Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#389 - hocolol **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#371 - kaslin (01/25/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#427 to #426 - kaslin (01/25/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #359 - datblkkid (01/25/2013) [-]
if this happens then who would be the ones who will be caught in the genocide?
#386 to #359 - anonymous (01/25/2013) [-]
the unarmed
User avatar #375 to #359 - liquidz (01/25/2013) [-]
Who is he trying to reassure that everything is fine?
User avatar #350 - wazerwifle (01/25/2013) [-]
Obama is 51 years old
Hitler was 56 when he died

51+56= 107

take the 7 and 1, and subtract them

7-1 = 6

divided by 2 which are obama and hitler

6/2 = 3 HALF LIFE 3 CONFIRMED!!!!!
User avatar #345 - blahness (01/25/2013) [-]
H-8 I-9 T-20 L-12 E-5 R-18
8+9+20-12-5-18 = 2

B-2 A-1 R-18 A-1 C-3 K-11
18-11-2-1-1 + 3 = 6



#353 to #345 - kabageguy (01/25/2013) [-]
The square root of Hitler is singed.
Singed is Hitler.
User avatar #401 to #353 - happygrowman (01/25/2013) [-]
if you mulitply 2x3 you get 6
User avatar #406 to #401 - kabageguy (01/25/2013) [-]
6 letters in singed.
User avatar #414 to #406 - happygrowman (01/25/2013) [-]
also 6 letters in hitler.

so 6 in singed, 6 in hitler and 6 in tomato
666 do you see this **** ?!
#433 to #414 - kabageguy (01/25/2013) [-]
This can mean only one thing.
User avatar #446 to #433 - happygrowman (01/25/2013) [-]
i think we have just confirmed of its existance....the harbinger of truth brings it to us upon his golden steed......its coming.....its coming.
#445 to #433 - kabageguy (01/25/2013) [-]
But we need to go further.
3 letters in Rin
3 letters in Emi
3+3 is 6.
6 letters in singed.
Singed is working with the feminists.
#343 - selfdenyingbeggar (01/25/2013) [-]
Well, he IS taking away your liberties which your funded fathers gave you, is he not? I'd worry more about that If I were you, OP.
#390 to #343 - Penguinn (01/25/2013) [-]
Well, I suppose the founding fathers were pretty wealthy
#396 to #390 - selfdenyingbeggar (01/25/2013) [-]
what do you mean?
#397 to #396 - Penguinn (01/25/2013) [-]
The funded fathers, they were pretty wealthy
#399 to #397 - selfdenyingbeggar (01/25/2013) [-]
oh, sorry, I meant founding fathers.
User avatar #342 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
Americans don't need automatics anyways.
User avatar #394 to #342 - liquidz (01/25/2013) [-]
Full auto guns have been banned since the 80's.

What they want to ban is functionally no different than a hunting rifle.

What you are afraid of is high capacity magazines, which allows a person to even the odds against multiple attackers, such as looters and criminals.

The 2nd amendment says "Shall not be infringed", the founding fathers even wrote that the people should have access to all arms of war in letters and other documents. They knew weapons would get more devastating, and their goal was to preserve the citizen's ability to repel the government, and to defend their own property, lives, and liberties.

Further saying that a guerilla army would be unable to fight back against the government is incorrect. Look at Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam and more. Even look at the revolutionary war we fought to win our Independence. It can be done, and it will be drawn out and very devastating to everyone.

What you need to do is ask yourself, how many rights will you let the government take from YOU, that you hold dear, before you say it's enough?

Don't just think that once they take the guns or ban them they will reveal a massive plan. Maybe this magical fairy princessistration will do nothing once they do it. But what's to say the next won't? Or another one 3 or 4 presidents later?

Do you really trust your government enough to let them take care of you completely?

Do you really think the police will get to your house in time when a criminal breaks in and is beating you to death, or using a knife, or other improvised weapon?

