| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Show:   Top Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
Show All Replies
User avatar #57 - deliciousjoecocker (01/25/2013) [-]
These are amazing
#54 - sweetellie (01/25/2013) [-]
I must say... this is one of the more peculiar pictures I've seen in my lifetime..
#52 - catzombie (01/25/2013) [-]
Photoshop isn't everything, just because it was before photoshop, that doesn't mean it's impossible. He must have used a simpler older program.

I don't know the date these were done, but photo manipulations like this was done in the time before computers, then i'd be impressed.
User avatar #95 to #52 - darman (01/25/2013) [-]
Photo manipulations can be done through use of scale models, use of negatives, alterations during and after development of film. It's very hard to do well due to the preciseness of the work. These are some of the best film edits I've ever seen.
#138 to #95 - catzombie (01/25/2013) [-]
No, he used a computer.
User avatar #61 to #52 - exotic ONLINE (01/25/2013) [-]
Art thou daft?
User avatar #59 to #52 - crawlerz (01/25/2013) [-]
he actually did not use a computer for these. A lot of crossed over negatives, some enlarging photos in his dark room, and a bit of air brush. Its magic. (he probably did some other stuff too but those are the main things I could find out about him)
#67 to #59 - catzombie (01/25/2013) [-]
Proof?
Unless he lived in the 1950's, it's hard to believe that.
User avatar #165 to #67 - crawlerz (01/26/2013) [-]
I'm not even sure why you mentioned the 1950's since the first home computers weren't even available until around 1981.
But also, http://thomasbarbey.com/about-thomas-barbey.cfm
its his official page, and he explains the general method he uses to make these images. Make sure to click the link under his picture in case it is telling about himself. This man was incredibly talented, but it shouldn't be unbelieveable, although it is definately amazing. I do hope that the link to his website works as proof. =)
#166 to #165 - catzombie (01/26/2013) [-]
I feel like he made the images black and white on purpose to make them look older then they actually are. I said 1950's because they were black and white. Also, he doesn't need to use a home computer, he could have used some type of professional computer only designed for picture editing from the 60's.
User avatar #167 to #166 - crawlerz (01/26/2013) [-]
He might have used black and white. Here are some photos. I glanced through it and they all seem to be from 1950 and earlier before any type of photo software even exsisted. I believe this man is just a lot better at this than these guys were. I understand your skeptical view on it being without a computer, but sometimes people are just amazing. In my honest opinion, this is what has happened here.
#51 - hangingtree (01/25/2013) [-]
Wat?
Wat?
#49 - warlockrichard (01/25/2013) [-]
that hurt my brain
#48 - killasmasha ONLINE (01/25/2013) [-]
-3
#47 - GingerCOM has deleted their comment. [-]
User avatar #46 - chikkachikka (01/25/2013) [-]
Ive been on that BRIDGE!! Its in prague... the charles bridge.. yes bitches.
#44 - griphun (01/25/2013) [-]
That's pretty neat!
User avatar #154 to #44 - shlongbottom (01/25/2013) [-]
Its not all the time when you get all of this nature in one spot!
User avatar #155 to #154 - griphun (01/25/2013) [-]
Well, I didn't catch a fish today, but I sure did catch one heck of an afternoon! Heheha!
User avatar #159 to #155 - shlongbottom (01/25/2013) [-]
lookit this tree.. this is an aspen tree. you can tell it's an aspen of the way that it is!
-2
#38 - capslockrage has deleted their comment. [-]
User avatar #39 to #38 - gmarrox (01/25/2013) [-]
Doctoring photos is a thing. Trust me, i am photography.
0
#40 to #39 - capslockrage has deleted their comment. [-]
User avatar #41 to #40 - gmarrox (01/25/2013) [-]
They're done naturally in the sense that no digital effects are used. These are done by splicing two or more existing negative prints together.
#37 - donatelo (01/25/2013) [-]
i tried taking a photography class and couldn't get sh*t. props to people who do it.
#36 - willindor (01/25/2013) [-]
Dictators were also very fond of photo manipulation.
#68 to #36 - dafogman (01/25/2013) [-]
So can the media.
User avatar #55 to #36 - ranzoray (01/25/2013) [-]
Who was the overcoated lad on the right?
User avatar #56 to #55 - willindor (01/25/2013) [-]
Nikolai Yezhov. Purged in 1940. Not exactly a nice guy.
User avatar #58 to #56 - ranzoray (01/25/2013) [-]
Ah, of course, none of those frauds were, thank you kind sir.
#34 - roadkillamanjaro **User deleted account** (01/25/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #33 - giblets (01/25/2013) [-]
Does anyone have the second picture in a high resolution?
#32 - izzytdi (01/25/2013) [-]
wait what?
User avatar #31 - jdonaldson (01/25/2013) [-]
Not Very hard to do if you have access to a dark room and a enlarger. All you need is to splice some negatives and then do some burning and dodging to draw on the photo. Then develop. If is truly sad that the art of actual film development is being lost.
#30 - N. Korean citizen (01/25/2013) [-]
It's easier to manipulate black and white images than is it is colored photos. still cool though
User avatar #29 - doigboiger (01/25/2013) [-]
Wow! He did all this is MS Paint?!
#28 - sammyjankiis (01/25/2013) [-]
These are really cool.
These are really cool.
 Friends (0)