| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Show:   Top Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
Show All Replies
User avatar #25 - thenameschuck ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
Race mixing is communism.....wot
User avatar #18 - PubLandlord (01/21/2013) [-]
The thing is if 80% of Americans voted against gay marriage it would be more important for democracys sake that it be illegal rather than the moral justification of it being legalised.

User avatar #19 to #18 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
That's why normal states are "state of laws", in which laws prevent "the tyranny of the majority".
Picture this: if over 50% of the US population voted that a certain individual be condemned to death, do you think that gives them any authority over the existing laws?
User avatar #20 to #19 - PubLandlord (01/21/2013) [-]
Not massively law how the American system work, in Europe we have European human rights laws and stuff that are more important than countries laws
User avatar #21 to #20 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
I know that EU laws > country laws, but that's why EU insists a lot of respecting the state of law.
User avatar #22 to #21 - PubLandlord (01/21/2013) [-]
Whats your view on gun control in America ?
User avatar #23 to #22 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
Tighten and reglement the shit out of it. If it works here, it's sure as hell advisable to do it there.
User avatar #24 to #23 - PubLandlord (01/21/2013) [-]
Where abouts are you from, this guy in an online debate sums up Americas gun laws really well

www.debate.org/debates/Guns-should-be-banned-in-the-united-states./1/

Just scroll down to read the debate
User avatar #26 to #24 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
Romania, so having a communist regime that controlled everything up to 23 years ago (despite having good relations & weapons shipping with close Muslim countries) is kind of a good point.
Here, not only are the guns kept a very close eye at (although one could get a tear-gas pistol or airsoft replicas with somewhat ease), but most can't afford them, either.

Will read the article when I get home.
User avatar #17 - ghettoswag (01/21/2013) [-]
Chances are the people in the first photo are the same people in the second
#12 - snerus (01/21/2013) [-]
I don't think he looks THAT stupid.
#8 - xsap (01/21/2013) [-]
yea.. tell me how stupid the people were 40 years ago..
User avatar #30 to #8 - mastadong (01/21/2013) [-]
I say we shoulda sent em back to africa immediately following the emancipation proclamation.. although I acknowledge a difference between a black man and a filthy nigger were still talking approx 1/5 that actually contribute to society where as the others will most likely try to talk your child into smoking..

and then proceed to rape them
#31 to #30 - N. Korean citizen (01/21/2013) [-]
Interesting statement. But if I could interject, mastadong, you look like the worlds biggest douchebag cunt in your profile picture and you look like you'd fuck your own sister for a slice of cheese. You look just as bad if not worse than the people you are describing.

And I bet you don't even like cheese.
User avatar #37 to #31 - mastadong (01/21/2013) [-]
Although I think its adorable you think anyone values your opinion in the slightest :D
User avatar #35 to #31 - mastadong (01/21/2013) [-]
Im just going to assume your a nigger judging by your ridiculous amount of vulgar language, the fact you feel the need to interject as anonymous, and what I can only imagine is a redneck/ hillbilly reference.

HEY NIGGER!! Get off mommys couch, get a job, deal with us "hillbillys", and become more than a fried chicken licken, kool aid sippin, crime statistic/ deadbeat.
User avatar #41 to #38 - mastadong (01/21/2013) [-]
I prefer "irritated" :)
#118 to #41 - thequeenofslime (01/21/2013) [-]
I'd be irritated too if I got verbally destroyed by an anon.
I'd be irritated too if I got verbally destroyed by an anon.
User avatar #55 to #41 - trueswordsman (01/21/2013) [-]
Hey asshole tell me why you think that they should be sent back to Africa.
#299 to #55 - N. Korean citizen (01/21/2013) [-]
maybe because they are:
loud
smell like shit
dumb as fuck
sitting on government/ tax payers money
64% of crime in the U.S is caused by blacks
shall i continue
User avatar #479 to #299 - mastadong (01/22/2013) [-]
^^^All about the facts baby.
Im done here.
User avatar #6 - profarnsworth (01/21/2013) [-]
Notice in the integration picture there is a mixture of youth and age, but in the gay marriage there is just old people. It just goes to show that either 1. The youth of america are accepting of other peoples views and lives, or 2. The youth of America is just too damn lazy to picket or protest.
User avatar #241 to #6 - thefloppinater (01/21/2013) [-]
I always thought it was because most young people tend to be more liberal nowadays.
User avatar #236 to #6 - McFuckUp (01/21/2013) [-]
Some young people are just as bad. During the election one of my former friends kept posting about how people voting for Obama had no morals because that meant they supported same sex marriage. I asked him to give me a reason that gay marriage is wrong, and he said that "It's an abomination to God."
He's 21 and has a kid out of wedlock with his 16 year old girlfriend.
There's a reason he's a former friend.
0
#200 to #6 - geckosandcheerios has deleted their comment. [-]
#185 to #6 - hillbillypowpow (01/21/2013) [-]
And if you look closely, you'll also notice that the segregation picture is also black and white
#174 to #6 - N. Korean citizen (01/21/2013) [-]
Seeing as how the do protest, but usually on the more accepting ground, I'd say the first.
User avatar #84 to #6 - teoferrazzi (01/21/2013) [-]
3. the youth of america were coerced by their parents to participate in protests.
now the youth of america is full of brats
#83 to #6 - kneehumper (01/21/2013) [-]
or 3: The youth of america is faboulouuuuuus
or 3: The youth of america is faboulouuuuuus
User avatar #67 to #6 - odapac (01/21/2013) [-]
Or maybe the young people's generation in the old photo are now the old people in the new photo and they still haven't learned to shut the fuck up.
User avatar #14 to #6 - sketchysketchist (01/21/2013) [-]
What about that occupy wall street thing.
Wasn't that just young people complaining about something they don't understand.
User avatar #11 to #6 - Bobtheblob (01/21/2013) [-]
A bit of both, really.
User avatar #4 - ilolzville (01/20/2013) [-]
No, in 40 years they're all going to wonder WHY THE FUCK they wanted to get married in the first place. Because marriage destroys relationships.
User avatar #15 to #4 - sketchysketchist (01/21/2013) [-]
Yeah!
Did you know 100% of all divorces start with marriage.
#76 to #15 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account** (01/21/2013) [-]
User avatar #13 to #4 - thepyras (01/21/2013) [-]
That isn't really true. Bad relationships have ruined marriage.
User avatar #3 - viscerys (01/20/2013) [-]
Just saying: I don't see the point in marriage to begin with.
User avatar #7 to #3 - mookiez (01/21/2013) [-]
So when You brake up, She takes half of Your shit.
User avatar #16 to #7 - sketchysketchist (01/21/2013) [-]
They really need to repeal that law.
Seriously, that made sense then when women weren't allowed to really work and needed a way to make it by.
Now anyone can work, and it's bullshit for the richer person to give it up just so some ass can live without having to work for it.
User avatar #5 to #3 - thefurie (01/21/2013) [-]
taxes, medical, not frowned upon by religions
User avatar #9 to #5 - trojanmannn (01/21/2013) [-]
i think if you're gay and getting married, you're probably frowned upon by every religion.
User avatar #10 to #9 - thefurie (01/21/2013) [-]
yeah but a couple living together isn't good in every religion
#2 - DrollHumor ONLINE (01/20/2013) [-]
I can't wait for it to be like that.
I can't wait for it to be like that.
#1 - N. Korean citizen (01/20/2013) [-]
Idk, I still think we should have segregation
 Friends (0)