Upload
Login or register
Back to the content 'Ice and Fire' Leave a comment Refresh Comments (119)
[ 119 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
#130 - bonboy
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
Wouldn't it just evaporate?
#128 - robotzombie
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Sometimes when I read content like this, its not funny because I already know whats going to happen



also never let your dad buy ancient grain crackers. they taste like cardboard and sand. even if he says theyre cheap and healthy for you hes wrong because sand can coat the insides of your intestines and cardboard if ingested can make you bland and boring like ancient grain crackers
#123 - datgermanguy
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Link you moron...
Link you moron...
#121 - weirddark
Reply +2
(01/27/2013) [-]
#116 - beerterror
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
how could this happen
#109 - killerblue
Reply +2
(01/27/2013) [-]
MFW
#105 - sinisterainbow
Reply +9
(01/27/2013) [-]
#99 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
im not claiming to be an expert on physics or anything. but im pretty sure that they will cancel each other out. not create a nuclear explosion.
#117 to #99 - arstya
Reply +3
(01/27/2013) [-]
It's magic, bitch. **** your science.
#103 to #99 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
And I'm pretty sure you didn't get the joke.
#106 to #103 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
no i did, but the joke dosent make sense.
#97 - harbingerwolf
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Someone needs to write a song about this ****.
#94 - lostwoodskid
Reply +6
(01/27/2013) [-]
"He is the prince that was promised, and his is the song of ice and fire."
#101 to #94 - shannonrw
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
You think R + L = J? I think so, it makes so much sense.
#112 to #101 - lostwoodskid
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
It really does, but there is so much more that could happen it's pretty hard to tell.
#124 to #112 - shannonrw
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Honestly, I don't think anyone can really say what GRRM is gonna do, he throws a lot of twists in. Who knows what'll happen? I hope that that's actually what happens, though.
#125 to #124 - lostwoodskid
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Plot twist: Jon Snow is actually Rhaegar.
#92 - ninjabaconone
Reply +8
(01/27/2013) [-]
#89 - murdocisgod
Reply +5
(01/27/2013) [-]
So who in the ****** great idea was this?
#113 to #89 - dafuqman
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
I actually didn't think they burned. Both me and the gf loved them.
#120 to #113 - channel
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
I'm telling your dad.....hahahaha
#122 to #120 - dafuqman
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#119 to #113 - ggdhindo
Reply +2
(01/27/2013) [-]
sureee "girl friend"
sureee "girl friend"
#114 to #113 - corruptdog
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
I agree with you.
#98 to #89 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
The person who got the idea to try to put Icy-Hot on their penis?
#93 to #89 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Those bitches burn. Never use them they suck. They ******* hurt oh my god just never.
#76 - jibbablabba
Reply +10
(01/27/2013) [-]
>Be me
>ruler of ancient China
>another blacksmith requests an audience
>ohboyherewego.jpg
>shows up with a Halberd that pierces any defense and a shield that blocks any offense.
>ask him "what if i jab the shield with that halberd?"
>He's speechless
>invent a new word that when translated means "Contradiction"
(though in all honesty wouldn't the spear and shield destroy one another?)
#108 to #76 - killerblue
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
They could be made, but they can't be created at the same time.

As such one could have a shield that blocks everything, but during that time the halber can' and the opposite is true if you have the halber the shield can't be here during that phase of time.
#102 to #76 - sinisterainbow
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
The fact is one cannot exist in a world with another, one would have to give, therefore either the sword would pierce or the shield would block.

The original question was what happens when an unstoppable bullet meets an unbreakable wall.
#77 to #76 - crazyolitis
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Heard of that. The whole "unstoppable force and immovable object" thingy is based on that.   
Merchants' FW he got asked the contradiction.
Heard of that. The whole "unstoppable force and immovable object" thingy is based on that.
Merchants' FW he got asked the contradiction.
#59 - jakesterify
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#47 - crazyolitis
Reply +19
(01/27/2013) [-]
What happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object?
What happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object?
#115 to #47 - thesupertechie
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
They surrender
#75 to #47 - azinfoo
Reply +7
(01/27/2013) [-]
I saw a really cool minutephysics video about it, but basically this:

An "immovable object" technically cannot exist because the theory of relativity says that there is no preferred frame of reference in the universe. Therefore, if I simply moved relative to the object, the object would be moving relative to me as well. So it's not that the object doesn't move, but it can't be moved by pushing on it. It's unacceleratable meaning it's speed is constant. Hypothetically if this were true, the object would have an infinite mass.

Interestingly enough, an unstoppable force is really just the same thing as an immovable object. An unstoppable force implies that the force or object cannot have it's speed altered, and is therefore also referred to as unacceleratable.

This whole scenario is obviously hypothetical because an object with an infinite mass would be a black hole which has already consumed the universe. Anyhow, the outcome of two unnacceleratable objects colliding is that they would both pass through each other without disturbing each other.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eKc5kgPVrA I was pretty much paraphrasing this video, perhaps he could explain it better than I could.
#90 to #75 - viewtifulbro
Reply +7
(01/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#63 to #47 - greatboobya
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Something's gotta give
#64 to #63 - crazyolitis
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Love that song.
#61 to #47 - Theyneverknow
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
If one exists the other doesn't
#60 to #47 - neutralgray
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Minutephysics handled this question, actually.
#65 to #60 - crazyolitis
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Never heard of it. Will check it out.
#49 to #47 - thearcher
Reply +14
(01/27/2013) [-]
I'll tell you what happens!
I'll tell you what happens!
#48 to #47 - dingojohn
Reply +3
(01/27/2013) [-]
You lose on a technicality.   
   
