Upload
Login or register
Back to the content 'My sides' Leave a comment Refresh Comments (122)
[ 122 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
#60 - kievaughnb
Reply +14
(01/26/2013) [-]
#55 - thedarkestrogue
Reply +6
(01/26/2013) [-]
MFW people in the comments are posting massive equations that I don't fully understand or comprehend.
MFW people in the comments are posting massive equations that I don't fully understand or comprehend.
#116 to #55 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Don't feel bad, they probably don't either, they just want to look smart. Although, judging by your reaction, it did work at least once.
#46 - Bobtheblob
Reply +8
(01/26/2013) [-]
#123 to #46 - allmightynig
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
do you even math bro?
#44 - ButtonFly
Reply +19
(01/26/2013) [-]
Now all the physicists on FunnyJunk have come out to play.
#48 to #44 - savannahijack
Reply -3
(01/26/2013) [-]
There cant really be that many
#42 - Calunn **User deleted account**
+44
has deleted their comment [-]
#76 to #42 - wafflelord
Reply +2
(01/27/2013) [-]
#69 to #42 - papairish
Reply +8
(01/26/2013) [-]
Maybe this is why boobs amaze us, because we, as humans, can't fully comprehend them - since they are traveling so fast in such a confined space.....
Awww, who am I kidding, tits are awesome cause they're tits!!
#43 to #42 - Calunn **User deleted account**
+4
has deleted their comment [-]
#45 to #43 - synapse
Reply +1
(01/26/2013) [-]
So he is off at 1.2 gigameters past the speed of light
#40 - felixjarl
Reply +38
(01/26/2013) [-]
This image has expired
#39 - crookedbean
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
I'd take a picture; it will last longer.
I'd take a picture; it will last longer.
#31 - englman
Reply +15
(01/26/2013) [-]
Physics Majors..
#29 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
anyone notice "sqrt" or squirt is in the equation?
#30 to #29 - whycanticaps
Reply +20
(01/26/2013) [-]
square root...not squirt
#33 to #30 - epicsauciness
Reply +11
(01/26/2013) [-]
12 year olds everywhere....
#28 - ThekidsTEN
Reply +2
(01/26/2013) [-]
I like how the c variable just disappeared
#74 to #28 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
c is used for the speed of light in almost all physics equations. it didnt disappear, it just was substituted in.
#27 - shadowstepone
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
well, by this logic, time goes significantly slower for larger boobs. the best ones are the hardest to get away with looking at. he's calculating for a c-cup, so double d's would be give or take 12 seconds per second
#23 - harleycurnow
Reply +25
(01/26/2013) [-]
B = 5T

B=boobtime
T=time
#37 to #23 - isopodic
Reply +7
(01/26/2013) [-]
He just overcomplicated it by defining "time" in a formula. Still awesome.
He just overcomplicated it by defining "time" in a formula. Still awesome.
#19 - asmodeu
Reply +1
(01/26/2013) [-]
Am I the only guy who doesn't get slapped/yelled at for staring at female boobs in a very observable manner ? So what if they notice ? Just tell them they have a nice collar..bone
#16 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
Even if it was possible for boobs to travel faster than the speed of light, this guy can't even math.
t=t'/sqrt(1-(v/c)^2)
Therefore, if v was higher than c, than v/c would be higher than 1, resulting in the square root of something that is negative, which is impossible