Even if you DO ban firearms or restrict them, the criminals have no need to obey laws. They will improvise more destructive weapons, or ignore them completely.
User avatar #436 to #394 - kasperscar (01/25/2013) [-]
The founding fathers had no semi automatic weapons which could carry up to 30 or more rounds.
Why would you need 30 rounds to shoot maybe less than 5 robbers?
User avatar #454 to #436 - liquidz (01/25/2013) [-]
1. It is not a 1 shot 1 kill thing with a gun. It may take 2 or 3 shots to put someone down and completely out of the fight
2. No one is 100% accurate either, we are all human and can miss in the heat of battle
3. What if there are more than 5 robbers, the 2nd amendment exists to protect the people from the government. Battlefields have more than just 5 people on them.
4. Regardless of what the founding fathers had at the time, their point was that the 2nd was to even the power of the people and the government. People being able to have the same arms as the military is it's point. It has nothing to do about sporting or hunting.

And if you think the founding fathers where not thinking ahead some:

"Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man gainst his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American...[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people."
---Tenche Coxe, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.
User avatar #472 to #454 - kasperscar (01/25/2013) [-]
If you are trained extensively, and have 12 rounds in a handgun, I bet you can take down 5 men easily,
To own a firearm in Australia, You must have Extensive training and must attend a range at least twice every two weeks, And to get a license is over 1 month wait, then another 1 month per firearm, You are able in your country to access multiple firearms of high power, and instantly if getting from a gun shop, You don't have extensive background checks which you are subjected to multiple mental and physical tests, I only believe you should have abit tighter laws not totally take away Your "freedom" but your laws are too loose.
User avatar #504 to #472 - liquidz (01/25/2013) [-]
With 5 men, assuming at least 2 bullets for each one to keep them down with 100% accuracy leaves you with only 2 rounds left. Hope you don't miss. A great example here is look at police who often fire 5 or more times to take out just 1 person. Range time is much more different than combat. Run a little bit, try to shoot at a moving target, keep yourself behind cover, and prepare to move again to remove the next target. Now do that as fast as you can... Not the same as a peaceful range where you can line up a shot and wait.

I agree Australian laws are BS, and put way too much undue burden on the gun owner just to even own the gun.

Our laws are not as loose as they make them out to be. The gun show loophole as they call it does not exist. All dealers at a gun show must do background checks. Dealers who do not do background checks regardless of a gun show or not face heavy fines, confiscation of their entire inventory and loss of their business.

The loop hole often refers to the fact that people can sell guns directly to an individual with no paper work. For which the majority of gun owners are responsible and ask to see a state ID, CCW permit (which shows they are not a felon) and or voter ID card (Also shows they are not a felon). They also write out a bill of sale.

If anything on that changed I would say it would be "ok" as long as they do it in a way that does not require excessive hassle. IE If a person wants to sell guns to another individual they must have a "Personal Reseller Card" which allows them to buy directly from another person. Getting that card requires the same background check as purchasing a gun normally would. It would have a 2 year expiration date on it. If you don't have the card and I don't have the card we shouldn't do business. Simple and effective.

What we are concerned about, is what happens if you Dr. does'nt like guns and you don't know? What if he gets paid off to turn you in, or say you are defective? Corp kickbacks to Dr's happen

User avatar #512 to #504 - kasperscar (01/25/2013) [-]
Seems your view is agreeable on, and you have a good view, I have only seen docos on it and meet a few people that have gone over there and fired weapons without a firearms license, just a flash of the driver license of 1 man for 4 people to go into a range and shoot, And i like your opinion, Just Certain aspects of your laws are to loose, Majority of my focus is how cheap it is also, So i think mabye a law on the price of ammo would help, either way, I agree on some of your points, and sorry if i cannot make any sense, I have not slept in two days, So my presentation is kinda jumbled, Cheers and i enjoyed reading your statement i feel that i have had an itterlectual conversation with you and not just like

Type thing
thankyou very much

User avatar #523 to #512 - liquidz (01/25/2013) [-]
Good to see you are into sensible options. Some people around here only think because we cherish our right to bare arms we are all stupid rednecks.

I don't approve of the ammo tax. It's easily worked around by reloading, and it does nothing but make it harder to train with your weapon. Which in my opinion is critical. Untrained people will shoot wildly and be more dangerous with handling their arms.

