #324 - anon id: 2cbfdda7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
1. He won't just give up in every situation.
2. A FIREARM, is a pistol, rifle, or portable gun.
3. While his aim will be off his pain threshold will be much higher, and he's damn sure not going to have just 7 rounds, so why should I?
4. Tell me that after you have a pack of boar rush you.
All in all you've demonstrated you have no idea what you're talking about in relation to firearms, you should probably stop talking about things you have no idea about.
#327 to #325 - blobbo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
1. I know, but it will be easier to take him down while he's reloading, don't you think so?
2. Oh, sorry, you're right... But who are you to decide that i can't have any weapon of my choise for my self deense? Are you the only one who can put limits??
3. If you can't live without more than 7 bullets at a time you can fill your house with guns and just change them while shooting, maybe shooting two guns at a time!! So you'll look exactly like your favourite movie hero.
4. Again, have you ever had "a pack of boar rush you"? I'm sure that hunters do not lay their lives on the number of bullets they have and that they always have a plan B (or at least they should)...
All in all you've demonstrated that you only want to keep your "right" to own an assault rifle (a gun for protection is far than enough) and to have more than 7 bullets in your weapon so that you'll look like a Rambo cowboy.
#328 to #327 - anon id: 2cbfdda7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
1.HES A CRIMINAL HE'S NOT GOING TO FOLLOW THE LAWS.
2. Sensible limits.
3. You run the risk of the intruder getting hold of one, and you might not have the time to switch.
4. Yes, me and my uncle both have, and why have a plan B when you can have a plan A that covers both?
A assault rifle is select fire, haven't even mentioned those, again showing your ignorance. And again you can say that having more than 7 shots is being rambo from your suburb, but don't blame gun owners next time a criminal shoots up a gun free zone.
#329 to #328 - blobbo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
1. He's a criminal psyco with many problems, he's not an ordinary thug, he probably won't have any friends and live alone... I don't think that he'll be able to find his local black market under his block.
2. YOUR sensible limits.
3. The intruder shoul know were you hide them while you don't have time to switch?!?
4. What if you don't have a great aim that day and can't hit the boars at all? I hope you have a plan B, but there's a lot of people that dies for stupid reasons so why not...
Your second comment is "Assault weapons BAN." so yes, you have mentioned those. Instead i never talked about gun free zones. If i lived in a so dangerous zone i would probably buy a gun too, but i would'n rage cause they don't let me keep my gun exactly as i want. Hey, i live in Italy were there's no any organized crime at all so what do i know...
#334 to #329 - anon id: 2cbfdda7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
The population of italy is equal to the amount of people who legally own guns, comparing the two countries is quite simply retarded.
I'm not going around dictating what people can and can't own.
Carrying 2 or 3 guns in your pajamas would be damn near impossible.
No, it allows for quick follow up shots in case you miss the vitals in the heat of the moment.
This isn't really going anywhere so i'm going to leave it at this, maybe these guns are unnecessary, but i won't be told what I can use to protect myself by people who have 24/7 armed guards and security, who live behind gated communities, who have never seen a firearm in their life.
#339 to #334 - blobbo
0 123456789123345869
(01/31/2013) [-]
Hahahaha yeah, italy is a gated community, no immigration at all if you DON'T CONSIDER north africa, east europe, china and india.
I know Italys population is about 60000000, you should look at the fireweapon crimes RATE.
I don't think that the 7 bullets law to be a solution, but surely is not the problem too. Also it's not me that decided it but your government, so quit complaining about such a stupid thing and start looking at the real problems.
#330 to #329 - anon id: 2cbfdda7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
1.It's not difficult at all to get a 30-50 round magazine on the street.
2. Pertaining to firearms, not bazookas and grenades.
3. The RISK of him finding one that isn't in a gun safe meaning if you weren't home, I actually care about where my guns go much to the surprise of anti gunners.
4. Hence a semi automatic rifle such as a AR-15 with a large magazine.
I said the assault weapons ban which refers incorrectly to semi automatics as assault weapons, never actually referred to true assault weapons. I'm talking about America, we have a border with a criminal infested ******** and gangs literally everywhere.
#333 to #330 - blobbo
0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
1. I personaly don't know where i could find any, and i don't have social problems.
2. Why? It's YOUR point of view, mine could be different, you don't live alone. So if you want more than 7 bullets i can pretend a bazooka.
3. You could keep all your guns near your bed, so you can take them as soon as the burglar wakes you up.
4. Let's shot everything and everywhere, is that a hunters solution?
I live in Italy with one of the strongest organized crimes in the world, still we don't have those problems... Why? Cause here if you wear a gun in public it means you're a cop and if you are not then you can go to jail...
#292 - awalkingdisaster **User deleted account**
+4 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#289 - anon id: 69ad6a9a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
American logic:
One kid chokes on a Kinder egg: We have to ban all Kinder eggs!!
One guy shoots 24 kids with a gun: We need even more guns!!
User avatar #295 to #289 - allanenraged
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
not the same. he didn't choke
#286 - josieabby
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
#270 - dishie
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Guns are the final solution to every problem.
#288 to #270 - renzard
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
And what do you know of final solutions?
#265 - churrundo
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Oh boy here we go
User avatar #267 to #265 - paintbucket
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Submitted: 23 hours ago

