Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#487 - lordnerevar (01/23/2013) [-]
When Marriage really IS one man and one woman forever, then I will take these arguments seriously. Outlaw divorce and abide by your own arguments and we'll talk. Who the 						****					 really cares if two men or women marry each other? It's none of our damn business. OP is using Godmode hax, because this is right.
When Marriage really IS one man and one woman forever, then I will take these arguments seriously. Outlaw divorce and abide by your own arguments and we'll talk. Who the **** really cares if two men or women marry each other? It's none of our damn business. OP is using Godmode hax, because this is right.
#455 - thebestofmurder (01/21/2013) [-]
I tend to lean a bit conservative in this manner, simply because the argument of, "you can love whoever you want" is asinine. I loved my grandfather and I love my dad, but does that make me gay? 						****					 no. What makes a person gay is sexual preference. So to me the argument comes off as, "you can 						****					 whoever you want". So how long will it be before people are 						*******					 their pet dog in the street because nobody can tell them "No"?
I tend to lean a bit conservative in this manner, simply because the argument of, "you can love whoever you want" is asinine. I loved my grandfather and I love my dad, but does that make me gay? **** no. What makes a person gay is sexual preference. So to me the argument comes off as, "you can **** whoever you want". So how long will it be before people are ******* their pet dog in the street because nobody can tell them "No"?
0
#460 to #455 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#440 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
The whole reason people/sheeple wanted to stop race mixing is because it's the genetically dominant species who overwrite everything else. In otherwords, it's why Black people ARE black. They have 'genetically' dominant traits across the board. Meaning over time, everyone in America WILL be black, and that also means the loss of European neurology too. In the end genetically dominant traits always win out. Even the Australian Aboriginees wanted race seperation, because white people are MORE genetically dominant than them, hence the loss of their people and culture.... Genetic Genocide,,, look at what America IS becoming... Were those people really wrong???
+2
#436 - deadmeme **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #500 to #436 - shfreaksixninesix (01/31/2013) [-]
A thumb for you, Sir!
0
#506 to #500 - deadmeme **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #508 to #506 - shfreaksixninesix (02/02/2013) [-]
i still see it.
i still see them all.
User avatar #434 - Durp (01/21/2013) [-]
I came here because the little thumbnail on the front page told me "you are going to look".
#417 - greenpyro (01/21/2013) [-]
I'm so glad racial mixing is accepted normally. I mean I know integration is still a problem in many places including the western world, but now I can completely see gay marriage being a normal thing a few decades from now. People don't like change or something challenging their beliefs, but marriage is now becoming more of a religious/moral issue that I feel that will end up being available for everyone regardless of sexual orientation.
pic unrelated :P
User avatar #501 to #417 - shfreaksixninesix (01/31/2013) [-]
I truly respect you for stating your beliefs so proudly.
though i don't believe in interracial (more as a preference reason) you are spot on. if only more people were so rationally worded instead of "OMG INSENSITIVE MORON, YOUSHOULN'TBEALIVE!!!!!*&$#(STUPID REDNECK COUSIN ****** "
I personally think that marriage is kind of redundant.
User avatar #505 to #501 - greenpyro (01/31/2013) [-]
Well I'm a straight latin guy so I'm all for interracial (as an immigrant I'm the first in my family to date a girl outside of my ethnicity, and of course my race). Marriage started out as a religious practice, thats has lasted thousands of yours, but in our age things are drastically changing, so I do seem as equal marriage as possible. Btw I'm probably older than 65% of FJ users which is why I'm a bit more mature than just sayin OMG blah blah. haha. Btw how come you commented on this? This content past a while ago
User avatar #507 to #505 - shfreaksixninesix (02/02/2013) [-]
interesting to find someone who can actually read what they are typing.
#402 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
I dont really dislike gay people, but I am against gay marriage. Why? Its simple, it lowers the bar. And by bar i mean tolerance. There is a group of people using the fact that gays can marry to try and legalize zoophilia(Google it). And it will spread, in the future you will be able to go masturbate with sand paper in public just because your born to like it and everyone else will be forced to tollerate it.
#441 to #402 - PurpleStuff (01/21/2013) [-]
You are so dumb that it makes me sad. Gif related.
You are so dumb that it makes me sad. Gif related.
User avatar #420 to #402 - hanakoikezawa (01/21/2013) [-]
I stopped reading at the zoophilia point
#419 to #402 - lazaman (01/21/2013) [-]
not sure if troll, or brainwashed by ignorance.
User avatar #461 to #419 - awesomeradish (01/21/2013) [-]
Why is your text pink? Are you jesus?
User avatar #477 to #461 - lazaman (01/21/2013) [-]
yeah sure why not.
User avatar #429 to #419 - ivoryhammer (01/21/2013) [-]
It's an anon, of course it's a troll
#415 to #402 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
Animals can't sign a marriage contract.
Case & point.
User avatar #412 to #402 - awesomeradish (01/21/2013) [-]
I don't see what's wrong with civil partnerships - if gay people are at such odds with christianity, why would they want to participate in a christian ceremony?
User avatar #442 to #412 - Keleth (01/21/2013) [-]
civil partnerships do not give all the benefits of marriage and many places don't recognize it
User avatar #451 to #442 - awesomeradish (01/21/2013) [-]
I see
#438 to #412 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
Christianity isn't against homosexuality, just like muslims aren't terrorists. There are lots of gay religious people.
User avatar #502 to #438 - shfreaksixninesix (01/31/2013) [-]
i understand your objective view, and in fact share it, but i believe that your comparison of muslim and and homicide bombers to christianity and homosexuals is misguided, and sadly it is almost all of christianity who abhor homosexuality. True there are many christians who are fine or indifferent, but christianity as a whole could be thought of objectively as a case of 2000 years of peer pressure, and speak once of the gay marriage, though not physically threatened, will be ridiculed for their idea and that can often be more painful than physical pain, so they instead keep the idea to themselves and let the idea of 'gays are unnatural" gets reenforced. endless cycle.
User avatar #411 to #402 - hackmon (01/21/2013) [-]
slippery slope fallacy, good job retard
#401 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
lol "race mixing is communism" XD .....Oh wait. Communism=equality of everyone... Race mixing IS communism. D;
User avatar #395 - lolzordz (01/21/2013) [-]
things change all the time throughout history, so does that mean everything is stupid?
#407 to #395 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
Good point man.
User avatar #388 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
The reality of this situation is that the gays aren`t marrying for `love` they are marrying for financial benefits such as lower expenses per person and cross-employer health plans, not that they don`t deserve this, but marriage is not a right to have for everyone, it is a privilege, a privilege subjugated by christian and catholic law which BLATANTLY STATES that marriage is between man and woman only. If there is a religion that marries gays then go right the **** for it.
#474 to #388 - instalation ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
Please just shut up. You're giving the rest of us religious a bad name. ;~;