If anything to expand on the mental health issues indeed, but it should not be just 1 doctor that declares you unable to own a gun, and it MUST have a review process. It is way too dangerous to say because someone is strongly opinionated or doesn't like the government, or just runs off at the mouth that they should not have a weapon. All of which are very fine lines, say something a little too aggressive and you are a public threat.

Just look what happens when someone writes online about something, you can't tell if they are sarcastic or not many times.

If they absolutely must have a "ban" on a type of weapon. Then it should not be banned, but instead just require training. Usually requiring training drives away unwanted people from owning or doing anything with that item, be it weapons, tools, explosives, etc. My only issue there is it becomes more of a privilege than a right when you do that.

I see it as the 2nd amendment is designed to keep a level playing field. Criminals will be armed, citizens will be armed, and the government is armed. If the government can't stop the criminals the citizens can. If the government is out of hand the citizens can step in.
#442 to #436 - anonymous (01/25/2013) [-]
What does it matter? They knew technology would progress, yet they still said that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed.

If you don't like guns, don't get one. But don't force your opinions on others.
User avatar #451 to #442 - kasperscar (01/25/2013) [-]
I do like guns, but why must you have such high capacity weapons in an urban environment?
If you are a farmer, Its fine for hunting, but why would it be needed in a home?
#409 to #394 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
Too many rednecks in one place...... You guys don't need guns as much as you claim to. You're just an insecure country is all. Get over yourself.
Too many rednecks in one place...... You guys don't need guns as much as you claim to. You're just an insecure country is all. Get over yourself.
User avatar #452 to #409 - kasperscar (01/25/2013) [-]
*High five*
User avatar #601 to #452 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
*high five* Cheers mate
#441 to #409 - anonymous (01/25/2013) [-]
Okay, don't need guns? You are a ******* idiot... The media wants people like you to believe that guns are bad. But, what they don't tell you is that there are far more cases out there about people getting attacked by a criminal(s) with guns (Which by the way do you really think that criminals would just be like "Oh, **** they made a LAW, better not do it.") where the attacked person attacks back with a constitutionally carried weapon and survives, rather than people being murdered in cold blood. Think before you talk. DON'T TREAD ON ME
User avatar #461 to #441 - kasperscar (01/25/2013) [-]
You have guns in u.s.a, So easily available that anyone can start to go, I wanna become a gangsta or some form of criminal, they access their guns legally and such being more easier than getting a contact, tighter the laws, more will be busted trying to buy illegal fire arms, more criminals or people that have bad intentions are caught.
User avatar #428 to #409 - liquidz (01/25/2013) [-]

On the contrary being able to personally fend off anyone who tries to attack me. Not even with a gun, but via other means hardly makes me or others around me insecure.

It's called facing the truth of the world that there are evil people that will do evil things.

Hows that ban on knives going for you? And that ban on swords that are coming through?

Oh! Don't attack the guy that broke into your house or you might find yourself in jail longer than him.

Have you ever fired a gun?

One more thing, because you didn't answer it. I seriously really want to know this...

Where do you draw the line? What rights are so valuable to you that you will not let the government take them from you?
User avatar #444 to #428 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
Evil People doing evil things Are you having a laugh?
Well considering that a knife can be made out of anything, to a tooth brush, clearly not. However a gunpowder weapon is obviously harder to come by than a sharp object you inbred. What do you reckon?
User avatar #468 to #444 - liquidz (01/25/2013) [-]
Let me word that so your simple mind can understand it. Mentally defective people exist, they are unpredictable. Criminals exist, they will do whatever they want to get what they want done.

Ever take chemistry? Or is that forbidden for the commoner to learn because they might know how to make gun powder or other explosives? Not hard to put gunpowder at one end of a tube and something in that tube to be launched out.

Now stop detouring and focus here, I ask the question again, because you either are blind, or have your overgrown UK nose sticking so high up you can't see the screen right.

What right do you hold so cherished that you won't give it up?
User avatar #485 to #468 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
This is no simple mind here, the problem is i'm speaking to an inbred right now.
evil is such a harsh term and being Mentally ill does not make you evil as you so claim or being a criminal for that matter doesn't make you evil as well. Nobody makes it a goal to be a criminal, it's just being dealt an unfortunate fate.

