Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#266 - infinitereaper
Reply -4
(01/26/2013) [-]
Expect when it isn't. Science has false facts throughout forever and will continue to have so.   
   
New discoveries and progress.. its a tricky business.
Expect when it isn't. Science has false facts throughout forever and will continue to have so.

New discoveries and progress.. its a tricky business.
#494 to #266 - infinitereaper
Reply -1
(01/27/2013) [-]
All of you go **** yourselves. The original point stands. Science will arrogantly tout the truth. Hell, what I mean by "False Fact" To begin with was not a literal false fact but a something believed to be a fact which was not a fact. Putting abstract and concrete thinking aside. God damn it FJ grow up.
#496 to #494 - pariahlol
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
You tell us to grow up and you're the one being an arrogant prick over here. It's as if you **** out stupidity.
#498 to #496 - infinitereaper
Reply -1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Personal attack. This is the internet. This is a ********* post. If you can't understand that's not my problem. Your probably just another bitch as teenager who thinks they know everything when they really don't know ****. Or a man who simply hasn't grown up yet.
#282 to #266 - capslockrage
Reply +2
(01/27/2013) [-]
There is no such thing as a "false fact", that's an oxymoron, just like yourself, a moron.
There have been THEORIES that are decades and sometimes centuries old, that have proven to be untrue.
A hell of a lot better than "You just have to have faith!"
#306 to #282 - infinitereaper
Reply -2
(01/27/2013) [-]
It's the same as peopel who think of a dream as "not real" such flawed logic.
#382 to #306 - capslockrage
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Dreams aren't real, they are dreams.
#383 to #382 - capslockrage
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Dreams themselves are real, but not the things that happen in them.
#493 to #383 - infinitereaper
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Half correct. But this is closer to the fallacy. Our definition of a fact is a fallacy. Science is plagued by too much pride. It's putting us back a few centuries in scientific progress.
#302 to #282 - infinitereaper
Reply -1
(01/27/2013) [-]
I'm not even religious you stupid twat. You fail to see the true logic at work here.

How many facts were known as truth throughout the centuries? A fact is just a human illusion. Truth is just our best guess... ah I'm not even going to argue and waste my time.
#315 to #302 - iamsuperior
Reply +2
(01/27/2013) [-]
They were known as truth, but if they weren't truth, then they weren't a goddam fact. They were believed to be a fact, but they weren't. Does gravity exist. Yes it ******* does and you can't refute that. Therefore, we have a fact. Did we evolve from Monkeys? Perhaps, but there is no definite proof, so it's not a fact. Got it?
#270 to #266 - theblupster
Reply +5
(01/26/2013) [-]
False facts do not exist. A fact is an inherently true statement.
#274 to #270 - punkrockdude
Reply -4
(01/26/2013) [-]
Just look at global warming. There are tons of false facts about it, such as the scientists that skewed data to make it seem worse than it is a few years back
#276 to #274 - sphyrna
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
source?
#284 to #276 - punkrockdude
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Heard about it back in 09 or 10 but don't feel like actually finding the article. Basically a climate scientists email was hacked and revealed that a report he made had certain data skewed to prove his hypothesis. Think they were calling it climategate or something
#299 to #284 - sphyrna
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Hmm i think I remember that actually. My only thing with it is that this was one guy, while plenty of data exists apart from his that indicate climate change is occurring. I would agree though that the issue has been taken by many and used in misleading ways, however
#273 to #270 - infinitereaper
Reply -3
(01/26/2013) [-]
False facts do exist. They are labels for something in reality. A fact can be true, or it can be a lie. Just like 1 could represent one rock, that 1 isn't the rock. For example, imagination: it is real. It's imaging taking place in your head in electro bla blah form. You're over thinking this mate.
#304 to #273 - pariahlol
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
You're a special kind of stupid aren't you
You're a special kind of stupid aren't you
#308 to #304 - infinitereaper
Reply -1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Whatever gets you to sleep at night. The fact is the matter is I'm probably more intelligent than half the people here. You would think because I just said that it cannot possibly be true. But this is just mob mentality. You think a few red thumbs makes me wrong? You think you're right because of the horde of people who can't understand the difference between the word cat and the actual collection of cells?