we're not all close minded assholes..
User avatar #446 to #388 - Keleth (01/21/2013) [-]
if marriage was only recognized by the religious bodies, then i would agree its a little silly...but no...government sees marriage and they see civil partnerships as less. much less rights
-1
#445 to #388 - rotinaj has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #458 to #445 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
>atheist religions
son what the actual **** .
User avatar #433 to #388 - lazaman (01/21/2013) [-]
OH COOL GUYS LOOK!
SOME ONE WHO "KNOWS" EVERYTHING SOME ONE IS FEELING WHEN DOING SOMETHING!

Because us gays are TOTALLY incapable of love, and we TOTALLY would never want to marry each other.

Mhm, thank you for enlightening me on MY feelings, thanks buddy!
User avatar #503 to #433 - shfreaksixninesix (01/31/2013) [-]
please don't attack me, this is an honest question. (I'm pro gay rights)
Why do you want to be_ married_? I understand that two people have the right to be together as a couple and be recognized as such, but why choose to go through an expensive ceremony, and vows that are trivial to think make a couple more couple-y when all that matters is that you love each other? not to side with #388, but you have to understand where hes coming from (albeit a very poorly put together point with loads of assumption) it kinda looks like the reaping of financial benefits. i guess what im saying is that, and this also applies to straight couples as well, why isn't the pure joy of love with another enough to be content instead of labeling oneself through an antiquated and, frankly redundant, ritual?
please no rage, it's only a question and i will gladly accept your answer, angry or not.
#473 to #433 - frohling (01/21/2013) [-]
hey lazaman we support your rights and everything, and I am not hating on you. but seriously bro don't be a fag :P
User avatar #437 to #433 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
Perhaps I was a bit general with my words, *most gays *most marriages are under catholic law
#408 to #388 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
>implying straight people arent doing that.

