Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#179 - thepineapple (01/18/2013) [-]
Boltgun.
Killzone.
Nail our enemies to the nearest wall.
Epic.
#281 to #179 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
Painkiller: impaling enemies to the walls before it was cool
#174 - VikingSharkPANCH (01/18/2013) [-]
and nails are waaaay cheaper than bullets. **** yea dewalt
#171 - wellwellwell (01/18/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #170 - dawdawdwa (01/18/2013) [-]
Pardon me while I go google all those measurement units.
User avatar #167 - scottsselfdefense (01/18/2013) [-]
you could probably make one of those. i want to. badly
#166 - gibroner (01/18/2013) [-]
politicians will refer to this as a high capacity assault hammer
politicians will refer to this as a high capacity assault hammer
User avatar #168 to #166 - scottsselfdefense (01/18/2013) [-]
HAH. yeah you're right. someone brought up a good point. why does obama get armed guards with assault weapons (that are fully automatic btw, while many of the assault weapons we are able to own are semi) but we are supposed to get nothing? thats his way of saying "haha im above the law" assuming a law is passed banning "assault weapons." we have rifles that look like carbines, but are really for hunting and target shooting purposes, not assault purpouses.
#192 to #168 - Lulzilla (01/18/2013) [-]
Shut up. Just...-Sigh-..Shut up. Key Words, ARMED GUARDS. Why do armed guards for banks have shotguns and assault weapons? Because it's needed for their job in case someone tries to steal and no idiot is going to steal from a vault or money truck with a simple pistol. Obamas guards have to be ready for ANYTHING. It's nice seeing how people lack common sense.    
P.S. Most of those guards are part of the military. Ever heard of the Marine Presidential Body Guards? It's a job you can pick when joining.
Shut up. Just...-Sigh-..Shut up. Key Words, ARMED GUARDS. Why do armed guards for banks have shotguns and assault weapons? Because it's needed for their job in case someone tries to steal and no idiot is going to steal from a vault or money truck with a simple pistol. Obamas guards have to be ready for ANYTHING. It's nice seeing how people lack common sense.
P.S. Most of those guards are part of the military. Ever heard of the Marine Presidential Body Guards? It's a job you can pick when joining.
User avatar #197 to #192 - dstone (01/18/2013) [-]
But that's just his point! No one in their right mind is going to steal from some one with one of those weapons. So why is it that the political stance on self and home protection say that a simple pistol is enough? A woman in Kansas used her self defense pistol on an intruder, she shot him SIX TIMES, he laid down, cried, got up and left. Imagine if he wasn't alone how ****** she would have been!
#201 to #197 - Lulzilla (01/18/2013) [-]
Because simple pistols ARE enough. Your home isn't a ******* military fort. It's not battle of Felucia. It's your damn HOME. A decent pistol IS enough. Your trying to ward someone off your property not commit first degree murder just because someone broke into your house. If this women shot this guy 6 times she must have really ****** aiming and this guy has to be fifty cent or something because I've been shot by a pistol before. Those mother ******* HURT. One shot you're pretty much DONE with whatever you were trying to do unless you determined enough.
Assault weapons speak for themselves. They're for ASSAULT purposes. You go to war and clear bunkers and what not with them.
A self defense weapon is for self defense. You're not trying to KILL the person unless it's 100% needed and most likely...it's not. Your logic is TERRIBLE and you should rethink your view on the world.
User avatar #250 to #201 - parttimezombie (01/18/2013) [-]
so what makes it an "Assault" weapon. because last time i checked. a civilian AR-15 works exactly the same as a pistol and a hunting rifle.