Ok but the problem with that is how are you going to mass produce that as well if the government were to outlaw a type of gun. It's not exactly inconspicuous having a factory churn out guns for the matter.

detouring, Oh congrats on a big word inbred.
There are many right I hold dear, but owning a gun isn't one of them.
User avatar #531 to #485 - liquidz (01/25/2013) [-]
Meh, perhaps using the word evil was not the best way to say it, but you comprehend my point. ****** up **** happens, so expect the possibility and be ready for it.

A criminal may have an unfortunate fate, or it can be someone that just see's it as an easy route instead. Starting out small, why buy the loaf of bread when you can grab it from the stand and run? What happens when that criminal gets bolder? Why not steal the woman's purse?

The US has large amounts of land, and wilderness. We have moonshiners hiding all the time and producing without getting caught. Besides who is to say that Billy Bob is'nt building one for himself in his garage? Or Jimbo who has a machine shop, is'nt making parts for his buddies? And let's not forget the " **** it" portion and people shipping them in illegally for the black market. It's alot of land and sea to secure, and if we can't keep illegals and drugs out. We can't keep weapons out.

So you have some rights you hold dear. What freedom of speech, almost everyone holds that dear.

Now I want to know, what do you do. Honestly. What are you going to do when your government says you can't say that, or you can't do that? How do you say that is unfair, or a critical human right that can not be taken away? Look at what happens in china, or North Korea they kill off their people for having the wrong views on what the government wants done.

You might say it can't happen here, or in your country. But do you know what will happen tomorrow? Next year? How about 20 years from now?

My should I lose my right to defend myself, because a select few are unable to use that right correctly?

Why should I be branded "terrorist", "gun nut", "maniac" or whatever term you or the government want to come up with, because I rather be able to even the odds against me and multiple attackers?

How about PIPA and SOPA? They only failed because companies saw a big chance to lose money. Think how much those bills would censor speech on the internet.
User avatar #589 to #531 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
right but I wasn't talking about moonshine, I was talking about a weapons factory. It's a fair big difference. It's bound to happen obviously here and there but it makes no difference to me because it's all hypothetical.
#344 to #342 - selfdenyingbeggar (01/25/2013) [-]
Rights are not about needing.
User avatar #346 to #344 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
The government will take away guns whenever they want. Do you think a hick army could really do much?
#354 to #346 - selfdenyingbeggar (01/25/2013) [-]
A guerilla might. I also don't think many soldiers would kill their country man, and the sadists would think it twice since they're armed. If you're attacking your own country I don't think you can use your technology that much because you don't have citizens paying your costs. Or at least it would have a very different outcome than just giving away their weapons. It also sends a message that people will give away their rights.
#361 to #354 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
You poor deluded yanks. Yes because a hick guerrilla army is just waiting to overthrow the government.
You poor deluded yanks. Yes because a hick guerrilla army is just waiting to overthrow the government.
User avatar #381 to #361 - iaminfactawizard (01/25/2013) [-]
The hicks and rednecks already tried to revolt. It took four years to put them down.
User avatar #384 to #381 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
And they haven't risen since.
User avatar #398 to #384 - liquidz (01/25/2013) [-]
They have'nt pushed us enough to make us do it.

See what happens when they take the guns.

Also, how do you like your higher violent crime rates over there?