I think you'll find there are gays marrying for love just as much as there are straights abusing the system.
User avatar #414 to #408 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
Read the whole paragraph please.
#422 to #414 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
I did. Your religion comment is ******** . You dont need religion to get married retard.
#396 to #388 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
Yes and in American law constitution reigns supreme over any other word
User avatar #398 to #396 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
When did I say that? I'm in canada ******** .
#391 to #388 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
Marriage existed before the bible. Its not purely christian so they dont own the rights to it. Plus religious law and governmental law SHOULD NOT apply to each other. Religion has no place in politics.
User avatar #394 to #391 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
Implying marriage is politics, implying marriage before religion.
#406 to #394 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
There were religions and marriages before Christianity dumbass. I'm talking about its up to the government to pass same sex laws i.e. POLITICS so religion has no right to say it shouldnt be passed. If marriage is only Christian how the **** did the ancient Egyptians and non-Christian countries marry for many years before the bible?
User avatar #413 to #406 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
Ancient Egypt and non-christian countries married under theeir own religion, obviously. Marriage is all under religious affairs, I thought I made that clear.
User avatar #410 to #406 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
Holy **** it`s like talking to Bill O`Reilly faggot version, first of all, get an account, second of all, please read, third, I never said there weren`t religions before christianity, fourth I said if there was a religion where gays can marry they should, please read before rebutting to refrain from looking like an ass.
#416 to #410 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
1) Dont rage because Im anon just because you cant form a legit argument
2) Im not gay Im just not an arrogant **** like you. I'm throwing legit arguments at you and you have no reputable come backs.
3) You said " implying marriage before religion" saying that marriages cant have existed before it. Which it did. So.. yeah you are a hypocrite and clearly dont read before you post.
Why should there be a religion where they should marry? Why not atheism WHICH I DID MENTION! There are Christians who accept gay marriage, atheists which accept it, muslims, jews etc. Just because YOU dont doesnt mean others dont.
Religion has no place in this. So dont ******* mention it. Its up to the government NOT religion. So it has no legit place in this argument.
Me read? Yeh... I just proved what an idiot you are. I had to repeat all my points here because you clearly are too stupid to have seen them.
User avatar #430 to #416 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
Also I don't see you providing back-up for saying that marriage existed before religion, which it didn't, atheists can't be reverends who marry, and religon has everything to do with marriage, you saying it being under the state/government implies that there were forms of government before religious beliefs, I see history isn't your major.
#444 to #430 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
You dont need a reverend to marry. You sign a sheet idiot in an office.
"forms of government" can include tribes of cavemen where we didnt have idols we just hunted like animals. So yes, there were.
Just look it up. If you cant grasp my point that religion doesnt have place in deciding same sex laws your just a ******* idiot. One simple point just cant be grasped by that ignorant singular brain cell.
User avatar #450 to #444 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
Ignorant of the fact of....?
User avatar #423 to #416 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
"If there is a religion that marries gays then go right the **** for it." I'm pretty sure I said that.
User avatar #449 to #423 - Keleth (01/21/2013) [-]
problem with that is, ITS ******* ILLEGAL!!!! thats the entire ******* problem!!!! MAKE IT LEGAL and then the churches that agree with it can do the ceremony!!
#435 to #423 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
"Religion has n0 place in this argument" AND religion doesnt decide whether same sex marriage is passed.
Pretty sure I said that about 4 times now. Religion has no place in deciding who marries who. THUS... this might be TOO hard for you to grasp... your entire argument is void. Every religion has people who accepts it anyway.
User avatar #443 to #435 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
My argument is that gays shouldn't marry under religions that disallow it, how is it void? it makes perfect sense.
#448 to #443 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
You said gay marriage is wrong because marriage is under Christian law. Which it ISNT.
My point is you're bringing religion into government. THEY decide the bill not some catholic loons so stop bringing them into it. They have no place. End of. NO religion in politics. Dont back up gay marriage as bad because of some pathetic Christian laws. They shouldnt mix.
User avatar #456 to #448 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
Sorry I meant to say most marriages in america, I suppose that was the hole, too late to patch it up now. I never said gay marriage it bad, not did i state I was against it, I was being sensible toward the people against it and why, being an anti-theist I really don't see myself in another situation backing up the relgious people.
#377 - miaandvinny (01/21/2013) [-]
Don't they already look stupid?
User avatar #370 - mewxchii ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
I'm against mixed racing. You're killing races by doing that. As for gay people I don't really care. The Bible said to not be gay, it never said to hate on others who chose to be.
#405 to #370 - julpiter (01/21/2013) [-]
while I appreciate you're honesty. Whats all that wrong with race mixing? it won't destroy a races culture or perceived "genetic superiority" all races have genetic benefits and downfalls created from thousands of years of adaptation. Besides what if people are in love? just because there of different races (though both human) the can't be together
User avatar #472 to #405 - mewxchii ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
Hey, its just a opinion/belief. Sad how no one respects that in this community. They even try to be immature about (person below me) ..But I get what you're getting at too.
#387 to #370 - corruptdog (01/21/2013) [-]
What?
What?
User avatar #392 to #387 - mewxchii ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
You're real nice.
#379 to #370 - choclategum (01/21/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkexKLCak5M   
   