Don't make me laugh.
#312 to #308 - pariahlol
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Look up the goddam definition of a fact. It's an undeniable assertion that is true and cannot be disproven. If it can be wrong, or false, then it's not a fact. It can be passed on as a fact, but it will never actually be a fact. You think you're more intelligent simply because you are you. As such, you are the center of your own world, and your ego is so enormously overgrown that you cannot accept that there are individuals out there who may or may not have intelligence of a level higher than you. In conclusion, go **** yourself. Pic related
Look up the goddam definition of a fact. It's an undeniable assertion that is true and cannot be disproven. If it can be wrong, or false, then it's not a fact. It can be passed on as a fact, but it will never actually be a fact. You think you're more intelligent simply because you are you. As such, you are the center of your own world, and your ego is so enormously overgrown that you cannot accept that there are individuals out there who may or may not have intelligence of a level higher than you. In conclusion, go **** yourself. Pic related
#492 to #312 - infinitereaper
Reply -1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Mwa ha ha. Oh lordy. You can burn in hell trash. This is just wordplay and definition. Ah. My personality type wouldn't be rare if we were to agree. Just be silent sheep.
#495 to #492 - pariahlol
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
That's not goddam word play. You were stating what a fact means in your comments, and you were ******* wrong, so I stated the true definition. Seriously kill yourself
#497 to #495 - infinitereaper
Reply -1
(01/27/2013) [-]
I keep telling you we cannot absolutely be sure absolute truth is absolute.

Consider physics. If we are off by even a trillionth of a decimal point in our factual figures they aren't facts. Everyone believes in it but they are false. My anger has run out. Assholes like you can rot in the patheticness that is your life. Enjoy it.
#275 to #273 - theblupster
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
If there is even a shadow of a doubt, it is not a fact. If it cannot be disproved, it is a fact.
#265 - mnmzg
Reply +1
(01/26/2013) [-]
#251 - everyonesbuddy
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
Post about pluto's demotion. Next post about ndt, the original pluto killer.
Post about pluto's demotion. Next post about ndt, the original pluto killer.
#257 to #251 - ExorArgus
Reply +2
(01/26/2013) [-]
Its not so much killing pluto out of the regular planets, its more they added it to a closer family where it would feel more welcome.
#246 - CXJokerXD
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
Classic internet. Tons of people with no degrees or experience or any sort of professional credibility, online criticizing, mocking, and slandering people who actually know what their talking about.
Classic internet. Tons of people with no degrees or experience or any sort of professional credibility, online criticizing, mocking, and slandering people who actually know what their talking about.
#239 - youngmoneysobased
Reply -2
(01/26/2013) [-]
according to Neil degrasse science is true weather you believe it or not when many scientist believe and voice their belief in creationism. Therefore creationism is true by Niels logic. good on you Niel
#262 to #239 - frylord
Reply -1
(01/26/2013) [-]
its true
#250 to #239 - merrymarvelite
Reply +7
(01/26/2013) [-]
What many scientists believe =/= science
#248 to #239 - twitchalicious **User deleted account**
+5
has deleted their comment [-]
#288 to #248 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Just like your scrotum
#236 - mytrakytra
Reply +12
(01/26/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Why can't science just be an explanation of the Bible?

If you believe in God or not do you think he would just make **** happen with no explanation whatsoever?