also im impressed with the multiple spidey pics. well done on that
User avatar #401 to #250 - scottsselfdefense (01/22/2013) [-]
what makes it an assault weapon really is just the look. like a bushmaster looks like a carbine. notice how they say assault weapon and not assault rifle? thats because assault rifles have a full auto setting (and a rifle caliber). an assault weapon is any weapon that the liberals dont think we should have because that would give us too much freedom and control over our own lives
User avatar #209 to #201 - dstone (01/18/2013) [-]
Whoa there with the insults, I'm trying to have a simple discussion and exchanging of facts/opinions, try to stay mature about this. Pistols have been proven time after time to NOT BE ENOUGH. Where would you have suggested this woman aim then? She hit him with all six rounds in her gun, she hit him in the torso as she was instructed, and yet it was still ineffective. But you're right my home ISN'T a military fort. To me it's much more valuable, the space where I lay my family down to rest is, in my opinion, supposed to be the safest spot they know of and what I choose to defend my home with is my choice and right. Simply saying "Ohh hurr durr assult weapon means you can only murder people with it!" Makes you seem terribly close-minded and ignorant. You're only serious assertions about defense pistols is that because they hurt people will stop? Or rather because the were enough to hurt YOU that it's good enough? Seriously? Ask any police officer about the issue of their stun guns not being enough or about how the threat of pain doesn't means **** to people who are adamant about harming you. You want to know what pistol's did when intruder's broke into my old home while I was a kid? Nothing. My uncle shot them, they rushed him and beat the **** out of him. I was forced to watch the rape of my sisters that day and do you know why? Because pistols aren't enough. You say that you're not supposed to kill everyone that breaks into your home and I agree, you're not. Yet you seem to think that all people with assault weapons do is open fire the minute they see the intruder. THEY DON'T! They tell them to leave else, they'll have to shot/call the police etc. People who give a **** put their hands up and say "Okay I'm leaving" Or something to the same extent. Not everyone with an assault weapon is looking to blindly murder someone under the guise of self defense, why can't you understand that a man with a tiny hand gun saying get out isn't as scary as one with a AR15?
User avatar #221 to #209 - Lulzilla (01/18/2013) [-]
As I said before, Either she was a bad shot or this guy was fifty cent or something. The guy RAN AWAY after being shot. Want to know something fantastic about pistols and handguns? You can reload them in the blink of an eye. If there were multiple people who were bent on harming that women in Kansas guess what...she's most likely going to get harmed. Shotgun, AK, M16, SAW, She's going to get hurt. A handgun/pistol is all you need. If a person is BENT on harming you like I said earlier it doesn't matter what you have their going to try their hardest to harm you. If they try their hardest to harm then you shoot their knee caps. They wont be walking any time soon. You don't need an assault weapon to ward people away. A protective dog and a hand gun will do the trick. People are always thinking "WELL WHAT IF THERE ARE LIKE A BILLION PEOPLE TRYING TO HURT ME HERP DERP WHAT IF SOMEONE WONT HER HUR HUR". It's most likely not going to happen to you. They're exceptions but most likely it wont happen to you. You don't need an assault weapon to scare people away because the only way for it to work is to get them before or in the action of doing something bad and they can physically see your weapon. A Desert Eagle and a AK pretty much sound the same.
I keep repeating myself but it's true. I regular hand gun is more then enough to stop someone who isn't bent on hurting you. A regular robber isn't trying to kill everyone in the house. He just wants your **** . He doesn't want a bullet hole in his body or to have a shoot out.
If someone who doesn't put their hands up and say "Okay I'm leaving" then you can shoot them.
User avatar #237 to #221 - dstone (01/18/2013) [-]
She had a dog, he killed it and she only had the six rounds on her, her original intent was that she'd use to scare people away... What I'm saying is that you're right, the ordinary robber isn't going to risk bodily harm for w.e he wanted to take from you. But how can we let that be the defining factor for home defense? Guy breaks in, and it's a 50/50 toss up on if he's actually ******* insane or not? As the old saying goes, "It's better to have it and not need it, than to need it and not have it." I'm not saying that "like a billion people" are trying to kill me. I've seen what 5 can do. Not everyone is a Marine like yourself, the first thing they think is "Oh **** he's running at me!" not "Time for selective targeting , I better take out his knees". Should that be part of the gun training? Yes I think that'd save a lot of lives. My next point would be that you're suggesting a Desert Eagle for home defense? Is that what you were shot with? Because if so I retract my comment about it being enough to hurt you. A pistol that shoots .50 cal is gonna ******* hurt. But being in mind that it's .50 cal it's no longer considered a self/home defense pistol. It's an armed/active duty pistol. .32 or lower for self defense, and speaking to a Marine, give your honest opinion please. Would you trust your life, and the lives of your loved ones on a six shooter .32? I wouldn't.
User avatar #255 to #237 - Lulzilla (01/18/2013) [-]
Seeing as I would never use a revolver seeing as we're not in the old western times anymore. Depending on where you live you can get a higher gun with a higher ammunition count but low power. (12 shots with .32 ammunition). Whenever I draw my weapon I'll always have extra magazines with me.
If someone is coming at you with murderous intent then by all means shoot him lethally. Heart cavity, Lungs, Brain, Neck, kidneys (Which will cause them to piss themselves.). I would never train someone to kill someone else by shooting in the gut seeing as that's a slow death and they can still do stuff. For instant kills you aim for the upper body. If there are ribs then shoot there.
I didn't know that they took the Desert Eagle of of the home defense. I only said that because it's pretty ******* scary. Shooting someone with it would cause a pretty much instant kill or life debilitating injury (which they could sue you for if you didn't have the proper intent). NO ONE will **** with you if you have a Desert Eagle. Shoot that baby once and they'll go running. The neighborhood will wake up and call the cops as-well.
Also if your worried about home defense then you should get a alarm system. It's the modern day and those things WORK. A protective dog would be the second line of defense and a fire arm would the the last line of defense.
User avatar #276 to #255 - dstone (01/18/2013) [-]
I understand how to take down a target sir. But thank you non the less for the instruction. What I'm saying is during this ban that's being discussed by the politics. 9mm is going to be the top of self defense rounds. Nothing greater than 9mm. Everything above isn't going to be allowed for civilian use. If you wouldn't trust your life with it. Why would you expect others to do the same? It's not only unconstitutional but also very unfair.