bit late to be saying that.
User avatar #287 to #267 - theshadowed
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Oh boy here we've gone?
#273 to #267 - churrundo
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
i don't even care
i don't even care
User avatar #275 to #273 - paintbucket
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
ok.
#259 - anon id: b1d7aae9
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
The real question is if America will ever become a truly civilised country inb4 red thumbs
User avatar #263 to #259 - paintbucket
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
because we have all of these violent riots going on.

oh wait no, that's in europe.
#264 to #263 - threenippledcousin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Anon may be wrong, but how do you his from Europe ?
User avatar #266 to #264 - paintbucket
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
i
what?
#269 to #266 - threenippledcousin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
You attacked Europe, under the belief anon was European i'm guessing
#316 to #269 - anon id: 02236356
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
I'm not the same anon, but most people who claim that the U.S. is uncivilized just because of gun ownership are snooty Europeans.

Canadians are usually too polite, Africa and Latin America are less industrialized, eastern Asia has political censorship or sexual fetishes that people could argue are uncivilized, and Australia and the Middle East respect gun owners. That leaves Europe and India, and I've never heard of Indians caring about U.S. gun laws.
User avatar #271 to #269 - paintbucket
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
well yeah
i'm talking about the riots in greece, france and spain.
#252 - willindor
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#250 - shazmothree
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Guns don't kill people. Dolphins kill people... with guns
#256 to #250 - dachief
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
....and rape.
#278 to #256 - piobaireachd
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
is that Putin??
#276 to #256 - doyouevenupload
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#227 - anon id: 1a15dc15
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
So you put the gun down and deal with it with that bedside lamp or a rolling pin.
"Holy ****, you mean you can resolve problems WITHOUT A GUN?"
#257 to #227 - bothemastaofall
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
User avatar #251 to #227 - tyuru
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
God made man, Colt made them equal
#311 to #251 - chevycowboy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
who or what is that from I like it
#281 to #251 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
This image has expired
I like that
User avatar #239 to #227 - paintbucket
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
or you could resolve it faster and safer (for you) with a gun.
most criminals will run when confronted with a firearm anyway.