Why can't we just accept this and have everyone happy?
#298 to #236 - bothemastaofall
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Because most of that is just as made up as old Greek god stories
#294 to #236 - ivoryhammer
Reply +2
(01/27/2013) [-]
Can't the bible just be a storybook? Like it was intended to be so? It wasn't written to be taken literally, it's like those old Aesop stories, they have a good message, but they never happened.
#287 to #236 - rockamekishiko
Reply +3
(01/27/2013) [-]
i think that's how it is. maybe he made up a bunch of laws of physics as if it was a videogame and let it flow on it's own
#253 to #236 - willindor
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
Because that is too easy for some people.
#264 to #253 - frylord
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
i see nothing wrong with it :<
#235 - avatarsarefornoobs
Reply +15
(01/26/2013) [-]
Its a repost, its a ********* starter, its old, its not funny, and I'm cranky today and this post did not help.
Its a repost, its a ********* starter, its old, its not funny, and I'm cranky today and this post did not help.
#297 to #235 - thelegitmetalhead
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Dat face
#230 - toxicskull
Reply -3
(01/26/2013) [-]
The thing is Science is backed up by proven points that are actually proven and make sense. However perhaps there could be one god but the Bible has been changed so much through the generations of humans that it is ******** but its interesting ********
#232 to #230 - pianoasis
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
Prove it. According to Heisenberg's Law of Uncertainty, you will never be able to prove anything because you will never actually observe it.
#310 to #232 - pariahlol
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
you can't prove it, so I simply go with Occam's Razor. It's more likely that somebody wrote it, than that there's a magical, all knowing, and condescending god out there. If other's choose to believe in god, then let them.
#233 to #232 - toxicskull
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
Perhaps so, or maybe this is all a dream and none of this is real but the point is humans know so little compared to how big the universe is.
#234 to #233 - pianoasis
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
Wake up toxicskull.. wake up
#237 to #234 - toxicskull
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
im trying! but its true is it not? Thinking about the vast majority of space and planets etc... and to us we are just in the middle of it all not knowing what lies ahead
#245 to #237 - pianoasis
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
Well we know quite a few things, according to our method of observing
#259 to #245 - toxicskull
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
I meant in overall we've done quite a bit of progress but compared to everything else its very little
#260 to #259 - pianoasis
Reply +1
(01/26/2013) [-]
Well how can you know that we haven't discovered very much if you don't know what we haven't discovered? There could be very little to discover in fact.
#261 to #260 - toxicskull
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
its obvious we havent
#229 - Canucklehead
Reply +5
(01/26/2013) [-]
Come back to FJ for the first time in a month.

Leave disappointed.

Why does this site have to be so conservative? Religion should not be compared to science.

Science does things in a way religion could never do.

The scientific method should take priority over religion by a fair margin every time.

If you're religious, that's fine. But we're not using that to determine where we come from.
#228 - bluejupiter
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
&lt;---- People who argue about religion and science.
<---- People who argue about religion and science.
#255 to #228 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
It's funny because that guy is Lucifer.
#226 - yutakenusername
Reply +9
(01/26/2013) [-]
MFW people think that evolution in its entirety is men evolving from apes.
#224 - Yesitsme
+4
has deleted their comment [-]
#222 - respectmyauthority
Reply +7
(01/26/2013) [-]
******* Neil Degrasse Tyson knows how we do!

Can't wait for the Cosmos rehash, he will bring honor to the Sagan
#227 to #222 - snakefire
Reply +1
(01/26/2013) [-]
I have a carl sagan folder
#242 to #227 - zombiesnipertwo
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
I know, Op knows, he knows, people reading this knows.
everybody know!
#244 to #242 - snakefire
Reply +1
(01/26/2013) [-]
#247 to #244 - zombiesnipertwo
Reply +2
(01/26/2013) [-]
more likely than you think
more likely than you think
#249 to #247 - snakefire
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#252 to #249 - zombiesnipertwo
Reply +1
(01/26/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#254 to #252 - snakefire
Reply +2
(01/26/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#263 to #254 - zombiesnipertwo
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
last one and everyone's favorite
#267 to #263 - snakefire
Reply +1
(01/26/2013) [-]
#221 - duntazemebrah
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
comment section....
#220 - buildaburg
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
Comments below
#219 - sammyjankiis
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
#217 - byposted
Reply -3
(01/26/2013) [-]
**byposted rolled a random image posted in comment #2573757 at FJ RPG **

Global Warming is not caused by humans, and has very little to do with "greenhouse gasses."

#209 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
If what he says is true, I'll walk over here which is simultaneously near and far away, which I'll do in four parallel time-lines because time is cubed and we are all idiots anyway.

(For a guy generally considered intelligent, that remark was very ignorant. The vast majority of science has an unspecified degree of truth to it (such as evolution and global warming) but some branches of science - such as the Time-Cube theory I referred to in my non-bracketed text - is closer to nonsense than an immediate apparent truth. If he practise that statement outside of theory, all kinds of science should be true.)
#208 - dusartemus **User deleted account**
+2
has deleted their comment [-]
#204 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
posting a screenshot of a gif image.. sigh