(Completely unrelated note, I'd like to thank you for your sacrifice and service for our country and freedom. I've seen too people take what you guys do/did for granted.)
#216 to #209 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
well if you think about it tactically and aim for the knees, ****** going to be a lot easier. no one can rush/charge/gain any momentum for a strike against you if they can't ******* walk. a pistol can easily accomplish this, and is all that is needed for home defence. or you can always move to canada
User avatar #243 to #216 - dstone (01/18/2013) [-]
Lol moving to Canada would be awesome if not for the cold :P. Selective firing/targeting isn't something common people have. The need to survive kicks in and you shoot what you can see. Most don't have the nerve to aim for the knee. Most aren't instructed to at that. Again, I'd like to point out that I'm not saying the point of a self defense gun is to kill whoever's trying to rush you or break in. I'm just saying should things turn into a situation where you need to fight for your life against multiple targets that the currently defined self defense pistols and rounds aren't enough.
User avatar #202 to #201 - Lulzilla (01/18/2013) [-]
Fallujah*
User avatar #172 to #168 - gibroner (01/18/2013) [-]
it's true and I hate people who say that when the 2nd Amendment was written it was referring to muskets that may be true but muskets were the standard military weapon. Also anyone who thinks that the 2nd amendment was about hunting is an idiot. You have to be straight up stupid to believe people who had just led a bloody and hard fought revolution against a tyrannical government that were writing the constitution of a new country only meant for people to have guns as a means for hunting
#175 to #172 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
We reserve the right to overthrow our government at any time we see fit... unfortunately they don't have to accept so they are trying to disarm us.
User avatar #176 to #175 - gibroner (01/18/2013) [-]
exactly so many politicians forget that the final straw for the American Revolution was that resulted in the battle of Lexington and Concord the famous "shot heard round the world" was the British attempt to seize an armory to keep the Americans having guns
#185 to #176 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
they aren't trying to disarm you. they're trying to stop you idiots from killing each other with guns that you(cereal murderers) never have been able to get!
User avatar #258 to #185 - parttimezombie (01/18/2013) [-]
they are trying to disarm "us idiots" from killing each other with guns? more people were stabbed to death, or beaten to death in the last year, than killed with an "assault rifle" why arent they banning knives or fists.
#178 to #176 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
Yeah, and history tends to repeat itself...so let's see where this goes.
User avatar #180 to #178 - gibroner (01/18/2013) [-]
I hope it doesn't come to that but if it does I will fight
#225 to #180 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
you do realise that if you're going to engage in armed combat against the government, they have tanks, assault helicopters, and most of all, the access to nuclear weapons? (not saying the us govt would just instantly resort to nuking everything, justing putting **** into perspective compared to your average hunting rifle).