Ours have been dropping rapidly since more people are getting armed. Hmm...
User avatar #417 to #398 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
I laughed hard when I read that, pal even if they did bang on your doors and pry them from your hands, what would you do? have a shootout with an army soldier or a police officer? You are right mad.
User avatar #477 to #417 - Lulzilla (01/25/2013) [-]
Lol, Okay there you can just stop now. Do you really think the military soldiers are going to obey the orders to kill innocent Americans or to invade our own country? I'm a Marine and everyone other military soldier would not fire against their own people (Except for the insane ones which is a very very very small number. Every infantry soldier knows who I'm talking about. The guy that brags about close quarter melee kills.).
Btw, doesn't matter if they're a hick or redneck. Those mother ******* know how to hunt and hunt WELL I'm pretty sure they can shoot another person a good 300 Yards away with a simple hunting rifle or shotgun (Slug not gauges.). Most of our BEST shooters come from rural areas since they know how to handle a gun. Plus the redneck population isn't very big but let's add in some more players. The serious gang members who have glocks and various assault weapons. The police officers who will revolt since they're regular people who have access to plenty of assault weapons and rounds (Including tear gas and all that jazz). The various militia groups in EVERY SINGLE STATE. The gun enthusiasts. The veterans. The people who have self defense weapons (Small caliber / low round handguns. Doesn't matter what type it's still a gun and last time I checked a bullet fired from any type of gun still kills people). The people who stock up for the Apocalypse (Most importantly the zombie Apocalypse. Those mother ******* got all sorts of weapons.) Anyone who has access to pellet/BB guns that fires a bb/pellet atleast at 600FPS. (Not that hard to make them fire even higher and yes they can kill people if aimed accurately.) Anyone in my high school that has taken gym since they make you do archery (Most likely a butt load of other highschools do that as-well. We used bows that fired from 30-50 pounds. That's more then enough to kill you and silently as-well).
User avatar #437 to #417 - liquidz (01/25/2013) [-]
Our military and police are already saying they will not enforce a confiscation of firearms from civilians.

Further, if they come by and take one of our guns, the others will know. It's not the individual they have to worry about. It's what the mass of other gun owners will do when they hear that citizens are having their property taken.

You chose your battles, and the ground you fight on.

Only an idiot picks a fight he can not win.

But since you don't get into fights over there you know nothing about actual conflict or preparation for anything.

A wise man does not keep all his eggs in one basket either. Take my guns, and you'll be surprised I'll still have some after they leave.
User avatar #460 to #437 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
_Only an idiot picks a fight he can not win.

Well I guess you would fit right in there then.
If that's the case then don't worry about it. You make to be such a rebel too but you don't come up as nothing more than a little keyboard warrior. I think you've been watching too much fox for one day.
User avatar #482 to #460 - liquidz (01/25/2013) [-]
Fox is propaganda ******** .

I don't watch mainstream media, I do my own research.

Further you know nothing about me, like I know of you.

You know nothing of my training, my skill set, who I know or even what I do.

All I know of you is that you seem not to be of this country, are attacking my rights because you don't like them, and when faced with a challenge on points are forced to redirect to insults instead of making proper counter points.

I know what I am fighting for, something you don't have. Something that is not a right for you but a privilege that can be taken away at any point.

I have been in fights, I have spoken to veterans, and know the effects war has had on them. I have trained with my weapons, my fists, and my mind. I know how to defend myself, my property, my family, and my country.

I do not live in a dream world where everything is fine. I know **** can go wrong at any moment. But I do not fear it, I plan for it as best as I can.

My weapons and skills are not just for me, they are to defend the rights and lives of those around me and that I care about. To preserve what I hold dear.

Now maybe you understand why I asked you the question before:

What do you hold so dear, with your rights, your property, and liberties that you will not allow the government or any one else to take it from you?

When you answer that, then ask yourself. How do you make sure you keep those rights, property, and liberties? What do you do when they ignore your efforts to remove them from office? What happens when voting no longer is effective because the corruption is that strong?

You aren't from this country, you know nothing of our culture, our people, or what we believe in other than what the TV tells you to think. Must be nice paying those BBC taxes even if you don't want to watch it huh?
User avatar #496 to #482 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
Further you know nothing about me, like I know of you.
You know nothing of my training, my skill set, who I know or even what I do.
I have been in fights, I have spoken to veterans, and know the effects war has had on them. I have trained with my weapons, my fists, and my mind. I know how to defend myself, my property, my family, and my country.
My weapons and skills are not just for me, they are to defend the rights and lives of those around me and that I care about. To preserve what I hold dear.

Oh my god I died laughing at that, thank you
This sounds like the army kid post about being a sniper and all that and everyone takes the post as a joke. This is hilarious!
Your "training" and "skills" frighten normal people i'm sure.
User avatar #509 to #496 - liquidz (01/25/2013) [-]
I don't need to frighten, and have no interest in it.

Grow up and learn about the real world and stop trying to think you are cute by being a troll.