In a reality in which an immovable object exists, there can obviously be no unstoppable objects, an vice versa.   
   
That question, the paradox, is rendered moot by the existing oxymoron in the question.
You lose on a technicality.

In a reality in which an immovable object exists, there can obviously be no unstoppable objects, an vice versa.

That question, the paradox, is rendered moot by the existing oxymoron in the question.
#53 to #48 - crazyolitis
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
This paradox was originally brought up by soem chinese guy. A merchant sold an unstoppable spear and an unbreakable (immovable somehow) shield.
The more you know.jpeg
#42 - deltadevilbladebtu **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#45 to #42 - wishanonscouldpost
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Inverted Song of Time. Slow time at the start of the first day before doing anything else.
#129 to #45 - deltadevilbladebtu **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#41 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
**anonymous rolls 49** ahahahahahaha so funny omg lol
#126 to #41 - BusterCherry
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#35 - tylosaurus
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Ice and fire are best elements.
#66 to #35 - DoktorHax
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
hey waiter, how bout some sauce?
#67 to #66 - tylosaurus
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
You'd like the source of this?

If anything, call me waitress.
#69 to #67 - DoktorHax
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
why yes, i would very much like the source for this, dear waitress.
#73 to #69 - tylosaurus
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
It's from Touhou.

Only the ice fairy though. The others are fan elements versions of her.
#43 to #35 - tomatospy
-3
has deleted their comment [-]
#54 to #43 - garaichu ONLINE
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
I'd love to hear what fire and ice are if not elements.
#56 to #54 - tomatospy
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
compound
#68 to #56 - tylosaurus
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
adj. (kmpound, km-pound, km-)
1. Consisting of two or more substances, ingredients, elements, or parts.
2. Botany Composed of more than one part.
n. (kmpound)
1. A combination of two or more elements or parts. See Synonyms at mixture.

Fire and ice are elements..
#79 to #68 - tomatospy
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#81 to #79 - tylosaurus
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
"That show"

What are you on about now?..
#82 to #81 - tomatospy
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
i dont even know please end me from this torture of confussion
#84 to #82 - tylosaurus
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
I don't know how.
#87 to #84 - tomatospy
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
i begeth of you
#78 to #68 - tomatospy
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
fire n'or water are elements and Empedocles was wrong
water is a compound of hydrogen and oxygen H2O
fire is different but is still not an element it consists of heat, fuel, and oxygen

#80 to #78 - tylosaurus
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
"Fire n'or water are elements".

"Fire is different, but is still not an element."

Now you're just being stupid. Do you not know the definition of elements either?..
#83 to #80 - tomatospy
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
a substance that can not be broken into different substances
#85 to #83 - tylosaurus
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
5. One of four substances, earth, air, fire, or water, formerly regarded as a fundamental constituent of the universe.
#91 to #85 - tomatospy
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
no Empedocles said that but was later proven wrong by a chemist whos name escapes my mind
also Phlogiston is a fire like element but not fire
#95 to #91 - tylosaurus
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
"Former".

Meaning it has been altered. I'm pretty sure what that guy proved wrong would be the theory of the world consisting of only the four elements. Where as fire sought towards space and all that other crap.

They are by definition still elements.
#96 to #95 - tomatospy
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
"classical elements"
there now we're both happy
#100 to #96 - tylosaurus
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
They are still elements though..
#86 to #85 - tylosaurus
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
oh and
7. elements The forces that constitute the weather, especially severe or inclement weather: outside paint that had been damaged by the elements.
#46 to #43 - tylosaurus
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Yeah, I do. What's wrong?
#23 - sweetellie
Reply +27
(01/27/2013) [-]
Wind waker HD guise...    
Wind Waker HD.
Wind waker HD guise...
Wind Waker HD.
#107 to #23 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
They already made it.... Skyward Sword, piece of **** graphics if I ever saw them.
#118 to #107 - arstya
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
#111 to #107 - ShadowEagle
Reply +4
(01/27/2013) [-]
As a die hard Zelda fan, I will kindly ask you to please, go die in a fire
#110 to #107 - sweetellie
Reply +4
(01/27/2013) [-]
I actually liked skyward sword's graphics...
I actually liked skyward sword's graphics...
#55 to #23 - garaichu ONLINE
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Me and my friends pretty much got a heart-attack throughout that entire Nintendo Direct.
So much awesome!
#30 to #23 - ndiliciousa
Reply +4
(01/27/2013) [-]
MFW they announced the remake of Wind Waker
#71 to #30 - RisenLichen
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
...WAT.

I NEED A WII U NOW
#27 to #23 - tonkkax
Reply +5
(01/27/2013) [-]
Excuse me sir, when will we get Majora's Mask for the 3DS?
#28 to #27 - beroty
Reply +12
(01/27/2013) [-]
in the same day of HF3
#29 to #28 - tonkkax
Reply +10
(01/27/2013) [-]
Im going to fly around the earth a couple times. See you soon!
Im going to fly around the earth a couple times. See you soon!
#31 to #29 - funnyrage
Reply +11
(01/27/2013) [-]
flying bear killed two canadians.
#26 to #23 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
It looks exactly the god damn same as the Gamecube version.
#34 to #26 - ivoryhammer
Reply +2
(01/27/2013) [-]
Maybe if you have vision problems, then yes, they look exactly the same
#25 to #23 - MetallicaForever
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=0u3djy6Ednc

long video, but im watching this right now, and then saw your comment
#22 - pyra
Reply +4
(01/27/2013) [-]
#44 to #22 - tomatospy
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]