try and start any uprising like that and you will be viciously anally penetrated by the people's governing officials
#184 to #180 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
a revolution won't end well for anyone. this isn't the 1600s anymore. war comes and kills millions out people in a very short time. thinking that violence Is going to to solve our government problems, you obviously haven't thought this through.
#189 to #184 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
1600's? Could've sworn the revolution happen in the late 1700's...any way you over estimate how much humans have come since revolutionary times. Simply because you're sheltered or something. Cold truth, humans are savage. If you've even been in the real world you'd know better than anyone. Violence isn't the best answer but sometimes it's the only answer, and the day the government comes knocking on doors demanding you relinquish your second amendment rights...well I do not envy that government agent.
#198 to #189 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
meant to type a 7, but I'm on my phone, and can't easily see what I'm typing. I'm in the military, been deployed, and know what will happen if there is an uprising because the people think turtle nasty government is trying to disarm them. you have no ducking idea why the middle east stated their revolts. comparably, you are acting like a whiney little kid whose mother won't let him stay up past his bed time.
User avatar #196 to #189 - Lulzilla (01/18/2013) [-]
It's people like you that make me depressed that I get shot for. As a Marine who's been deployed to Afghan I'll say people aren't savage. Crazy people are savage. Do you think that I WANT to kill people? Do you really think the people the Taliban force to attack us WANT to attack us? You don't know **** about the real world. This government is perfectly fine the way it is. You don't chop down the apple tree just because a couple apples are rotten. Our government has some kinks in it (corruption) but it doesn't make it BAD. You're the people who vote for the damn politicians anyways.
#254 to #196 - mustachekid (01/18/2013) [-]
I dont understand why people feel so passionately about having assault rifles. And i hate when people say they will fight the government if they try to take them away. Its basically saying " **** you for your service" to anybody in the military. I for one would like to thank you for your service
#204 to #196 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
You're joking... I hope you are both of you. People...human nature...is not savage... HAHA. Yes people can act civilized, go around in public and be normal. Don't sit there and tell me though if put back in primitive situation that humans would not devolve into there every man for themselves and the ones the care for mentality. Masking the truth isn't covering it up with lies and as a Marine I expect more of you soldier. So many people have died for freedoms and you as a soldier will dispute their rights? I come from a looong military family, intend to join after I get my associates or bachelors, don't care for either of them really but my family asked me to try for those first.
#206 to #204 - Lulzilla (01/18/2013) [-]
Just saying you're lucky this is the internet. If not I'd punch you in the face since you don't know what it's like. Also your going to become an officer. Big whoop. You automatically rank up to a Second Lieutenant because you have a bachelors degree in something that's more then 90% it's not related to the military. You get to command people and work nice hours and walk around like you have a giant dick just because you have a bachelors degree while the rest of us enlistees are fighting the damn war and you puss out and become an officer. Unless you're a combat officer your useless in my eyes. Also humans are social animals. If you really think we're going to be every man for himself then explain how our ancestors got along. Explain how they didn't kill everyone else and secluded themselves from the others. Oh wait you cant because they formed Tribes which formed into something else which ultimately formed into countries and governments. You're an idiot who obviously doesn't have a damn clue about the world and is contently fed titty milk because you're not man enough to drink the damn coffee black. I've had FRIENDS that died in my deployment. CRAZY people want to kill people. Humans don't instinctively want to kill another human being.
Just saying you're lucky this is the internet. If not I'd punch you in the face since you don't know what it's like. Also your going to become an officer. Big whoop. You automatically rank up to a Second Lieutenant because you have a bachelors degree in something that's more then 90% it's not related to the military. You get to command people and work nice hours and walk around like you have a giant dick just because you have a bachelors degree while the rest of us enlistees are fighting the damn war and you puss out and become an officer. Unless you're a combat officer your useless in my eyes. Also humans are social animals. If you really think we're going to be every man for himself then explain how our ancestors got along. Explain how they didn't kill everyone else and secluded themselves from the others. Oh wait you cant because they formed Tribes which formed into something else which ultimately formed into countries and governments. You're an idiot who obviously doesn't have a damn clue about the world and is contently fed titty milk because you're not man enough to drink the damn coffee black. I've had FRIENDS that died in my deployment. CRAZY people want to kill people. Humans don't instinctively want to kill another human being.
#210 to #206 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
Tough guy huh? Wish this wasn't the internet so I could let you try. Then again what kinda marine would you be if you didn't have that mentality. You're ignorance to human nature is refreshing honestly. Yes, humans form tribes hence every man for themselves and the ones they care about. You can't deny the atrocities humans have committed throughout time. Humans will kill you and take your **** in a survival situation just because of the will to survive.