Also, I can math
#22 to #16 - strangepanda
Reply +5
(01/26/2013) [-]
The square root of minus one equals i. His answer had that nasty little i in it. When he explains his answer he also adds that this is in the imaginary/complex direction. He made it so they generally move in the complex direction, the one thing we can't see. This is why he can safely state it and nobody can prove him wrong :)
#41 to #22 - drolive
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
still would have made more sense if the v and c were switched right? or maybe im just not brainy enough..
#21 to #16 - juicymucus
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
Pssst I think youre taking the joke too seriously...
Pssst I think youre taking the joke too seriously...
#12 - wardylocks
Reply +103
(01/26/2013) [-]
I have my own boobs, but looking at other peoples is just so so much better.
#96 to #12 - brutalfistfuck
Reply +4
(01/27/2013) [-]
#62 to #12 - ipunchinfants
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#11 - qotsa
Reply +87
(01/26/2013) [-]
i don't mind when guys look at my boobs, because they're ****** neat.    
and i really can't blame them, i look at the boobs of other girls too.
i don't mind when guys look at my boobs, because they're ****** neat.
and i really can't blame them, i look at the boobs of other girls too.
#63 to #11 - ipunchinfants
Reply +8
(01/26/2013) [-]
ok then show me your boobs if you don't mind
i'm sorry it was worth a try
#140 to #63 - qotsa
Reply +3
(01/27/2013) [-]
because you were so polite and i don't want to gtfo
#143 to #140 - ipunchinfants
Reply 0
(01/29/2013) [-]
<3
now without the shirt
jkjk you have nice boobs in the non rude most way possible lol
#144 to #143 - qotsa
Reply +1
(01/30/2013) [-]
haha thanks ;)
#10 - potential [OP]
Reply +162
(01/26/2013) [-]
I know I'm going to far when I get to my own content.
#122 to #10 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
LOL, "my own content."
#20 to #10 - matthewboss
Reply +17
(01/26/2013) [-]
Post content
Go to bed
Check how it's doing the next day
write witty comment about getting to own content
???
Profit
#26 to #20 - partnerintroll
Reply +15
(01/26/2013) [-]
#17 to #10 - necessary **User deleted account**
+48
has deleted their comment [-]
#91 to #17 - joeledo
Reply +17
(01/27/2013) [-]
your comment was necessary
#93 to #91 - necessary **User deleted account**
+20
has deleted their comment [-]
#111 to #93 - uberteddy
Reply +1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Was that really necessary?
#7 - needlessfoal
Reply +15
(01/26/2013) [-]
#2 - nargogh
Reply +10
(01/26/2013) [-]
This is ********, nothing can travel faster than light which speed is about 3x10^8 m/s. 1,5 gigametres per second is 1,5x10^9 m/s.

Son, Einstein is disappointed.
#9 to #2 - riddickgamer
Reply -6
(01/26/2013) [-]
thats funny, because we have proven there are particles that can travel faster then the speed of light.
#13 to #9 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
We actually haven't done that. If you're talking about the experiment at CERN in which the neutrino was measured to travel faster than the speed of light by 60nanoseconds over some distance that I can't remember, that was proven to be an error in the fiberoptic timing system. That is why no paper was published; they sent out the data for peer review and, sure enough, they found the problem.

www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/06/neutrinos-cant-beat-light/

Nothing has ever been shown to travel faster than the speed of light.

U BAD AT PHYSICS.
#4 to #2 - autoxx
Reply +28
(01/26/2013) [-]
Nothing can ACCELERATE to the speed of light because it's mass would become infinite.
Things already traveling at the speed of light (or beyond) do not apply to your theories.
#75 to #4 - awesomenessdefined
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
No object with mass can travel at the speed of light.
#59 to #4 - kievaughnb
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
What about photons traveling out of an atmosphere and into the vacuum of space? would they remain at just below c or would they accelerate to c and become black holes?

Sorry, I don't know much about physics
#35 to #4 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
its*
#14 to #4 - jakeattack
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
tachyons right? so thats what boobs are. woah
#5 to #4 - nargogh
Reply +4
(01/26/2013) [-]
Nothing possessing mass CAN achieve speed equal or greater than the speed of light. Boobs have mass. Also, the light itself cannot travel faster than the light speed, it can only be slowed down (for example, by using Bosy-Einstein condensate).
#8 to #5 - autoxx
Reply -4
(01/26/2013) [-]
Everything has mass, including light.
If you try to detect light as a particle; Voila, it's a particle. And as a particle it has mass.
The gravitational pull of a black hole wouldn't have any effect unless it had mass.
#34 to #8 - nargogh
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
Also, you need to read sth about Einstein's general relativity theory. Gravitational field causes distortion of space, in which photons move.
#32 to #8 - nargogh
Reply +2
(01/26/2013) [-]
Photons do not have RESTING mass. You seriously need to review your knowledge of elementary physics.
#25 to #8 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
Einstein is rolling in his grave because of your butchering of general relativity
#18 to #8 - fuzdohraa
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
the black ole part is not true since to say that gravity attracts mass is simplyfying it, gravity actually attracts energy and mass is energy so that is why it is attracted, light however is pure energy and therefore has no mass but is still affected by the gravity of a black hole
#15 to #8 - jakeattack
Reply +3
(01/26/2013) [-]
not true, photons are mass less particles. if the higgs field is indeed true, then they fly right through it. but the reason black holes pull in light is because gravity is warping the space around it. its like warping where the light goes. like those car tracks shaped like big funnels in a way. light moves straight, but its road is curved in another dimension
#3 to #2 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
nothing we know(aka: following the rules we have observed with mechanics we developed under rules we created) of can travel faster than light
#6 to #3 - anon
Reply 0
(01/26/2013) [-]
its travelling in the complex direction, there are no rules in imagination land
#1 - nyj
Reply +42
(01/26/2013) [-]
It really does seem like girls have sensors in their boobs that alert them whenever eyes have seen them.