I care less what you think of me. I am here to point out to you my opinion. You can think I am a 500lb over weight McDonalds eating **** head for all I care.

I can picture you as the typical stuck up british snob as well.

Whoop de doo...

I will ask yet again, because you only want to derail.

What do you hold so dear, with your rights, your property, and liberties that you will not allow the government or any one else to take it from you?

Or do you have no answer, because you are afraid to face the truth and your "entertainment" by my posts is your escape from reality?
User avatar #515 to #509 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
Allow me that to answer that with a brilliant quote

"Further you know nothing about me, like I know of you.
You know nothing of my training, my skill set, who I know or even what I do.
I have been in fights, I have spoken to veterans, and know the effects war has had on them. I have trained with my weapons, my fists, and my mind. I know how to defend myself, my property, my family, and my country.
My weapons and skills are not just for me, they are to defend the rights and lives of those around me and that I care about. To preserve what I hold dear."

I just really don't care what you have to say is all.
User avatar #536 to #515 - liquidz (01/25/2013) [-]
Fair enough. You might not care.

But I hope when the time comes that it is something important that you need to care about, that you don't handle it with snappy comebacks, but with logic, reason, and appropriate debating skills.

Because those rights and properties that you do cherish will one day need you to step up to the task.
User avatar #585 to #536 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
Might? no I really don't. To you as well, someday may you attain common sense,logic, and reason, because arguing on the internet is ******* retarded.
You're trying to be nice while being an asshole. Stop being so condescending keyboard warrior and maybe you'll go somewhere in life.
User avatar #861 to #585 - liquidz (01/25/2013) [-]
Practice what you preach then.
#372 to #361 - Orangepeel (01/25/2013) [-]
Yes because a hick guerrilla army is just waiting to overthrow the government.

Well, they did it in 1783....
#392 to #372 - selfdenyingbeggar (01/25/2013) [-]
He did make me wonder if people could defend themselves against the government. i mean, soldiers attacking US soil and killing their families sounds very strange to me. But if they were, for whatever reason, inclined to do it, would they win? I used the costs of war and lack of income as a reason why it wouldn't work, ot at least that would mean that they can't use all their resources, but with banks being what they are, maybe they'd loan the government and/or army what they'd need?
User avatar #419 to #392 - liquidz (01/25/2013) [-]
Look at what trouble Iraq, and Afghanistan are giving our soldiers and think that our better trained and knowledgeable people here would not be just as bad if not worse.

Citizens already know what is important and of value to strike, the vulnerabilities that exist.

It's a war that no one wants or even wants to go near.

Pushing for restrictions and taking away of more liberties is the exact opposite thing that should be done right now with so many far greater pressing issues.

An economy running out of control, not just here but world wide.
Military spread incredibly thin
Other countries attacking us via cyber warfare 24/7 and threatening to do worse when they get the chance.
Liberties eroded severely by the patriot act and other laws.
High government dependency by those or poorer income standings.

That's just to name a few.
User avatar #374 to #372 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
Right and that was how many years ago? The amount of dense Americans is overwhelming.
#379 to #374 - Orangepeel (01/25/2013) [-]
Lol now you're just getting desperate.
Lol now you're just getting desperate.
User avatar #383 to #379 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
Oh alright.
#369 to #361 - selfdenyingbeggar (01/25/2013) [-]
I'm talking about defense.
#378 to #369 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
User avatar #349 to #346 - Orangepeel (01/25/2013) [-]
I agree. What good would any of us be against the government? I mean, no one really NEEDS to even talk bad about the government anyway. The constitution is outdated. We don't need the first and second amendments.
User avatar #487 to #349 - liquidz (01/25/2013) [-]
I am going to assume you are horribly uninformed and or trolling.

You do know what the 1st amendment is right?
User avatar #499 to #487 - Orangepeel (01/25/2013) [-]
It was sarcasm...
User avatar #510 to #499 - liquidz (01/25/2013) [-]
Good, hard to tell on the net with some of these comments.