ps I"ll be enlisted as I care not for college and would rather not be a pretentious officer.
User avatar #234 to #210 - Lulzilla (01/18/2013) [-]
Tough guy? Your insulting my military experience and title. Something I worked HARD to get while you haven't done crap and pretending that you have the dick of a horse. If you think of the atrocities humanity caused you realize those people weren't SANE. Gangis Kahn, Hitler, Stalin, Whoever was in charge of Japan during WW2, Slave traders, The Roman Catholic church, The leaders to terrorist organizations, ect. They aren't SANE people. People will fight to survive but not everyone is going to kill everyone else or do harm to one another to survive. They'll pair up and survive and if a threat enters their group they deal with it the same way the primitive tribes did. Shut up and think for a second.
#274 to #234 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
What is this clause of sanity you keep preaching? Why were they insane? Because they did horrible acts? Hitler was actually quite the tactician and a military genius. I didn't insult your title or experience, you in fact insulted my face and my title of my face. Sanity has nothing to do with a moral issue. You're very one track minded. They aren't insane, they just have no moral compass and how their own personal agenda...and guess what else just for fun. Just before hitler took over Germany he made sure to disarm are civilians. Most people you listed were government leaders. That was only 70 years ago! Quit acting like humanity is something innocent cause lord knows the earth has seen more blood from human activites than anything else.
#233 to #210 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
none of the horrible, horrible things that mankind has done in the past have been done in a survival situation ******** . pretty much all of the horrible acts committed at least throughout the course of modern history have been carried out by raving ******* lunatics (hitler, stalin, etc). maybe if you didn't spend so much time watching movies you'd be aware of this
#270 to #233 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
You're kidding. I'm not even gonna honor that with a response.
#161 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
Imagine if it was your child shot dead by that gunman, or your mother that was gunned down in the movie theater, why can't most idiots think for a second instead of just act like "being awesome" and **** ? It's like, we're becoming more and more stupid each passing year, and now you've got these ******* big-ass nail guns, what a ****** company, what a ****** idea, what a ****** country. wow. just. wow.
And I really am sorry for being such a butthurt anon, but, come on.
User avatar #208 to #161 - timmywankenobi (01/18/2013) [-]
It is called evolution ************ do you know it ?
User avatar #165 to #161 - scottsselfdefense (01/18/2013) [-]
log in and say that like a man
#164 to #161 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
What the **** is wrong with you people? It's not real, lrn2read the description faggot.
#160 - therealredhood (01/18/2013) [-]
Call it what it is: a Railway Rifle.
Call it what it is: a Railway Rifle.
User avatar #273 to #160 - thescatmanohone (01/18/2013) [-]
H&H nail gun.
#157 - envinite ONLINE (01/18/2013) [-]
> Assault riffles with big nails instead bullets
> no license needed

