Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#246 - obliviousman ONLINE
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
hypocrites. hypocrites everywhere.
#233 - gedmpbass
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
I desperately want to kick this bitch in the throat. Nothing to do with politics, I just never liked the smug ******* look on her face.
#251 to #233 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Well she looks like Daniel Radcliffe, so **** her she looks like a dude... unless she is Daniel Radcliffe...
#199 - weenieandthebutt
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
In terms of my political views, I'm more in favour towards the left but all those god damn 'liberal' activists really ******* piss me. I can sometimes agree on their ideologies of a less restrictive government but a lot of them are pretentious douchebags who get easily get offended at harmless jokes.
#259 to #199 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
...less restrictive government? Are we talking about the same liberals?
#195 - MistaJesus
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Liberal ≠ Ban soda
#178 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Shes so beautiful ,Her ideas are gems, Her twisted hair style is fantastic. I love her from the bottom of my heart.
#182 to #178 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
She looks like Drag Queen Hairy Potter from Jamaica you *******
#223 to #178 - UnoSkullmanx
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
That's a dude.
#117 - metallicaone
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#114 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
The stupidity in this thread, it burns
#112 - themarineelite
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#110 - supernovacesta **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#90 - nicolajibsen
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
GARD I ******* HATE HER!"!
GARD I ******* HATE HER!"!
#76 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
I know someone like this.. The bitch wants to ban GMO foods though.. If she wants to eat like a picky organic only eating rabbit then she can but she doesn't have to destroy my food source.. She doesn't even eat meat.. Why she pissing all over the GMO salmon..?
#79 to #76 - tyraxio
Reply -5
(01/27/2013) [-]
I don't think you get it. GMO foods shouldn't be banned because they're bad for you, they should be banned because they're bad for the Earth, you know, other people than yourself. It's a bit like smoking in public.
#73 - timerce
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#62 - lolollo
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Literally never heard a liberal say either of those things.
#49 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Sugary drinks such as soda greatly contribute to the obesity epidemic in this country, the absolute ignorance as to what most consumers willingly put into their body is shocking. The fatter the population you have = more people with healthcare problems = a higher rate that people pay on their health insurance premiums, even those who are responsible and demonstrate a healthy lifestyle. You can argue against the effectiveness of the law, but its core objective does have some merit.

bring the red bitches
#61 to #49 - frink
Reply -1
(01/27/2013) [-]
By that logic then we should have forced abortions to control the population. Less people means less money having to be spent.
#56 to #49 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
The obesity epidemic is really US-specific and specific to the past 20 years (at the most).
There's no obesity epidemic in Europe nor in any other well-fed part of the world and there's no ban of sodas there.
Also, there was no ban of sodas nor was there a famine in the US prior to the US obesity epidemic.

Bring the Liberal pseudo-intellectuals.
#78 to #56 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
#63 to #56 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
I am utterly stumped by what point you are trying to communicate. Please refine and further polish what your trying to say if you have something intelligent to add. Americans DO have an abnormally high consumption of soft drinks, especially compared to that of Europe, even a quick google search verifies that. (www You need to login to view this link We consume near double the amount of the runner-up, Canada. Your out of your ******* mind if you think that is not indicative of a problem. And your right, there is not a large obesity epidemic in Europe. That's due to a myriad of different factors, one of them certainly being less soda consumption, as evident by the graph.

Americans have developed some of worst eating habits in the world thanks to the new era of high-calorie/low-nutrient foods. Your a moron if you cant see why there needs to be some restraint, because at this present time most Americans do not possess any.
#44 - wudup
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
I'm liberal, and I'm not like this. This image is of the irritating "extremist" mentality that both sides suffer from plenty.
#38 - Onemanretardpack ONLINE
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
I know it's not always black and white like this, but I love how this place is like the only place who isn't sucking democrat/liberal dick right now. We just **** with everyone
#36 - Crusader
Reply -4
(01/27/2013) [-]
But it doesn't work like that.
Yes, there are SOME that think like that, like there are conservatives that think like that.
But there a lot of Liberals that think there should simply be restrictions.
Like the 42 ounce drinks out there, those are just unhealthy, there is no upside to a 42 ounce coke.
They don't want to ban all of them, they want people to know that there is enough sugar to bake a cake in those drinks.
#42 to #36 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
why do you care what how much sugar i drink. I don't care who you marry or what job you work or what you smoke so what gives you the right to restrict what i drink.
#133 to #42 - Crusader
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
DOn't get all bitchy at me, I'm just the messenger
#34 - popkornking
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
*sigh* why do people always boil **** like this down to "this is what all liberals think" or "this is what all conservatives think" it's not that ******* black and white
#20 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
God Dammit HARRY! Get that ******* wig off, you cross dressing bastard
#30 to #20 - taintedangel
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
You see harry potter?

I always saw Frodo. :/
#2 - thekingofop **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#3 to #2 - davidavidson [OP]
Reply -1
(01/26/2013) [-]
You said it mr