Killing races? What's wrong with you? The human race will still be the same, the only thing that would probably change is skin color, which has been happening since the start of human migration.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkexKLCak5M

Killing races? What's wrong with you? The human race will still be the same, the only thing that would probably change is skin color, which has been happening since the start of human migration.
User avatar #389 to #379 - mewxchii ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
Whoawhoa get your mind out of the games. Not races as in human and elf. Race as in white vs black. When a white (typically a woman) hooks up with a ****** they create a MIXED child.
#397 to #389 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
We were all originally black. Our ancestors have a lot of mixed blood so this 'mixing' isnt exactly 'new'.
User avatar #470 to #397 - mewxchii ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
Thats an evolution THEORY. Even if it was true, It proves blacks are unevolved.
User avatar #384 to #379 - konradkurze (01/21/2013) [-]
well since monkeys hold the larger numbers, the worlds turning black

when monkeys take over the world will be primitive caveman **** forever, do you want that?
#386 to #384 - choclategum (01/21/2013) [-]
I don't know about you, but i'll rather have koko the gorilla than some self-entitled race pig.
User avatar #390 to #386 - konradkurze (01/21/2013) [-]
take a look at somalia, how ******* there are poor and lazy as **** and they survive mostly through killing each other and pirating stuff to live

if blacks took over the world....it would all be like somalia

User avatar #403 to #390 - choclategum (01/21/2013) [-]
So apparently Somalia equals all blacks? What about south africa? Does that not ring a bell?
User avatar #421 to #403 - konradkurze (01/21/2013) [-]
south africans are being pushed out of there by the black majority....in fact most are taking off down to australia and new zealand with the looser migration laws

as for the blacks, left to their own ways, they will all become primitive....with the numbers of primitive ones back in their country, and the ones with other countries that produce more hiphop retards than scholars, eventually the braindead ones will take over
#439 to #421 - choclategum (01/21/2013) [-]
"south Africans are being pushed out of there by the black majority"   
 Who do you think the majority of people in south Africa are? They're black. Do you think before you type 						****					 like this down. No that's it, i'm done, click on that youtube link up there for more, i'm through.   
   
Africans are in the majority at just over 41-million, making up 79.2% of the total population. The coloured(mixed) population is 4,615,401 (8.9%), while there are 4,586,838 (8.9%) whites. The Indian/Asian population stands at 1,286,930 (2.5%). In 2011, "other" was included in the Census, and accounts for 280 454 or 0.5% of the total.   
   
http://www.southafrica.info/about/people/population.htm#.UP2oRCfoQrc#ixzz2Ie3C2W XD
"south Africans are being pushed out of there by the black majority"
Who do you think the majority of people in south Africa are? They're black. Do you think before you type **** like this down. No that's it, i'm done, click on that youtube link up there for more, i'm through.

