Not a single remark about zombies?

Unacceptable!

its aight

Battlefield gives you more opportunity to play as a team with stuff like medic and support. In COD everyone just go solo because there is no reward for teamwork.

jesus maybe its hard for you to understand some people prefer to play solo. im good either way but give respect to those who dont want or need to reply on other people to own.

My thing is I don't deny that CoD is a good game. I just think people make it seem better than it actually is.

Well, the reason why CoD is so popular is because it's so easy to learn, it's easily accessible and you can play it very casually. It doesn't require very much of you and if this is a good or a bad thing depends on your own prefferenses.

moaning*

already came out?
from what i remeber it was free right?

Yep, the beta anyway, and totally free.

It doesn't even have any pay-to-win bullshit.

yeah they brag about this non pay to win
going to their site right away and downloading this shit

I'm only SR-44 when everybody else I know is between SR-80 and SR-130


I'm not sure if I should be happy I have slightly more life, or sad because I'm only half the rank...

that feel. first game to really make me understand why xbox live was such a big hit. cod4 for ever. followed by black ops. but damn cod4 is where the real shit began.

"sitting on your ass" - "have a life"

These two actions work in perfect harmony.
- Said no one ever.

Tell me, what other part of your body can you sit on?

These two actions work, because I don't always sit on my ass, only four days of the week.

The days in which you are not obliged to get off of said ass otherwise you'll lose your job, yeah.

When I did coding for my uncle's software firm, more of my job pertained to sitting on my ass than not.

Damn, yesterday I went from 52 to the next prestige 53

the joys of double xp did the whole of prestige 4 and got to level 30 prestige 5

I like that, and it proves how CoD fans are easily entertained. WWII Reznov was seen as just another Russian soldier, but in Black Ops he was seen as something much greater: a fucking savior. Leave it to Treyarch to make a good game for once, then fuck up the series's multiplayer in the most recent game. I like the WaW multiplayer, if it wasn't for all the damn modders.

I can't look it up atm, but you are most likely right. I think it should have been Krevchenko who was the main villain in Black Ops, though. Dude's bad ass as fucking flaming fuck.

Why was this thumbed down? It's as if some dumb fucks are taking it as you insulting one of the best CoD games around. It's better than Black Cocks 2, that's for sure.

I thumbed him down, it wasn't because I thought he was being offensive.
It's because WaW is not the first game in the Black Ops series.
If it were, there would be more continuity between the two, rather than a few characters.

Yes, but that doesn't mean that WaW was a prequel, it just means that they take place in the same universe, Star Wars KotOR uses characters that are then mentioned in other Star Wars media, does that mean that they are all direct sequels? no.
WaW was a game simulating many of the battles of WW2, BO and BO2 are both games that have fictional characters and occurences.
You can't say WaW is a direct sequel because he is in both.
Because Treyarch themselves have said, "WaW and the Black Ops games are separate"

I never said it was the same story arc, I said same universe.
Iron man and Hulk are in the same universe and have many characters that interact, but one is not a sequel to another.
Yes, characters carry over, but it is not a direct sequel as the game does not carry over directly.
If it was a direct sequel then it would focus on the same main character, the same antagonist or the same story.
Modern warfare 2 is a direct sequel to Modern Warfare, because it is the same characters, same bad guy, and the same story.
WaW has one main character in common, different enemies and a different story than Black Ops.
It is sequel, but not a direct one, it is partial, as only half the main characters are even mentioned.

Dragovich was not part of any plot point in WaW, the only thing he did was not send reinforcements at the very end of the game, not very big.
SW ep 4 does have the same main characters
Emporor
Anakin/Vader
Obi-Wan
C3P0
R2D2
It is a continuation of what happens after the climax of ep 3
WaW made quick mention of one of the antagonists and features 2/6 "Main characters"
As I said, it is a sequel, but not a direct one.
If it turned out Mason was the son of Miller from WaW, I would see it as more of a direct sequel, but as it stands, half the story from WaW is irrelevant to BO, and therefore, it is not a direct sequel.

If you wanted to go as far as to say Dragovich is in both, even though he is briefly mentioned at the end, then I would say
Luke
Leah
Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru
The clones
Chewbacca

Definition of Consider - To think about
- To think carefully about
- A carefully thought about OPINION
And the thing about Opinion, is that it cannot be wrong as long as it can be supported.

yes brother!

Yeah, I don't see why they released Bf4 before Bc3, I was getting exited for the announcement, in my opinion Bc2 was a far better game then 3. The only problem I had was the dodgy hit detection.

well you also gotta be really good at the game to level up fast.

and play more than two hours a day