bedside lamp? lol no, let me just beat you with my steel crowbar.
#244 to #239 - anon id: 1a15dc15
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
They'll also probably run if you confront them with a steel crowbar since most burglaries are disorganised crime.
User avatar #245 to #244 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
And if they aren't?
Oh right your ******
User avatar #246 to #245 - paintbucket
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
better safe with a 12ga than dead
User avatar #282 to #246 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
As I tell liberals,
I can live under my ideology. If mine is wrong I'm still alive.
If theirs is wrong they are dead
User avatar #229 to #227 - undeadwill
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Good luck with an old man fighting with a young strong bugler hand to hand.
#235 to #229 - anon id: 1a15dc15
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
"Guns are the only thing that can save the old people!!"
User avatar #241 to #235 - undeadwill
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
And equalize the fight
#232 to #229 - anon id: 69ad6a9a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
The guy in that cartoon doesn't look that old...
User avatar #236 to #232 - undeadwill
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Like she said. He's ****** if he's going hand to hand.
User avatar #233 to #232 - Zarke
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Slouching posture, no teeth, wrinkled outline... He looks old. Also, his wife looks old.
#223 - TheRedDragon **User deleted account**
+13 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#290 to #223 - jinkazama
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Look at it like this.

A psycho goes on a rampage. He can do much more damage if he can easily get a gun. Not 100% the guns fault, but without a gun lives would be saved
User avatar #258 to #223 - HarvietheDinkle
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Nice job taking the middle ground but not saying anything.

Do you have a solution?
#304 to #258 - TheRedDragon **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #268 to #258 - voltkills
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
well i do, dont give guns to mentally ill people....
User avatar #274 to #268 - HarvietheDinkle
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
well, yeah.

I, personally, advocate for the increased purchasing of non-lethal forms of protection (tasers, etc.)
User avatar #210 - thewalruss
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
OMG how many burglars are there in the US??? Why are you always expecting a robber in your houses?
#255 to #210 - anon id: 69956711
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
it only takes once man
User avatar #225 to #210 - paintbucket
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
live in detroit for a few years.
#214 to #210 - anon id: 5881f6f7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
there's has been 3 break ins in my apartment complex sense last august i would rather have my gun just in case. i don't live in that bad of an area either this **** just happens
User avatar #216 to #214 - thewalruss
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
OMG That's terrible... and look at me, I'm mexican. Well... we could have the narcos, but no one breaks into our houses :| I've never seen a gun in my life, just in the movies and in the games.
#219 to #216 - anon id: 5881f6f7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
i don't have a gun gun to shoot some one and i hope i don't have to but with the other breaks ins i worry
#205 - afireinsidebrad
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
At the risk of starting my own ********* of doom, am I the only one who is for the banning of high powered assault weapons but against semi-automatics being banned? Where the hell do you live where you need an AK-47 with a bayonet attachment and drum clip to defend your house? HIgh power, do ban, but semi-auto, dont

this has been my opinion, feel free to assault me

<-image not relevant
#326 to #205 - afireinsidebrad
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
im kinda enjoying the fact that im getting bitched at, and i do apologize for using improper terminology, but my thumbs are green, brain is full of **** right now
User avatar #262 to #205 - Crusader
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Because assault weapons account for less than 1% of all gun crime.
User avatar #249 to #205 - ilikepieelman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
You gon' get learned today.

1. Assault rifles have been banned in the US since the 80s, hence why they're so expensive
2. You're uneducated. There's no such thing as an assault weapon.
assaultweapon.info
3. Magazine, not clip
4. 7.62x39 or .223 are not high-powered. .308 and .300 Winchester Magnum are high-powered.
User avatar #247 to #205 - gmarrox
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
AK-47's aren't as high powered as people seem to make them out to be. They're used in war because they're versatile and durable. One could easily buy a hunting rifle with more power and a larger round size than an AK-46, AR 15, etc.
User avatar #238 to #205 - Zarke
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
What the hell do people mean when they say "high-powered"? These "assault weapons" fire comparatively low-powered cartridges compared to your grandpa's hunting rifle.
#221 to #205 - paintbucket
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
i do have have an AK-47 with a drum.   
considering how little &quot;assault weapons&quot; are used in crime   
there's no point infringing my rights.   
   