Yep, I can ******* see where this going in the next 3 years.

People already freaked out with the dangerous potential of the guns which already need license and now there is a big-ass nail gun which is freely distributed and used without restriction. Jesus ******* christ America, get your **** together.
#158 to #157 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
...It's not real you ******* pussy.
User avatar #159 to #158 - envinite ONLINE (01/18/2013) [-]
Real or not, I bet many big nail-guns like this is exist in America and it don't need license since it's not categorized as fire-arms.
#163 to #159 - Nameloc (01/18/2013) [-]
Actually, no.

Your jimmies are getting rustled over a fake picture. Congrats.

Besides, more or less a good majority of nail guns in America are the ones powered by air. (I forget the actual name; It's where you need a giant freaking tank beside it and run a small hose to the gun..)
#188 to #163 - bearpirate (01/18/2013) [-]
Pneumatic air tools. Everyone just says air tools though since saying pneumatic and air in the same sentence is pretty redundant.
#162 to #159 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
Get a gun then? Seriously? Scared of nail guns now? Might as well ban fists while were at it, oh watch out, that knuckle might poke an eye out! Grow some faggot.
User avatar #169 to #162 - envinite ONLINE (01/18/2013) [-]
Well, if I was pointed with a nail-gun with 2 blocks range in 10 meters away, I would be freaked out too. Also, who the **** would use a nail-gun to nail things in those range?

And why with the fist? Are you pro-guns starting a ****** 'guns is not dangerous' analogy again?

Also, is the insult necessary?
#177 to #169 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
Well I just wanted to show you how ridiculous you, obvious liberal faggot is obvious, sound when you say **** like that. Of course guns are dangerous, are you retarded? They are GUNS! You can't just take them away though, this isn't Europe we have a second amendment. No it wasn't written for ******** purposes, it was written to defend one's self from or with the government.