Africans are in the majority at just over 41-million, making up 79.2% of the total population. The coloured(mixed) population is 4,615,401 (8.9%), while there are 4,586,838 (8.9%) whites. The Indian/Asian population stands at 1,286,930 (2.5%). In 2011, "other" was included in the Census, and accounts for 280 454 or 0.5% of the total.

http://www.southafrica.info/about/people/population.htm#.UP2oRCfoQrc#ixzz2Ie3C2W XD
User avatar #454 to #439 - konradkurze (01/21/2013) [-]
when i think south african, i think of the europeans who colonised it and actually set a national border as opposed to the tribal domains the black africans had

blacks are just african, yes they now live in parts that have been set as separate countries by european laws, but theyre still the same people as much as the people in different states in usa are americans

south africa was in fact controlled by these white Afrikaans up until britain had a hissy fit with south africa and demanded it be handed over to the black majority
User avatar #369 - carsondailey (01/21/2013) [-]
in all fairness it looks like the majority might be dead in 40 years due to their age already
User avatar #368 - thedarkestrogue (01/21/2013) [-]
Hey they want it that way, its their choice.
I choose not to meddle in other peoples affairs.
Just makes you look like an idiot.
#374 to #368 - miaandvinny (01/21/2013) [-]
They choose to meddle in gay's affairs by voting against same sex marriage
User avatar #376 to #374 - thedarkestrogue (01/21/2013) [-]
my point of view is that its non of their business. Who are they to judge what makes other people happy?
User avatar #367 - desiduratum (01/21/2013) [-]
FJ = support of gay marriage, also = hatred of faggotry? is this correct community?
#372 to #367 - miaandvinny (01/21/2013) [-]
gay people and faggots are different. It's like black people and ******* .
User avatar #409 to #372 - desiduratum (01/21/2013) [-]
oh, i see. so, perez hilton is a fag, right? where as elton john is just gay?
User avatar #381 to #372 - ppeeddoobbeeaarr (01/21/2013) [-]
It sucks that I can only thumb once.
User avatar #363 - IamSofaKingdom (01/21/2013) [-]
I have no problem with gay marriage being legalized but I don't see how they would look stupid. They want marriage to be a religiously sanctified union. It isn't like they say gay people should be exiled or murdered or that they can't have an equivalent bonding union similar to marriage, they just want to keep current marriage the way it is for themselves. That's not me agreeing with the opinion just pointing out the nature of it.

The people on the bottom were hate-filled, bigots and persecuted people of other races violently.

The top picture may look narrow minded, but I wouldn't say stupid.
User avatar #362 - dramallama (01/21/2013) [-]
yeah and in a 100 years you will look so stupid for being against pedophilia
#371 to #362 - miaandvinny (01/21/2013) [-]
But a child doesn't have the ability to make that large of a decision....
#382 to #371 - cynicalskin (01/21/2013) [-]
a 17 year old girl has just as much ability as an 18 year old girl lol
#400 to #382 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
16 is the legal age is many countries so that isnt really a good example.
#484 to #400 - cynicalskin (01/22/2013) [-]
I'm pretty sure we're talking about America here lol
0
#385 to #382 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#485 to #385 - cynicalskin (01/22/2013) [-]
But technically it is, which is what I was talking about
0
#459 to #385 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#383 to #382 - miaandvinny (01/21/2013) [-]
Then she can wait a year.
User avatar #356 - Onemanretardpack (01/21/2013) [-]
Your religion is weak, HAIL SITHIS!
#354 - Womens Study Major (01/21/2013) [-]
I don't think the old-time protesters look stupid.
I actually agree with them.

I find the mixing of bloodlines to be a bit sad. In another 200 years or so, we'll all be mixed together and their won't be any "Pure" blood left in any of us.
Not saying anyone is better then another, but that its just sad that we'll lose alot of our genetic originality.


And yes, I signed out because I know the flames you all will drop on me will make the sun look a pussy.
0
#463 to #354 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #424 to #354 - arstya ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
Sorry to burst your bubble anon, but we survive because of the mixing. Diversity keeps every species and ecosystem alive. No diversity, no new genes. It's like sticking with a 80's computer in today's age.
 Friends (0)