if some **** seriously hits the fan, i want it, and i have it.   
other than that, you have no idea how much fun it is.
i do have have an AK-47 with a drum.
considering how little "assault weapons" are used in crime
there's no point infringing my rights.

if some **** seriously hits the fan, i want it, and i have it.
other than that, you have no idea how much fun it is.
User avatar #201 - itrooztrooperdown
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Americans and their gun-mania, that's always fun.
#196 - cuberkid
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
i like the fact the ban is the "assault rifle ban" you cant get an assault rifle( to the most of my knowledge) in the states BECAUSE the definition of "assault rifle" is one that has full automatic capabilities and just because a semi auto rifle looks like a full auto M4 when in fact its a semi auto AR15 doesn't make the semi auto rifle an "assault rifle" per say, it is just "a rifle"
User avatar #198 to #196 - bcsaint [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
not true by any means, fully auto guns already are ban, they define it as anything that can hold more than 7 rounds
#206 to #198 - cuberkid
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
replying, thats what im saying, but they are tagging the semi auto AR15's as "assault rifles" which they are not because they are semi auto only and do not have full auto capabilities, they are mistaken though because they look like full auto versions of it
User avatar #181 - sirham
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Even though I'm against guns, they shouldn't ban them. There are so many guns already, that if they banned them, murderers would still be able to get them easily. It would just be a waste of money and police. In Denmark, weed is illegal. But it's easy as hell to get.
User avatar #197 to #181 - beatmasterz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Murderers aren't cold blooded criminals who kill people for a living. A murderer has a right to a gun as much as a normal citizen.
User avatar #234 to #197 - paintbucket
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
a murderer isn't a murderer until he murders
felons don't have a right to a gun.
User avatar #243 to #234 - beatmasterz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Welcome back paintbucket, I see you're wasting no time sharing your opinions.
User avatar #248 to #243 - paintbucket
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
i stated a fact.
now instead of whining like a bitch, maybe you could form a proper argument.
User avatar #301 to #248 - beatmasterz
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Getting a little defensive are we? I'd be happy to talk about it, message me if you want to.
User avatar #200 to #197 - sirham
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
I know. But a lot of school shootings, are carried out by students, using their parents guns. But if the student was really pissed, he would be able to get a gun easily.
User avatar #202 to #200 - beatmasterz
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
That stuff is usually done on impulse. Opportunity makes every man a criminal. If he had to go to the black market and haggle for a gun I doubt he would still go through all the effort.
User avatar #207 to #202 - sirham
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
You're right. But I'm guessing that most shootings are related to gang culture, and gangs wouldn't be affected that much, if guns were made illegal.
User avatar #208 to #207 - beatmasterz
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
I don't know, weren't it mostly autistic bullied loser kids who shoot up their school?
User avatar #211 to #208 - sirham
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Yeah, they are. But I was just talking generally about shootings.
User avatar #213 to #211 - beatmasterz
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
oh. Yeah probably.
#176 - jonnyourmaster
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
just for reference, the day they make my semi-auto guns illegal there will b nothing stopping me from making them all full-auto.
User avatar #260 to #176 - Crusader
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
They aren't making all semi-auto guns illegal, they are making certain semi-auto guns illegal.
Also, you need special permits to have full-auto weapons, so therefore they will most likely have laws in place to stop people from trying to rush and get those guns.
User avatar #309 to #260 - jonnyourmaster
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
all the semi auto guns i have will be illegal and its not hard to hake a full auto conversion. also the penalty for having either will be the same so there is no point to keeping them semi.
User avatar #159 - skumbaner
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
People with guns don't kill people.
It is actually the hand which commit the act, so therefore USA should ban hands. Because hands kill people.
#285 to #159 - bacabac
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Thing objects!
User avatar #162 to #159 - LocoJoe
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/30/2013) [-]
Why don't we just make murder illegal!