ps yes the insult was necessary cause it's people like you coming at a whole country's 2nd amendment based on other countries standards. What the **** kinda American are you? faggot.
User avatar #181 to #177 - envinite ONLINE (01/18/2013) [-]
I DON'T AGREE WITH PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OF FIREARMS THEREFORE I'M LIBERA-, OH I'M SORRY, I DON'T HAVE THE RIGHTS TO HAVE OPINION ABOUT AMERICA BECAUSE I'M NOT AMERICAN. faggot.
#190 to #181 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
From someone who has used a nailgun for work, I can say from experience that if you want to kill someone with a nail gun, you have to put it to their chest. Good luck getting close to anyone with such a short hose and loud noises from your compressor. Firing a nail through the air is not going to kill anyone...believe me, I tried.
#182 to #181 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
Stop yelling, people only do that when they've been out smarted. You don't believe in private ownership of firearms because you're a coward, not because you're a liberal. Most simple way to put it, you live in fear. It's ok though, the when the weak cannot defend themselves the strong will be there to carry your weight. Guns are around, it's the modern age. In a perfect world we still carry swords but we don't and governments have guns, and criminals have guns, and miscellaneous groups have guns. Why shouldn't I have a gun?
User avatar #195 to #182 - envinite ONLINE (01/18/2013) [-]
1. I'm from a country where guns is banned for safety reason, so that's first reason why I don't agree with private ownership of guns, since it's potentially very dangerous, not mention with the past 3 years shooting incident, especially in US. Also US is the country with the highest fire-arms crime.
2. No, I don't live in fear. I trust the government for the safety. I don't need firearms to be or feel 'safe'. If you don't trust your government, why don't just start a revolution? Make a new government that you trust & live in harmony & 'freedom'?
3. If the US government ban guns, there will be no/less civilian have guns, except for hunters or VIP, and these people need a 'special' license. Different with most cases in US, gun control is not strict enough. People who have criminal records & mental problem can have guns as long they have money. Also with banning guns, I think there will be much less crime in US. Since criminals & misc group don't have guns to start a crime. For defense, why don't just use a knife, fists or those shock-thingie? or maybe trust the police & army? Isn't Polices & army are used as protection & safety? If you don't trust the police or army, why not delete them? Give everyone guns and try to survive in your own territory just like a caveman?
Well, that's just opinion from a not-american about America.
#318 to #195 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
Less guns doesn't mean there will be less crime, the UK is a perfect example of this as they have very strict gun laws but have the highest violent crime rate in the entire world. Most criminals in the US would most likely just find a different weapon to commit their crimes.
#207 to #195 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
How to address this...
1. Highest fire arms crime, yes. As with this ''assault weapons" dilemma, more people are bludgeoned to death than killed with the quote on quote assault weapons, can't even call them that cause there not FULLY AUTOMATIC hence assault weapon.

2. So far I like our government over here, no need for a revolution. Things are getting a bit hasty but whatever I'm sure they won't come after guns yet. Your trust is severely misplaced. Also you speak of freedom as if it's foreign to you, maybe it is.

3. Ohhh boy. Yes criminals can get guns. Occasionally someone with no criminal background gets through the normal system but most buy their guns from black market services. Ya know, gun dealers that buy them from other countries like ******* Cuba and Mexico, just a tad south of us. But taking civilian guns is a good idea? Canada doesn't really pose a threat...yet...but then we have ******* Mexico. Drug wars of the century going on and their crossing our borders...and getting full civilian benefits. "You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass." -Isoroku Yamamoto General in Japans army during world war 2.


#193 to #182 - xxxsonic fanxxx (01/18/2013) [-]
I'm afraid you are mistaken there. the fact that someones opinion angers you because it isn't yours shows that not only are you insecure, but also immature and ignorant. your attitude is counter to how our very government was created...with a voting system called democracy. also, this whole "liberal faggot" thing is uncalled for.
#155 - froller (01/18/2013) [-]
**froller rolled a random image posted in comment #2543617 at FJ RPG **
User avatar #152 - worlddestroyguy (01/18/2013) [-]
`murica
User avatar #151 - flagsareop (01/18/2013) [-]
They really nailed this one
User avatar #153 to #151 - funnyrage ONLINE (01/18/2013) [-]
goddammit carlos i know its you!
User avatar #148 - fargone (01/18/2013) [-]
This is the logical continuation of that jury-rigged nail gun from High School of the Dead.
It's beautiful.
#154 to #148 - sengenjin (01/18/2013) [-]
I'm literally watching that as i type this...
#142 - DoktorHax (01/18/2013) [-]
someone say nailgun?
User avatar #156 to #142 - elementjif (01/18/2013) [-]
no
#137 - ridiculiculous (01/18/2013) [-]
What I thought of
+1
#141 to #137 - felinescrotum **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#135 - copycopy ONLINE (01/18/2013) [-]
#132 - joktapuss (01/18/2013) [-]
TF2 Beta
#116 - elatedmonkey (01/18/2013) [-]
Did someone say NAIL GUN!?
Did someone say NAIL GUN!?
User avatar #138 to #116 - fuckinniggers (01/18/2013) [-]
no no no its the, naaaiiiiil gun
-7
#111 - fjhateme **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)