The mindset of people around here... is unnerving to say the least.
#356 to #349 - selfdenyingbeggar (01/25/2013) [-]
gee, I think I've found one of the truly dumb people on the internet.
#360 to #356 - anonymous (01/25/2013) [-]
your a little piece of **** ************ , when they come knocking on your door at three in the morning to come take your ass away, ill have my guns, your a liberal ******* pussy who wants a utopia. wake up puss cakes. stupid faggot
#368 to #360 - selfdenyingbeggar (01/25/2013) [-]
uuhhhh I think you are confused.
#376 to #368 - anonymous (01/25/2013) [-]
yea alright, eat **** ************ , dumb ass, I mean I don't understand why you would want to limit your self from protecting your family. do not act like the bad guys aren't gonna get them. the evil dosen't reside in the gun
#380 to #376 - selfdenyingbeggar (01/25/2013) [-]
I'm the one who was defending the 2nd amendment, that's what i meant.
#382 to #380 - anonymous (01/25/2013) [-]
smart man
User avatar #365 to #360 - shoryuken (01/25/2013) [-]
User avatar #358 to #356 - Orangepeel (01/25/2013) [-]
It was sarcasm... Mind you though, I'm worried that half the people on funnyjunk would have agreed with what I just said.
#366 to #358 - selfdenyingbeggar (01/25/2013) [-]
hey, maybe you like this video, who knows. I think it's funny and true. But at least it's funny.
#364 to #358 - selfdenyingbeggar (01/25/2013) [-]
I'm glad. Yep, I doubt there would be that many but there sure would be some.
#339 - thebritishguy (01/25/2013) [-]
this photo was taken in a year, WAKE THE **** UP!
User avatar #332 - hardongo ONLINE (01/25/2013) [-]
this post gave me cancer
#335 to #332 - russianbro has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #336 to #335 - upunkpunk (01/25/2013) [-]
The comment section gave me cancer, its just a bunch of people repeating the same joke, slightly different.
User avatar #330 - seniorawesomesauce (01/25/2013) [-]
If Obama was really Hitler he'd have fixed the economy by now.
User avatar #538 to #330 - pokemonstheshiz (01/25/2013) [-]
by bumping up production of military products so they could go to war

like America would manufacture something now a days lol
User avatar #450 to #330 - italianrambo (01/25/2013) [-]
By killing all the jews

Think about it. Hitler didn't increase the amount of money in Germany. He increased the ratio of money:people by getting rid of people

User avatar #891 to #450 - wersand (01/25/2013) [-]
He improved the economy by building the Autobahn and creating factory jobs. All of this was of course, to prepare for his war.
User avatar #822 to #450 - supermegasherman (01/25/2013) [-]
he improved the economy before he exterminated the jews...
User avatar #493 to #450 - comeherekids (01/25/2013) [-]
you know that is not at all why the economy improved right?
User avatar #505 to #493 - italianrambo (01/25/2013) [-]
Its a math joke

But yea I have an idea about the history of it
User avatar #506 to #505 - comeherekids (01/25/2013) [-]
that is a weak math joke....
User avatar #568 to #506 - italianrambo (01/25/2013) [-]
Ratios man, ratios
User avatar #895 to #568 - comeherekids (01/26/2013) [-]
just using a ratio paired with inaccurate history does not make for a good joke for me. :L
#818 to #568 - bummerdrummer (01/25/2013) [-]
i thought it was a good joke.
#325 - notandytags (01/25/2013) [-]
Obama has a dog
HITLER had a dog
#322 - arstya (01/25/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#316 - dawgfan (01/25/2013) [-]
Funny Junk debating gun rights or gun control?
Funny Junk debating gun rights or gun control?
#310 - woeis has deleted their comment [-]
#309 - Yesitsme has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #355 to #309 - sphinxe (01/25/2013) [-]
I studied a bit of America in history, and a lot of people really liked the idea of a president who was a family man/liked kids and listened to what they had to say; especially with Kennedy. So I guess you could say some people liked tacky.
#338 to #309 - anonymous (01/25/2013) [-]
I know right. Obama is the only president in history to ever use political moves. How dare he!
#313 to #309 - capslockrage has deleted their comment [-]
#340 to #313 - anonymous (01/25/2013) [-]
everything the president does publicly is a political move, retard.
 Friends (0)